Concentration-QTc modeling of sitravatinib in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Sitravatinib (MGCD516) is an orally available, small molecule, tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Concentration-corrected QT interval (QTc; C-QTc) modeling was undertaken, using 767 matched concentration-ECG observations from 187 patients across two clinical studies in patients with advanced solid malignancies, across a dose range of 10-200 mg, via a linear mixed-effects (LME) model. The effect on heart rate (HR)-corrected QT interval via Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) at the steady-state maximum concentration (Cmax,ss) for the sitravatinib proposed therapeutic dosing regimen (100 mg malate once daily [q.d.]) without and with relevant intrinsic and extrinsic factors were predicted. No significant changes in HR from baseline were observed. Hysteresis between sitravatinib plasma concentration and change in QTcF from baseline (ΔQTcF) was not observed. There was no significant relationship between sitravatinib plasma concentration and ΔQTcF. The final C-QTc model predicted a mean (90% confidence interval [CI]) ΔQTcF of 3.92 (1.95-5.89) ms and 2.94 (0.23-6.10) ms at the proposed therapeutic dosing regimen in patients with normal organ function (best case scenario) and patients with hepatic impairment (worst-case scenario), respectively. The upper bounds of the 90% CIs were below the regulatory threshold of concern of 10 ms. The results of the described C-QTc analysis, along with corroborating results from nonclinical safety pharmacology studies, indicate that sitravatinib has a low risk of QTc interval prolongation at the proposed therapeutic dose of 100 mg malate q.d.

Effectiveness of Nonmydriatic Ultra-Widefield Retinal Imaging to Screen for Diabetic Eye Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial (Clearsight).

OBJECTIVE: Suboptimal diabetic eye disease screening is a major cause of preventable vision loss. Screening barriers include mydriasis and the need for dedicated screening appointments. The Clearsight trial assessed whether nonmydriatic ultra-widefield (NM UWF) screening on the day of a diabetes clinic visit improved detection of clinically important eye disease versus usual screening. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-center, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted at St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada. Adults with diabetes due for screening were randomized to same-day, on-site screening (NM UWF imaging) on the day of a scheduled diabetes clinic visit or usual screening (encouraged to arrange optometrist screening). The primary outcome was detection of actionable eye disease (AED), defined as the need for an ophthalmology referral or increased ocular surveillance. The primary analysis (modified intention-to-screen) compared the proportions of AED between groups within 1 year of enrollment. RESULTS: Of 740 participants randomized between 7 March 2016 and 17 April 2019, 335 on-site screening and 323 usual screening participants met criteria for the primary analysis. More AED was detected in the on-site screening group than in the usual screening group (50 of 335 [14.9%] vs. 22 of 323 [6.8%]; adjusted odds ratio 2.51; 95% CI 1.49-4.36). The number needed to screen by on-site screening in order to detect 1 additional patient with AED was 13 (95% CI 8-29). CONCLUSIONS: Same-day, on-site screening by NM UWF imaging increased the detection of clinically important diabetic eye disease versus usual screening. Integration of NM UWF imaging into routine diabetes clinic visits improved screening adherence and has the potential to prevent vision loss.

Closing the Gap: Results of the Multicenter Canadian Randomized Controlled Trial of Structured Transition in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a structured transition program for young adults with type 1 diabetes improves clinic attendance, glycemic control, diabetes-related distress, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, young adults (17-20 years) with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to a transition program with a transition coordinator or to standard care. The intervention lasted 18 months (6 in pediatric and 12 in adult care). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who failed to attend at least one adult diabetes clinic visit during the 12-month follow-up after completion of the intervention. RESULTS: We randomized 205 participants, 104 to the transition program and 101 to standard care. Clinic attendance was improved in the transition program (mean [SD] number of visits 4.1 [1.1] vs. 3.6 [1.2], P = 0.002), and there was greater satisfaction with care (mean [SD] score 29.0 [2.7] vs. 27.9 [3.4], P = 0.032) and less diabetes-related distress (mean [SD] score 1.9 [0.8] vs. 2.1 [0.8], P = 0.049) reported than in standard care. There was a trend toward improvement in mean HbA1c (8.33% [68 mmol/mol] vs. 8.80% [73 mmol/mol], P = 0.057). During the 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in those failing to attend at least one clinic visit (P = 0.846), and the mean change in HbA1c did not differ between the groups (P = 0.073). At completion of follow-up, the groups did not differ with respect to satisfaction with care or diabetes-related distress and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Transition support during this 18-month intervention was associated with increased clinic attendance, improved satisfaction with care, and decreased diabetes-related distress, but these benefits were not sustained 12 months after completion of the intervention.