Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 74(18): 5741-9, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18641165

RESUMEN

The diversity of free-living protozoa in five meat-cutting plants was determined. Light microscopy after enrichment culturing was combined with sequencing of PCR-amplified, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-separated 18S rRNA gene fragments, which was used as a fast screening method. The general results of the survey showed that a protozoan community of amoebae, ciliates, and flagellates was present in all of the plants. Protozoa were detected mainly in floor drains, in standing water on the floor, on soiled bars of cutting tables, on plastic pallets, and in out-of-use hot water knife sanitizers, but they were also detected on surfaces which come into direct contact with meat, such as conveyer belts, working surfaces of cutting tables, and needles of a meat tenderizer. After 7 days of incubation at refrigerator temperature, protozoa were detected in about one-half of the enrichment cultures. Based on microscopic observations, 61 morphospecies were found, and Bodo saltans, Bodo spp., Epistylis spp., Glaucoma scintillans, Petalomonas spp., Prodiscophrya collini, and Vannella sp. were the most frequently encountered identified organisms. Sequencing of DGGE bands resulted in identification of a total of 49 phylotypes, including representatives of the Amoebozoa, Chromalveolata, Excavata, Opisthokonta, and Rhizaria. Sequences of small heterotrophic flagellates were affiliated mainly with the Alveolata (Apicomplexa), Stramenopiles (Chrysophyceae), and Rhizaria (Cercozoa). This survey showed that there is high protozoan species richness in meat-cutting plants and that the species included species related to known hosts of food-borne pathogens.


Asunto(s)
Eucariontes/genética , Parasitología de Alimentos , Carne/parasitología , Animales , Biodiversidad , ADN Protozoario/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Contaminación de Equipos , Eucariontes/clasificación , Industria de Alimentos , Genes Protozoarios , Genes de ARNr , Microscopía , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , ARN Ribosómico 18S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
2.
FEMS Microbiol Rev ; 29(5): 911-34, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16219512

RESUMEN

In contrast to the notorious pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. leprae, the majority of the mycobacterial species described to date are generally not considered as obligate human pathogens. The natural reservoirs of these non-primary pathogenic mycobacteria include aquatic and terrestrial environments. Under certain circumstances, e.g., skin lesions, pulmonary or immune dysfunctions and chronic diseases, these environmental mycobacteria (EM) may cause disease. EM such as M. avium, M. kansasii, and M. xenopi have frequently been isolated from drinking water and hospital water distribution systems. Biofilm formation, amoeba-associated lifestyle, and resistance to chlorine have been recognized as important factors that contribute to the survival, colonization and persistence of EM in water distribution systems. Although the presence of EM in tap water has been linked to nosocomial infections and pseudo-infections, it remains unclear if these EM provide a health risk for immunocompromised people, in particular AIDS patients. In this regard, control strategies based on maintenance of an effective disinfectant residual and low concentration of nutrients have been proposed to keep EM numbers to a minimum in water distribution systems.


Asunto(s)
Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/aislamiento & purificación , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/patogenicidad , Microbiología del Agua , Abastecimiento de Agua , Amoeba , Animales , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Desinfección/métodos , Ecosistema , Humanos , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/clasificación , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas/crecimiento & desarrollo
3.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 147(2): 105-11, 2011 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21513995

RESUMEN

The occurrence and diversity of free-living protozoa (FLP) on butterhead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) was investigated using four different sampling techniques (washing, swabbing, homogenization, and excising). FLP were recovered from all leaf samples (n=64), and cultures were FLP-positive after 1 week. Identification of FLP was performed by light microscopy and sequencing of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-separated 18S rRNA gene fragments. Bodo saltans, Spumella (-like) spp. and Cercozoa were the most common heterotrophic nanoflagellates. Amoebae belonged mainly to the Vannellida and Tubulinida. Colpoda steinii and Cyclidium glaucoma were the most common ciliates. The total number of FLP on middle leaves estimated by the Most Probable Number method ranged from 9.3 × 10(2)MPN/g to 2.4 × 10(5)MPN/g leaf, with flagellates (92 MPN/g to 2.4 ×10(5)MPN/g) being more abundant than amoebae (<3 MPN/g to 9.3 × 10(3)MPN/g) and ciliates (<3 MPN/g to 9.3 × 10(2)MPN/g). Washing or rinsing leaves followed by spin-drying in a household salad spinner reduced the protozoan number with maximum one log unit. Our survey shows that FLP on lettuce leaves are a common and diverse but largely unexplored group of microorganisms.


Asunto(s)
Eucariontes/clasificación , Eucariontes/aislamiento & purificación , Lactuca/parasitología , Amoeba/clasificación , Amoeba/genética , Amoeba/aislamiento & purificación , Biodiversidad , ADN Protozoario/genética , Eucariontes/genética , Genes de ARNr , ARN Ribosómico 18S/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA