Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(6): 1074-1080, 2021 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32604415

RESUMEN

The surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations at our 877-bed quaternary care hospital in Detroit led to an emergent demand for Infectious Diseases (ID) consultations. The traditional 1-on-1 consultation model was untenable. Therefore, we rapidly restructured our ID division to provide effective consultative services. We implemented a novel unit-based group rounds model that focused on delivering key updates to teams and providing unit-wide consultations simultaneously to all team members. Effectiveness of the program was studied using Likert-scale survey data. The survey captured data from the first month of the Detroit COVID-19 pandemic. During this period there were approximately 950 patients hospitalized for treatment of COVID-19. The survey of trainees and faculty reported an overall 95% positive response to delivery of information, new knowledge acquisition, and provider confidence in the care of COVID-19 patients. This showed that the unit-based consult model is a sustainable effort to provide care during epidemics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Pandemias , Derivación y Consulta , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(16): 2114-2120, 2020 11 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427279

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no proven antiviral or immunomodulatory therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The disease progression associated with the proinflammatory host response prompted us to examine the role of early corticosteroid therapy in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a single pretest, single posttest quasi-experiment in a multicenter health system in Michigan from 12 March to 27 March 2020. Adult patients with confirmed moderate to severe COVID were included. A protocol was implemented on 20 March 2020 using early, short-course, methylprednisolone 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/day divided in 2 intravenous doses for 3 days. Outcomes of standard of care (SOC) and early corticosteroid groups were evaluated, with a primary composite endpoint of escalation of care from ward to intensive care unit (ICU), new requirement for mechanical ventilation, and mortality. All patients had at least 14 days of follow-up. RESULTS: We analyzed 213 eligible subjects, 81 (38%) and 132 (62%) in SOC and early corticosteroid groups, respectively. The composite endpoint occurred at a significantly lower rate in the early corticosteroid group (34.9% vs 54.3%, P = .005). This treatment effect was observed within each individual component of the composite endpoint. Significant reduction in median hospital length of stay was also observed in the early corticosteroid group (5 vs 8 days, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated an independent reduction in the composite endpoint at 14-days controlling for other factors (adjusted odds ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval, .22 - .77). CONCLUSIONS: An early short course of methylprednisolone in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 reduced escalation of care and improved clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04374071.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administración & dosificación , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
3.
Am J Transplant ; 20(11): 3051-3060, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654332

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are expected to have poorer outcomes compared to nontransplant patients because of immunosuppression and comorbidities. The clinical characteristics of 47 SOTr (38 kidneys and 9 nonkidney organs) were compared to 100 consecutive hospitalized nontransplant controls. Twelve of 47 SOTr managed as outpatients were subsequently excluded from the outcome analyses to avoid potential selection bias. Chronic kidney disease (89% vs 57% P = .0007), diabetes (66% vs 33% P = .0007), and hypertension (94% vs 72% P = .006) were more common in the 35 hospitalized SOTr compared to controls. Diarrhea (54% vs 17%, P < .0001) was more frequent in SOTr. Primary composite outcome (escalation to intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital all-cause mortality) was comparable between SOTr and controls (40% vs 48%, odds ratio [OR] 0.72 confidence interval [CI] [0.33-1.58] P = .42), despite more comorbidities in SOTr. Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy occurred in 20% of SOTr compared to 4% of controls (OR 6 CI [1.64-22] P = .007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increasing age and clinical severity were associated with mortality. Transplant status itself was not associated with mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Autoimmun ; 114: 102512, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646770

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can progress to cytokine storm that is associated with organ dysfunction and death. The purpose of the present study is to determine clinical characteristics associated with 28 day in-hospital survival in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that received tocilizumab. This was a retrospective observational cohort study conducted at a five hospital health system in Michigan, United States. Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 that were admitted to the hospital and received tocilizumab for cytokine storm from March 1, 2020 through April 3, 2020 were included. Patients were grouped into survivors and non-survivors based on 28 day in-hospital mortality. Study day 0 was defined as the day tocilizumab was administered. Factors independently associated with in-hospital survival at 28 days after tocilizumab administration were assessed. Epidemiologic, demographic, laboratory, prognostic scores, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Clinical response was collected and defined as a decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status or discharged alive from the hospital. Of the 81 patients included, the median age was 64 (58-71) years and 56 (69.1%) were male. The 28 day in-hospital mortality was 43.2%. There were 46 (56.8%) patients in the survivors and 35 (43.2%) in the non-survivors group. On study day 0 no differences were noted in demographics, clinical characteristics, severity of illness scores, or treatments received between survivors and non-survivors. C-reactive protein was significantly higher in the non-survivors compared to survivors. Compared to non-survivors, recipients of tocilizumab within 12 days of symptom onset was independently associated with survival (adjusted OR: 0.296, 95% CI: 0.098-0.889). SOFA score ≥8 on day 0 was independently associated with mortality (adjusted OR: 2.842, 95% CI: 1.042-7.753). Clinical response occurred more commonly in survivors than non-survivors (80.4% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001). Improvements in the six-point ordinal scale and SOFA score were observed in survivors after tocilizumab. Early receipt of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 was an independent predictor for in-hospital survival at 28 days.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/sangre , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Interleucina-6/inmunología , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Receptores de Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores de Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 56(5): 2452-8, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22354290

RESUMEN

In published studies, cohorts of patients with bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) have predominantly been infected with Enterococcus faecium. Little is known about the epidemiology and outcomes associated with bacteremia due to VR Enterococcus faecalis. A retrospective study of isolates obtained from January 2008 to October 2010 was conducted at Detroit Medical Center (DMC). Unique patients with blood cultures positive for VRE were reviewed. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. During the study period, 105 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis and 197 cases of bacteremia due to VR E. faecium were identified. The mean age in the study cohort was 61.5 ± 15 years; 162 subjects (53.6%) were male. After controlling for a propensity score, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with >2-fold-lower in-hospital mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium. Interestingly, bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with longer hospital stay after VRE isolation, although total length of stay was similar for groups with VR E. faecalis and VR E. faecium. Bacteremia due to VR E. faecalis was associated with a >2-fold-lower risk for mortality than bacteremia due to VR E. faecium, possibly due to the availability of ß-lactam therapeutics for treatment of VR E. faecalis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterococcus faecalis/patogenicidad , Enterococcus faecium/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , beta-Lactamas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico
6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(8): 1032-1035, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Urine cultures have poor specificity for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We evaluated the effect of a urine-culture stewardship program on urine culture utilization and CAUTI in adult intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: A quasi-interventional study was performed from 2015 to 2017. SETTING AND PATIENTS: The study cohort comprised 21,367 patients admitted to the ICU at a teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: The urine culture stewardship program included monthly 1-hour discussions with ICU house staff emphasizing avoidance of "pan-culture" for sepsis workup and obtaining urine culture only if a urinary source of sepsis is suspected. The urine culture utilization rate metric (UCUR; ie, no. urine cultueres/catheter days ×100) was utilized to measure the effect. Monthly UCUR, catheter utilization ratio (CUR), and CAUTI rate were reported on an interactive quality dashboard. To ensure safety, catheterized ICU patients (2015-2016) were evaluated for 30-day readmission for UTI. Time-series data and relationships were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analysis. RESULTS: Urine culture utilization decreased from 3,081 in 2015 to 2,158 in 2016 to 1,218 in 2017. CAUTIs decreased from 78 in 2015 to 60 in 2016 and 28 in 2017. Regression analysis over time showed significant decreases in UCUR (r, 0.917; P < .0001) and CAUTI rate (r, 0.657; P < .0001). The co-correlation between UCUR and CAUTI rate was (r, 0.625; P < .0001) compared to CUR and CAUTI rate (r, 0.523; P = .004). None of these patients was readmitted with a CAUTI. CONCLUSIONS: Urine culture stewardship program was effective and safe in reducing UC overutilization and was correlated with a decrease in CAUTIs. Addition of urine-culture stewardship to standard best practices could reduce CAUTI in ICUs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(6): e2012270, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32543702

RESUMEN

Importance: In late December 2019, an outbreak caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 emerged in Wuhan, China. Data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of infected patients in urban communities in the US are limited. Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to perform a comparative analysis of hospitalized and ambulatory patient populations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a case series of 463 consecutive patients with COVID-19 evaluated at Henry Ford Health System in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, from March 9 to March 27, 2020. Data analysis was performed from March to April 2020. Exposure: Laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic data, underlying comorbidities, clinical presentation, complications, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Results: Of 463 patients with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [16.8] years), 259 (55.9%) were female, and 334 (72.1%) were African American. Most patients (435 [94.0%]) had at least 1 comorbidity, including hypertension (295 patients [63.7%]), chronic kidney disease (182 patients [39.3%]), and diabetes (178 patients [38.4%]). Common symptoms at presentation were cough (347 patients [74.9%]), fever (315 patients [68.0%]), and dyspnea (282 patients [60.9%]). Three hundred fifty-five patients (76.7%) were hospitalized; 141 (39.7%) required intensive care unit management and 114 (80.8%) of those patients required invasive mechanical ventilation. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.2; P = .001), severe obesity (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-3.6; P = .02), and chronic kidney disease (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.3; P = .006) were independently associated with intensive care unit admission. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had longer length of stay and higher incidence of respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, shock, and mortality (57 patients [40.4%] vs 15 patients [7.0%]) compared with patients in the general practice unit. Twenty-nine (11.2%) of those discharged from the hospital were readmitted and, overall, 20.0% died within 30 days. Male sex (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; P = .03) and age older than 60 years (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.9-9.7; P < .001) were significantly associated with mortality, whereas African American race was not (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.8; P = .86). Conclusions and Relevance: In this review of urban metropolitan patients with COVID-19, most were African American with a high prevalence of comorbid conditions and high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, complications, and mortality due to COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/genética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Tos/etiología , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Prevalencia , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA