Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) placement is often performed within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) to prevent adverse events (AEs) such as stent occlusion and bleeding. This study compares the safety and outcomes of LAMSs alone versus LAMSs with coaxial DPPSs for PFC management. METHODS: Patients undergoing drainage of a PFC with LAMSs were retrospectively identified and categorized as LAMS or LAMS/DPPS based on initial drainage strategy. The AE rate, AE type, and clinical success were extracted by chart review. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five individuals (83 LAMS, 102 LAMS/DPPS) were identified. No significant differences were found in rates of clinical success (75.9% LAMS vs 69.6% LAMS/DDPS, P = .34) or overall AEs (15.7% LAMS vs 15.7% LAMS/DPPS, P = .825). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative single-center study, placement of a coaxial DPPS for drainage of PFCs with LAMSs did not affect rates of AEs or clinical success.

Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Background/Aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480). Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.

A Rare Case of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is an autoimmune disease that affects small and medium-sized vessels. It is classically known to present with renal and respiratory tract symptoms. However, the disease can manifest in other organ systems, especially cardiovascular involvement. Though there are multiple reports of cardiac involvement in GPA, it is not commonly evaluated and is often overlooked in patients with GPA. Heart disease in GPA has a wide range of presentations ranging from subacute and silent to severe abnormalities, which can prove fatal if not identified and treated appropriately. Identifying cardiac involvement early in patients with no apparent signs can help with prevention strategies and follow-up to avoid significant complications. Pericarditis is the most common pathology noted in GPA, followed by cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, valvular disease, and conduction abnormality. In our report, we present a case of GPA in a young male with asymptomatic conduction abnormality of the heart. Although it was silent at the presentation, identifying the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) changes prompted us to admit him to the telemetry floor. Continuous telemetry monitoring helped us identify the progression of the conduction abnormality, which otherwise could have been missed. This led us to correlate to his symptoms which he later developed during his admission course. His symptoms subsided after prompt treatment. If not identified early, these cardiac abnormalities can delay management, leading to increased disease burden and morbidity. Hence, essential cardiac work with at least ECG and continuous telemetry monitoring is recommended.