RESUMEN
Supplementation is crucial for improving performance and health in phenylketonuria (PKU) patients, who face dietary challenges. Proteins are vital for athletes, supporting muscle growth, minimizing catabolism, and aiding muscle repair and glycogen replenishment post-exercise. However, PKU individuals must limit phenylalanine (Phe) intake, requiring supplementation with Phe-free amino acids or glycomacropeptides. Tailored to meet nutritional needs, these substitutes lack Phe but fulfill protein requirements. Due to limited supplement availability, athletes with PKU may need higher protein intake. Various factors affect tolerated Phe levels, including supplement quantity and age. Adhering to supplement regimens optimizes performance and addresses PKU challenges. Strategically-timed protein substitutes can safely enhance muscle synthesis and sports performance. Individualized intake is essential for optimal outcomes, recognizing proteins' multifaceted role. Here, we explore protein substitute supplementation in PKU patients within the context of physical activity, considering limited evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fenilalanina , Fenilcetonurias , Humanos , Fenilalanina/metabolismo , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Ejercicio Físico , Fenilcetonurias/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumors (GHomas) are the most common acromegaly cause. At diagnosis, most of them are macroadenomas, and up to 56% display cavernous sinus invasion. Biomarker assessment associated with tumor growth and invasion is important to optimize their management. OBJECTIVES: The study aims to identify clinical/hormonal/molecular biomarkers associated with tumor size and invasiveness in GHomas and to analyze the influence of pre-treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) or dopamine agonists (DAs) in key molecular biomarker expression. METHODS: Clinical/analytical/radiological variables were evaluated in 192 patients from the REMAH study (ambispective multicenter post-surgery study of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition). The expression of somatostatin/ghrelin/dopamine system components and key pituitary/proliferation markers was evaluated in GHomas after the first surgery. Univariate/multivariate regression studies were performed to identify association between variables. RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients harbor macroadenomas (63.8% with extrasellar growth). Associations between larger and more invasive GHomas with younger age, visual abnormalities, higher IGF1 levels, extrasellar/suprasellar growth, and/or cavernous sinus invasion were found. Higher GH1 and lower PRL/POMC/CGA/AVPR1B/DRD2T/DRD2L expression levels (P < .05) were associated with tumor invasiveness. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator's penalized regression identified combinations of clinical and molecular features with areas under the curve between 0.67 and 0.82. Pre-operative therapy with DA or SSAs did not alter the expression of any of the markers analyzed except for DRD1/AVPR1B (up-regulated with DA) and FSHB/CRHR1 (down-regulated with SSAs). CONCLUSIONS: A specific combination of clinical/analytical/molecular variables was found to be associated with tumor invasiveness and growth capacity in GHomas. Pre-treatment with first-line drugs for acromegaly did not significantly modify the expression of the most relevant biomarkers in our association model. These findings provide valuable insights for risk stratification and personalized management of GHomas.
Asunto(s)
Acromegalia , Adenoma , Adenoma Hipofisario Secretor de Hormona del Crecimiento , Invasividad Neoplásica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Acromegalia/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Adenoma Hipofisario Secretor de Hormona del Crecimiento/patología , Adenoma Hipofisario Secretor de Hormona del Crecimiento/metabolismo , Adenoma/metabolismo , Adenoma/patología , Anciano , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/metabolismoRESUMEN
The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of second-line therapies in patients with acromegaly caused by a growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) co-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH&PRL-Pit-NET) compared to their efficacy in patients with acromegaly caused by a GH-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (GH-Pit-NET). This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with acromegaly on treatment with pasireotide and/or pegvisomant. Patients were classified in two groups: GH&PRL-Pit-NETs when evidence of hyperprolactinemia and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for GH and PRL was positive or if PRL were >200 ng/dL regardless of the PRL-IHC and GH-Pit-NETs when the previously mentioned criteria were not met. A total of 28 cases with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and 122 with GH-Pit-NETs met the inclusion criteria. GH&PRL-Pit-NETs presented at a younger age, caused hypopituitarism, and were invasive more frequently than GH-Pit-NETs. There were 124 patients treated with pegvisomant and 49 with pasireotide at any time. The efficacy of pegvisomant for IGF-1 normalization was of 81.5% and of pasireotide of 71.4%. No differences in IGF-1 control with pasireotide and with pegvisomant were observed between GH&PRL-Pit-NETs and GH-Pit-NETs. All GH&PRL-Pit-NET cases treated with pasireotide (n = 6) and 82.6% (n = 19/23) of the cases treated with pegvisomant normalized PRL levels. No differences in the rate of IGF-1 control between pegvisomant and pasireotide were detected in patients with GH&PRL-Pit-NETs (84.9% vs 66.7%, P = 0.178). We conclude that despite the more aggressive behavior of GH&PRL-Pit-NETs than GH-Pit-NETs, no differences in the rate of IGF-1 control with pegvisomant and pasireotide were observed between both groups, and both drugs have shown to be effective treatments to control IGF-1 and PRL hypersecretion in these tumors.
Asunto(s)
Acromegalia , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Prolactina , Somatostatina , Humanos , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/análogos & derivados , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Prolactina/sangre , Prolactina/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/metabolismo , Acromegalia/tratamiento farmacológico , Acromegalia/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/metabolismo , Anciano , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Hormona de Crecimiento Humana , Prolactina , Somatostatina , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Prolactina/metabolismo , Prolactina/sangre , Hormona de Crecimiento Humana/análogos & derivados , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe real-world use of lanreotide combination therapy for acromegaly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ACROCOMB is a retrospective observational Spanish study of patients with active acromegaly treated with lanreotide combination therapy between 2006 and 2011. 108 patients treated at 44 Spanish Endocrinology Departments were analyzed separately: 61 patients received lanreotide/cabergoline (cabergoline cohort) and 47 lanreotide/pegvisomant (pegvisomant cohort). RESULTS: Patient median age was 50.8 years in the cabergoline cohort and 42.7 years in the pegvisomant cohort. Prior medical treatments were somatostatin analogue (SSA) monotherapy (40 [66%] patients) or dopamine agonists (7 [11%] patients) in the cabergoline cohort and SSA (29 [62%] patients) or pegvisomant monotherapy (16 [34%] patients) in the pegvisomant cohort. Across both cohorts 12 patients were previously untreated, and prior therapy was unknown/missing in 4 patients. Median duration of combined treatment was 1.6 years (0.16) and 2.1 years (0.46.3) in the cabergoline and pegvisomant cohorts, respectively. At baseline, median insulin growth factor (IGF)-I values were 149% upper limit of normal (ULN) (15505%) in the cabergoline cohort and 156% ULN (15534%) in the pegvisomant cohort, and decreased to 104% ULN (13557%) p<0.001 and 86% ULN (23345%) p<0.0001, respectively, at end of study (EOS). Normal age-adjusted values of IGF-I were obtained in 48% of lanreotide/cabergoline-treated patients and 70% of lanreotide/pegvisomant-treated patients at EOS. There were no significant changes in hepatic, cardiac or glycaemic parameters in either cohort. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice lanreotide treatment combinations are useful options for patients with acromegaly when monotherapy is insufficient; particularly, the combination of lanreotide and pegvisomant in patients not controlled with either SSA or pegvisomant alone has high efficacy and is well-tolerated
PROPÓSITO: Describir el uso de lanreotida en combinación terapéutica en acromegalia en la práctica clínica. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: ACROCOMB es un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, de pacientes con acromegalia activa tratados en centros hospitalarios españoles con lanreotida en combinación con cabergolina o pegvisomant entre 2006 y 2011. Se revisaron los datos clínicos de 108 pacientes tratados en 44 departamentos de endocrinología: 61 pacientes recibieron lanreótido/cabergolina (cohorte cabergolina) y 47 lanreotida/pegvisomant (cohorte pegvisomant). RESULTADOS: La edad mediana de los pacientes fue de 50,8 años en la cohorte de cabergolina y 42,7 años en la de pegvisomant. Los tratamientos médicos previos a la combinación con lanreótido fueron análogos de somatostatina (SSA) en monoterapia (40 [66%] pacientes) o agonistas de la dopamina (7 [11%] pacientes) en la cohorte de cabergolina y SSA (29 [62%] pacientes) y pegvisomant en monoterapia (16 [34%] pacientes) en la de pegvisomant. Doce pacientes no habían recibido tratamiento previo y en 4 pacientes se desconocía la terapia previa. La mediana de duración del tratamiento fue de 1,6 años (0,1-6) y 2,1 años (rango 0,4 a 6,3) en las cohortes de cabergolina y pegvisomant, respectivamente. Al inicio del estudio el valor mediano del factor de crecimiento de insulina-I era 149% el límite superior normal (LSN) (15-505%) en la cohorte de cabergolina y 156% LSN (15-534%) en la de pegvisomant. Al final del estudio se redujeron a 104% LSN (13-557%) p < 0,001 y 86% LSN (23-345%) p < 0,0001, respectivamente. Al final del estudio, se reportaron valores normales de factor de crecimiento de insulina-I ajustados por edad en el 48% de los pacientes tratados con lanreotida/cabergolina y 70% de los tratados con lanreotida/pegvisomant. No hubo cambios significativos en los parámetros hepáticos, cardíacos o glucémicos. CONCLUSIÓN: En la práctica clínica las combinaciones con lanreotida son una opción útil en el tratamiento de pacientes con acromegalia que no está bien controlada en monoterapia, ya sea con SSA carbegolina o pegvisomant; particularmente, la combinación de lanreotida y pegvisomant tiene una alta eficacia y se tolera bien
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Acromegalia/tratamiento farmacológico , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Agonistas de Dopamina/farmacocinética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
Los craneofaringiomas son tumores epiteliales raros localmente agresivos que habitualmente se localizan en la región selar y supraselar. El diagnóstico de sospecha del craneofaringioma se basa en los hallazgos clínicos y radiológicos, posteriormente confirmados con el estudio histológico. El tratamiento de elección es la cirugía en la gran mayoría de los casos, con objeto de reducir los síntomas compresivos y resecar la mayor parte de la masa tumoral con la menor morbilidad posible. La radioterapia externa es el tratamiento estándar para el control de restos tumorales poscirugía o recidivas locales. Las lesiones paraselares son lesiones de prevalencia muy baja y engloban enfermedades neoplásicas, inflamatorias, infecciosas, embrionarias y vasculares. Su diagnóstico y tratamiento es específico según el tipo de lesión
Craniopharyngiomas are rare, locally aggressive epithelial tumors usually located in the sellar and suprasellar region. Diagnosis of craniopharyngioma is usually suggested by clinical and radiological findings that should be confirmed histologically. Surgery is the treatment of choice for most patients. The goal of surgery is to relieve compressive symptoms and to remove as much tumor as safely possible. Radiation therapy is the usual treatment to control postoperative tumor remnants and local recurrences. Parasellar lesions are low prevalent lesions and include neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, developmental, and vascular diseases. Both their diagnosis and treatment depend on the type of lesion