Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping in the risk stratification of patients affected by chronic myocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic myocardial inflammation is the substrate for arrhythmias and dilated cardiomyopathy onset, causing morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the noninvasive gold standard for myocardial inflammation detection, due to the high sensitivity of the parametric mapping techniques. However, the potential prognostic capabilities of CMR mapping have not been studied in the setting of chronic myocarditis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on consecutive patients undergoing CMR with suspicion of chronic myocarditis from September 2017 to November 2021. CMR was acquired according to 2018 Lake Louise Criteria recommendations. The outcome (chronic heart failure, recurrent chronic myocarditic chest pain, ICD/PM implantation, arrhythmias [Lown class ≥ 2]) was collected at follow-up. The extent and degree of native T1, T2, and extracellular volume fraction alterations were used to create multivariate binary logistic regression models for outcome prediction, with or without left ventricle ejection fraction; their AUCs were compared with DeLong test. Differences between other parameters were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The population included 88 patients (age 43 [32-52] yo), mostly male (53/88, 60%). After a median follow-up of 21 (17-34) months, 31/88 (35%) patients experienced the outcome. The model based on the extension of mapping alterations and LV dysfunction reached a good predictability (AUC 0.71). The model based on the intensity of mapping alterations and LV dysfunction had a very good performance (AUC 0.80). CONCLUSION: The quantitative analysis of CMR mapping parameters indicative of myocardial damage severity may improve risk stratification in patients with chronic myocarditis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The intensity of myocardial damage, assessed as the degree of native T1, T2, and ECV alteration, together with left ventricle dysfunction, improved patient risk stratification. Further prospective studies will be necessary for validation before clinical application. KEY POINTS: Risk stratification of patients affected by chronic myocarditis is an unmet clinical need. Cardiovascular MRI (CMR) can role in risk stratification thanks to its multiparametric capabilities of tissue characterization. A model based on CMR parametric mapping and left ventricle ejection fraction can predict arrhythmia, heart failure, and recurrent symptoms.

Cardiac Wolframinopathies: A Case Report of Myocarditis and a Literature Review of Cardiac Involvement in Wolfram Syndrome 1.

Purpose: Myocarditis is frequently a sporadic disease, but may also occur in the context of genetic disorders which may increase susceptibility to cardiac inflammation. Cardiac involvement in Wolfram syndrome type 1 (WS1) has been scarcely characterized. To our knowledge, no cases of virus-negative myocarditis have been reported in the WS1 pediatric population. Methods: We report the description of a pediatric case of acute myocarditis in the context of WS1, followed by a literature review of cardiovascular involvement associated with wolframin variants, and discuss potential pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic options. Results: A young patient with WS1, treated with insulin and liraglutide, was admitted for acute chest pain. Cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy were performed to confirm the clinical suspicion of myocarditis. While congenital heart diseases and arrhythmias have been described previously in patients with WS1, this is the first description of virus-negative myocarditis. Conclusions: Myocarditis may represent a possible manifestation of cardiovascular involvement in WS1. Cardiovascular screening may be considered in patients with WS1.

Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab combination therapy for immune idiopathic myopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a rare and heterogenous group diseases, and their treatment is not fully defined yet. According to previous small case series, the combination of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab (RTX) may be effective in controlling difficult-to-treat patients. Our aim was to further explore the efficacy and safety of this combined approach in patients with IIM. METHODS: Patients with IIM treated with the RTX/MMF combination in our Center were retrospectively identified. After the start of combination therapy, the efficacy was evaluated at 12 months (T12) according the 2016 ACR/EULAR response criteria for IIM. Cardiac imaging and pulmonary function tests were used to monitor disease activity in patients with myocarditis and interstitial lung disease, respectively. Adverse events were recorded over the follow-up period. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients (median age 61 years; 70% female) included in the study, anti-synthetase syndrome was the most prevalent IIM subgroup (60%). At treatment start, muscle, heart, and lung were the most commonly actively affected organs. After 12 months, a moderate or major response was observed in all patients, and creatine kinase was significantly decreased (p-value = 0.012). Cardiac imaging and enzymes monitoring showed a reduction of heart inflammation, while pulmonary function tests improved in patients with lung involvement. No severe side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show that combination of RTX and MMF is effective and safe in patients with severe and refractory IIM. Therefore, this combined treatment might represent a feasible approach for difficult-to-treat IIM cases.

Myocarditis Following Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib, and Belzutifan Plus Lenvatinib for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Cardiac toxicity is an adverse event of several classes of anti-cancer drugs. Herein, we present the case of a 52-year-old woman with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), previously treated with debulking surgery, pembrolizumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) in combination with axitinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)), followed by lenvatinib (TKI) and belzutifan (HIF-2α inhibitor), who developed myocarditis proven by cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy. The case was notable for reporting a not-yet described adverse event during treatment with belzutifan plus lenvatinib, the etiology of which was of unobvious determination given the pre-exposure to pembrolizumab, a known cause of drug-related myocarditis. We surmise that myocarditis was a delayed adverse event related to pembrolizumab (8 months after treatment interruption), although we emphasize that only attentive monitoring of cardiac adverse events of patients exposed to belzutifan and lenvatinib in the context of large clinical trials may rule out any causal implication of these drugs.

Clinical profiling and outcomes of viral myocarditis manifesting with ventricular arrhythmias.

Aims: Clinical features and risk stratification of patients with viral myocarditis (VM) complicated by ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are incompletely understood. We aim to describe arrhythmia patterns and outcomes in patients with VM and early-onset VA. Methods and results: We present a single-centre study, enrolling patients with VM proven by endomyocardial biopsy, and evidence of VA within 24 h of hospitalization. The incidence of major adverse events (MAE), including all-cause death, severe heart failure, advanced atrioventricular blocks, or major VA, was evaluated during a 24-month follow-up (FU) and compared with a matched group of virus-negative myocarditis. Of patients with VM (n = 74, mean age 47 ± 16 years, 66% males, and left ventricular ejection fraction 51 ± 13%), 20 (27%) presented with major VA [ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF)], and 32 (44%) had polymorphic VA. Patients with polymorphic VA more commonly had evidence of ongoing systemic infection (24/32 vs. 10/42, P = 0.004) and experienced greater occurrence of MAE at discharge (15/32 vs. 2/42, P < 0.001). However, the incidence of MAE during FU was higher in patients with monomorphic VA compared to those with polymorphic VA (17/42 vs. 2/28, P = 0.002). Patients with monomorphic VA displayed frequently signs of chronic cardiomyopathy and had outcomes comparable with virus-negative myocarditis (log rank P = 0.929). Presentation with VT/VF was independently associated with MAE [at discharge: hazard ratio (HR) 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-14.0, P = 0.005; during FU: HR 6.3, 95% CI 2.3-17.6, P < 0.001]. Conclusion: In patients with VM, polymorphic VA point to ongoing systemic infection and early adverse outcomes, whereas monomorphic VA suggest chronic cardiomyopathy and greater incidence of MAE during FU. Presentation with VT/VF is independently associated with MAE.