Nonseizure consequences of Dravet syndrome, KCNQ2-DEE, KCNB1-DEE, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, ESES: A functional framework.

RATIONALE: Developmental epilepsies and encephalopathies (DEEs) are characterized by many severe developmental impairments, which are not well-described. A functional framework could facilitate understanding of their nature and severity and guide the selection instruments to measure improvements in therapeutic trials. METHODS: An online survey administered through several parent-organized foundations utilized accepted functional classifications and questionnaires derived from common instruments to determine levels of mobility, fine motor, communication, and feeding functions. Statistical analyses focused on overall levels of function and across-group comparisons adjusted for age. RESULTS: From 6/2018 to 2/2020, 252 parents provided information for one or more functional domains. Median age was 7.2 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.9 to 11.8), and 128 (51%) were females. DEE groups were Dravet syndrome (N = 72), KCNQ2-DEE (N = 80), KCNB1-DEE, (N = 33), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS; N = 26), electrographic status epilepticus in sleep (ESES; N = 15), and others (N = 26). Overall, functional hand grasp was absent in 48 (20%). Of children ≥2 years old, 60/214 (28%) could not walk independently, 85 (40%) were dependent on someone else for feeding, and 153 (73%) did not effectively communicate with unfamiliar people. Impairments entailing absence or near absence of independent function (profound impairment) were observed in 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 domains for 58 (25%), 78 (34%), 40 (17%), 33 (14%), and 22 (10%) children, respectively. After adjustment for age, impairment levels varied substantially across DEE group for mobility (p < 0.0001), feeding (p < 0.0001), communication (p < 0.0001), hand grasp (p < 0.0001), and number of profoundly impaired domains (p < 0.0001). Three or four profoundly affected domains were reported in 44% of KCNQ2-DEE participants, followed by LGS (29%), KCNB1-DEE (27%), ESES (7%), and Dravet syndrome (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Many children with DEEs experience severe functional impairments, and few children have typical function. As precision therapies will emphasize nonseizures consequences of DEEs, understanding the nature of abilities and impairments will be critical to selecting appropriate outcome measures in therapeutic trials.

Dravet syndrome: Characteristics, comorbidities, and caregiver concerns.

The Dravet Syndrome Foundation (DSF) conducted the largest in-depth survey of parents and caregivers of patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) to date, in order to (1) identify top concerns among caregivers, (2) establish an approximate frequency of characteristics and comorbidities of DS beyond seizures, and (3) provide direction for clinicians and researchers looking to study the effects of DS on the patient and family unit. Two hundred fifty-six responses were received representing a patient age range of 9months to 32years with a median age group of 7-10years (IQR=8). In an open response, caregivers ranked speech/communication, impacts on siblings, and cognitive impairment as their top concerns after seizure control, and nearly two-thirds of caregivers reported having suffered from depression. Some characteristics of DS such as gait issues increased with patient age, while others, including photosensitivity, hypotonia, and ataxia, were present from a young age. Comorbidities such as sleep disturbances and cardiac abnormalities were more frequently reported than in previous studies and some (including bradycardia) were correlated with SCN1A mutation status. This survey supports the concept of Dravet syndrome as a disease of the central nervous system with far-reaching effects and highlights the importance of the patient voice in determining appropriate research objectives. While seizure frequency is a relatively well-understood objective, seizures represent only a portion of parent and caregiver concerns. Studying the characteristics of DS described herein may identify additional outcomes significant for research.

Sleep in Dravet syndrome: A parent-driven survey.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and quantify the nature and severity of sleep disruptions in young people with Dravet syndrome (DS) based upon parent report. METHODS: Qualitative review of available pediatric sleep instruments with parent members of the Dravet syndrome Foundation led to the design of a series of questions customized to DS and other severe epilepsies. The questionnaire was administered as part of an on-line survey that reflected specific sleep-related concerns of parents of children with severe epilepsy. RESULTS: 76 parent-respondents completed the survey for their children-participants. Children's median age was 7.5 years (IQR 4.7-15.3); 41 (54 %) were female. The majority of parents (70/76, 93 %) used some method to monitor children while sleeping; co-sleeping was the most common method (45/76, 59 %). Seizures disrupted sleep in 40/76 (53 %); 19(48 %) reported nocturnal seizures 3 or more nights per week. In addition, 58/76 (76 %) also reported non-seizure-related nocturnal awakenings with 30 reporting awakenings 3 or more nights affected per week. SIGNIFICANCE: Young people with Dravet syndrome have frequently disrupted sleep secondary to seizures and other factors. Co-sleeping practices, medication effects, enuresis during seizures and other factors are not considered on standard sleep questionnaires. Current findings highlight the frequency of epilepsy-specific concerns and lay groundwork for sleep measures more appropriate for this population.

Dravet syndrome: A quick transition guide for the adult neurologist.

INTRODUCTION: Dravet syndrome (DS) is still seen as a "pediatric disease", where patients receive excellent care in pediatric centers, but care is less than optimal in adult health care systems (HCS). This creates a barrier when young adults need to leave the family-centered pediatric system and enter the adult, patient-centered HCS. Here we create a guide to help with the transition from pediatric to adult for patients with DS. METHODS: Experts in Dravet syndrome flagged the main barriers in caring for adults with DS and created a 2-page transition summary guide based on their expertise and a literature review. RESULTS: The 2-page guide addresses: DS diagnosis in children and adults; clinical manifestations, including the differences in seizures types and frequencies between children and adults with DS; the natural history of intellectual disability, behavior, gait, motor disorders and dysautonomia; a review of optimal treatments (including medications not commonly used in adult epilepsy settings such as stiripentol and fenfluramine), as well as emergency seizure management; avoidance of triggers, preventive measures, and vaccine administration in adults with DS. CONCLUSION: Several young adults with DS are still followed by their child neurologist. This 2-page transition guide should help facilitate the transition of patients with DS to the adult HCS and should be given to families as well as adult health care providers that may not be familiar with DS.