RESUMEN
Manual hemacytometer cell counting of body fluids is labor-intensive and requires skilled testing personnel. We performed a multicenter evaluation of the Iris iQ200 automated microscopy analyzer Body Fluids Module (Iris Diagnostics, Chatsworth, CA) and compared 350 iQ200 body fluid cell counts with manual hemacytometer cell counts. Within-run imprecision, expressed as coefficient of variation (CV), ranged from 2.6% to 5.9% for RBC counts between 875 and 475 x 10(6)/L and from 4.2% to 6.5% for nucleated cell counts between 820 and 590 x 10(6)/L. The lower limits of detection, based on a CV of 20% or less, were 30 and 35 x 10(6)/L for RBCs and nucleated cells, respectively. There was very good agreement between automated iQ200 and manual body fluid cell counts based on slopes and r2 values. The iQ200 has satisfactory performance for enumerating RBCs and nucleated cells in most body fluids, with the exception of cerebrospinal fluid specimens that contain low cell numbers.
Asunto(s)
Líquidos Corporales/citología , Recuento de Células/instrumentación , Química Clínica/instrumentación , Programas Informáticos , Urinálisis/instrumentación , Recuento de Células/métodos , Química Clínica/métodos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Microscopía , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Urinálisis/métodosRESUMEN
We describe a 43-year-old woman with falsely increased thyroxine (T(4)) and triiodothyronine (T(3)) concentrations (total and index values) using a competitive electrochemiluminescent immunoassay, due to human anti-sheep antibodies. The thyrotropin (TSH) concentration was within normal limits. When specimens were re-tested by an immunoassay utilizing mouse antibodies, the total T(4) and T(3) concentrations were within normal limits. Removal of IgG by protein G column chromatography resulted in normalization of total T(4) and T(3) concentrations. In contrast, a mouse IgG column failed to normalize the elevated total T(4) and T(3) concentrations. Other immunoassays utilizing mouse monoclonal antibodies and rabbit antisera were unaffected, indicating that the interference was anti-sheep antibodies and not heterophile antibodies. We believe this is the first report of human anti-sheep antibodies causing falsely increased total and free T(4) and T(3) serum concentrations in competitive immunoassays using sheep antisera. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential problem since inaccurate thyroid function tests can lead to inappropriate treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Heterófilos/biosíntesis , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Luminiscencia , Hormonas Tiroideas/biosíntesis , Adulto , Animales , Electroquímica/métodos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Ovinos , Tiroxina/biosíntesis , Triyodotironina/biosíntesisRESUMEN
Automated instruments that can examine urine for cells and particles have reduced the need for labor-intensive manual microscopy. We evaluated the performance of the Iris iQ200 Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer (Iris Diagnostics, Chatsworth, CA) and compared results with manual cell and particle counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chambers. Within-run imprecision (coefficient of variation) of the iQ200 for urine samples ranged from 3.0% to 45% for RBC counts between 1,029 and 3 x 10(6) cells/L, 3.4% to 40% for WBC counts between 1,006 and 4 x 10(6) cells/L, and 8.9% to 35% for epithelial cell counts between 93 and 4 x 10(6) cells/L. Between-run imprecision was 3.3% at 1,017 x 10(6) cells/L and 19.2% at 28 x 10(6) cells/L. There was good agreement between the iQ200 and manual cell counts (r > or = 0.94); however; the iQ200 produced lower results based on slopes of 0.92 (RBC count), 0.81 (WBC count), and 0.94 (epithelial cell counts). The iQ200 has satisfactory performance and correlates well with manual cell counts. Most urine samples containing RBCs, WBCs, and epithelial cells can be reported without review of captured images.
Asunto(s)
Recuento de Células/instrumentación , Microscopía , Urinálisis/instrumentación , Orina/citología , Autoanálisis/instrumentación , Recuento de Células/métodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Orina/microbiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of misdiagnosed tertiary hyperparathyroidism attributable to heterophile antibody interference in a parathyroid hormone (PTH) assay. METHODS: We present clinical and laboratory data relative to this case and review the pertinent English-language literature. RESULTS: A 36-year-old woman with a functioning renal allograft, PTH excess (3,374 pg/mL) refractory to medical therapy, and a history of renal osteodystrophy presented for consideration of a third parathyroidectomy. Remedial parathyroidectomy was performed. The PTH levels did not decline postoperatively, but the patient developed severe hypocalcemia. Reanalysis of the patient's serum specimens was performed with (1) addition of heterophile blocking agents to the murine-based immunoassay and (2) use of a different, goat antibody-based immunoassay. The true PTH level was found to be 5 pg/mL with use of both methods. CONCLUSION: Previous administration of muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3) for immunosuppression may have resulted in the development of human antimurine heterophile antibodies, causing a falsely elevated PTH result.