Mixed methods analysis of hospice staff perceptions and shared decision making practices in hospice.

PURPOSE: Shared decision making has been a long-standing practice in oncology and, despite a lack of research on the subject, is a central part of the philosophical foundation of hospice. This mixed methods study examined the perceptions of staff regarding shared decision making and their use of shared decision elements in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings. METHODS: The revised Leeds Attitude to Concordance scale (LatConII) was used to measure the attitudes of hospice staff toward shared decision making. Field notes and transcripts of hospice interdisciplinary team meetings that included family caregivers as participants were coded to identify 9 theory-driven shared decision making elements. The results were mixed in a matrix analysis comparing attitudes with practice. Three transcripts demonstrate the variance in the shared decision making process between hospice teams. RESULTS: Hospice staff reported overall positive views on shared decision making; however, these views differed depending on participants' age and position. The extent to which staff views were aligned with the observed use of shared decision making elements in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings varied. CONCLUSION: Policy and practice conditions can make shared decision making challenging during hospice interdisciplinary team meetings despite support for the process by staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a sub-study of a parent study registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02929108).

Characteristics Associated With Nonreceipt of Surveillance Testing and the Relationship With Survival in Stage II and III Colon Cancer.

We investigated characteristics of patients with colon cancer that predicted nonreceipt of posttreatment surveillance testing and the subsequent associations between surveillance status and survival outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database combined with Medicare claims. Patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2009 with disease stages II and III and who were between 66 and 84 years of age were eligible. A minimum of 3 years' follow-up was required, and patients were categorized as having received any surveillance testing (any testing) versus none (no testing). Poisson regression was used to obtain risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the relative likelihood of No Testing. Cox models were used to obtain subdistribution hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for 5- and 10-year cancer-specific and noncancer deaths. There were 16,009 colon cancer cases analyzed. Patient characteristics that predicted No Testing included older age, Black race, stage III disease, and chemotherapy. Patients in the No Testing group had an increased rate of 10-year cancer death that was greater for patients with stage III disease (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.48, 2.17) than those with stage II disease (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 1.66). Greater efforts are needed to ensure all patients receive the highest quality medical care after diagnosis of colon cancer.

"It's important to me": A qualitative analysis on shared decision-making and patient preferences in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Shared decision-making (SDM) occurs when physicians and patients jointly select treatment that aligns with patient care goals. Incorporating patient preferences into the decision-making process is integral to successful decision-making. This study explores factors influencing treatment selection in older patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC). METHODS: This qualitative study included women age ≥65 years with EBC. To understand role preferences, patients completed the Control Preferences Scale. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore patients' treatment selection rationale. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparative method identifying major themes related to treatment selection. RESULTS: Of 33 patients, the majority (48%) desired shared responsibility in treatment decision-making. Interviews revealed that EBC treatment incorporated three domains: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences, clinical characteristics, and patient values. Patients considered 19 treatment selection themes, the most prioritized including physician trust and physical side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Because preferences and approach to treatment selection varied widely in this sample of older, EBC patients, more research is needed to determine best practices for preference incorporation to optimize SDM at the time of treatment decisions.

Should we be talking about guidelines with patients? A qualitative analysis in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist on perceptions of guideline-based care in oncology. This qualitative analysis describes patients' and oncologists' views on the value of guideline-based care as well as discussing guidelines when making metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In-person interviews completed with MBC patients and community oncologists and focus groups with academic oncologists were audio-recorded and transcribed. Two coders utilized a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts independently using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS: Participants included 20 MBC patients, 6 community oncologists, and 5 academic oncologists. Most patients were unfamiliar with the term "guidelines." All patients desired to know if they were receiving guideline-discordant treatment but were often willing to accept this treatment. Five themes emerged explaining this including trusting the oncologist, relying on the oncologist's experiences, being informed of rationale for deviation, personalized treatment, and openness to novel therapies. Physician discussions regarding the importance of guidelines revealed three themes: consistency with scientific evidence, insurance coverage, and limiting unusual practices. Oncologists identified three major limitations in using guidelines: lack of consensus, inability to "think outside the box" to personalize treatment, and lack of guideline timeliness. Although some oncologists discussed guidelines, it was often not considered a priority. CONCLUSIONS: Patients expressed a desire to know whether they were receiving guideline-based care but were amenable to guideline-discordant treatment if the rationale was made clear. Providers' preference to limit discussions of guidelines is discordant with patients' desire for this information and may limit shared decision-making.

What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an ideal environment for shared decision-making because of the large number of guideline-based treatment options with similar efficacy but different toxicity profiles. This qualitative analysis describes patient and provider factors that influence decision-making in treatment of MBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients and community oncologists completed in-person interviews. Academic medical oncologists participated in focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo. Using an a priori model based on the Ottawa Framework, two independent coders analyzed transcripts using a constant comparative method. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS: Participants included 20 patients with MBC, 6 community oncologists, and 5 academic oncologists. Analysis of patient interviews revealed a decision-making process characterized by the following themes: decision-making style, contextual factors, and preferences. Patient preference subthemes include treatment efficacy, physical side effects of treatment, emotional side effects of treatment, cognitive side effects of treatment, cost and financial toxicity, salience of cutting-edge treatment options (clinical trial or newly approved medication), treatment logistics and convenience, personal and family responsibilities, treatment impact on daily activities, participation in self-defining endeavors, attending important events, and pursuing important goals. Physician decisions emphasized drug-specific characteristics (treatment efficacy, side effects, cost) rather than patient preferences, which might impact treatment choice. CONCLUSION: Although both patients with MBC and oncologists considered treatment characteristics when making decisions, patients' considerations were broader than oncologists', incorporating contextual factors such as the innovative value of the treatment and life responsibilities. Differences in perspectives between patients and oncologists suggests the value of tools to facilitate systematic communication of preferences in the setting of MBC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Both patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and oncologists emphasized importance of efficacy and physical side effects when making treatment decisions. However, other patient considerations for making treatment decisions were broader, incorporating contextual factors such as the logistics of treatments, personal and family responsibilities, and ability to attend important events. Furthermore, individual patients varied substantially in priorities that they want considered in treatment decisions. Differences in perspectives between patients and oncologists suggest the value of tools to facilitate systematic elicitation of preferences and communication of those preferences to oncologists for integration into decision-making in MBC.

Hypofractionated radiation in older women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: American Society of Radiation Oncology Choosing Wisely campaign recommends hypofractionated radiation and against routine use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. We analyzed guideline recommendation adherence and financial implications in a modern Medicare cohort of women treated across the southeastern United States. METHODS: Our study population comprised Medicare patients over 65 years of age with breast cancer diagnosis from 12 cancer centers in the Southeast United States with stage 0-II breast treated with lumpectomy from 2012 to 2015. Hypofractionation was defined as 4 or fewer weeks of radiation treatments. Factors associated with utilization of hypofractionation and IMRT were identified using Poisson regression. Median costs during radiation treatments were compared for hypofractionation and IMRT. RESULTS: In older women (median age 71), 75% were treated with conventional fractionation, and 20% received IMRT. Hypofractionated women were more likely to have a positive estrogen(ER) or progestorone(PR) receptor status, lower comorbidity scores, and be treated at a high volume center (all P < 0.05). IMRT was utilized in 20% of patients and was more common in women treated with conventional fractionation (P < 0.001). Positive ER/PR status (P < 0.001) and utilization of hormonal blockade (P = 0.02) were associated with increased utilization of IMRT. CONCLUSION: In an older cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer, a majority were treated with conventional fractionated radiation, while approximately 20% were treated with IMRT. Both of which were associated with increased cost relative to hypofractionation.

Radiation therapy utilization in Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted for select older patients who are compliant with hormonal blockade, but there is no recent claim-based analysis for determining patterns of care and guiding possible treatment recommendations. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years old or older and were diagnosed with breast cancer at 1 of 12 cancer centers affiliated with an academic center in the southeastern United States were analyzed. Stage 0 or I patients treated with lumpectomy from 2012 to 2014 were identified. Patient, treatment, and center characteristics were analyzed for the utilization of RT. RESULTS: Among 800 women treated with lumpectomy, 64% received adjuvant radiation. The median age was 74 years. The omission of RT was more likely in older patients, stage 0 patients, and patients with more comorbidities (P < .01). Hormonal blockade was used in 41% of the patients who did not receive RT. The utilization of hormonal blockade with the omission of RT was more likely in patients with fewer comorbidities (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In an older cohort of patients who otherwise would have qualified for the omission of radiation, two-thirds were treated with radiation. Future guideline recommendations should address omission in the context of hormonal blockade compliance because only 41% of the patients used hormonal blockade when radiation was not delivered. Cancer 2018;124:475-81. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Treatment patterns for ductal carcinoma in situ with close or positive mastectomy margins.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy remains an effective treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) but whether further therapy is warranted for close or positive margins is controversial. We aim to characterize the treatment practices of DCIS throughout the United States in patients who undergo mastectomy with close or positive margins to better understand the use of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2004-2013 National Cancer Database, we identified all female patients with a diagnosis of DCIS who underwent mastectomy. Distributional characteristics were summarized for overall and margin-stratified samples. Characteristic differences were assessed by region and receipt of radiation. Chi-square and independent sample t-tests were used to assess differences for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: In 21,591 patients who met inclusion criteria, 470 patients with close/positive margins were identified. Sixteen percent of patients with close/positive margins received PMRT compared to 1.5% with negative margins (P < 0.01). There was no difference in PMRT and patient race, insurance status, treatment facility, or endocrine therapy. Patients with close/positive margins who received PMRT were more likely to be in an urban setting from the Midwest (24.6%) and Northeast (21.8%) compared to the West (11.0%) and South (10.7%) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PMRT for DCIS following mastectomy with close/positive margins differs across the country. Regional variations in treatment patterns reinforce a need to determine whether PMRT improves survival to establish treatment guidelines.

In support of the Choosing Wisely campaign: Perceived higher risk leads to unnecessary imaging in accelerated partial breast irradiation?

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an increasingly utilized modality for early stage breast cancer as part of breast conservation therapy (BCT). There remains concern regarding local recurrence, requiring more frequent post-radiation surveillance imaging. The purpose of this study is to determine clinical significance of frequent surveillance in this perceived higher risk population. Patients treated at a community academic medical center from 2005 to 2013 with partial breast radiation were retrospectively identified. All patients were treated with lumpectomy followed by balloon based APBI. Diagnostic, clinical, radiographic, and outcomes data were collected. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were identified. Median age at time of diagnosis was 63. Stage was 0, I, and II in 27%, 64%, and 9%, respectively. Most patients had pure invasive ductal cancer. Ninety-two percent and 99% of patients had imaging performed by 6 and 12 months (± 3 months) respectively. Median interval between end of radiation and first image, and subsequent 3 images were 6, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 49 months for all patients (range 7-106). Six patients experienced local recurrence: 4 invasive, all clinically detected, and none within the first 2 years. One patient had mammographically detected recurrent ductal carcinoma in situ. No mammographic images within the first year lead to diagnosis of recurrent cancer. APBI via balloon base brachytherapy offered women excellent locoregional control rates. Frequent mammographic surveillance did not result in increased detection of early recurrent disease. The result of our study are in line with the Choosing Wisely campaign recommendations to perform no more than annual follow-up for women who have completed radiation as part of BCT, with first imaging done at 6-12 months. We recommend mammographic surveillance be performed no more frequently than annually, with first image after BCT to be done 12 months from completion of radiation.

Long term radiographic findings of breast brachytherapy: Implications of surgical volume.

PURPOSE: Little is known about long-term radiographic findings after treatment with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors leading to formation and resolution of seroma were performed in patients treated with lumpectomy and APBI. RESULTS: Post-treatment images of 129 patients were reviewed by one radiologist. Median surgical excision volume was 108.9 cc (range 20.5-681.9). Primary mode of imaging was mammogram. Median time from end of RT to first and last surveillance image was 6 and 54 months, respectively. Median number of images was 7 (range 3-12). Seroma was identified in 98 (76%) patients, with median maximum diameter of 3.9 cm. Forty (41%) patients experienced resolution of seroma, at a median time of 29 months (range 6-74). On univariate analysis, surgical excision volume was associated with seroma formation, and tumor stage and margin re-excision were significant on univariate and multivariate analysis. No factors were associated with seroma resolution. CONCLUSION: Seroma formation after APBI resolves around 2.5 years for many patients, but persists for others possibly due to primary tumor and surgical excision volumes. With revised criteria on the definition of positive margins, smaller volumes may lead to decreased risk of seroma formation for future patients.

Radiotherapy for pleomorphic adenoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to update our experience in treating pleomorphic adenoma with radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated with RT alone (2 patients) or combined with surgery (23 patients), with follow-up ranging from 1.8 to 34.9 years (median, 10.5 years). RESULTS: Local control was achieved in 13 (75%) of 16 patients with subclinical disease and 5 (56%) of 9 patients with gross disease. Overall local control was achieved in 18 (72%) of 25 patients. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall local control rates were 76 %, 76%, and 68%, respectively. Ten patients died of the following causes: recurrent disease, 2; malignant transformation, 2; and intercurrent disease, 6. At last follow-up, 14 patients were alive without evidence of disease, and 1 patient was alive with disease. Dental carries and transient facial nerve deficits were the most common complications. No patients developed severe complications subsequent to RT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at high risk for developing recurrent pleomorphic adenoma after surgery, RT is effective in controlling subclinical disease.

Choosing Wisely at the End of Life: Use of Shorter Courses of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis.

PURPOSE: American Society for Radiation Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend ≤10 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastasis, with consideration for 1 fraction in patients with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate characteristic differences in guideline concordance to fractionation regimens in a modern cohort of older patients with a diagnosis of bone metastasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years treated with RT for bone metastasis from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Guideline-concordant RT fractionation was defined in the entire cohort as ≤10 fractions. Utilization of 1 fraction versus ≥2 fractions was analyzed in deceased patients. Patient demographic, disease, and facility characteristics associated with shorter fractionation were analyzed. RESULTS: In 569 patients treated with RT, the median age at diagnosis was 73 years. The most common cancer types were lung (37%), genitourinary (26%), breast (15%), and gastrointestinal (10%). Among all patients, 34%, 30%, and 36% received 1 fraction, 2 to 10 fractions, and ≥11 fractions, respectively. In comparison with receipt of 1 to 10 fractions, receipt of ≥11 fractions was associated with a $1467 increase in per-patient cost to Medicare during the calendar quarter of RT. Almost two-thirds of patients who died within 30 days of RT completion were treated with >1 fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Although guideline concordance was high overall, a large number of patients received longer courses of RT at the end of life. Strong consideration should be made for utilization of shorter courses, particularly in patients with a limited prognosis.

Gait Speed and Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases.

CONTEXT: Accurate estimation of life expectancy in patients with brain metastases is critical for counseling and choosing appropriate therapy. Performance status is the single greatest determinant of overall survival in this population. However, current measures of performance status are subjective and often based on brief clinical encounters. Gait speed is an objective, reliable predictor of overall health and survival. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between gait speed and survival in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with documented gait speed and Karnofsky performance status seen in consultation for newly diagnosed brain metastases from 2014 to 2015. Gait speed was measured during neurological examination over 4 m at normal pace. Graded prognostic assessment scores were calculated from clinical information. The primary outcomes were overall survival and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 88 patients (97%) met inclusion criteria. Overall, the median gait speed was 0.7 m/s (range 0-1.0 m/s). Gait speed was associated with increased overall survival in addition to graded prognostic assessment score. Median survival was longer in patients with normal gait speed (>0.6 m/s, 11.9 months) compared to those with slow gait speed (≤0.6 m/s, 4.5 months, P < 0.001) or who were nonambulatory (1.1 months, P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality for normal, slow, and nonambulatory patients was 0%, 15%, and 42%, respectively. The graded prognostic assessment overestimated actual survival for nonambulatory patients (2.2 vs. 1.1 months) and underestimated for those with normal gait speed (4.4 vs. 11.9 months). CONCLUSION: Gait speed is associated with overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. Gait speed assessment is simple, objective, and may provide additional prognostic information to improve life expectancy estimation and management decisions.

Defining Health Across the Cancer Continuum.

Health is not defined by the absence of disease or suffering, but by response to a series of life events that can markedly alter the quality and quantity of life. Patients with cancer experience significant but dynamic physical, psychosocial, and financial challenges. With the increasing number of patients with early stage cancers transitioning to survivorship, there is a critical need to address health promotion and overall well-being. For those with advanced cancer, discussion about prognosis and early integration of palliative care can have a profound impact on the quality of life. Effective communication between healthcare providers and patients is important in aligning treatment recommendations with patient goals and preferences throughout cancer therapy. This review provides a dynamic definition of health and proposes actionable guidelines for health promotion at any point along the cancer continuum: survivorship after early cancer or when goals of care transition to improve quality at the end of life.

Choosing Wisely: Opportunities for Improving Value in Cancer Care Delivery?

INTRODUCTION: Patients, providers, and payers are striving to identify where value in cancer care can be increased. As part of the Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign, ASCO and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology have recommended against specific, yet commonly performed, treatments and procedures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data to examine concordance with CW recommendations across 12 cancer centers in the southeastern United States. Variability for each measure was evaluated on the basis of patient characteristics and site of care. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine differences in average costs per patient by concordance status. Potential cost savings were estimated on the basis of a potential 95% adherence rate and average cost difference. RESULTS: The analysis included 37,686 patients with cancer with Fee-for-Service Medicare insurance. Concordance varied by CW recommendation from 39% to 94%. Patient characteristics were similar for patients receiving concordant and nonconcordant care. Significant variability was noted across centers for all recommendations, with as much as an 89% difference. Nonconcordance was associated with higher costs for every measure. If concordance were to increase to 95% for all measures, we would estimate a $19 million difference in total cost of care per quarter. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate ample room for reduction of low-value care and corresponding costs associated with the CW recommendations. Because variability in concordance was driven primarily by site of care, rather than by patient factors, continued education about these low-value services is needed to improve the value of cancer care.

Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations.

CONTEXT: Advance care planning (ACP) improves alignment between patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment and care received at end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation of lay navigator-led ACP. METHODS: A convergent, parallel mixed-methods design was used to evaluate implementation of navigator-led ACP across 12 cancer centers. Data collection included 1) electronic navigation records, 2) navigator surveys (n = 45), 3) claims-based patient outcomes (n = 820), and 4) semistructured navigator interviews (n = 26). Outcomes of interest included 1) the number of ACP conversations completed, 2) navigator self-efficacy, 3) patient resource utilization, hospice use, and chemotherapy at EOL, and 4) navigator-perceived barriers and facilitators to ACP. RESULTS: From June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015, 50 navigators completed Respecting Choices® First Steps ACP Facilitator training. Navigators approached 18% of patients (1319/8704); 481 completed; 472 in process; 366 declined. Navigators were more likely to approach African American patients than Caucasian patients (20% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Significant increases in ACP self-efficacy were observed after training. The mean score for feeling prepared to conduct ACP conversations increased from 5.6/10 to 7.5/10 (P < 0.001). In comparison with patients declining ACP participation (n = 171), decedents in their final 30 days of life who engaged in ACP (n = 437) had fewer hospitalizations (46% vs. 56%, P = 0.02). Key facilitators of successful implementation included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and prior ACP experience; barriers included space limitations, identifying the "right" time to start conversations, and personal discomfort discussing EOL. CONCLUSION: A navigator-led ACP program was feasible and may be associated with lower rates of resource utilization near EOL.

Combined small-cell lung carcinoma: An institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine prognostic factors and survival in patients who present with combined small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: A retrospective review of combined SCLC histology in patients treated between1995-2010 was undertaken. Demographics, diagnostic information, disease characteristics, treatment modality, and survival were captured. Survival estimates were performed using Kaplan Meier analysis. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified, and 35 records were available for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 50-85). The study included 20 (57%) women and 15 (43%) men; and 94% had a current or former history of smoking. Histology was SCLC/large cell carcinoma not otherwise specified in 28 (80%), and SCLC/adenocarcinoma or SCLC/squamous cell carcinoma in seven (20%). Cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities were present in 80% of patients, and 24 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Twenty-eight patients received treatment of chemotherapy (n = 24), cranial radiotherapy (n = 5), or thoracic radiotherapy (n = 7). Staging was as follows: stage I-III (n = 11), stage IV (n = 24). Median survival was 15.4 months (range <1-53 months) and 3.4 months (range <1-21.9 months) for American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-III and stage IV, respectively. Estimated overall six and 12 month survival was 82%, 55%, 37%, and 17% for stage I-III and stage IV, respectively. An improved overall survival rate was found for patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2, and no weight loss (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Akin to SCLC, advanced stage combined SCLC portends a poor prognosis. Perhaps novel chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents may improve outcomes for future patient populations.