Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(5): 1194-1205, 2020 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32025716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological cut-off values and clinical interpretive breakpoints have been developed for a number of antifungal agents with the most common Candida species that account for the majority of infections due to pathogenic yeasts species. However, less-common species, for which susceptibility data are limited, are increasingly reported in high-risk patients and breakthrough infections. METHODS: The UK National Mycology Reference Laboratory performs routine antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical yeast isolates submitted from across the UK. Between 2002 and 2016, >32 000 isolates representing 94 different yeast species were referred to the laboratory. Here we present antifungal susceptibility profiles generated over this period for amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, anidulafungin and flucytosine against 35 species of uncommon yeast using CLSI methodologies. MIC data were interpreted against epidemiological cut-off values and clinical breakpoints developed with Candida albicans, in order to identify species with unusually skewed MIC distributions that potentially indicate resistance. RESULTS: Potential resistance to at least one antifungal agent (>10% of isolates with MICs greater than the epidemiological cut-off or clinical breakpoint) was evidenced for 29/35 species examined here. Four species exhibited elevated MICs with all of the triazole antifungal drugs against which they were tested, and 21 species exhibited antifungal resistance to agents from at least two different classes of antifungal agent. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a number of yeast species with unusual MIC distributions and provides data to aid clinicians in deciding which antifungal regimens may be appropriate when confronted with infections with rarer yeasts.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Fluconazol , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Anidulafungina , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Flucitosina/farmacología , Humanos , Itraconazol , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Filogenia , Reino Unido , Voriconazol/farmacología
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182537

RESUMEN

The triazole drug fluconazole remains one of the most commonly prescribed antifungal drugs, both for prophylaxis in high-risk patients and also as a second-line treatment option for invasive Candida infections. Established susceptibility profiles and clinical interpretive breakpoints are available for fluconazole with Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida tropicalis, and Candida parapsilosis, which account for the majority of infections due to pathogenic yeast species. However, less common species for which only limited susceptibility data are available are increasingly reported in high-risk patients and from breakthrough infections. The UK National Mycology Reference Laboratory performs routine antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of pathogenic yeast submitted from across the United Kingdom. Between 2002 and 2016, ∼32,000 isolates were referred, encompassing 94 different yeast species. Here, we present fluconazole antifungal susceptibility data generated using a CLSI methodology over this 15-year period for 82 species (2,004 isolates) of less common yeast and yeast-like fungi, and amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and anidulafungin, with members of the Nakaseomyces clade (C. glabrata, Candida nivariensis, and Candida bracarensis). At least 22 different teleomorph genera, comprising 45 species, exhibited high MICs when tested with fluconazole (>20% of isolates with MICs higher than the clinical breakpoint [≥8 mg/liter] proposed for C. albicans). Since several of these species have been reported anecdotally from breakthrough infections and therapeutic failures in patients receiving fluconazole, the current study underscores the importance of rapid and accurate yeast identification and may aid clinicians dealing with infections with rarer yeasts to decide whether fluconazole would be appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica/efectos de los fármacos , Fluconazol/farmacología , Levaduras/efectos de los fármacos , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Candidiasis/microbiología , Humanos , Itraconazol/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/microbiología , Triazoles/farmacología , Reino Unido , Levaduras/aislamiento & purificación , Levaduras/patogenicidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA