Circulating microRNAs and sudden cardiac arrest outcomes.

AIM: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have regulatory functions in organs critical in resuscitation from sudden cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF-SCA); therefore, circulating miRNAs may be markers of VF-SCA outcome. METHODS: We measured candidate miRNAs (N=45) in plasma using qRT-PCR among participants of a population-based VF-SCA study. Participants were randomly selected cases who died in the field (DF, n=15), died in hospital (DH, n=15), or survived to discharge (DC, n=15), and, age-, sex-, and race-matched controls (n=15). MiRNA levels were compared using ANOVA, t-tests, and fold-changes. RESULTS: Mean age of groups ranged from 66.9 to 69.7. Most participants were male (53-67%) and white (67%). Comparing cases to controls, plasma levels of 17 miRNAs expressed in heart, brain, liver, and other tissues (including miR-29c, -34a, -122, -145, -200a, -210, -499-5p, and -663b) were higher and three non-specific miRNAs lower (miR-221, -330-3p, and -9-5p). Among DH or DC compared with DF cases, levels of two miRNAs (liver-specific miR-122 and non-specific miR-205) were higher and two heart-specific miRNAs (miR-208b and -499-5p) lower. Among DC vs. DF cases, levels of three miRNAs (miR-122, and non-specific miR-200a and -205) were higher and four heart-specific miRNAs (miR-133a, -133b, -208b, and -499-5p) lower. Among DC vs. DH cases, levels of two non-specific miRNAs (miR-135a and -9-3p) were lower. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating miRNAs expressed in heart, brain, and other tissues differ between VF-SCA cases and controls and are related to resuscitation outcomes. Measurement of miRNAs may clarify mechanisms underlying resuscitation, improve prognostication, and guide development of therapies. Results require replication.

The dispatcher assisted resuscitation trial: indirect benefits of emergency research.

OBJECTIVE: Conduct of emergency research under waiver of consent produces special challenges. Moreover, the act of performing research may have unintended effects, potentially beneficial or detrimental. The Dispatcher-Assisted Randomized Trial (DART) was designed to compare 2 types of dispatcher cardiopulmonary (CPR) instruction, but not intended to affect the proportion of arrest victims that received bystander CPR. We sought to determine whether odds of receiving bystander CPR were higher during DART than during the periods before and after. METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study of 8626 adults who suffered non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival in greater King County, Washington, between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2011. Bystander CPR status was assessed through review of dispatch recordings and EMS reports to classify any bystander CPR (any B-CPR), and further categorized as bystander CPR with or without dispatcher assistance (DA-CPR and B-CPR, no DA). We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate odds of B-CPR before, during, and after DART. RESULTS: The proportions receiving any B-CPR were 52% before DART (1817/3468), 59% during DART (2093/3527), and 54% after DART (885/1631). Compared to the period before DART, odds of receiving any B-CPR were higher during DART (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.23-1.49), but no different after (OR=1.10, 0.98-1.24). Compared to the before period, odds of DA-CPR were higher during DART (OR=1.79, 1.59-2.02) but no different after (OR=0.94, 0.80-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Odds of bystander CPR were higher during the trial, an increase related to higher likelihood of DA-CPR. The finding suggests a possible indirect community-wide benefit due to the interventional trial.

Greater hand-grip strength predicts a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes over 10 years in leaner Japanese Americans.

AIMS: Much is known about body composition and type 2 diabetes risk but less about body function such as strength. We assessed whether hand-grip strength predicted incident diabetes. METHODS: We followed 394 nondiabetic Japanese-American subjects (mean age 51.9) for the development of diabetes. We fit a logistic regression model to examine the association between hand-grip strength at baseline and type 2 diabetes risk over 10 years, adjusted for age, sex, and family history. RESULTS: A statistically significant (p = 0.008) and negative (coefficient -0.208) association was observed between hand-grip strength and diabetes risk that diminished at higher BMI levels. Adjusted ORs for a 10-pound hand-grip strength increase with BMI set at the 25th, 50th or 75th percentiles were 0.68, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among leaner individuals, greater hand-grip strength was associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes, suggesting it may be a useful marker of risk in this population.