Deproteinized bovine bone in association with guided tissue regeneration or enamel matrix derivatives procedures in aggressive periodontitis patients: a 1-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate and compare two regenerative periodontal procedures in young individuals with aggressive periodontitis (AgP). METHODS: Thirty-two patients aged 14-25 years (mean ± SD 19.3 ± 5.7) were diagnosed as having AgP with multiple intra-bony defects (IBDs) and treated by one of two regenerative modalities of periodontal therapy: guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using deproteinized bone xenograft (DBX) particles and a resorbable membrane (the GTR group), or an application of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) combined with DBX (the EMD/DBX group). Periodic monitoring of treated sites included recording of probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival recession. Pre-treatment and 1-year post-operative findings were statistically analysed within and between groups. RESULTS: The PD and CAL values decreased significantly with time, but not those between study groups. The mean pre-treatment and 1-year post-treatment PDs of the IBDs of the GTR group (n = 16; sites = 67) were 8.93 ± 1.14 mm and 3.58 ± 0.50 mm, respectively, and the mean CALs were 9.03 ± 1.03 mm and 4.16 ± 0.53 mm respectively. The mean PDs of the EMD/DBX group (n = 16; sites = 73) were 8.77 ± 1.04 mm and 3.61 ± 0.36 mm, respectively, and the mean CALS were 8.79 ± 1.04 mm and 3.77 ± 0.22 mm respectively (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of AgP patients by either GTR or by application of EMD/DBX yielded similarly successful clinical results at 1-year post-treatment.

Effect of guided tissue regeneration on newly formed bone and cementum in periapical tissue healing after endodontic surgery: an in vivo study in the cat.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of anorganic bovine bone as a grafted biomaterial on newly formed bone and cementum in periapical regions after surgical endodontic treatment in cats. METHODS: After inducing apical periodontitis in 9 cats, root canal and surgical endodontic treatment were performed on 72 roots of first and second maxillary premolars. Bone defects were treated with biomaterial particles + a membrane, biomaterial only, a membrane only, or left unfilled (control). Histomorphometry on nondecalcified sections were performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Analysis of variance with repeated measures was used within 2 and 3 subject factors to analyze newly formed bone, cementum, biomaterial conduction, and resorption. RESULTS: At each time period, bone formation was greater at the grafted membrane-protected sites than in the grafted-unprotected sites. At 6 months, the bone area fraction at membrane nongrafted sites was greater than in the grafted-protected sites. The new cementum was significantly greater at 6 months than at 3 months and greater at the grafted membrane-protected sites over the unprotected ones at 6 months. Statistically, the grafted biomaterial, the membrane, and the time contributed significantly to the amount of new bone (P<.05) with no significant interaction. Biomaterial osteoconduction was significantly affected by the time. All 3 variables showed a significant interaction on new cementum. CONCLUSIONS: There was significantly more bone formation after surgical endodontic treatment when membrane and bone grafts were used as compared with bone grafts only or unfilled control sites. However, it appears that the key factor to the enhanced tissue regeneration is the membrane and not the grafted biomaterial.