Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 66(2): 136-141, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35508892

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Trials incorporating placebo-to-active treatment crossover are encouraged in fatal conditions like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) but may underestimate active treatment survival benefit. Here, we apply methods for modeling survival without crossover, including the rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM), to data from the CENTAUR trial of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (PB and TURSO) in ALS incorporating both randomized placebo-controlled and open-label extension (OLE) phases. METHODS: Intent-to-treat (ITT) and RPSFTM survival analyses were performed with final data at a July 2020 cutoff date. Analyses of subgroups based on randomized treatment and OLE phase participation were also performed. RESULTS: Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of death for PB and TURSO versus participants initially on placebo were 0.57 (0.35-0.92) on ITT analysis and 0.39 (0.17-0.88) in the primary on-treatment RPSFTM analysis (p = .023). Median ITT survival duration for PB and TURSO (25.8 mo) was 6.9 mo longer than placebo (18.9 mo) on ITT analysis and 10.6 mo longer than the median RPSFTM-adjusted survival duration for placebo (15.2 mo). Median survival duration was 18.8 mo longer in the PB and TURSO-randomized subgroup who continued into the OLE phase versus the placebo-randomized subgroup who did not continue into the OLE phase (p < .0001), although OLE phase selection bias may have potentially confounded these results. DISCUSSION: Similar to the prespecified ITT analysis, post hoc analyses adjusting for treatment crossover in CENTAUR showed a significant survival benefit for PB and TURSO. Such methods may provide clinical context for observed survival outcomes in future ALS crossover trials.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Análisis de Supervivencia
2.
Nurs Crit Care ; 26(4): 224-233, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33124119

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients who are critically ill are at increased risk of hospital acquired pneumonia and ventilator associated pneumonia. Effective evidence based oral care may reduce the incidence of such iatrogenic infection. AIM: To provide an evidence-based British Association of Critical Care Nurses endorsed consensus paper for best practice relating to implementing oral care, with the intention of promoting patient comfort and reducing hospital acquired pneumonia and ventilator associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. DESIGN: A nominal group technique was adopted. A consensus committee of adult critical care nursing experts from the United Kingdom met in 2018 to evaluate and review the literature relating to oral care, its application in reducing pneumonia in critically ill adults and to make recommendations for practice. An elected national board member for the British Association of Critical Care Nurses chaired the round table discussion. METHODS: The committee focused on 5 aspects of oral care practice relating to critically ill adult patients. The evidence was evaluated for each practice within the context of reducing pneumonia in the mechanically ventilated patient or pneumonia in the non-ventilated patient. The five practices included the frequency for oral care; tools for oral care; oral care technique; solutions used and oral care in the non-ventilated patient who is critically ill and is at risk of aspiration. The group searched the best available evidence and evaluated this using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong, moderate, weak, or best practice consensus statement when applicable. RESULTS: The consensus group generated recommendations, delineating an approach to best practice for oral care in critically ill adult patients. Recommendations included guidance for frequency and procedure for oral assessment, toothbrushing, and moisturising the mouth. Evidence on the use of chlorhexidine is not consistent and caution is advised with its routine use. CONCLUSION: Oral care is an important part of the care of critically ill patients, both ventilated and non-ventilated. An effective oral care programme reduces the incidence of pneumonia and promotes patient comfort. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Effective oral care is integral to safe patient care in critical care.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Adulto , Consenso , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Higiene Bucal , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos
3.
J Nutr ; 150(1): 149-158, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31504715

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although dietary intakes and dietary intake patterns (DPs) have been associated with single metabolites, it is unclear whether DPs are also reflected in specific metabolite patterns (MPs). Moreover, the influence of groups of gut bacteria on the relationship between DPs and MPs is underexplored. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the association of DPs and serum MPs and also the modifying effect of the gut bacteria compositional patterns (BCPs). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional investigation among 225 individuals (median age: 63 y; 53% women) from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Dietary intakes were assessed by three 24-h dietary recalls, gut bacteria composition was quantified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and the serum metabolome was profiled by an untargeted approach. We identified DPs and BCPs by the treelet transform analysis. We modeled associations between DPs and 8 previously published MPs and the modifying effect of BCPs by fitting generalized linear models using DataSHIELD R. RESULTS: We identified 5 DPs and 7 BCPs. The "bread, margarine, and processed meat" and "fruiting vegetables and vegetable oils" DPs were positively associated with the "amino acids" (ß = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.69; P = 0.03) and "fatty acids" MPs (ß = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.74; P = 0.01), respectively. The "tea and miscellaneous" was inversely associated with the "amino acids" (ß = -0.28; 95% CI: -0.52, -0.05; P = 0.02) and "amino acid derivatives" MPs (ß = -0.21; 95% CI: -0.39, -0.02; P = 0.03). One BCP negatively modified the association between the "bread, margarine, and processed meat" DP and the "amino acids" MP (P-interaction = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In older German adults, DPs are reflected in MPs, and the gut bacteria attenuate 1 DP-MP association. These MPs should be explored as biomarkers of these jointly consumed foods while taking into account a potentially modifying role of the gut bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Dieta , Conducta Alimentaria , Alimentos/clasificación , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(1): 150-154.e2, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542270

RESUMEN

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysmal chronic dissection is often complicated by retrograde filling of the false lumen and dissected distal landing zone. A "cheese wire"-style fenestration of the dissection intimal flap can create a landing zone facilitating TEVAR. This technique successfully aided TEVAR in 3 patients with an average age of 57.3 years. Complications included type III endoleak requiring relining and renal artery occlusion requiring stent placement. Average duration of clinical follow-up was 19 ± 4 months. Imaging follow-up was 8 ± 10 months. All patients have survived for more than 1 year without aneurysm enlargement.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Eur J Pediatr ; 177(6): 867-870, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29610991

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to determine bacteriological stability of a probiotic mixture dispersed in various diluents. The commercially available probiotic (Infloran®), containing Bifidobacterium bifidum (109 CFU/250 mg tablet) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (109 CFU/250 mg tablet), was dispersed within expressed breast milk, sterile water, and infant formula and examined at temperatures of 4 and 21 °C. When stored at 4 °C, significant decreases (P < 0.05) in the level of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum were observed in expressed breast milk and sterile water after a 6-h period. However, when stored in infant formula, both strains remained stable over a 12-h period. When stored at 21 °C, a significant decrease (P < 0.05) was observed in the level of L. acidophilus in sterile water, expressed breast milk and infant formula throughout a 12-h period. However, no significant decrease was observed overtime in B. bifidum in all three diluents at this temperature. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that, when stored at 4 °C, this probiotic product can remain at a stable condition for 6 h in sterile water and infant formula; however, the viability of the probiotic decreases significantly after this period of time. Administration of this probiotic in sterile water can be an acceptable alternative to dispersion and administration in expressed breast milk. What is Known: • Administration of probiotics containing lactobacilli and bifidobacteria has become more widespread in neonatology, mainly as prophylaxis for the prevention of necrotising entercolitis in preterm infants. • Probiotic reconstitution, from its powder base, is not standardized and various diluents, including sterile water, breast milk, and infant formula, have been used. What is New: • When stored at 4 °C, a probiotic containing lactobacilli and bifidobacteria remains at a stable microbological condition for up to 6 h in sterile water. • Administration of this probiotic dispersed in sterile water, followed by an EBM feed, can be an acceptable alternative to dispersion and administration in EBM.


Asunto(s)
Bifidobacterium bifidum/fisiología , Fórmulas Infantiles/microbiología , Lactobacillus acidophilus/fisiología , Viabilidad Microbiana , Leche Humana/microbiología , Probióticos , Microbiología del Agua , Almacenamiento de Alimentos/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Temperatura
6.
Pharm Stat ; 15(3): 255-63, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26991401

RESUMEN

This paper illustrates an approach to setting the decision framework for a study in early clinical drug development. It shows how the criteria for a go and a stop decision are calculated based on pre-specified target and lower reference values. The framework can lead to a three-outcome approach by including a consider zone; this could enable smaller studies to be performed in early development, with other information either external to or within the study used to reach a go or stop decision. In this way, Phase I/II trials can be geared towards providing actionable decision-making rather than the traditional focus on statistical significance. The example provided illustrates how the decision criteria were calculated for a Phase II study, including an interim analysis, and how the operating characteristics were assessed to ensure the decision criteria were robust. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto/métodos , Toma de Decisiones , Diseño de Fármacos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
7.
N Engl J Med ; 366(15): 1382-92, 2012 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22452356

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Olaparib (AZD2281) is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study to evaluate maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and had had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib, at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines. RESULTS: Of 265 patients who underwent randomization, 136 were assigned to the olaparib group and 129 to the placebo group. Progression-free survival was significantly longer with olaparib than with placebo (median, 8.4 months vs. 4.8 months from randomization on completion of chemotherapy; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.001). Subgroup analyses of progression-free survival showed that, regardless of subgroup, patients in the olaparib group had a lower risk of progression. Adverse events more commonly reported in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (by more than 10% of patients) were nausea (68% vs. 35%), fatigue (49% vs. 38%), vomiting (32% vs. 14%), and anemia (17% vs. 5%); the majority of adverse events were grade 1 or 2. An interim analysis of overall survival (38% maturity, meaning that 38% of the patients had died) showed no significant difference between groups (hazard ratio with olaparib, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.39; P=0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib as maintenance treatment significantly improved progression-free survival among patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Interim analysis showed no overall survival benefit. The toxicity profile of olaparib in this population was consistent with that in previous studies. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00753545.).


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
8.
Pharm Stat ; 13(3): 184-95, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24692364

RESUMEN

This paper provides an introduction to utilities for statisticians working mainly in clinical research who have not had experience of health technology assessment work. Utility is the numeric valuation applied to a health state based on the preference of being in that state relative to perfect health. Utilities are often combined with survival data in health economic modelling to obtain quality-adjusted life years. There are several methods available for deriving the preference weights and the health states to which they are applied, and combining them to estimate utilities, and the clinical statistician has valuable skills that can be applied in ensuring the robustness of the trial design, data collection and analyses to obtain and handle this data. In addition to raising awareness of the subject and providing source references, the paper outlines the concepts and approaches around utilities using examples, discusses some of the key issues, and proposes areas where statisticians can collaborate with health economic colleagues to improve the quality of this important element of health technology assessment.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Económicos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
9.
Breast Cancer Res ; 15(5): R88, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24063698

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This Phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of olaparib, a potent oral poly(ADPribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). METHODS: Eligible patients who had received ≤1 prior cytotoxic regimen for mTNBC were treated with olaparib 200 mg bid continuously plus weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 for three weeks per four-week cycle. Dose modifications in a large proportion of patients due to neutropenia resulted in enrollment of a second cohort of patients who, if they experienced grade ≥2 neutropenia in cycle 1, received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, which was continued prophylactically in subsequent cycles. All patients had measurable disease; tumor responses were evaluated according to RECIST (version 1.0). RESULTS: Nineteen patients (cohort 1, n = 9; cohort 2, n = 10) received treatment; 15 had received prior taxane chemotherapy. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (n = 12, 63%), nausea (n = 11, 58%) and neutropenia (n = 11, 58%). Seven neutropenia events were reported in cohort 1 (four grade ≥3) and four in cohort 2 (two grade ≥3, including one event of febrile neutropenia). The median (range) dose intensity of paclitaxel was 57% (26 to 100%) in cohort 1 and 73% (29 to 100%) in cohort 2. Seven patients (37%) had a confirmed partial response; one patient remains on olaparib monotherapy without progression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of olaparib and weekly paclitaxel was complicated by a significant clinical interaction, with higher-than-expected rates of neutropenia despite secondary prophylaxis. Given the encouraging response rate, alternative scheduling and dosing strategies should be considered (funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00707707).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/mortalidad
10.
Pharm Stat ; 12(6): 348-57, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24136868

RESUMEN

In parallel group trials, long-term efficacy endpoints may be affected if some patients switch or cross over to the alternative treatment arm prior to the event. In oncology trials, switch to the experimental treatment can occur in the control arm following disease progression and potentially impact overall survival. It may be a clinically relevant question to estimate the efficacy that would have been observed if no patients had switched, for example, to estimate 'real-life' clinical effectiveness for a health technology assessment. Several commonly used statistical methods are available that try to adjust time-to-event data to account for treatment switching, ranging from naive exclusion and censoring approaches to more complex inverse probability of censoring weighting and rank-preserving structural failure time models. These are described, along with their key assumptions, strengths, and limitations. Best practice guidance is provided for both trial design and analysis when switching is anticipated. Available statistical software is summarized, and examples are provided of the application of these methods in health technology assessments of oncology trials. Key considerations include having a clearly articulated rationale and research question and a well-designed trial with sufficient good quality data collection to enable robust statistical analysis. No analysis method is universally suitable in all situations, and each makes strong untestable assumptions. There is a need for further research into new or improved techniques. This information should aid statisticians and their colleagues to improve the design and analysis of clinical trials where treatment switch is anticipated.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Proyectos de Investigación , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Determinación de Punto Final , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Probabilidad , Programas Informáticos , Análisis de Supervivencia
11.
Adv Ther ; 40(12): 5204-5221, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751021

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a Treat & Extend (T&E) regime with intervals up to every 16 weeks (Q16W), relative to other therapies currently in use for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of particular interest were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies applied in flexible dosing regimens such as Pro re nata (PRN) and T&E, which are the mainstay in clinical practice. METHODS: An SLR identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2021 was conducted, followed by a Bayesian NMA comparing faricimab T&E treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and laser therapy. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central subfield thickness (CST), injection frequency, ocular adverse events (AE) and all-cause discontinuation, all of which were evaluated at 12 months. Subgroup analyses including patients' naïve to anti-VEGF were conducted where feasible. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies identified in the SLR were included in the NMA. Most importantly for decision making in clinical practise, faricimab T&E was associated with a statistically greater (95% credible intervals exclude zero) and clinically meaningful decrease in retinal thickness compared to all other flexible dosing regimens (greater retinal drying by 55-125 microns). Anatomical outcomes determine treatment efficacy and retreatment of patients. The NMA also showed a statistically greater increase in mean change in BCVA for faricimab T&E vs. flexible regimens using ranibizumab and bevacizumab (increase of 4.4-4.8 letters) as well as a numerical improvement vs. aflibercept PRN (two letters, 95% credible intervals including zero). Accordingly, the injection frequency was numerically lower versus other treatments using flexible dosing regimens (decrease by 0.92-1.43 injections). The analyses also indicated that the safety profile of faricimab T&E was comparable to those of ranibizumab and aflibercept, which have well-established safety profiles, with similar results for the number of all-cause discontinuations. CONCLUSION: Faricimab provides a new treatment option in DME with dual-pathway inhibition of VEGF and angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first indirect comparison of faricimab T&E in DME. The analyses indicate that faricimab T&E is associated with superior retinal drying along with numerically fewer injections compared to all other treatments given in flexible dosing regimens. It also showed superior visual acuity outcomes compared to ranibizumab and bevacizumab.


Asunto(s)
Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red , Ranibizumab/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico
12.
N Engl J Med ; 361(10): 947-57, 2009 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19692680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous, uncontrolled studies have suggested that first-line treatment with gefitinib would be efficacious in selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label study, we randomly assigned previously untreated patients in East Asia who had advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma and who were nonsmokers or former light smokers to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day) (609 patients) or carboplatin (at a dose calculated to produce an area under the curve of 5 or 6 mg per milliliter per minute) plus paclitaxel (200 mg per square meter of body-surface area) (608 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: The 12-month rates of progression-free survival were 24.9% with gefitinib and 6.7% with carboplatin-paclitaxel. The study met its primary objective of showing the noninferiority of gefitinib and also showed its superiority, as compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel, with respect to progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001). In the subgroup of 261 patients who were positive for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received gefitinib than among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.64; P<0.001), whereas in the subgroup of 176 patients who were negative for the mutation, progression-free survival was significantly longer among those who received carboplatin-paclitaxel (hazard ratio for progression or death with gefitinib, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.05 to 3.98; P<0.001). The most common adverse events were rash or acne (in 66.2% of patients) and diarrhea (46.6%) in the gefitinib group and neurotoxic effects (69.9%), neutropenia (67.1%), and alopecia (58.4%) in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib is superior to carboplatin-paclitaxel as an initial treatment for pulmonary adenocarcinoma among nonsmokers or former light smokers in East Asia. The presence in the tumor of a mutation of the EGFR gene is a strong predictor of a better outcome with gefitinib. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00322452.)


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Gefitinib , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos
13.
Nurs Times ; 108(25): 20-1, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22856097

RESUMEN

Hospital patients are at increased risk of malnutrition and may need oral nutritional supplements. This article describes the development of a poster to raise nurses' awareness of the importance of chilling supplements to encourage patients to take them and find out their preferred flavours.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Capacitación en Servicio/métodos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Cooperación del Paciente , Carteles como Asunto , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Reino Unido
14.
Toxicol Rep ; 8: 1498-1512, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34401360

RESUMEN

Toombak is a smokeless tobacco produced from the Nicotiana rustica tobacco plant from Sudan. Pre-prepared and ready to buy Toombak samples were analysed using mass spectrometry (heavy metals), gas and liquid chromatography (metabolomics), 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing (microbiome) and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) and pH analysis. Chromium, cobalt, and copper were high in the pre-prepared form of Toombak while iron, tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were high in both types. Firmicutes and Actinobacteria dominated Toombak. Samples of ready to buy Toombak showed inter-variational differences depending on place of purchase. We found Virgibacillus were increased in the pre-prepared form while Corynebacterium casei, Atopococus tabaci, Atopostipes suicloacalis, Oceanobacillus chironomi and Staphylococcus gallinarum were the most abundant species in the ready to buy forms. PICRUSt analysis highlighted increased activity of metal transport systems in the ready to buy samples as well as an antibiotic transport system. SEM-EDX highlighted large non-homogenous, irregular particles with increased sodium, while pH of samples was in the alkaline range. The final composition of Toombak is affected by its method of preparation and the end product has the potential to impart many negative consequences on the health of its users. TSNA levels observed in Toombak were some of the highest in the world while the micro-environment of Toombak supports a distinct microbiota profile.

15.
Lancet ; 372(9652): 1809-18, 2008 Nov 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19027483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two phase II trials in patients with previously-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer suggested that gefitinib was efficacious and less toxic than was chemotherapy. We compared gefitinib with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who had been pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We undertook an open-label phase III study with recruitment between March 1, 2004, and Feb 17, 2006, at 149 centres in 24 countries. 1466 patients with pretreated (>/=one platinum-based regimen) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned with dynamic balancing to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day orally; n=733) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) intravenously in 1-h infusion every 3 weeks; n=733). The primary objective was to compare overall survival between the groups with co-primary analyses to assess non-inferiority in the overall per-protocol population and superiority in patients with high epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-gene-copy number in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00076388. FINDINGS: 1433 patients were analysed per protocol (723 in gefitinib group and 710 in docetaxel group). Non-inferiority of gefitinib compared with docetaxel was confirmed for overall survival (593 vs 576 events; hazard ratio [HR] 1.020, 96% CI 0.905-1.150, meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion; median survival 7.6 vs 8.0 months). Superiority of gefitinib in patients with high EGFR-gene-copy number (85 vs 89 patients) was not proven (72 vs 71 events; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p=0.62; median survival 8.4 vs 7.5 months). In the gefitinib group, the most common adverse events were rash or acne (360 [49%] vs 73 [10%]) and diarrhoea (255 [35%] vs 177 [25%]); whereas in the docetaxel group, neutropenia (35 [5%] vs 514 [74%]), asthenic disorders (182 [25%] vs 334 [47%]), and alopecia (23 [3%] vs 254 [36%]) were most common. INTERPRETATION: INTEREST established non-inferior survival of gefitinib compared with docetaxel, suggesting that gefitinib is a valid treatment for pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Docetaxel , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Gefitinib , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Taxoides/efectos adversos
16.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 177(12): 1348-57, 2008 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18337594

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving gefitinib. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate risk factors for ILD in Japanese patients with NSCLC during treatment with gefitinib or chemotherapy. METHODS: In a prospective epidemiologic cohort, 3,166 Japanese patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC were followed for 12 weeks on 250 mg gefitinib (n = 1,872 treatment periods) or chemotherapy (n = 2,551). Patients who developed acute ILD (n = 122) and randomly selected control subjects (n = 574) entered a case-control study. Adjusted incidence rate ratios were estimated from case-control data by odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression. Crude (observed) incidence rates and risks were calculated from cohort data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The observed (unadjusted) incidence rate over 12 weeks was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.3-3.3) per 1,000 person-weeks, 4.5 (3.5-5.4) for gefitinib versus 1.7 (1.2-2.2) for chemotherapy; the corresponding observed naive cumulative incidence rates at the end of 12-week follow-up were 4.0% (3.0-5.1%) and 2.1% (1.5-2.9%), respectively. Adjusted for imbalances in risk factors between treatments, the overall OR for gefitinib versus chemotherapy was 3.2 (1.9-5.4), elevated chiefly during the first 4 weeks (3.8 [1.9-7.7]). Other ILD risk factors in both groups included the following: older age, poor World Health Organization performance status, smoking, recent NSCLC diagnosis, reduced normal lung on computed tomography scan, preexisting chronic ILD, concurrent cardiac disease. ILD-related deaths in patients with ILD were 31.6% (gefitinib) versus 27.9% (chemotherapy); adjusted OR, 1.05 (95% CI, 0.3-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: ILD was relatively common in these Japanese patients with NSCLC during therapy with gefitinib or chemotherapy, being higher in the older, smoking patient with preexisting ILD or poor performance status. The risk of developing ILD was higher with gefitinib than chemotherapy, mainly in the first 4 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Gefitinib , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 20(6): 451-460.e5, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extended onset of treatment effect and longer-term survival with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapies, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have changed the landscape of second- or subsequent-line (2L+) treatments for adults with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic literature review included phase I to IV randomized, controlled trials of 2L+ NSCLC therapies from MEDLINE, Embase, and secondary sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies of treatments approved in the European Union or United States had to be in English with ≥ 10 patients per arm. A fractional polynomials network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted because traditional NMA of hazard ratios does not account for delayed onset of clinical effect or long-term survival observed in PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor trials. Adjusted analyses accounted for treatment switching in the atezolizumab OAK trial. Expected survival time reflected area under the curve over the time horizon. Expected overall survival (OS) was ranked by median ranking with 95% credible intervals and by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Of 25,115 screened records, 28 studies were included in the quantitative analyses of OS and progression-free survival. RESULTS: PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had comparable expected 5-year OS; all performed better than other treatment options. In unadjusted analyses, surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranked nivolumab first (87.9%), followed by atezolizumab (85.8%) and pembrolizumab (82.8%). Analyses adjusted for patients switching from docetaxel to immunotherapy ranked atezolizumab first (89.6%), followed by nivolumab (86.5%) and pembrolizumab (81.9%). CONCLUSION: This NMA applied an appropriate approach for indirect comparisons, including cancer immunotherapies, and supported robustness of PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapies for 2L+ treatment of NSCLC.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Modelos Estadísticos , Neoplasias/terapia , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias/inmunología , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia
19.
Clin Nutr ; 38(6): 2504-2520, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655101

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies indicate that dietary fat quantity and quality influence the gut microbiota composition which may as a consequence impact metabolic health. This systematic review aims to summarize the results of available studies in humans on dietary fat intake (quantity and quality), the intestinal microbiota composition and related cardiometabolic health outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic review (CRD42018088685) following PRISMA guidelines and searched for literature in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: From 796 records, 765 records were excluded based on title or abstract. After screening of 31 full-text articles six randomized controlled trials (RCT) and nine cross-sectional observational studies were included. Our results of interventional trials do not suggest strong effects of different amounts and types of dietary fat on the intestinal microbiota composition or on metabolic health outcomes while observational studies indicate associations with the microbiota and health outcomes. High intake of fat and saturated fatty acids (SFA) may negatively affect microbiota richness and diversity and diets high in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) may decrease total bacterial numbers whereas dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) had no effect on richness and diversity. CONCLUSIONS: High fat and high SFA diets can exert unfavorable effects on the gut microbiota and are associated with an unhealthy metabolic state. Also high MUFA diets may negatively affect gut microbiota whereas PUFA do not seem to negatively affect the gut microbiota or metabolic health outcomes. However, data are not consistent and most RCT and observational studies showed risks of bias.


Asunto(s)
Dieta , Grasas de la Dieta , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Dieta/métodos , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
20.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 104(2): F159-F164, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29925539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the appropriate dosing interval of a probiotic (Infloran) given daily, biweekly and weekly in preterm infants <32 weeks' gestation. METHODS: There were 8 infants in the daily group, 8 infants in the biweekly group and 10 infants in the weekly group, all born between 25 and 32 weeks' gestation. The control group consisted of 12 preterm infants who did not receive the probiotic. Infloran (250 mg/capsule), containing Bifidobacterium bifidum (1×109 colony-forming unit (CFU)) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (1×109 CFU), was administered in 2.5 mL of breast milk per kilogram weight of the infant (2×109 CFU of bacteria in total), until 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). Stool samples were collected at 31, 34, 41 and 44 weeks PMA and frozen at -20°C. RESULTS: After administration of the probiotic at 31 weeks PMA, Bifidobacterium were significantly higher in the daily group (45%) in comparison with the biweekly (17%) and weekly (9%) groups. At 34 weeks PMA, Bifidobacterium were significantly higher again in the daily (60%) group in comparison with the biweekly (21%), weekly (23%) and control (15%) groups. At 41 weeks PMA a decrease in the relative abundances of Streptococcaceae and Enterococcaceae was found in all three probiotic groups, and by 44 weeks PMA significantly higher levels of Lactobacillus were found in the biweekly group (16.5%) in comparison with the weekly group (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a daily dose of Infloran is a suitable dosage for preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit, with significantly higher levels of Bifidobacterium found in the daily probiotic group up to 44 weeks PMA.


Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Bifidobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Esquema de Medicación , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/prevención & control , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , Lactobacillus acidophilus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA