Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(3): 338-48, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701170

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Orteronel is an investigational, partially selective inhibitor of CYP 17,20-lyase in the androgen signalling pathway, a validated therapeutic target for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We assessed orteronel in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and no previous chemotherapy from 324 study centres (ie, hospitals or large urologic or group outpatient offices) in 43 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 400 mg orteronel plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily or placebo plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice response system and patients were stratified by region (Europe, North America, and not Europe or North America) and the presence or absence of radiographic disease progression at baseline. The two primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, determined in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01193244. FINDINGS: From Oct 31, 2010, to June 29, 2012, 2353 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 1560 were randomly assigned to receive either orteronel plus prednisone (n=781) or placebo plus prednisone (n=779). The clinical cutoff date for the final analysis was Jan 15, 2014 (with 611 deaths). Median follow-up for radiographic progression-free survival was 8·4 months (IQR 3·7-16·6). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 13·8 months (95% CI 13·1-14·9) with orteronel plus prednisone and 8·7 months (8·3-10·9) with placebo plus prednisone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71, 95% CI 0·63-0·80; p<0·0001). After a median follow-up of 20·7 months (IQR 14·2-25·4), median overall survival was 31·4 months (95% CI 28·6-not estimable) with orteronel plus prednisone and 29·5 months (27·0-not estimable) with placebo plus prednisone (HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·08; p=0·31). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were increased lipase (137 [17%] of 784 patients in the orteronel plus prednisone group vs 14 [2%] of 770 patients in the placebo plus prednisone group), increased amylase (77 [10%] vs nine [1%]), fatigue (50 [6%] vs 14 [2%]), and pulmonary embolism (40 [5%] vs 27 [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 358 [46%] patients receiving orteronel plus prednisone and in 292 [38%] patients receiving placebo plus prednisone. INTERPRETATION: In chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, radiographic progression-free survival was prolonged with orteronel plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone. However, no improvement was noted in the other primary endpoint, overall survival. Orteronel plus prednisone was associated with increased toxic effects compared with placebo plus prednisone. On the basis of these and other data, orteronel is not undergoing further development in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. FUNDING: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/enzimología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Asia , Australia , Inhibidores Enzimáticos del Citocromo P-450/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Naftalenos/administración & dosificación , Nueva Zelanda , América del Norte , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/enzimología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Esteroide 17-alfa-Hidroxilasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Esteroide 17-alfa-Hidroxilasa/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Blood ; 119(19): 4375-82, 2012 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22422823

RESUMEN

Combinations of bortezomib (V) and dexamethasone (D) with either lenalidomide (R) or cyclophosphamide (C) have shown significant efficacy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated VDC, VDR, and VDCR in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11) and D 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15), with either C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and R 15 mg (days 1-14; VDCR), R 25 mg (days 1-14; VDR), C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8; VDC) or C 500 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15; VDC-mod) in 3-week cycles (maximum 8 cycles), followed by maintenance with V 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for four 6-week cycles (all arms)≥very good partial response was seen in 58%, 51%, 41%, and 53% (complete response rate of 25%, 24%, 22%, and 47%) of patients (VDCR, VDR, VCD, and VCD-mod, respectively); the corresponding 1-year progression-free survival was 86%, 83%, 93%, and 100%, respectively. Common adverse events included hematologic toxicities, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, and gastrointestinal disturbances. All regimens were highly active and well tolerated in previously untreated MM, and, based on this trial, VDR and VCD-mod are preferred for clinical practice and further comparative testing. No substantial advantage was noted with VDCR over the 3-drug combinations. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00507442).


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(8): 1967-1973, 2017 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27678453

RESUMEN

Purpose: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease for which better prognostic models for survival are needed. We examined the added value of circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration relative to common prognostic laboratory measures from patients with CRPC.Methods: Utility of CTC enumeration as a baseline and postbaseline prognostic biomarker was examined using data from two prospective randomized registration-directed trials (COU-AA-301 and ELM-PC4) within statistical models used to estimate risk for survival. Discrimination and calibration were used to measure model predictive accuracy and the added value for CTC enumeration in the context of a Cox model containing albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), PSA, hemoglobin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALK). Discrimination quantifies how accurately a risk model predicts short-term versus long-term survivors. Calibration measures the closeness of actual survival time to the predicted survival time.Results: Adding CTC enumeration to a model containing albumin, LDH, PSA, hemoglobin, and ALK ("ALPHA") improved its discriminatory power. The weighted c-index for ALPHA without CTCs was 0.72 (SE, 0.02) versus 0.75 (SE, 0.02) for ALPHA + CTCs. The increase in discrimination was restricted to the lower-risk cohort. In terms of calibration, adding CTCs produced a more accurate model-based prediction of patient survival. The absolute prediction error for ALPHA was 3.95 months (SE, 0.28) versus 3.75 months (SE, 0.22) for ALPHA + CTCs.Conclusions: Addition of CTC enumeration to standard measures provides more accurate assessment of patient risk in terms of baseline and postbaseline prognosis in the mCRPC population. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 1967-73. ©2016 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenos/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 11(21): 7692-9, 2005 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16278389

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity, maximal tolerated dose, and clinical and immunologic response to autologous dendritic cells pulsed with melanoma-associated antigen gp100-derived G280-9V peptide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve HLA-A*0201(+) patients with advanced melanoma were administered dendritic cells pulsed with G280-9V peptide. Cohorts of three patients were administered 5 x 10(6), 15 x 10(6), and 50 x 10(6) cells i.v. every 3 weeks for six doses according to a dose escalation scheme. Three additional patients were treated at the highest dose. No additional cytokines or therapies were coadministered. The immunogenicity of G280-9V-pulsed dendritic cells was measured by IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay, tetramer assay, and (51)Cr release assay comparing prevaccination to postvaccination blood samples. Response to treatment was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: CD8(+) immunity to the native G280 was observed in 8 (67%) patients as measured by ELISPOT and in 12 (100%) patients as measured by tetramer assay. Of the 9 patients tested, 9 (100%) had measurable high-avidity CTL activity as defined by lysis of allogeneic melanoma lines, which coexpress HLA-A*0201 and gp100. The median follow-up of the entire cohort is 43.8 months. Two (17%) partial responses were observed and 3 (25%) patients had stable disease. The median survival of the treated population was 37.6 months. At this time, three patients are alive, including one patient who continues to respond without additional treatment. CONCLUSION: The high rate of immunization as measured by three independent assays and the occurrence of clinical regression support continued investigation of G280-9V peptide as a candidate epitope in melanoma vaccine formulations.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Vacunas contra el Cáncer , Células Dendríticas/citología , Melanoma/terapia , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/química , Proteínas de Neoplasias/química , Fragmentos de Péptidos/química , Adulto , Anciano , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Separación Celular , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Antígenos HLA-A/biosíntesis , Antígeno HLA-A2 , Humanos , Interferón gamma/metabolismo , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Melanoma/mortalidad , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/biosíntesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Neoplasias/biosíntesis , Péptidos/química , Fenotipo , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antígeno gp100 del Melanoma
5.
Urol Oncol ; 34(12): 530.e15-530.e21, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765518

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of MLN2704, a humanized monoclonal antibody MLN591 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen, linked to the maytansinoid DM1 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 62 patients received MLN2704 at ascending doses on 4 schedules: weekly (60, 84, 118, and 165mg/m2; 12 patients); every 2 weeks (120, 168, 236, and 330mg/m2; 15 patients); every 3 weeks (330 and 426mg/m2; 18 patients); and on days 1 and 15 of a 6-week schedule (6-week cycle, 330mg/m2; 17 patients). The primary efficacy endpoint was a sustained ≥50% decline from baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) without evidence of disease progression. Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed. RESULTS: Neurotoxicity was dose-limiting. Overall, 44 patients (71%) exhibited peripheral neuropathy: 6 (10%) had grade 3/4. Neurotoxicity rates remained high despite increasing the dosing interval to 3 (13 of 14; one grade 3) and 6 weeks (16 of 17; three grade 3). MLN2704 pharmacokinetics were dose-linear. Rapid deconjugation of DM1 from the conjugated antibody was seen. In all, 5 patients (8%) experienced ≥50% decline in PSA; 5 (8%) had PSA stabilization lasting≥90 days. Only 2 of 35 patients on the 3- and 6-week schedules achieved a PSA decline of >50%. CONCLUSIONS: MLN2704 has limited activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Disulfide linker lability and rapid deconjugation lead to neurotoxicity and a narrow therapeutic window.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Maitansina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacocinética , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Monitoreo de Drogas , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/farmacocinética , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Maitansina/administración & dosificación , Maitansina/efectos adversos , Maitansina/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(7): 723-31, 2015 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25624429

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor. This study examined orteronel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our study, 1,099 men were randomly assigned in a 2:1 schedule to receive orteronel 400 mg plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, stratified by region (Europe, North America [NA], and non-Europe/NA) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form worst pain score. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS], ≥ 50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen [PSA50], and pain response at 12 weeks) were to undergo statistical testing only if the primary end point analysis was significant. RESULTS: The study was unblinded after crossing a prespecified OS futility boundary. The median OS was 17.0 months versus 15.2 months with orteronel-prednisone versus placebo-prednisone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.886; 95% CI, 0.739 to 1.062; P = .190). Improved rPFS was observed with orteronel-prednisone (median, 8.3 v 5.7 months; HR, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.653 to 0.885; P < .001). Orteronel-prednisone showed advantages over placebo-prednisone in PSA50 rate (25% v 10%, P < .001) and time to PSA progression (median, 5.5 v 2.9 months, P < .001) but not pain response rate (12% v 9%; P = .128). Adverse events (all grades) were generally more frequent with orteronel-prednisone, including nausea (42% v 26%), vomiting (36% v 17%), fatigue (29% v 23%), and increased amylase (14% v 2%). CONCLUSION: Our study did not meet the primary end point of OS. Longer rPFS and a higher PSA50 rate with orteronel-prednisone indicate antitumor activity.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenos/administración & dosificación , Naftalenos/efectos adversos , Clasificación del Tumor , América del Norte , Oportunidad Relativa , Dimensión del Dolor , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Clin Cancer Res ; 20(5): 1335-44, 2014 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24418642

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The androgen receptor pathway remains active in men with prostate cancer whose disease has progressed following surgical or medical castration. Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, oral, nonsteroidal, selective, reversible inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in the production of androgenic hormones. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a phase I/II study in men with progressive, chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and serum testosterone <50 ng/dL. In the phase I part, patients received orteronel 100 to 600 mg twice daily or 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone 5 mg twice a day. In phase II, patients received orteronel 300 mg twice a day, 400 mg twice a day plus prednisone, 600 mg twice a day plus prednisone, or 600 mg once a day without prednisone. RESULTS: In phase I (n = 26), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed and 13 of 20 evaluable patients (65%) achieved ≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline at 12 weeks. In phase II (n = 97), 45 of 84 evaluable patients (54%) achieved a ≥50% decline in PSA and at 12 weeks, substantial mean reductions from baseline in testosterone (-7.5 ng/dL) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (-45.3 µg/dL) were observed. Unconfirmed partial responses were reported in 10 of 51 evaluable phase II patients (20%). Decreases in circulating tumor cells were documented. Fifty-three percent of phase II patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events irrespective of causality; most common were fatigue, hypokalemia, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: 17,20-Lyase inhibition by orteronel was tolerable and results in declines in PSA and testosterone, with evidence of radiographic responses.


Asunto(s)
Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Esteroide 17-alfa-Hidroxilasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Imidazoles/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenos/farmacología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 26(13): 2147-54, 2008 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18362364

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: MLN2704 is an immunoconjugate designed to deliver the maytansinoid antimicrotubule agent drug maytansinoid-1 directly to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-expressing cells via the PSMA-targeted monoclonal antibody MLN591. This novel immunoconjugate has shown cytotoxic anti-prostate cancer activity. This study investigated the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of MLN2704. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer received MLN2704 intravenously over 2.5 hours. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received MLN2704 at doses of 18 to 343 mg/m(2). Eighteen of these patients received >or= three doses at 4-week intervals. Pharmacokinetics of conjugate levels were dose proportional. There was no correlation between clearance and body-surface area. MLN2704 was nonimmunogenic. Study drug-related grade 3 toxicities occurred in three (13%) of 23 patients, including uncomplicated febrile neutropenia (the only DLT) in one patient, reversible elevations in hepatic transaminases, leukopenia, and lymphopenia. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 toxicities included fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Neuropathy occurred in eight (35%) of 23 patients, including five of six patients treated at 343 mg/m(2). Two (22%) of the nine patients treated at 264 or 343 mg/m(2) had sustained a more than 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen versus baseline, accompanied by measurable tumor regression in the patient treated at 264 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: Therapeutic doses of MLN2704 can be administered safely on a repetitive basis. An MTD was not defined. MLN2704 is being administered at more frequent intervals in ongoing trials to determine an optimal dosing schedule.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antígenos de Superficie/inmunología , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Glutamato Carboxipeptidasa II/inmunología , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Neoplasias Óseas/inmunología , Neoplasias Óseas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Inmunoconjugados/farmacocinética , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Maitansina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Testosterona/sangre , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Cancer Metastasis Rev ; 24(4): 521-37, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16408160

RESUMEN

The recent clinical and commercial success of anti-cancer antibodies such as rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab has continued to foster great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for the treatment of both hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies which, in contrast with traditional cytotoxic small molecule drugs, target tumor cells and have a lower impact on non-malignant by-stander organs, the potential increases in efficacy associated with conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drugs clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. A significant number of cell surface proteins, glycoproteins, receptors, enzymes and peptides have been discovered that have become targets for the treatment of advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. A variety of naked antibodies and antibody conjugates have currently progressed through preclinical development and are in early or more advanced stages of clinical development. Clinicians, scientists and prostate cancer patients are all keenly interested to learn whether these agents when administered alone or in combination with other hormonal-based and cytotoxic therapies will show lasting benefit for sufferers of this common disease.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anticuerpos Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inmunología
10.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 8(8): 429-34, 2002.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12234168

RESUMEN

Contamination of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) with tumor cells has been associated with increased incidence of relapse in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma following autologous HSC transplantation. Effective purging of tumor cells may improve the results of HSC transplantation, but current methods of purging are technically difficult to perform with large numbers of cells and do not consistently remove all detectable cells. We report a pilot clinical trial in which 10 patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received high-dose chemotherapy followed by infusion of autologous HSCs depleted of B-cells by high-density microparticles (HDM) coated with anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (BCell-HDM). HSCs were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. In 6 of the 10 patients, B-cells were detectable by immunocytochemical analysis of the apheresis products prior to treatment. Following treatment with the BCell-HDM, no B-cells were detected in the products from 5 of these patients, a result representing a median depletion of >2.2 logs (range, >0.4 to >5.1 logs). The median recovery of nontarget cells postdepletion was 73% for CD34 cells and 78% for CD3+ cells. All patients received high-dose cyclophosphamide, BCNU (carmustine), and etoposide prior to reinfusion of their B-cell-depleted autologous HSCs. The median number of CD34+ cells cryopreserved was 3.6 x 10(6) cells/kg (range, 2.2-10.1 x 10(6) cells/kg). Engraftment was rapid in all cases, with a median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L of 10 days (range, 8-11 days). The median time to achieve a platelet count of 20 x 10(9)/L unsupported by platelet transfusion was 11.5 days (range, 8-17 days). This nonmagnetic negative-depletion technology is simple, rapid, and effective in depleting target cells to undetectable levels, with excellent recovery of nontarget cells.


Asunto(s)
Linfocitos B , Separación Celular/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/citología , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antígenos de Diferenciación de Linfocitos B/inmunología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos B/citología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/normas , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Microesferas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Prevención Secundaria , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA