Comparative study of stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging in renal assessment to distinguish patients with primary aldosteronism from healthy controls.

PURPOSE: To compare the ability of diffusion parameters obtained by stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish between patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and healthy controls (HCs) in renal assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 participants (22 patients and 22 HCs) underwent renal MRI with an 11 b-value DWI sequence and a 3 b-value diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) sequence from June 2021 to April 2022. Binary logistic regression was used to construct regression models combining different diffusion parameters. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and comparisons were used to evaluate the ability of single diffusion parameters and combined diffusion models to distinguish between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of six diffusion parameters (including the cortical anomalous exponent term [α_Cortex], medullary fractional anisotropy [FA_Medulla], cortical FA [FA_Cortex], cortical axial diffusivity [Da_Cortex], medullary mean diffusivity [MD_Medulla] and medullary radial diffusivity [Dr_Medulla]) were included, and 10 regression models were studied. The area under the curve (AUC) of Dr_Medulla was 0.855, comparable to that of FA_Cortex and FA_Medulla and significantly higher than that of α_Cortex, Da_Cortex and MD_Medulla. The AUC of the Model_all parameters was 0.967, comparable to that of Model_FA (0.946) and Model_DKI (0.966) and significantly higher than that of the other models. The sensitivity and specificity of Model_all parameters were 87.2% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Model_all parameters, Model_FA and Model_DKI were valid for differentiating between PA patients and HCs with similar differentiation efficacy and were superior to single diffusion parameters and other models.

Comparison of virtual and true non-contrast images from dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (CT) in patients with colorectal cancer.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is commonly assessed by computed tomography (CT), but the associated radiation exposure is a major concern. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the image quality of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images reconstructed from arterial and portal venous phases with that of true non-contrast (TNC) images in patients with CRC to assess the potential of TNC images to replace VNC images, thereby reducing the radiation dose. Methods: A total of 69 patients with postoperative pathologically confirmed CRC at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between May 2022 and April 2023 were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The CT protocol included the acquisition of TNC images, arterial and portal venous phase images; the VNC images were reconstructed from the two postcontrast phase images. Several parameters, including the CT attenuation value, absolute attenuation error, imaging noise [standard deviation (SD)], signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were measured in multiple abdominal structures for both the TNC and VNC images. Two blinded readers assessed the subjective image quality using a five-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the objective and subjective results between the TNC and VNC images. Individual measurements of radiation doses for the TNC scan and contrast scan protocols were recorded. Results: A total of 2,070 regions of interest (ROIs) of the 69 patients were analyzed. Overall, the VNC images exhibited significantly lower attenuation values and SD values than the TNC images in all tissues, except for the abdominal aorta, portal vein, and spleen. The mean absolute attenuation errors between the VNC and TNC images were all less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU). The percentages of absolute attenuation errors less than 5 and 10 HU in the VNC images from the arterial phase (VNCa) were 78.99% and 97.97%, respectively, while those from the portal venous phase (VNCp) were 81.59% and 96.96%, respectively. The absolute attenuation errors between the TNC and VNCa images were smaller than those between the TNC and VNCp images for tumors [VNCaerror: 2.77, interquartile range (IQR) 1.77-4.22; VNCperror: 3.27, IQR 2.68-4.30; P=0.002]. The SNR values and CNR values in the VNC images were significantly higher than those in the TNC images for all tissues, except for the portal vein and spleen. The image quality was rated as excellent (represented by a score of 5) in the majority of the TNC and VNC images; however, the VNC images scored lower than the TNC images. Eliminating the TNC phase resulted in a reduction of approximately 37.99% in the effective dose (ED). Conclusions: The VNC images provided accurate CT attenuation, good image quality, and lower radiation doses than the TNC images in CRC, and the VNCa images showed minimal differences in the CT attenuation of the tumors.

Monoexponential, biexponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis models of diffusion-weighted imaging in kidney assessment: comparison between patients with primary aldosteronism and healthy controls.

PURPOSE: This study used various diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models (including monoexponential, biexponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis models) in renal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare whether there were differences in each diffusion parameter between patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two (female:male, 14:8; age, 48 ± 10 years) patients with PA and 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent MRI examinations of the kidneys. The independent-sample t test or the Mann‒Whitney U test was used to detect differences in the diffusion metrics of the kidneys between the two groups. Univariable and multivariable linear regression were applied to analyze the correlations between diffusion parameters and the clinical indicators. RESULTS: The mean diffusivity (MD, p < 0.001) and radial diffusivity (Dr, p < 0.001) values in the medulla were lower in the PA group than in the HC group. The medullary fractional anisotropy (FA, p < 0.001) was higher than that of HCs. The FA (p < 0.001) and axial diffusivity (Da, p < 0.001) values in the cortex were lower in the PA group. The cortical α (anomalous exponent term, p = 0.016) was higher in the PA patients than in the HCs. Linear regression analysis showed that log(plasma aldosterone concentration) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were correlated with medullary FA. CONCLUSION: The stretched-exponential model (cortical α) and the kurtosis model (FA, MD and Dr in the medulla and FA and Da in the cortex) showed significant differences between PA patients and healthy volunteers and may have potential for noninvasive renal assessment in PA patients.

Prognostic value of ground glass opacity on computed tomography in pathological stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical role of ground glass opacity (GGO) on computed tomography (CT) in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients currently remains unclear. AIM: To explore the prognostic value of GGO on CT in lung adenocarcinoma patients who were pathologically diagnosed with tumor-node-metastasis stage I. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted through the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases up to April 3, 2021. The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were combined to assess the association between the presence of GGO and prognosis, representing overall survival and disease-free survival. Subgroup analysis based on the ratio of GGO was also conducted. STATA 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies involving 4467 patients were included. The pooled results indicated that the GGO predicted favorable overall survival (HR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.34-0.59, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.18-0.70, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis based on the ratio of GGO further demonstrated that the proportion of GGO was a good prognostic indicator in pathological stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients, and patients with a higher ratio of GGO showed better prognosis than patients with a lower GGO ratio did. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis manifested that the presence of GGO on CT predicted favorable prognosis in tumor-node-metastasis stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with a higher GGO ratio were more likely to have a better prognosis than patients with a lower GGO ratio.