RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Early in COVID-19, continuing professional development (CPD) providers quickly made decisions about program content, design, funding and technology. Although experiences during an earlier pandemic cautioned providers to make disaster plans, CPD was not entirely prepared for this event. We sought to better understand how CPD organisations make decisions about CPD strategy and operations during a crisis. METHODS: This is a descriptive qualitative research study of decision making in two organisations: CPD at the University of Toronto (UofT) and the US-based Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education (SACME). In March 2021, using purposive and snowball sampling, we invited faculty and staff who held leadership positions to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interview focused on the individual's role and organisation, their decision-making process and reflections on how their units had changed because of COVID-19. Transcripts were reviewed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis. We used Mazmanian et al.'s Ecological Framework as a further conceptual tool. RESULTS: We conducted eight interviews from UofT and five from SACME. We identified that decision making during the pandemic occurred over four phases of reactions and impact from COVID-19, including shutdown, pivot, transition and the 'new reality'. The decision-making ability of CPD organisations changed throughout the pandemic, ranging from having little or no independent decision-making ability early on to having considerable control over choosing appropriate pathways forward. Decision making was strongly influenced by the creativity, adaptability and flexibility of the CPD community and the need for social connection. CONCLUSIONS: This adds to literature on the changes CPD organisations faced due to COVID-19, emphasising CPD organisations' adaptability in making decisions. Applying the Ecological Framework further demonstrates the importance of time to decision-making processes and the relational aspect of CPD. To face future crises, CPD will need to embrace creative, flexible and socially connected solutions. Future scholarship could explore an organisation's ability to rapidly adapt to better prepare for future crises.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Educación Médica Continua , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Educación Médica Continua/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Toma de Decisiones , Pandemias , Ontario , Entrevistas como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Age correlated changes in mental and physical capacity have contributed to increasing concerns about older physicians' clinical competence. This paper explores the relationship between age and health in a clinical population referred for fitness for duty evaluations. METHODS: Fifty cases from an evaluation center performing fitness for duty evaluations were randomly selected. Cases were reviewed for referral reason, demographic information, diagnosis, and recommendations. RESULTS: Age ranged from 28-70 (median age of 51, mode of 45).Eighty-eight percent of cases had a diagnosed medical condition with potential cognitive sequellae. CONCLUSION: While the literature supports performance concerns in aging practitioners, health independent of age, appears to be an important contributing factor. A screening process considering biopsychosocial reserve and professional load while applicable to older clinicians would optimally be implemented for physicians across their careerspan.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/psicología , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Estado de Salud , Seguridad del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Unprofessional behavior, which can include failure to engage, dishonest and/or disrespectful behavior, and poor self-awareness, can be demonstrated by medical trainees and practicing physicians. In the authors' experience, these types of behaviors are associated with exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Given this overlap, the authors studied the percentage of ACEs among trainees and physicians referred for fitness-for-duty evaluations and patterns between the types of ACEs experienced and the reason for referral. METHOD: A final sample of 123 cases of U.S. trainees and physicians who had been referred to a Midwestern center for assessment and/or remediation of professionalism issues from 2013 to 2018 was created. Included professionalism lapses fell within 3 categories: boundary violation, disruptive behavior, or potential substance use disorder concerns. All participants completed a psychosocial developmental interview, which includes questions about ACE exposure. Overall rate of reported ACEs and types of ACEs reported were explored. RESULTS: Eighty-six (70%) participants reported at least 1 ACE, while 27 (22%) reported 4 or more. Compared with national data, these results show significantly higher occurrence rates of 1 or more ACEs and a lower occurrence rate of 0 ACEs. ACEs that predicted reasons for referral were physical or sexual abuse, feeling unwanted or unloved, witnessing abuse of their mother or stepmother, or caretaker substance use. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, ACE exposure was associated with professionalism issues. Remediating individuals with professionalism issues and exposure to ACEs can be complicated by heightened responses to stressful stimuli, difficulties with collaboration and trust, and decreased self-efficacy. Adoption of a trauma-informed medical education approach may help those that have been impacted by trauma rebuild a sense of control and empowerment. The findings of this study may be useful predictors in identifying those at risk of problematic behavior and recidivism before a sentinel event.
Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Profesionalismo/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The literature on unprofessional behavior is reviewed. It is well accepted that unprofessional behavior, including a lack of civility and respect, can have a negative impact on patient safety and quality of care. METHODS: We used a focused review in the context of 20 years of experience of assessing, treating, and remediating unprofessional behavior. The review highlights that unprofessional behavior can stem from a variety of sources, including health, psychological/psychiatric issues, social functioning or support, or a combination of these. The review covers the challenges in the work environment and the relationship between outcome, as experienced by the physician, and the likelihood the physician will repeat or modify his or her behavior. RESULTS: Based on the evidence provided in the review and our clinical and research experience, we offer a new framework for the assessment, treatment, and remediation of physicians with professionalism transgressions: the Environmentally Valid Learning Approach. The approach is related to and expands on Miller's Pyramid by adding bio-psycho-social functioning and professional identity to the Pyramid. It emphasizes the dynamic and environmental characteristics of professional identity. CONCLUSIONS: Effective intervention is possible. Consideration of contributory factors, addressing/treating those factors, teaching/remediating skill deficiencies, and determining elements that need to be in place to foster implementation and maintenance of the developing skills are necessary components for successful resolution. The behavior is fully remediated when a self-sustaining alternative to the unprofessional behavior is established and the desired behavior becomes a permanent part of the physician's behavioral repertoire.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mala Conducta Profesional/ética , Profesionalismo/ética , Cirujanos/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comprensión , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This Invited Commentary highlights the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences and the potential effect that such experiences can have in the medical education setting on trainees, colleagues, and faculty. The author draws on 20 years of experience working in organizations devoted to helping physicians with disruptive behavior learn new behavioral skills to enable them to function within the complex medical environment. A case example-an amalgam of individuals who have presented for remediation-is used to illustrate the issues that result from adverse childhood experiences. There is a broad and well-understood literature demonstrating a correlation between early life trauma and medical and mental health issues. Adverse early life experiences can also contribute to attachment-related difficulties including problems with boundaries, trust, and suspiciousness; lack of reciprocity; lack of attunement with others' emotional states; as well as regulation issues, including difficulties labeling and expressing feelings and internal states. Difficulties with self-concept, including a lack of continuous and predictable sense of self, low self-esteem, and shame and guilt, are also associated with exposure to adverse childhood experiences. Given the documented high proportion of health care workers, including physicians, who are trauma survivors, trauma-sensitive education must be a priority, not only in medical school but across the educational continuum.
Asunto(s)
Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia/métodos , Profesionalismo/normas , Adaptación Psicológica , Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia/tendencias , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/normas , Profesionalismo/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether population-specific normative data should be employed when screening neurocognitive functioning as part of physician fitness for duty evaluations. If so, to provide such norms based on the evidence currently available. METHODS: A comparison of published data from four sources was analyzed. Data from the two physician samples were then entered into a meta-analysis to obtain full information estimates and generate provisional norms for physicians. RESULTS: Two-way analysis of variance (Study x Index) revealed a significant main effect and an interaction. Results indicate differences in mean levels of performance and standard deviation for physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on general population normative data results in under-identification of potential neuropsychological difficulties. Population specific normative data are needed to effectively evaluate practicing physicians.
Asunto(s)
Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Médicos , Inhabilitación Profesional , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Continuous professional development relies on the link between performance and an educational process aimed at improving knowledge and skill. One of the most broadly used frameworks for assessing skills is Miller's Pyramid. This Pyramid has a series of levels of achievement beginning with knowledge (at the base) and ending with routine application in the clinical setting. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of convergence of two measurement methods, one based on Miller's framework, the second using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education/American Board of Medical Specialties (ACGME/ABMS) Core Competency framework. The data were gathered from the faculty of a large, Midwestern regional health care provider and hospital system. Data from 264 respondents were studied. The 360° data were from raters of physicians holding supervisory roles in the organization. The scale items were taken from an instrument that has been validated for both structure and known group prediction. RESULTS: The Miller scale was purposely built for this application. The questions were designed to describe each level of the model. The Miller scale was reduced to a single dimension. This result was then regressed on the items from the 360° item ratings. Results of a multivariate analysis of variance isolated a significant relationship between the Miller's Pyramid score and the competency items (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrate a relationship between measures based on Miller's framework and behavioral measures based on the ABMS/ACGME core competencies. Equally important is the finding that while they are related they are not identical. These findings have implications for continuous professional development programing design.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Aprendizaje , Enseñanza , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Humanos , Médicos/normas , Análisis de Regresión , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
High accountability men in the medical, legal, corporate, and mental health professions sometimes engage in behavior that violates their fiduciary responsibilities. These highly skilled men may engage in disruptive or explosive behavior, cross sexual boundaries with clients or patients, abuse substances, or have other psychiatric problems that compromise their workplace performance. When this occurs, licensing boards, professional societies, or supervising executives often require the dysregulated man to seek assistance. This article reports on ways the Professional Renewal Center incorporates recommendations from "Gender Aware Therapy" in developing a male-friendly approach to conducting comprehensive multidisciplinary psychological assessments, and to providing intensive, multimodal, weeks-long treatment services.