Gait and Balance Assessments using Smartphone Applications in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Gait dysfunctions and balance impairments are key fall risk factors and associated with reduced quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Smartphone-based assessments show potential to increase remote monitoring of the disease. This review aimed to summarize the validity, reliability, and discriminative abilities of smartphone applications to assess gait, balance, and falls in PD. Two independent reviewers screened articles systematically identified through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and SportDiscuss. Studies that used smartphone-based gait, balance, or fall applications in PD were retrieved. The validity, reliability, and discriminative abilities of the smartphone applications were summarized and qualitatively discussed. Methodological quality appraisal of the studies was performed using the quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Thirty-one articles were included in this review. The studies present mostly with low risk of bias. In total, 52% of the studies reported validity, 22% reported reliability, and 55% reported discriminative abilities of smartphone applications to evaluate gait, balance, and falls in PD. Those studies reported strong validity, good to excellent reliability, and good discriminative properties of smartphone applications. Only 19% of the studies formally evaluated the usability of their smartphone applications. The current evidence supports the use of smartphone to assess gait and balance, and detect freezing of gait in PD. More studies are needed to explore the use of smartphone to predict falls in this population. Further studies are also warranted to evaluate the usability of smartphone applications to improve remote monitoring in this population.Registration: PROSPERO CRD 42020198510.

Smartphone-based gait and balance assessment in survivors of stroke: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Gait and balance impairments are associated with falls and reduced quality of life among survivors of stroke (SS). Effective methods to assess these impairments at-home and in-clinic can help reduce fall risks and improve functional outcomes. Smartphone technology may be able to evaluate these impairments. This review aims to summarize the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of smartphone applications for determining gait and balance disorders in SS. METHOD: Database search through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and SportDiscuss was conducted to retrieve studies that explored the use of smartphone-based applications for assessing gait and balance disorders in SS. Two independent reviewers screened potential articles to determine eligibility for inclusion. Eligible studies were summarized for participant and study characteristics, validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of smartphone assessments. Methodological quality assessment of studies was performed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. RESULTS: Seven cross-sectional studies were included in the review. Quality assessment revealed all studies had low risk of bias. Three of the included studies examined the validity, four examined the reliability, and two examined the specificity and sensitivity of smartphone-based application assessments of gait and balance in SS. Studies revealed that smartphones were valid, reliable, specific, and sensitive. Six of the seven included studies intended their use for SS and one study for clinicians. CONCLUSION: Preliminary evidence supports that smartphone-based gait and balance assessments are valid, reliable, sensitive, and specific in SS in laboratory settings. Future research is needed to test smartphone-based gait and balance assessments in home settings and determine optimal wear sites for assessments.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSmartphone-based gait and balance assessments are feasible, valid and reliable for survivors of strokeThe findings may guide future research to standardize the use of smartphone to assess gait and balance in this population.The remote use of smartphone-based assessments to predict fall risk in survivors of stroke needs to be explored.

Smartphone applications to assess gait and postural control in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Methods to effectively assess gait and balance impairments are necessary to guide interventions among people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Smartphone-based evaluations are becoming popular due to the ubiquitous use of smartphones in society. OBJECTIVE: To determine the current state of smartphone applications that assess gait and balance among PwMS. METHODS: Two independent reviewers screened articles retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and SportDiscuss. Articles meeting eligibility criteria were summarized and qualitatively discussed. Participant characteristics, validity, reliability, sensitivity and specificity measures, and main results of smartphone-based gait and balance evaluations were summarized. Methodological quality appraisal of the studies was performed using the quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: Eight articles were included in this review. The studies present mostly with low risk of bias. All studies successfully tested the use of smartphone applications in assessing gait and balance among PwMS. In total, 75% of the studies evaluated the validity; 38% evaluated the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of smartphone applications to assess gait and balance. Of those, all studies except one found smartphone applications to be appropriately valid, reliable, sensitive, and specific in assessing gait and balance. Most studies (88%) reported PwMS and clinicians as their intended users. CONCLUSION: There is evidence supporting the use of smartphone applications to assess gait and balance among PwMS. Future studies should further examine the psychometric properties of smartphone-based gait and postural control assessments as well as the sensitivity and specificity to improve the interpretation of the results.