RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a reduction in parastomal hernias (PSH) with prophylactic mesh. However, concerns persist regarding variably supportive evidence and cost. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to inform a novel cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Centre Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched (February 2018). We included RCTs assessing mesh reinforcement during stoma formation. We assessed PSH rates, subsequent repair, complications and operative time. Odds ratios (OR) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were generated on intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) bases. These then informed cost analysis using 2017 UK/USA reimbursement rates and stoma care costs. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included. Four hundred fifty-three patients were randomised to mesh (PP 412), with 454 controls (PP 413). Six studies used synthetic meshes, three composite and two biological (91.7% colostomies; 3.64% ileostomies, 4.63% not specified). Reductions were seen in the number of hernias detected clinically and on computed tomography scan. For the former, ITT OR was 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.11-0.51; p = 0.0003; n = 11); NNT 4.17 (2.56-10.0), with fewer subsequent repairs: OR 0.29 (0.13-0.64; p = 0.002; n = 7; NNT16.7 (10.0-33.3). Reductions persisted for synthetic and composite meshes. Operative time was similar, with zero incidence of mesh infection/fistulation, and fewer peristomal complications. Synthetic mesh demonstrated a favourable cost profile, with composite approximately cost neutral, and biological incurring net costs. CONCLUSIONS: Reinforcing elective stomas with mesh (primarily synthetic) reduces subsequent PSH rates, complications, repairs and saves money. We recommend that future RCTs compare mesh subtypes, techniques, and applicability to emergency stomas.
Asunto(s)
Colostomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Abdominal/prevención & control , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Colostomía/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hernia Abdominal/etiología , Humanos , Ileostomía/economía , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Números Necesarios a Tratar , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Mallas Quirúrgicas/economíaRESUMEN
AIM: Subtotal colectomy (STC) is a well-established treatment for complicated and refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). A laparoscopic approach offers potentially improved outcomes. The aim of the study was to report our experience with STC for UC in a single large centre. METHOD: From January 2007 to May 2015, all consecutive patients undergoing STC for UC were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively managed database. Patients with known Crohn's disease or those undergoing one-stage procedures were excluded. Demographics, perioperative outcomes and second-stage procedures were analysed. RESULTS: During the study period, 151 STCs were performed for UC [100 emergency (66%) and 51 elective (34%)]. Acute severe colitis refractory to therapy was the most common indication (62%). Overall, 117 laparoscopic (78%) and 34 open STCs were performed, with a conversion rate of 14.5%. Mortality and morbidity rates were 0.7% and 38%, respectively. Whilst operative time was shorter for open STC (by 75 min; P = 0.001), there were fewer complications (32% vs 62%; P = 0.002) and a shorter hospital stay (by 6.9 days; P = 0.0002) following laparoscopic STC. Fewer complications and shorter hospital stay were also observed after elective STC. Patients undergoing laparoscopic STC were more likely to undergo a restorative second-stage procedure than those having open STC (75% vs 50%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic STC for UC is feasible and safe, even in the emergency situation. A laparoscopic approach may offer advantages in terms of lower morbidity and reduced length of stay. Elective resection may offer similar advantages and is best performed whenever possible.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ventra hernias are increasing in prevalence and many recur despite attempted repair. To date, much of the literature is underpowered and divergent. As a result there is limited high quality evidence to inform surgeons succinctly which perioperative variables influence postoperative recurrence. This systematic review aimed to identify predictors of ventral hernia recurrence. METHODS: PubMed was searched for studies reporting prognostic data of ventral hernia recurrence between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2018. Extracted data described hernia type (primary/incisional), definitions of recurrence, methods used to detect recurrence, duration of follow-up, and co-morbidity. Data were extracted for all potential predictors, estimates and thresholds described. Random-effects meta-analysis was used. Bias was assessed with a modified PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool). RESULTS: Screening of 18 214 abstracts yielded 274 individual studies for inclusion. Hernia recurrence was defined in 66 studies (24.1 per cent), using 41 different unstandardized definitions. Three patient variables (female sex, age 65 years or less, and BMI greater than 25, 30, 35 or 40 kg/m2), five patient co-morbidities (smoking, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ASA grade III-IV, steroid use), two hernia-related variables (incisional/primary, recurrent/primary), six intraoperative variables (biological mesh, bridged repair, open versus laparoscopic surgery, suture versus mesh repair, onlay/retrorectus, intraperitoneal/retrorectus), and six postoperative variables (any complication, surgical-site occurrence, wound infection, seroma, haematoma, wound dehiscence) were identified as significant prognostic factors for hernia recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study summarized the current evidence base for predicting ventral hernia recurrence. Results should inform best practice and future research.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Técnicas de Sutura , Herniorrafia/instrumentación , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ventral hernias (VHs) often recur after surgical repair and subsequent attempts at repair are especially challenging. Rigorous research to reduce recurrence is required but such studies must be well-designed and report representative and comprehensive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assesses methodological quality of non-randomised interventional studies of VH repair by systematic review. METHODS: We searched the indexed literature for non-randomised studies of interventions for VH repair, January 1995 to December 2017 inclusive. Each prospective study was coupled with a corresponding retrospective study using pre-specified criteria to provide matched, comparable groups. We applied a bespoke methodological tool for hernia trials by combining relevant items from existing published tools. Study introduction and rationale, design, participant inclusion criteria, reported outcomes, and statistical methods were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty studies (17,608 patients) were identified: 25 prospective and 25 retrospective. Overall, prospective studies scored marginally higher than retrospective studies for methodological quality, median score 17 (IQR: 14-18) versus 15 (IQR 12-18), respectively. For the sub-categories investigated, prospective studies achieved higher median scores for their, 'introduction', 'study design' and 'participants'. Surprisingly, no study stated that a protocol had been written in advance. Only 18 (36%) studies defined a primary outcome, and only 2 studies (4%) described a power calculation. No study referenced a standardised definition for VH recurrence and detection methods for recurrence varied widely. Methodological quality did not improve with publication year or increasing journal impact factor. CONCLUSION: Currently, non-randomised interventional studies of VH repair are methodologically poor. Clear outcome definitions and a standardised minimum dataset are needed.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/normas , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses the perioperative variables and post-operative outcomes reported by randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of VH repair. This review focuses particularly on definitions of hernia recurrence and techniques used for detection. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to identify and quantify the inconsistencies in perioperative variable and postoperative outcome reporting, so as to justify future development of clear definitions of hernia recurrence and a standardised dataset of such variables. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for elective VH repair RCTs reported January 1995 to March 2016 inclusive. Three independent reviewers performed article screening, and two reviewers independently extracted data. Hernia recurrence, recurrence rate, timing and definitions of recurrence, and techniques used to detect recurrence were extracted. We also assessed reported post-operative complications, standardised operative outcomes, patient reported outcomes, pre-operative CT scan hernia dimensions, intra-operative variables, patient co-morbidity, and hernia morphology. RESULTS: 31 RCTs (3367 patients) were identified. Only 6 (19.3%) defined hernia recurrence and methods to detect recurrence were inconsistent. Sixty-four different clinical outcomes were reported across the RCTs, with wound infection (30 trials, 96.7%), hernia recurrence (30, 96.7%), seroma (29, 93.5%), length of hospital stay (22, 71%) and haematoma (21, 67.7%) reported most frequently. Fourteen (45%), 11 (35%) and 0 trials reported CT measurements of hernia defect area, width and loss of domain, respectively. No trial graded hernias using generally accepted scales. CONCLUSION: VH RCTs report peri- and post-operative variables inconsistently, and with poor definitions. A standardised minimum dataset, including definitions of recurrence, is required.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
The midline of the brachialis muscle is now regarded by many surgeons as an internervous plane, between the musculocutaneous nerve supply to the medial portion and a radial nerve contribution to the lateral portion, a principle applied in anterior approaches to the humerus. The radial nerve to brachialis has been described previously in East Asian specimens (Ip and Chang, 1968, Anat Rec 162:363-371; Mahakkanukrauh and Somsarp, 2002, Clin Anat 15:206-209). We sought to investigate the occurrence and character of this nerve in the UK Caucasian population. Dissection of the musculocutaneous nerve and radial nerve was carried out in Caucasian cadaveric arms (n = 42). The radial nerve was dissected from the spiral groove to the lateral epicondyle. Where a branch to brachialis was encountered, its course and level of origin relative to the length of the arm were noted. The musculocutaneous nerve innervated the brachialis in all specimens. Upon investigation 67% of specimens were found to have a radial nerve branch to brachialis. Sixty-one percent of these branches went straight into the muscle, 13% descended, and 26% recurred. The level of origin of the radial nerve branch to brachialis was at a mean of 23% of the distance between the lateral epicondyle and the acromion (n = 31, range 17-37%, SD = 5.3). In three specimens, two branches were observed. A radial nerve contribution to the innervation of the brachialis was present in 67% of UK Caucasian cadavers, which is less than that noted by others in East Asian specimens. The level of the origin of these branches is predictable based on surface landmarks. This fact may be of use during humeral surgery.