New US capsule endoscopy for superficial and submucosal imaging of the esophagus: the first-in-human study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS is essential in diagnosing and staging of esophageal subepithelial lesions and tumors. However, EUS is invasive, relies on highly trained endoscopists, and typically requires sedation. The newly developed US capsule endoscopy (USCE), which incorporates both white-light and US imaging modalities into a tethered capsule, is a minimally invasive method for obtaining superficial and submucosal information of the esophagus. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of this USCE system. METHODS: Twenty participants were enrolled: 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with esophageal lesions indicated for EUS. Participants first underwent USCE and subsequently EUS within 48 hours. The primary outcome was the technical success rate of USCE. Secondary outcomes were safety, visualization of the esophagus, and comfort assessment. RESULTS: The technical success rate of USCE was 95% because 1 patient failed to swallow the capsule. No adverse events were observed. The esophagus was well visualized, and all lesions were detected under USCE optical mode in 19 participants. For healthy volunteers, the US images of normal esophageal walls were all characterized by differentiated 7-layer architecture under both USCE and EUS. For 9 patients, the features of esophageal lesions were recognized clearly under USCE, and presumptive diagnoses derived from USCE were all consistent with those from EUS. Most participants preferred USCE to EUS. CONCLUSIONS: The novel USCE is feasible and safe to observe the esophageal mucosa and acquire submucosal information, which has the potential to be widely used in the clinic. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05054933.).

Status quo of the public's knowledge of probiotics based on video-sharing platforms.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been deemed multipotent and unprecedentedly applied in the health field recently. However, there are challenges in promoting credible and reliable resources while avoiding misinformation regarding probiotics for the public. METHODS: This study analysed 400 eligible probiotic-related videos selected from YouTube, and the three most popular video-sharing platforms (Bilibili, Weibo and TikTok) in China. Video retrieval was performed on September 5th, 2022. GQS and tailored DISCERN tool assess each video's quality, usage, and reliability. A comparative analysis of videos from different sources was carried out. RESULTS: The identity distribution of probiotic video-producers was predominantly experts (n = 202, 50.50%), followed by amateurs (n = 161, 40.25%) and health-related institutions (n = 37, 9.25%). The videos' content category mainly discussed the function of probiotics (n = 120, 30%), the way to choose suitable products (n = 81, 20.25%), and the methods for taking probiotics (n = 71, 17.75%).The overall quality of videos was moderate (3/5 point) assessed by GQS, while the usage (1/6 point) and reliability (2/5 point) detailing probiotics assessed by tailored DISCERN tool were poor. The attitude of probiotic video-producers was primarily positive (n = 323, 80.75%), followed by neutral (n = 52, 13.00%) and negative (n = 25, 6.25%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed that videos on social media platforms publicise important information including the concepts, usage, and precautions of probiotics to the public. But the overall quality of uploaded videos about probiotics was unsatisfactory. More efforts are needed to improve the higher-quality content of probiotic-related online videos and better propagate probiotic knowledge to the public in the future.