Psychometric Properties of Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test Among Multiple Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in assessing postural controls across various populations. DATA SOURCES: Articles were searched in 9 databases from inception to March 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles to include studies that reported at least 1 psychometric property of the Brief-BESTest. There were no language restrictions. DATA EXTRACTION: The 2 independent reviewers extracted data (including psychometric properties of Brief-BESTest) from the included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised by the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments checklist, and the quality of statistical outcomes was assessed by the Terwee et al method. A best-evidence synthesis for each measurement property of the Brief-BESTest in each population was conducted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four studies encompassing 13 populations were included. There was moderate to strong positive evidence to support the internal consistency (Cronbach α>0.82), criterion validity (ρ≥0.73, r≥0.71), and construct validity (ρ≥0.66, r≥0.50, area under curve>0.72) of the Brief-BESTest in different populations. Moderate to strong positive evidence supported the responsiveness of the Brief-BESTest in detecting changes in postural controls of patients 4 weeks after total knee arthroplasty or patients with subacute stroke after 4-week rehabilitation. However, there was strong negative evidence for the structural validity of this scale in patients with various neurologic conditions. The evidence for the reliability of individual items and measurement errors remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: The Brief-BESTest is a valid (criterion- and construct-related) tool to assess postural control in multiple populations. However, further studies on the reliability of individual items and minimal clinically important difference of the Brief-BESTest are warranted before recommending it as an alternative to the BESTest and Mini-BESTest in clinical research/practice.

Exploring the relationship between pain intensity and knee moments in participants with medial knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: High biomechanical loading is believed to be a risk factor to pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), but controversial findings have been reported on the relationship between external knee adduction moment (KAM) and pain. A more comprehensive analysis considering other factor such as external knee flexion moment (KFM) could help better reveal this relationship. This study explored the relationship between external knee adduction moment and pain intensity in participants with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using an integrated path analysis model. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study based on laboratory setting. Forty-seven participants with clinical and radiographic medial knee OA were analyzed for their external knee adduction moment (KAM) and knee flexion moment (KFM) during walking using a motion analysis system. Pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the pain subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Varus/valgus alignment was captured and quantified using a bi-planar X-ray system. Using a path analysis model, the relationships between pain intensity, KAM, KFM, OA radiographic severity, knee varus angle and walking speed were examined. RESULTS: The proposed path model met the goodness-of-fit criteria. Based on this model, KAM had a negative effect on VAS pain indirectly through the mediation of KFM. The model indicated KAM and KFM were negatively related to one another; and KFM was positively related to VAS. The KAM index, defined as (KAM/ (KAM + KFM)), was negatively related to VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Path analysis enabled the construction of a more integrated pathokinematic framework for people with knee OA. The KAM index which reflected the load sharing on the frontal and sagittal planes also revealed its relationship with pain. Re-distribution of mechanical loading from frontal to sagittal plane might be a strategy for pain avoidance associated with mechanical irritation.

Combination Effect of High-Dose Preoperative and Periarticular Steroid Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain remains a major barrier to a patient's recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Periarticular corticosteroids in local infiltration analgesics (LIA) and high-dose intravenous corticosteroids have individually shown to improve pain control after TKA. However, potential interactions between them have not been investigated. This study aims to evaluate any combination effect of both routes of corticosteroids in TKA. METHODS: This is a double-blinded, paired, randomized controlled trial involving 1-stage bilateral TKAs. All received 16 mg of dexamethasone intravenously. One knee was randomized to receive LIA with 40 mg of triamcinolone, while the other knee receives LIA without corticosteroids. For each patient, one knee was affected by intravenous steroids only, while the other was under the combined effect of intravenous and periarticular steroids (IVPAS). Knee pain, Southampton wound scores, and functional knee scores (Knee Society Knee Score and Oxford Knee Scores) were compared between knees of the same patient. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (92 TKAs) were included. IVPAS knees showed significantly lower visual analog scale scores from day 1 to 6 weeks (P < .05) and a larger range of movement from day 2 to 4 (P < .05). IVPAS knees achieved active straight leg raise earlier than intravenous steroids (1.6 vs 2.3 days, P < .05). No differences in Southampton wound scores and functional knee scores for up to 1 year. CONCLUSION: Combining intravenous and periarticular corticosteroids improved pain control and recovery after TKA with no increase in wound complications up to 1 year.

Correcting severe flexion contracture with fusiform capsulectomy of posterior capsule during total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fusiform capsulectomy of posterior capsule in correcting severe flexion contracture during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in the patients who had preoperative severe flexion contracture (> 30 degrees) prior to TKA and received fusiform capsulectomy of posterior capsule during TKA between December 2013 and November 2018. Range of motion (ROM), knee functional score, forgotten joint score (FJS), post-operative complications, and radiographic results were collected and evaluated. RESULT: Twenty patients (32 knees) were enrolled in this study. The mean duration of follow-up was 27.19 ± 15.92 months. The flexion contracture improved from pre-operative 37.69 ± 11.79° to post-operative 5.78 ± 4.44° (p < 0.001), and ROM increased from pre-operative 63.50 ± 21.74° to post-operative 97.88 ± 13.20° (p < 0.001). KSS clinical score increased from pre-operative 32.94 ± 11.03 to post-operative 82.34 ± 10.73 (p < 0.001), and KSS function score increased from pre-operative 28.97 ± 18.43 to post-operative 68.75 ± 15.96 (p < 0.001). The post-operative FJS was 76.08 ± 2.14. There was no implant loosening, infection, obvious haematoma formation, resultant instability, neurovascular complications, or revision for any reasons in the cohort until the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of fusiform capsulectomy of posterior capsule to correct the severe flexion contracture during primary TKA is safe and effective and could provide good short-term results.

Preoperative dexamethasone for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids can reduce pain but the optimal dose and safety profiles are still uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate two different doses of dexamethasone for pain management and their side effects after total knee arthroplasty. DESIGN: A prospective randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: One hundred and forty-six patients were randomly allocated to one of three study groups. INTERVENTIONS: Before operation, patients in group D8, D16 and P received dexamethasone 8 mg, dexamethasone 16 mg and placebo (0.9% saline), respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was postoperative pain score. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, physical parameters of the knees and side effects of dexamethasone. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, group D16 patients had significantly less pain during maximal active flexion on postoperative day 3 [-1.3 (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.31), P = 0.005]. There was also a significant dose-dependent trend between pain scores and dexamethasone dose (P = 0.002). Compared with placebo, patients in group D16 consumed significantly less opioid [-6.4 mg (95% CI, -11.6 to -1.2), P = 0.025] and had stronger quadriceps power on the first three postoperative days (all P < 0.05). They also had significantly longer walking distance on postoperative day 1 [7.8 m ([95% CI, 0.85 to 14.7), P = 0.023] with less assistance during walking on the first two postoperative days (all P < 0.029) and significantly better quality-of-recovery scores on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.018). There were significant dose-dependent trends between all the above parameters and dexamethasone dose (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the incidence of chronic pain or knee function 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone 16 mg given before total knee arthroplasty led to a reduction in postoperative pain, less opioid consumption, stronger quadriceps muscle power, better mobilisation and better overall quality-of-recovery after operation. No long-term improvement in reduction in pain and function of the knee was found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02767882.

Ten- to Sixteen-Year Follow-Up of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Factors Affect Wear?

BACKGROUND: Increase in acetabular cup abduction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional polyethylene is associated with greater linear wear. Whether this relationship holds true for highly crosslinked liners, particularly with long-term follow-up, is still controversial. The effect of liner thickness on wear of highly cross-linked liners also remains to be clarified.This study sought to determine (1) the long-term clinical and radiological performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA and (2) the effect of acetabular component positioning, polyethylene thickness, and patient demographics on wear. METHODS: Ninety-three THAs using a 28-mm hip ball, single brand of highly cross-linked polyethylene liner, and cementless cup were performed in 87 patients. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score and need for revision surgery. Linear and volumetric wear, presence of osteolysis, and cup abduction angle were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 51.4 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.7 years (10-16 years). Patients aged >50 years had higher rates of linear wear than those aged <50 years (P = .015). Positive correlation was found between cup abduction angle (P = .014) and cup version (P = .035) with a linear wear rate. Thinner liners (≤7 mm) had similar rates of linear and volumetric wear as thicker liners (≥8 mm) (P = .447). CONCLUSION: This is the only study to demonstrate a positive significant relationship between cup abduction angle and version with linear wear rate in THA with at least 10 years of follow-up. Liner thickness was not found to affect wear rates.

Dynamic cyclic compression modulates the chondrogenic phenotype in human chondrocytes from late stage osteoarthritis.

Human osteoarthritic chondrocytes (hOACs) are characterized by their "dedifferentiated" and catabolic phenotype and lack the ability for restoring their inherent functions by themselves. Here we investigated whether extrinsically supplemented mechanical signal via compression loading would affect the phenotype of hOACs. Specifically, we applied cyclic compression loading on cultured hOACs-collagen constructs and measured the expression of the major chondrogenic factors, cell-matrix interaction molecules and matrix degradation enzymes. Dynamic compression loading stimulates the expression and nuclear localization of sox9 in hOACs and reduces the catabolic events via downregulated expression of collagenases. These results contribute to better understanding towards mechanoregulation of hOACs.

Does Barbed Suture Lower Cost and Improve Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Wound closure is key to prevent infection, facilitate immediate rehabilitation, and improve efficiency of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Continuous knotless suturing with barbed suture can potentially save time and distribute tension more evenly. However, its role in TKA in terms of cost-effectiveness and wound complications is not clear. This study aims at comparing barbed and traditional sutures' wound closure time and cost in primary TKA. METHODS: One hundred nine knees were randomized into either barbed or traditional group. Synthetic absorbable sutures (Vicryl, Ethicon Inc) and bidirectional barbed sutures (Stratafix, Ethicon Inc) were used. Arthrotomy and subcutaneous wound closure time, wound complications, and rehabilitation parameters in terms of range of motion and Knee Society Score were compared. Patients were followed up to 3 months. RESULTS: Traditional sutures had significantly more positive leak tests (10 vs 2, P value <.05) and wound complications (11 vs 2, P value <.05). No differences in range of motion and Knee Society Score were noted. Arthrotomy and subcutaneous closure time were significantly shorter with barbed sutures (arthrotomy 325 seconds vs 491 seconds; subcutaneous 306 seconds vs 381 seconds, P value <.05). Concerning cost of suture material and operation time, barbed suture on average saved USD 48.7 per TKA in our local institute. CONCLUSION: Bidirectional barbed suture improves the cost-effectiveness of TKA through reducing wound closure time and wound complications.

Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON). METHODS: Ninety knees in 81 patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into CON, computer navigation (NAV) and PSI groups to receive TKA. The surgical routines were standardized. The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on standard radiographs. Tourniquet time, operation time and patients' functional scores were documented. RESULTS: Conventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component (p = 0.001) compared to NAV. Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment, and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference. The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group (p < 0.001). Four early complications occurred in the PSI group (p = 0.015). At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients' function among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: No significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA. Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

The accuracy of sizing of the femoral component in total knee replacement.

PURPOSE: Femoral sizing in total knee replacement is important. Either undersizing or oversizing may result in deleterious effects to the clinical outcome after the surgery. There has been no study on the precision and accuracy of femoral sizing and the effect of measurement at different landmarks over the distal femur. This study assesses the intra-observer and inter-observer error of femoral sizing and identifies the effect of the placement site of the anterior referencing tool on femoral sizing. METHODS: Five investigators with different clinical experience measured the femoral size of 10 cadaveric specimens twice using three anterior referencing tool. The measurement of the femoral size was repeated at nine designated points on the anterior cortex of the cadaveric femora. RESULTS: Excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreements were obtained using the three anterior referencing tools. When the size on which the majority agreed was regarded as the actual size of the specimen, measurement at the nine designated points on the anterior cortex showed a deviation from the actual size from 6.2 to 46.2 %. Placing the femoral sizer stylus at the middle and 2 cm above the proximal margin of the anterior femoral condyle yielded the highest precision and accuracy. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the experience of the surgeons, measurement of the femoral size using the three anterior referencing tools is very accurate. Placing the stylus of the femoral sizer at the middle and 2 cm above the proximal margin of the anterior femoral condyle best reflects the actual size of the femur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Experimental study.

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical treatment for medial compartment arthritis of the knee, yet surgical outcomes are directly related to surgical execution. Robotic arm-assisted surgery aims to address these difficulties by allowing for detailed preoperative planning, real-time intraoperative assessment and haptic-controlled bone removal. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between conventional manual mobile bearing and robot arm-assisted fixed bearing medial UKA in our local population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study of 148 UKAs performed at an academic institution with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. 74 robotic arm-assisted UKAs were matched to 74 conventional UKAs via propensity score matching. Radiological outcomes included postoperative mechanical axis and individual component alignment. Clinical parameters included a range of motion, Knee Society knee score and functional assessment taken before, 6 and 12 months after the operation. RESULTS: Robot arm-assisted UKA produced a more neutral component coronal alignment in both femoral component (robotic -0.2 ± 2.8, manual 2.6 ± 2.3; P = 0.043) and tibial component (robotic -0.3 ± 4.0, manual 1.7 ± 5.3; P < 0.001). While the postoperative mechanical axis was comparable, robot arm-assisted UKA demonstrated a smaller posterior tibial slope (robotic 5.7 ± 2.7, manual 8.2 ± 3.3; P = 0.02). Clinical outcomes did not show any statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional UKA, robotic arm-assisted UKA demonstrated improved component alignment and comparable clinical outcomes. Improved radiological accuracy with robotic-arm assistance demonstrated promising early results.

The association between tibial torsion, knee flexion excursion and foot progression during gait in people with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb malalignment is associated with gait kinematics, but there is limited information on the relationship between gait kinematics and tibial torsion in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to investigate possible associations between tibial torsion and early stance kinematics during gait in people with mild and moderate medial knee OA. METHODS: Forty-seven participants (age: 62.1 ± 6.0 years; female/male: 37/10) diagnosed with medial knee OA were recruited from a regional hospital. Thirty of them had mild and seventeen had moderate knee OA. Lower limb alignment including tibial torsion and valgus/varus alignment were assessed by an EOS biplaner X-ray system with participants in weight-bearing position. Lower limb kinematics during gait was captured using the Vicon motion analysis system. The associations were estimated by partial Pearson correlation coefficient test. RESULTS: Our results indicated that external tibial torsion was related to early stance knee flexion excursion in participants with moderate knee OA (r = -0.58, p = 0.048), but not in participants with mild knee OA (r = 0.34, p = 0.102). External tibial torsion was associated with external foot progression angle (r = 0.48, p = 0.001), and knee varus/valgus alignment was associated with knee flexion excursion (r = -0.39, p = 0.010) in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: Both horizontal and frontal lower limb alignments were associated with knee flexion excursion at early stance of gait cycle in participants with medial knee OA. The distal rotational profile of lower limb would likely affect knee motion in sagittal plane. It implies that people with moderate knee OA could possibly benefit from correction of rotational alignment of lower limb.

Multimodal periarticular injection vs continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, crossover, randomized clinical trial.

This study compares the efficacy of pain control using continuous femoral nerve block (FNB) and multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection. This is a randomized, crossover, clinical trial. Sixteen patients having bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee scheduled for staged total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either FNB (0.2% ropivacaine), via indwelling catheter for 72 hours, or multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection in the first stage. In the second stage, they received the opposite treatment. The primary outcome measure was morphine consumption by patient-controlled analgesia in the first 72 hours postoperatively. Cumulative morphine consumption as well as rest pain and motion pain in the first 72 hours was comparable between the 2 groups. The functional outcomes did not differ significantly. We conclude that multimodal periarticular soft tissue injection provides comparable analgesia to continuous FNB after total knee arthroplasty.

Adipokine Signaling Pathways in Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating joint disease that affects millions of individuals. The pathogenesis of OA has not been fully elucidated. Obesity is a well-recognized risk factor for OA. Multiple studies have demonstrated adipokines play a key role in obesity-induced OA. Increasing evidence show that various adipokines may significantly affect the development or clinical course of OA by regulating the pro/anti-inflammatory and anabolic/catabolic balance, matrix remodeling, chondrocyte apoptosis and autophagy, and subchondral bone sclerosis. Several signaling pathways are involved but still have not been systematically investigated. In this article, we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms of adipokines in OA, and highlight the possible signaling pathways. The review suggested adipokines play important roles in obesity-induced OA, and exert downstream function via the activation of various signaling pathways. In addition, some pharmaceuticals targeting these pathways have been applied into ongoing clinical trials and showed encouraging results. However, these signaling pathways are complex and converge into a common network with each other. In the future work, more research is warranted to further investigate how this network works. Moreover, more high quality randomised controlled trials are needed in order to investigate the therapeutic effects of pharmaceuticals against these pathways for the treatment of OA. This review may help researchers to better understand the pathogenesis of OA, so as to provide new insight for future clinical practices and translational research.

A Randomized Controlled Study on the Use of Tourniquet in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use and the optimal timing of tourniquet during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Most previous studies failed to show clinically significant differences in different strategies. The aim of this study was to determine how three strategies of tourniquet application affect the outcome in TKA patients. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled study. Patients who undergo TKA were randomized into one of the three groups (1:1:1 ratio): tourniquet inflated from skin incision to cement hardening, tourniquet from cement application to hardening, and tourniquet from skin incision to skin closure. The perioperative blood loss, limb swelling, and complications were recorded. The level of hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, creatine kinase (CK), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined. Patients' thigh and TKA wound pain, Knee Society knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society functional assessment (KSFA) scores, and rehabilitation parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were comparable. We only found significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (skin to cement: 58.7 ± 36.1 mL, cement-only: 147.8 ± 107.9 mL, skin to skin: 16.3 ± 13.1 mL, p < 0.0001). There were no statistical differences in postoperative drainage, thigh/knee circumference, change of hemoglobin/hematocrit, CRP, IL-6, CK, and LDH on day 1 to day 4 after surgery. The thigh/TKA wound Visual Analogue Scale scores, KSKS score, KSFA score, and rehabilitation parameters were not significantly different at up to 6-month follow-up. No thromboembolic events were noted. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed that there was no best tourniquet strategy in TKA. Different tourniquet methods can be utilized based on surgeon preference without affecting outcomes.

Pain, balance, and mobility in people 1 year after total knee arthroplasty: a non-randomized cross-sectional pilot study contrasting posterior-stabilized and medial-pivot designs.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common treatment for severe knee osteoarthritis. Medial-pivot TKA systems (MP-TKA) are theoretically better than posterior-stabilized TKA systems (PS-TKA) in improving static and dynamic balance of patients although it is difficult to objectively quantify these balance parameters in a clinical setting. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using wearable devices in a clinical setting to examine whether people with MP-TKA have better postoperative outcomes than PS-TKA, and their balance control is more akin to age-matched asymptomatic controls. METHODS: The current cross-sectional pilot study recruited 57 participants with 2 different prosthesis designs (20 PS-TKA, 18 MP-TKA) and 19 asymptomatic controls. At 1-year post-TKA, pain, knee stiffness, and physical function were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Static balance, mobility, and gait stability of the participants were evaluated based on data collected from wearable motion sensors during the near tandem stance, timed-up-and-go, and 6-min walk tests. RESULTS: Compared to asymptomatic controls, both TKA groups reported significantly more pain and stiffness and demonstrated reduced functional mobility, increased stride-time-variability, and impaired balance. After Bonferroni adjustment, no significant differences in pain, balance, and mobility performance were observed between PS-TKA and MP-TKA participants 1 year after surgery. However, there was a trend for increased anteroposterior sway of the lumbar and head regions in the MP-TKA participants when undertaking the near tandem stance test. The wearable motion sensors were easy to use without any adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to use wearable motion sensors in a clinical setting to compare balance and mobility performance of patients with different TKA prothesis designs. Since this was a pilot study and no definite conclusions could be drawn, future clinical trials should determine the impacts of different TKA prosthesis designs on post-operative outcomes over a longer follow-up period.

Effect of Steroid in Local Infiltration Analgesia in One-Stage Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Paired-Randomized Controlled Study.

Although local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is effective in relieving pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its effect is short lasting and the optimal combination of drugs is unknown. Steroids being a potent and long-acting anti-inflammatory drug might extend LIA's effect. This study aims to evaluate the role of steroids in LIA. This is a paired-randomized controlled study involving one-stage bilateral TKA patients. LIA containing ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline with or without triamcinolone was given. One knee was randomized to receive LIA with steroids, while the other received LIA without steroids. The primary outcome was knee pain in terms of the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were rehabilitation progress, functional scores, and complications. Outcomes were compared between the knees of the same patient and documented up to 1 year. A total of 45 patients (90 TKAs) were included. LIA with steroid knees showed lower VAS score at rest and during activity from postoperation day 1 to 5 and at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). Passive and active range of movement was also greater in LIA with steroid group from day 1 to 7 and day 2 to 5, respectively (p < 0.05). Steroid-treated knees also achieved active straight leg raise earlier (1.2 vs. 2.0 days, p < 0.05). No differences in Knee Society Score and complication rates between both groups. Steroids in LIA offer additional and extended benefit in pain control and rehabilitation after TKA, while no adverse effects were found up to 1-year follow-up.

Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and prediction of arthroplasty outcomes: a review.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence is an emerging technology with rapid growth and increasing applications in orthopaedics. This study aimed to summarize the existing evidence and recent developments of artificial intelligence in diagnosing knee osteoarthritis and predicting outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2010 and May 31, 2021. The terms included: 'artificial intelligence', 'machine learning', 'knee', 'osteoarthritis', and 'arthroplasty'. We selected studies focusing on the use of AI in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis, prediction of the need for total knee arthroplasty, and prediction of outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Non-English language articles and articles with no English translation were excluded. A reviewer screened the articles for the relevance to the research questions and strength of evidence. RESULTS: Machine learning models demonstrated promising results for automatic grading of knee radiographs and predicting the need for total knee arthroplasty. The artificial intelligence algorithms could predict postoperative outcomes regarding patient-reported outcome measures, patient satisfaction and short-term complications. Important weaknesses of current artificial intelligence algorithms included the lack of external validation, the limitations of inherent biases in clinical data, the requirement of large datasets in training, and significant research gaps in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence offers a promising solution to improve detection and management of knee osteoarthritis. Further research to overcome the weaknesses of machine learning models may enhance reliability and allow for future use in routine healthcare settings.

A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.

The size of the femoral head and acetabular anteversion are crucial for stability in total hip replacements. This study examined the effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion on the posterior instability after total hip replacement in an in vivo setting. The acetabular shell was inserted at 0-20° of anteversion at five degree intervals. By using different head sizes (28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm), the degrees of dislocation were recorded by computer navigation. The 36-mm group consistently showed better stability compared with the 32- and 28-mm groups, regardless of the degree of cup anteversion. Within each group of head size, the hip was significantly more stable when the cup anteversion increased from 0° to 10°. The difference became insignificant when it increased from 15° to 20°.