Long-Term Outcomes of Living-Related Kidney Donation for Alport Syndrome Spectrum: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Data to guide the evaluation of living-related donor candidates for kidney transplant recipients with Alport syndrome (AS) spectrum are limited. We aimed to examine a cohort of living-related donors to recipients with AS and compare their outcomes with a control group to improve understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Living donors (LDs) of AS recipients and propensity score-matched control LDs without any family history of AS (control group) were followed for major cardiac events, death, post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria. RESULTS: There were 31 LDs (48.4% male), in whom relationship to AS recipient included mother (45.2%), father (32.3%), sibling (16.1%), grandparent (3.2%), and uncle (3.2%). Long-term outcomes over 10.0 (IQR, 3.0-15.0) years were evaluated in 25 and 25 LDs from study and control groups, respectively. During follow-up, 5 LDs (20.0%) in study group developed major cardiac event (acute coronary ischemia [n = 4] and severe congestive heart failure [n = 1]) after 5.5 (IQR, 4.5-10.3) years, whereas only 2 (8.0%) LDs in control group developed major cardiac events (p = 0.221). New-onset hypertension was higher in study group (56.0%) compared to the control group (16.0%) (p = 0.003). Three donors in study and 2 donors in control group who developed new-onset hypertension died during follow-up (p = 0.297). Major cardiac event rate was significantly higher in donors who developed hypertension after donation (0 vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.558 and p = 0.120, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Although the risk of kidney disease can be minimized by careful donor evaluation, our findings suggest that hypertension risk after the donation is higher than expected in related donors of recipients with AS.

COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Experience from the First Two Waves of Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of complications from COVID-19. However, data on the risk of allograft damage or death in kidney transplant recipients recovering from COVID-19 is limited. In addition, the first and second waves of the pandemic occurred at different times all over the world. In Turkey, the Health Minister confirmed the first case in March 2020; after that, the first wave occurred between March and August 2020; afterward, the second wave began in September 2020. This study aims to demonstrate the clinical presentations of kidney transplant recipients in the first two waves of the pandemic in Turkey and explore the impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes after the initial episode. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 from seven centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Initially, four hundred and eighty-eight kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021 were enrolled. The endpoints were the occurrence of all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury, cytokine storm, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, longer-term outcomes such as mortality, need for dialysis, and allograft function of the surviving patients was analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-five patients were followed up for a median of 132 days after COVID-19. Forty-seven patients (9.9%) died after a median length of hospitalization of 15 days. Although the mortality rate (10.1% vs. 9.8%) and intensive care unit admission (14.5% vs. 14.5%) were similar in the first two waves, hospitalization (68.8% vs. 29.7%; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (44.2% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.8% vs. 16%; p = 0.456), and cytokine storm rate (15.9% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.072) were higher in first wave compared to the second wave. These 47 patients died within the first month of COVID-19. Six (1.4%) of the surviving patients lost allografts during treatment. There was no difference in the median serum creatinine clearance of the surviving patients at baseline (52 mL/min [IQR, 47-66]), first- (56 mL/min [IQR, 51-68]), third- (51 mL/min [IQR,48-67]) and sixth-months (52 mL/min [IQR, 48-81]). Development of cytokine storm and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality remains a problem in COVID-19. All the deaths occur in the first month of COVID-19. Also, acute kidney injury is common in hospitalized patients, and some of the patients suffer from graft loss after the initial episode.

Significance of caveolin-1 immunohistochemical staining differences in biopsy samples from kidney recipients with BK virus viremia.

BK virus infections which usually remains asymptomatic in healthy adults may have different clinical manifestations in immunocompromised patient population. BK virus reactivation can cause BK virus nephropathy in 8% of kidney transplant patients and graft loss may be seen if not treated. Clathrin or Caveolar system is known to be required for the transport of many viruses from Polyomaviruses family including BK viruses. In this study, kidney transplant patients with BK virus viremia were divided into two groups according to the BK virus nephropathy found in kidney biopsy (Group I: Viremia+, Nephropathy+ / Group II: Viremia+, Nephropathy-). Kidney biopsies were examined with immunohistochemical staining to determine the distribution and density of the Caveolin-1 and Clathrin molecules. Immunohistochemical staining of the 31 pathologic specimens with anti-caveolin-1 immunoglobulin revealed statistically significant difference between group-I and group-II. The number of the specimens stained with anti-caveolin-1 was less in group I. On the other hand, we did not find any difference between the groups regarding the anti-clathrin immunochemical analysis. According to these findings, caveolin-1 expression differences in kidney transplant patients may be important in disease progression.

Improving the urine spot protein/creatinine ratio by the estimated creatinine excretion to predict proteinuria in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Since the daily creatinine excretion rate (CER) is directly affected by muscle mass, which varies with age, gender, and body weight, using the spot protein/creatinine ratio (Spot P/Cr) follow-up of proteinuria may not always be accurate. Estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) can be calculated from spot urine samples with formulas derived from anthropometric factors. Multiplying Spot P/Cr by eCER gives the estimated protein excretion rate (ePER). We aimed to determine the most applicable equation for predicting daily CER and examine whether ePER values acquired from different equations can anticipate measured 24 h urine protein (m24 h UP) better than Spot P/Cr in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This study enrolled 23 children with kidney transplantation. To estimate m24 h UP, we calculated eCER and ePER values with three formulas adapted to children (Cockcroft-Gault, Ghazali-Barratt, and Hellerstein). To evaluate the accuracy of the methods, Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analysis were used. RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was found between m24 h UP and Spot P/Cr (p < .001, r = 0.850), and the correlation was enhanced by multiplying the Spot P/Cr by the eCER equations. The average bias of the ePER formulas adjusted by the Cockcroft-Gault, Ghazali-Barratt, and Hellerstein equations were -0.067, 0.031, and 0.064 g/day, respectively, whereas the average bias of Spot P/Cr was -0.270 g/day obtained by the Bland-Altman graphics. CONCLUSION: Using equations to estimate eCER may improve the accuracy and reduce the spot urine samples' bias in pediatric kidney transplantation recipients. Further studies in larger populations are needed for ePER reporting to be ready for clinical practice.

Predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to present the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of our multicenter cohort of adult KTx recipients with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study using data of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 collected from 34 centers in Turkey. Demographic characteristics, clinical findings, laboratory parameters (hemogram, CRP, AST, ALT, LDH, and ferritin) at admission and follow-up, and treatment strategies were reviewed. Predictors of poor clinical outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the need for ICU admission. The secondary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality and/or ICU admission. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients (male/female: 63/46, mean age: 48.4 ± 12.4 years) were included in the study. Acute kidney injury (AKI) developed in 46 (42.2%) patients, and 4 (3.7%) of the patients required renal replacement therapy (RRT). A total of 22 (20.2%) patients were admitted in the ICU, and 19 (17.4%) patients required invasive mechanical ventilation. 14 (12.8%) of the patients died. Patients who were admitted in the ICU were significantly older (age over 60 years) (38.1% vs 14.9%, p = 0.016). 23 (21.1%) patients reached to composite outcome and these patients were significantly older (age over 60 years) (39.1% vs. 13.9%; p = 0.004), and had lower serum albumin (3.4 g/dl [2.9-3.8] vs. 3.8 g/dl [3.5-4.1], p = 0.002), higher serum ferritin (679 µg/L [184-2260] vs. 331 µg/L [128-839], p = 0.048), and lower lymphocyte counts (700/µl [460-950] vs. 860 /µl [545-1385], p = 0.018). Multivariable analysis identified presence of ischemic heart disease and initial serum creatinine levels as independent risk factors for mortality, whereas age over 60 years and initial serum creatinine levels were independently associated with ICU admission. On analysis for predicting secondary outcome, age above 60 and initial lymphocyte count were found to be independent variables in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Over the age of 60, ischemic heart disease, lymphopenia, poor graft function were independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 in this patient group. Whereas presence of ischemic heart disease and poor graft function were independently associated with mortality.

Mortality analysis of COVID-19 infection in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis and renal transplant patients compared with patients without kidney disease: a nationwide analysis from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and immunosuppression, such as in renal transplantation (RT), stand as one of the established potential risk factors for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case morbidity and mortality rates for any type of infection have always been much higher in CKD, haemodialysis (HD) and RT patients than in the general population. A large study comparing COVID-19 outcome in moderate to advanced CKD (Stages 3-5), HD and RT patients with a control group of patients is still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study, involving hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 from 47 centres in Turkey. Patients with CKD Stages 3-5, chronic HD and RT were compared with patients who had COVID-19 but no kidney disease. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests, COVID-19 treatments and outcome [in-hospital mortality and combined in-hospital outcome mortality or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU)] were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1210 patients were included [median age, 61 (quartile 1-quartile 3 48-71) years, female 551 (45.5%)] composed of four groups: control (n = 450), HD (n = 390), RT (n = 81) and CKD (n = 289). The ICU admission rate was 266/1210 (22.0%). A total of 172/1210 (14.2%) patients died. The ICU admission and in-hospital mortality rates in the CKD group [114/289 (39.4%); 95% confidence interval (CI) 33.9-45.2; and 82/289 (28.4%); 95% CI 23.9-34.5)] were significantly higher than the other groups: HD = 99/390 (25.4%; 95% CI 21.3-29.9; P < 0.001) and 63/390 (16.2%; 95% CI 13.0-20.4; P < 0.001); RT = 17/81 (21.0%; 95% CI 13.2-30.8; P = 0.002) and 9/81 (11.1%; 95% CI 5.7-19.5; P = 0.001); and control = 36/450 (8.0%; 95% CI 5.8-10.8; P < 0.001) and 18/450 (4%; 95% CI 2.5-6.2; P < 0.001). Adjusted mortality and adjusted combined outcomes in CKD group and HD groups were significantly higher than the control group [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) CKD: 2.88 (1.52-5.44); P = 0.001; 2.44 (1.35-4.40); P = 0.003; HD: 2.32 (1.21-4.46); P = 0.011; 2.25 (1.23-4.12); P = 0.008), respectively], but these were not significantly different in the RT from in the control group [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (0.76-4.72); P = 0.169; 1.87 (0.81-4.28); P = 0.138, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CKDs, including Stages 3-5 CKD, HD and RT, have significantly higher mortality than patients without kidney disease. Stages 3-5 CKD patients have an in-hospital mortality rate as much as HD patients, which may be in part because of similar age and comorbidity burden. We were unable to assess if RT patients were or were not at increased risk for in-hospital mortality because of the relatively small sample size of the RT patients in this study.

Case report: A kidney transplant patient with mild COVID-19.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a pandemic with a mortality rate of 1%-6% in the general population. However, the mortality rate seems to be significantly higher in elderly patients, especially those hospitalized with comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery diseases. Because viral diseases may have atypical presentations in immunosuppressed patients, the course of the disease in the transplant patient population is unknown. Hence, the management of these patients with COVID-19 is an area of interest, and a unique approach is warranted. Here, we report the clinical features and our treatment approach for a kidney transplant patient with a diagnosis of COVID-19. We believe that screening protocols for SARS-Cov-2 should be re-evaluated in patients with solid-organ transplants.

COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter experience in Istanbul.

INTRODUCTION: Management of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients should include treatment of the infection, regulation of immunosuppression, and supportive therapy. However, there is no consensus on this issue yet. This study aimed to our experiences with kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 from five major transplant centers in Istanbul, Turkey, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified as having moderate or severe pneumonia for the analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury, the average length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Forty patients were reviewed retrospectively over a follow-up period of 32 days after being diagnosed with COVID-19. Cough, fever, and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms in all patients. The frequency of previous induction and rejection therapy was significantly higher in the group with severe pneumonia compared to the moderate pneumonia group. None of the patients using cyclosporine A developed severe pneumonia. Five patients died during follow-up in the intensive care unit. None of the patients developed graft loss during follow-up. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has been seen to more commonly cause moderate or severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients. Immunosuppression should be carefully reduced in these patients. Induction therapy with lymphocyte-depleting agents should be carefully avoided in kidney transplant recipients during the pandemic period.

Effects of spironolactone on residual renal function and peritoneal function in peritoneal dialysis patients.

There is increasing evidence that long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with structural changes in the peritoneal membrane. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has been demonstrated to lessen peritoneal injury and to slow the decline in residual renal function. Whether spironolactone affects residual renal function in addition to the peritoneal membrane is unknown. We evaluated 23 patients (13 women) with a glomerular filtration rate of 2 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more who were receiving PD. Patients with an active infection or peritonitis episode were excluded. Baseline measurements were obtained for serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); for daily ultrafiltration (in milliliters); for end-to-initial dialysate concentration of glucose (4/D0 glucose), Kt/V, and peritoneal transport status; and for dialysate cancer antigen 125 (CA125). Spironolactone therapy (25 mg) was given daily for 6 months, after which all measurements were repeated. Mean age of the patients was 46 +/- 13 years. Duration of PD was 15 +/- 21 months (range: 2-88 months). After spironolactone therapy, mean dialysate CA125 was significantly increased compared with baseline (20.52 +/- 12.06 U/mL vs. 24.44 +/- 13.97 U/mL, p = 0.028). Serum hs-CRP, VEGF, TGF-beta, CTGF, daily ultrafiltration, D/Do glucose, Kt/V and peritoneal transport status were similar at both times. At the end of the study period, residual glomerular filtration rate in the patients was lower. In PD patients, treatment with spironolactone seems to slow the decline of peritoneal function, suppress the elevation of profibrotic markers, and increase mesothelial cell mass.

Insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in women with PCOS who have normal glucose tolerance test.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the insulin resistance in women with PCOS patients who have normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to evaluate cardiovascular risk by measuring C-reactive protein (CRP) and carotid intimae-media thickness (CIMT). METHODS: A total of 34 patients and age and body mass matched 20 healthy control subjects were included to this prospective study. Both of patients and control groups were consisted of normal oral glucose tolerance test. Insulin resistance (IR) was estimated using HOMA-IR method. CRP, lipid and hormone levels were measured. CIMT was measured by Carotid Artery B-Mode ultrasonography. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between patients and controls in BMI, and waist circumference, lipid, TSH, LH, FSH, estradiol, and prolactin levels. Serum insulin, testosterone, DHEAS, ferritin levels and HOMA values were significantly higher in patient group. We found that 64.7% (n = 22/34) patients with PCOS had insulin resistance. Both of CIMT and CRP levels were significantly higher in the PCOS patients had BMI over 25 kg/m². CRP levels was significantly higher in the PCOS patients had waist circumference greater than 80 cm. CONCLUSION: We found insulin resistance in the women with PCOS even if OGTT was normal. Our data were similar to literature, the women with PCOS have increased risk of premature atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome.

Experience of kidney transplantation to a patient with Bernard Soulier syndrome: A case report.

Renal transplantation could be a challenging operation in patients with haemorrhagic diathesis, with predictable difficulties or even with unpredictable hurdles. Bernard Soulier Syndrome (BSS) is one of the ethiologies of the thrombocytopenia and it is a rare hereditary disease associated with defects of the platelet glycoprotein complex glycoprotein Ib/V/IX and characterized by large platelets, thrombocytopenia, and severe bleeding symptoms. Here, we present a challenging renal transplantation in BSS.

Propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes for living kidney donation in alternative complement pathway diseases: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) are complement-mediated rare diseases with excessive activation of the alternative pathway. Data to guide the evaluation of living-donor candidates for aHUS and C3G are very limited. The outcomes of living donors to recipients with aHUS and C3G (Complement disease-living donor group) were compared with a control group to improve our understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context. METHODS: Complement disease-living donor group [n = 28; aHUS(53.6%), C3G(46.4%)] and propensity score-matched control-living donor group (n = 28) were retrospectively identified from 4 centers (2003-2021) and followed for major cardiac events (MACE), de novo hypertension, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), cancer, death, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria after donation. RESULTS: None of the donors for recipients with complement-related kidney diseases experienced MACE or TMA whereas two donors in the control group developed MACE (7.1%) after 8 (IQR, 2.6-12.8) years (p = 0.15). New-onset hypertension was similar between complement disease and control donor groups (21.4% vs 25%, respectively, p = 0.75). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.11 and p = 0.70, respectively). One related donor for a recipient with complement-related kidney disease developed gastric cancer and another related donor developed a brain tumor and died in the 4th year after donation (2, 7.1% vs none, p = 0.15). No recipient had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies at the time of transplantation. Median follow-up period of transplant recipients was 5 years (IQR, 3-7). Eleven (39.3%) recipients [aHUS (n = 3) and C3G (n = 8)] lost their allografts during the follow-up period. Causes of allograft loss were chronic antibody-mediated rejection in 6 recipients and recurrence of C3G in 5. Last serum creatinine and last eGFR of the remaining patients on follow up were 1.03 ± 038 mg/dL and 73.2 ± 19.9 m/min/1.73 m2 for aHUS patients and 1.30 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 56.4 ± 5.5 m/min/1.73 m2 for C3G patients. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance and complexity of living related-donor kidney transplant for patients with complement-related kidney disorders and motivates the need for further research to determine the optimal risk-assessment for living donor candidates to recipients with aHUS and C3G.

Reduction of uric acid levels with allopurinol treatment improves endothelial function in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a key event in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Association of hyperuricemia with CVD has been previously reported in the nonuremic population. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of treatment of hyperuricemia with allopurinol on ED and changes in the serum reactive oxygen species in patients with CKD. METHODS: In this study, 19 (13 male) hyperuricemic (UA > 7 mg/dl) nondiabetic CKD patients without any comorbidity, aged < 60 years with creatinine clearance (CrCl) between 20 and 60 ml/min were evaluated. Endothelial functions were assessed by ischemia-induced forearm vasodilatation method (EDD). Oxidative stress was evaluated by measuring the serum oxidized LDL (ox-LDL), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and nitrotyrosine (NT) levels. After measuring all these tests at baseline, allopurinol therapy was commenced for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of allopurinol treatment, all measurements were repeated. Then, allopurinol treatment was ceased and same measurements were also repeated 8 weeks after ceasing of the treatment. RESULTS: Serum creatinine, total cholesterol, albumin, hs-CRP, CrCl and proteinuria levels of the patients were similar among three study periods. After allopurinol therapy, the mean serum UA and NT levels significantly reduced as compared to baseline. At the 8th week after cessation of allopurinol treatment, serum UA levels were significantly increased. After allopurinol therapy, EDD value increased from 5.42 ± 8.3% at baseline to 11.37 ± 9% (p < 0.001). At the 8th week after ceasing allopurinol treatment, EDD returned to baseline values (5.96 ± 8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of hyperuricemia with allopurinol improve ED in patients with CKD. However, mechanism responsible for this beneficial effect seems to be apart from antioxidant effects of allopurinol.

Lower serum prohepcidin levels associated with lower iron and erythropoietin requirements in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic HCV infection have increased liver iron. Recently identified protein hepcidin synthesized in the liver, is thought to be a key regulator for iron homeostasis and is induced by infection and inflammation. Lower erythropoietin and iron supplementation requirements were previously reported in HD patients with HCV infection. We investigated the association of prohepcidin with inflammation and iron parameters in HD patients with and without chronic HCV infection. METHODS: Sixty patients (27 male, 33 female, mean age 50±15 years) on chronic HD were included. Parameters related to iron metabolism (ferritin, serum iron and total iron binding capacity (TIBC)), inflammation (hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6) and prohepcidin levels were measured. The response to treatment (erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance index) was assessed from the ratio of the weekly erythropoietin (rhuEPO) dose to hemoglobin (Hb) per unit weight. RESULTS: Serum prohepcidin levels of HCV positive patients (135±25 ng/mL) were significantly lower than HCV negative patients [148±18 ng/mL, (p=0.025)]. Serum IL-6 levels of HCV positive patients were also significantly lower than HCV negative patients (p=0.016). Serum prohepcidin levels were positively correlated with ferritin (r=0.405, p=0.001) and IL-6 (r=0.271, p=0.050) levels in HD patients. In the HCV positive group, serum prohepcidin levels significantly correlated with ferritin levels (r=0.514 p=0.004). In the HCV negative group, serum prohepcidin levels significantly correlated with serum IL-6 levels (r=0.418, p=0.027). In multiple regression analysis performed to predict prohepcidin in HCV positive patients, serum ferritin was found to be an independent variable (r=0.28, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HCV positive HD patients have low levels of serum prohepcidin and IL-6 which might account for iron accumulation together with lower iron and rhuEPO requirements in these patients.

Comparison of markers of appetite and inflammation between hemodialysis patients with and without failed renal transplants.

OBJECTIVE: The survival of patients returning to hemodialysis (HD) following kidney transplant failure is unfavorable. However, the factors responsible for this poor outcome are largely unknown; chronic inflammation due to failed allograft and malnutrition may contribute to morbidity and mortality. We aim to compare the markers of appetite and malnutrition, and their relation with inflammation in HD patients with and without previous kidney transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with failed renal allografts at least 3 months on dialysis (31 men, 25 women; mean age, 46 ± 9 years) and 77 HD patients who never underwent a transplant (43 men, 34 women; mean age, 50 ± 15 years) were included in the study. The appetite and diet assessment tool (ADAT) was used to determine the self reported appetite of patients. Serum concentrations of ghrelin, leptin, insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured. Associations among these variables were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences considering age, gender or duration of renal replacement therapy between the 2 groups. The scores from Appetite and Diet Assessment Tool were significantly higher in the failed-transplant group. Serum ghrelin levels were significantly higher and serum albumin levels were significantly lower in the failed-transplant group. Serum leptin levels were similar between 2 groups. In addition, hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α levels, which were used as inflammatory parameters, were significantly higher in the failed-transplant group. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated serum ghrelin levels and inflammation may cause diminished appetite and malnutrition in patients with failed renal allografts, and higher levels of this hormone seem to be associated with inflammation caused by retained failed allografts.

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: An increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files. RESULTS: Of the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.

Serum uric acid level is associated with cardiac hypertrophy in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Serum uric acid (UA) level as a significant and independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and the link between this marker and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in renal transplant recipients remains to be clarified. METHODS: A total of 141 renal transplant recipients (83 men), between ages of 18 and 69 (mean age 37 ± 11), were included in this single center study. In addition to demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters, serum UA concentrations were evaluated. LVH was determined by two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography. RESULTS: Serum UA levels were significantly higher (6.14 ± 1.15 mg/dL) in patients with LVH (n = 54) when compared to patients (n = 87) who did not have this abnormality (5.29 ± 1.43 mg/dL) (p = 0.006). Serum UA levels were significantly correlated with septal wall thickness, LV posterior wall thickness, LV mass index (LVMI), and pulmonary arterial pressure. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that UA predicted LVMI (r(2) = 0.150, ß = 0.369, p = 0.001). However, serum creatinine (ß = 0.060, p = 0.593) and age (ß = 0.146, p = 0.175) were not predictors of LVMI. CONCLUSION: High serum UA levels are associated with LVH in renal transplant recipients, which underlines the importance of treating hyperuricemia.

Coronary artery calcification and coronary flow velocity in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Decreased coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a marker of endothelial dysfunction, coronary artery calcification and inflammation, well-known cardiovascular risk factors in haemodialysis (HD) patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation of coronary artery calcification scores (CACS) with CFR in HD patients. METHODS: Sixty-four end-stage renal failure patients were enrolled in this study (38 males, 26 females). Thirty-nine healthy subjects (22 males, 17 females) were included in the control group. Biochemical parameters and acute-phase inflammation marker [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] of patients were recorded before dialysis. The CACS were measured by electron beam computerized tomography method. CFR recordings were performed by trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography. The relationship between CACS and CFR was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean CACS was 281 +/- 589 and 29 patients had CACS < 10. Patients with CACS > 10 had significantly lower CFR values compared to patients with CACS < 10 (1.56 +/- 0.38 vs 1.84 +/- 0.53, P = 0.024). However, there was no difference in hs-CRP values between the groups. CFR was negatively correlated with CACS (r = -0.276, P = 0.030). In multiple stepwise regression analysis, CACS was found to be an independent variable for predicting CFR (P = 0.048). During a follow-up of 18 months, 10 patients had experience of cardiovascular events. Patients with CACS > 10 had significantly higher event rate [34.5% (10/29) vs 0% (0/24)] compared to those with CACS < 10 (P = 0.001). Patients who developed cardiovascular events had significantly higher mean CACS and lower CFR values than the remaining group (P = 0.019 and P = 0.039). All of four patients who died during follow-up were in the CFR < 2 and CACS > 10 groups. CONCLUSIONS: CACS was associated with CFR in HD patients. However, we did not find any association of inflammation with CACS and CFR. This association between CFR and CACS might indicate two different (anatomical and functional) aspects of the common pathophysiology of the arterial system in HD patients.

Endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis patients with failed renal transplants.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a common precursor and denominator of cardiovascular events including development of atherosclerosis. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate ED, measured by coronary flow reserve (CFR) in hemodialysis (nHD) patients who were never transplanted and patients with failed renal transplants restarting hemodialysis (fTx-HD). METHODS: Forty nHD (24 males, mean age 39 ± 9 yr) and 43 fTx-HD patients (27 males, mean age 36 ± 9 yr) were included in the study. Clinical and biochemical parameters, including high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were determined. Also, CFR measurements were used to evaluate ED. RESULTS: There were no significant differences regarding age, gender, smoking status, systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels, mean duration of HD treatment as well as Kt/V((urea)) values between the two groups. Time spent on dialysis in the nHD group and dialysis duration following failure of renal allograft in the fTx-HD group were similar. Serum creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit, calcium and phosphorus levels were similar between the two groups as well. When compared to nHD group, serum total cholesterol (139 ± 3 vs. 154 ± 3 mg/dL, p = 0.045), serum albumin (3.8 ± 0.3 g/dL vs. 4.1 ± 0.2 g/dL, p < 0.0001) and CFR (1.60 ± 0.2 vs. 1.75 ± 0.3, p = 0.028) levels were significantly lower, while serum hs-CRP levels (11 ± 15 mg/L vs. 3 ± 4 mg/L, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the fTx-HD group. Serum hs-CRP negatively correlated (r = -0254, p = 0.021), while serum albumin positively correlated (r = 0402, p = 0.001) with CFR values. CONCLUSION: ED is more prominent in fTx-HD than the nHD patients. Inflammation, caused by failed renal allograft can be responsible for this abnormality.

Does pregnancy increase graft loss in female renal allograft recipients?

BACKGROUND: Although many transplanted women who were previously infertile can conceive during the posttransplant period, maternal and fetal complications are likely. We evaluated the effect of pregnancy after renal transplantation in this study. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated female renal transplant recipients who became pregnant. Age- and transplantation time-matched nonpregnant patients were used as a control group. We analyzed data regarding the demographic features of the pregnant patients, their serum creatinine levels before pregnancy, during pregnancy and during the postpartum period until now, immunosuppressive drugs, complications during pregnancy and fetal complications. RESULTS: In total 57 patients were included in this study. We divided the transplanted patients into two groups: 22 deliveries in 19 patients (delivery group) and 38 nonpregnant patients (control group). The mean follow-up durations and ages of transplantation were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the mean serum creatinine values of the two groups (p = 0.42). Regarding immunosuppressive drugs, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.23). The frequencies of chronic hypertension, proteinuria, use of erythropoietin, and urinary tract infection were not statistically significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.31, 0.59, 0.36, 0.28, respectively). There were also no significant differences noted in graft and patient survival between the groups (p = 0.577). CONCLUSION: Female transplant recipients who have stable creatinine levels, insignificant proteinuria, and normal blood pressure or controlled hypertension may become pregnant, and they can have successful pregnancies. Their graft functions and survivals are not affected by gestation.