Safety and Feasibility of a Nocturnal Heart Rate Elevation-Exploration of a Novel Treatment Concept.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are associated with myocardial fibrosis and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). In a preclinical model of LVH, we demonstrated that a moderate increase in heart rate can reduce interstitial fibrosis and improve LV compliance. We therefore hypothesized that moderately elevated heart rates can be used to beneficially modify the myocardial substrate in patients with diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. As a preliminary step to test this hypothesis, we evaluated if patients can tolerate this novel pacemaker-based treatment approach without adverse effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: A pacemaker-mediated increase in heart rate to 100 beats/min for 5 hours at night was tested over 4 weeks in 10 patients with diastolic dysfunction. The patients underwent a physical examination, biomarker collection, 6-minute walk test, heart failure questionnaire, and echocardiography before and after the pacing intervention. None of the patients reported any symptoms at night. No arrhythmias were induced. Eight patients completed the protocol. Three patients experienced unanticipated daytime pacing from an interfering pacemaker function. There were no detrimental changes in biomarkers or LV systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal pacing at a rate of 100 beats/min appears to be safe and well tolerated in this small exploratory patient cohort.

CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) as second reader on radiologists' diagnostic performance in interpreting computed tomographic (CT) colonographic examinations by using a primary two-dimensional (2D) approach, with segmental, unblinded optical colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was IRB-approved with written informed consent. Four board-certified radiologists analyzed 60 CT examinations with a commercially available review system. Two-dimensional transverse views were used for initial polyp detection, while three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal and 2D multiplanar views were available for problem solving. After initial review without CAD, the reader was shown CAD-identified polyp candidates. The readers were then allowed to add to or modify their original diagnoses. Polyp location, CT Colonography Reporting and Data System categorization, and reader confidence as to the likelihood of a candidate being a polyp were recorded before and after CAD reading. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were estimated for CT examinations with and without CAD readings by using multireader multicase analysis. RESULTS: Use of CAD led to nonsignificant average reader AUC increases of 0.03, 0.03, and 0.04 for patients with adenomatous polyps 6 mm or larger, 6-9 mm, and 10 mm or larger, respectively (P > or = .25); likewise, CAD increased average reader sensitivity by 0.15, 0.16, and 0.14 for those respective groups, with a corresponding decrease in specificity of 0.14. These changes achieved significance for the 6 mm or larger group (P < .01), 6-9 mm group (P < .02), and for specificity (P < .01), but not for the 10 mm or larger group (P > .16). The average reading time was 5.1 minutes +/- 3.4 (standard deviation) without CAD. CAD added an average of 3.1 minutes +/- 4.3 (62%) to each reading (supine and prone positions combined); average total reading time, 8.2 minutes +/- 5.8. CONCLUSION: Use of CAD led to a significant increase in sensitivity for detecting polyps in the 6 mm or larger and 6-9 mm groups at the expense of a similar significant reduction in specificity.

Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine which of several computed tomographic (CT) colonography-based polyp measurements is most compatible with the linear measurement at optical colonoscopy and which is best for assessing change in polyp size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval; informed consent was obtained. Prone and supine CT colonography with same-day optical colonoscopy was performed in 216 patients (147 men and 69 women; age range, 46-79 years; mean age, 59.2 years) with 338 polyps detected at CT colonography. Polyp size was measured with three linear measurements and two volume measurements. One linear measurement and one volume measurement were performed by using automated segmentation; remaining measurements were performed manually. Compatibility with linear size at optical colonoscopy and measurement reproducibility were assessed three ways: variation from size measurement at optical colonoscopy, change between prone and supine scans, and variability between observers. Confidence analysis assessed the ability of each measurement to identify polyps with an optical colonoscopy measurement of 1 cm or greater. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one segmentable polyps were present on both supine and prone scans. Linear polyp diameter manually measured on a three-dimensional endoluminally viewed surface (L(M3D)) indicated with 95% confidence that a polyp measured as 0.8 cm or smaller was less than 1.0 cm at optical colonoscopy. Prone and supine polyp size difference was smallest for L(M3D) and the linear diameter computed from manual and automated volume measurements, with interquartile ranges smaller than or equal to 0.3, 0.2, and 0.5 cm, respectively. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was smallest for linear polyp diameter measurements on a two-dimensional display, with a mean percentage difference of 2.8% (95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement: -17.8%, 23.4%) and 5.0% (95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement: -28.3%, 38.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: L(M3D) best approximated polyp size measurements at optical colonoscopy. Linear diameter calculated from automated volume measurements showed the smallest variation between supine and prone scans while avoiding observer variability and may be best for assessing polyp size changes with serial examinations.