Combined High-Dose Radiotherapy with Sequential Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Based Chemotherapy Increase the Resectability and Survival in Locally Advanced Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The locally advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has detrimental oncological outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable ICC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2021, 116 patients were identified through medical record who underwent radiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable ICC. The resectability of ICC is determined by the multidisciplinary team at each institution. Overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median equivalent radiotherapy dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was 52 Gy (range, 30 to 110 Gy). Forty-seven patients (40.5%) received sequential gemcitabine-cisplatin based chemotherapy (GEM-CIS CTx). Multivariate analysis identified two risk factors, EQD2 of ≥ 60 Gy and application of sequential GEM-CIS CTx for OS. Patients were grouped by these two risk factors: group 1, EQD2 ≥ 60 Gy with sequential GEM-CIS CTx (n=25); group 2, EQD2 < 60 Gy with sequential GEM-CIS CTx or fluoropyrimidine-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n=70); and group 3, radiotherapy alone (n=21). Curative resection was more frequently undergone in group 1 than in groups 2 or 3 (28% vs. 8.6% vs. 0%, respectively). Consequently, OS was significantly better in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined high-dose radiotherapy with sequential GEM-CIS CTx improved oncologic outcomes in patients with locally advanced unresectable ICC. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.

Proton Beam Radiotherapy as a Curative Alternative to Radiofrequency Ablation for Newly Diagnosed Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 323 patients who underwent PBT (n=40) or RFA (n=283) as a curative treatment for previously untreated HCC between October 2016 and June 2021. The primary endpoints were local progression and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.4 years (range=1.1-5.7 years). In terms of portal vein tumor thrombosis, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein, and prothrombin-induced by vitamin K absence-II, the PBT group had significantly more severe tumor burdens than those of the RFA group (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.0004, and p<0.0001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in cumulative local progression rate (10.4% in PBT vs. 7.8% in RFA at 3-years, p=0.895). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported in only one patient (0.4%) after RFA. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not a significant prognostic factor for local progression (hazard ratio=1.05; 95% confidence interval=0.32-3.48; p=0.934). CONCLUSION: PBT demonstrated comparable local control with acceptable toxicity to RFA in newly diagnosed HCC. Therefore, PBT may be a valid alternative.

Impact and optimal timing of local therapy addition in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and optimal timing of local treatment in patients with borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX. Method: Between 2015 and 2020, 258 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were analysed. Treatment outcomes were compared between systemic treatment group (ST) and multimodality treatment groups (MT) using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. The MT were stratified as follows: FOLFIRINOX + radiation therapy (RT) (MT1), FOLFIRINOX + surgical resection (MT2), and FOLFIRINOX + RT + surgical resection (MT3). Results: With median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) for the ST was 22.0%, and it was significantly worse than MT (MT1, 46.3%; MT2, 65.7% and MT3; 90.2%; P < .001). The 2-year locoregional progression free survival (LRPFS) and overall PFS in ST were 10.7% and 7.0%, which were also significantly lower than those of MT (2-year LRPFS: MT1, 31.8%; MT2, 45.3%; MT3, 81.0%; 2-year overall PFS: MT1, 23.3%; MT2, 35.0%; MT3, 66.3%; P < .001). In time-varying multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, local treatment contributed to better treatment outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.568 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.398-0.811), 0.490 (95% CI, 0.331-0.726), and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.458-0.940) for OS, LRPFS, and overall PFS, respectively. The time window of 11-17 months after FOLFIRINOX appeared to demonstrate the maximal efficacy of local treatments in OS. Conclusions: Adding local treatment in BR/LAPC patients treated with upfront FOLFIRINOX seemed to contribute in improved treatment outcomes, and it showed maximal efficacy in OS when applied 11-17 months after the initiation of FOLFIRINOX. We suggest that administration of sufficient period of upfront FOLFIRINOX may intensify the efficacy of local treatments, and well controlled prospective trials are expected.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia involvement.

PURPOSE: For the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), research on primary lesions with mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement is lacking. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes and efficacy of dose-escalated neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to patients with LARC involving MRF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 301 patients who were diagnosed with LARC involving MRF and underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≤50.4 Gy were defined as the non-boost group, while ≥54.0 Gy as the boost group. Pathological tumor response and survival outcomes, including intrapelvic recurrence-free survival (IPRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients (89.4%) achieved a negative pathological circumferential resection margin and 104 (34.6%) had good pathological tumor regression grades. With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, IPRFS, DMFS, and OS rates at 5-years were 88.6%, 78.0%, and 91.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by RT dose, the boost group included more advanced clinical stages of patients. For the non-boost group and boost group, 5-year IPRFS rates were 90.3% and 87.0% (p = 0.242), 5-year DMFS rates were 82.0% and 71.3% (p = 0.105), and 5-year OS rates were 93.0% and 80.6% (p = 0.439), respectively. Treatment related toxicity was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.211). CONCLUSION: Although this retrospective study failed to confirm the efficacy of dose-escalated NCRT, favorable IPRFS and pathological complete response was achieved with NCRT followed by TME. Further studies combining patient customized RT dose with systemic therapies are needed.

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers.

Backgrounds/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions: The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Korean practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2022: an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.