Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 213-20, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26317487

RESUMEN

The updated Banff classification allows for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in the absence of peritubular capillary C4d staining. Our objective was to quantify allograft loss risk in patients with consistently C4d-negative AMR (n = 51) compared with C4d-positive AMR patients (n = 156) and matched control subjects without AMR. All first-year posttransplant biopsy results from January 2004 through June 2014 were reviewed and correlated with the presence of donor-specific antibody (DSA). C4d-negative AMR patients were not different from C4d-positive AMR patients on any baseline characteristics, including immunologic risk factors (panel reactive antibody, prior transplant, HLA mismatch, donor type, DSA class, and anti-HLA/ABO-incompatibility). C4d-positive AMR patients were significantly more likely to have a clinical presentation (85.3% vs. 54.9%, p < 0.001), and those patients presented substantially earlier posttransplantation (median 14 [interquartile range 8-32] days vs. 46 [interquartile range 20-191], p < 0.001) and were three times more common (7.8% vs 2.5%). One- and 2-year post-AMR-defining biopsy graft survival in C4d-negative AMR patients was 93.4% and 90.2% versus 86.8% and 82.6% in C4d-positive AMR patients, respectively (p = 0.4). C4d-negative AMR was associated with a 2.56-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.05, p = 0.033) increased risk of graft loss compared with AMR-free matched controls. No clinical characteristics were identified that reliably distinguished C4d-negative from C4d-positive AMR. However, both phenotypes are associated with increased graft loss and thus warrant consideration for intervention.


Asunto(s)
Complemento C4b/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Am J Transplant ; 14(2): 459-65, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24400968

RESUMEN

Renal transplantation in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies has historically proven challenging due to increased risk for thrombosis and allograft failure. This is especially true for patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) and its rare subtype, the catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS). Since a critical mechanism of thrombosis in APS/CAPS is one mediated by complement activation, we hypothesized that preemptive treatment with the terminal complement inhibitor, eculizumab, would reduce the extent of vascular injury and thrombosis, enabling renal transplantation for patients in whom it would otherwise be contraindicated. Three patients with APS, two with a history of CAPS, were treated with continuous systemic anticoagulation together with eculizumab prior to and following live donor renal transplantation. Two patients were also sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and required plasmapheresis for reduction of donor-specific antibodies. After follow-up ranging from 4 months to 4 years, all patients have functioning renal allografts. No systemic thrombotic events or early graft losses were observed. While the appropriate duration of treatment remains to be determined, this case series suggests that complement inhibitors such as eculizumab may prove to be effective in preventing the recurrence of APS after renal transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/prevención & control , Inactivadores del Complemento/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión
3.
Am J Transplant ; 14(4): 779-87, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24580828

RESUMEN

The impact of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies (DSA) on short- and long-term liver transplant outcome is not clearly defined. While it is clear that not all levels of allosensitization produce overt clinical injury, and that liver allografts possess some degree of alloantibody resistance, alloantibody-mediated adverse consequences are increasingly being recognized. To better define the current state of this topic, we assembled experts to provide insights, explore controversies and develop recommendations for future research on the consequences of DSA in liver transplantation. This article summarizes the proceedings of this inaugural meeting. Several insights emerged. Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), although rarely diagnosed, is increasingly understood to overlap with T cell-mediated rejection. Isolated liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of early allograft immunologic injury when preformed DSA are high titer and persist posttransplantation. Persons who undergo simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation are at risk of renal AMR when Class II DSA persist posttransplantation. Other under-appreciated DSA associations include ductopenia and fibrosis, plasma cell hepatitis, biliary strictures and accelerated fibrosis associated with recurrent liver disease. Standardized DSA testing and diagnostic criteria for both acute and chronic AMR are needed to distil existing associations into etiological processes in order to develop responsive therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Hepatopatías/inmunología , Trasplante de Hígado , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Pronóstico , Informe de Investigación
4.
Am J Transplant ; 14(7): 1573-80, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913913

RESUMEN

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/inmunología , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/diagnóstico , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
Tissue Antigens ; 77(1): 3-8, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21155718

RESUMEN

Antibodies to donor HLA (human leukocyte antigen) and/or ABO antigens were a contraindication to transplantation of most organs for decades. Desensitization protocols have shown the ability to produce reduction of such antibodies sufficient to achieve a successful transplantation. The two major protocols in use are high-dose IVIg or plasmapheresis with low-dose IVIg. The protocols differ in the basic treatment and, to some degree, in their application, but both use standard immunosuppressive agents as well as more recently developed adjunctive agents such as cell-depleting antibodies. Graft and patient survival with both types of protocol are comparable to that of non-sensitized patients, although desensitized patients do have a higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Antibodies to donor antigens may persist after transplantation, and while the initial antibody titer represents the level of difficulty for successful desensitization, the strength of antibodies that persist after transplantation reflects the risk of AMR. Current protocols do not eliminate B cell clones specific for donor HLA; therefore, desensitized patients remain at an increased risk of antibody rebound if patients experience pro-inflammatory events. Therefore, ongoing antibody monitoring is crucial for early detection of antibody-mediated graft injury. Importantly, the results of numerous programs show that ABOi- and HLA-positive crossmatch renal transplantation, with proper desensitization, can be performed successfully. Further, in addition to increasing the rate of transplantation among sensitized patients, desensitization is providing insight into immunoregulatory processes and may provide information useful in diseases involving immune dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/inmunología , Factores Inmunológicos/inmunología
7.
Am J Transplant ; 10(9): 2154-60, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20636451

RESUMEN

A 43-year-old patient with end-stage renal disease, a hypercoagulable condition and 100% panel reactive antibody was transferred to our institution with loss of hemodialysis access and thrombosis of the superior and inferior vena cava, bilateral iliac and femoral veins. A transhepatic catheter was placed but became infected. Access through a stented subclavian into a dilated azygos vein was established. Desensitization with two cycles of bortezomib was undertaken after anti-CD20 and IVIg were given. A flow-positive, cytotoxic-negative cross-match live-donor kidney at the end of an eight-way multi-institution domino chain became available, with a favorable genotype for this patient with impending total loss of a dialysis option. The patient received three pretransplant plasmapheresis treatments. Intraoperatively, the superior mesenteric vein was the only identifiable patent target for venous drainage. Eculizumab was administered postoperatively in the setting of antibody-mediated rejection and an inability to perform additional plasmapheresis. Creatinine remains normal at 6 months posttransplant and flow cross-match is negative. In this report, we describe the combined use of new agents (bortezomib and eculizumab) and modalities (nontraditional vascular access, splanchnic drainage of graft and domino paired donation) in a patient who would have died without transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Inhibidores de Proteasas/uso terapéutico , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Adulto , Anticuerpos/sangre , Anticuerpos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígenos CD20/inmunología , Bortezomib , Catéteres de Permanencia , Creatinina/sangre , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Drenaje , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Vena Femoral , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Plasmaféresis , Circulación Esplácnica , Terapias en Investigación , Vena Cava Inferior , Vena Cava Superior , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones
8.
Am J Transplant ; 9(9): 2136-9, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19663896

RESUMEN

Identification of factors responsible for an increase in the breadth or strength of HLA-specific antibody (HSA) is critical to the continued successful management and transplantation of sensitized patients. A retrospective review of our HLA registry identified 107 patients with known HSA and sufficient information in their electronic patient record to determine the presence or absence of a proinflammatory event. The patients were stratified according to transplant status [sensitized and on the transplant waitlist (n = 65); immunosuppressed recipients of a positive crossmatch (+XM) transplant (n = 42)]. Eighty-three percent of waitlist candidates and 55% of sensitized kidney transplant recipients with a documented proinflammatory event had an associated increase in HSA. Interestingly, among patients with a culture-proven infection, 97% of the waitlist patients and 54.8% of +XM recipients had an associated rise in HSA. Overall, proinflammatory events were associated with a greater increase among waitlist patients than +XM recipients, 5.3-fold [IRR 5.25, (95% CI 4.03-6.85), p < 0.001] versus 2.5-fold [IRR 2.54, (95% CI 1.64-3.95), p < 0.001] increase in HSA. Therefore, sensitized patients known to have an infection or undergoing surgery should be monitored for expansion of HSA.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/química , Antígenos HLA/química , Inflamación , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Anciano , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Infecciones/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Listas de Espera
9.
Am J Transplant ; 9(1): 231-5, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18976298

RESUMEN

Desensitized patients are at high risk of developing acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In most cases, the rejection episodes are mild and respond to a short course of plasmapheresis (PP) / low-dose IVIg treatment. However, a subset of patients experience severe AMR associated with sudden onset oliguria. We previously described the utility of emergent splenectomy in rescuing allografts in patients with this type of severe AMR. However, not all patients are good candidates for splenectomy. Here we present a single case in which eculizumab, a complement protein C5 antibody that inhibits the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC), was used combined with PP/IVIg to salvage a kidney undergoing severe AMR. We show a marked decrease in C5b-C9 (MAC) complex deposition in the kidney after the administration of eculizumab.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Complemento C5/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Terapia Recuperativa
10.
Am J Transplant ; 9(8): 1826-34, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19538492

RESUMEN

We reviewed 116 surveillance biopsies obtained approximately 1, 3, 6 and 12 months posttransplantation from 50 +XM live donor kidney transplant recipients to determine the frequency of subclinical cell-mediated rejection (CMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Subclinical CMR was present in 39.7% of the biopsies at 1 month and >20% at all other time points. The presence of diffuse C4d on biopsies obtained at each time interval ranged from 20 to 30%. In every case, where histological and immunohistological findings were diagnostic for AMR, donor-specific antibody was found in the blood, challenging the long-held belief that low-level antibody could evade detection due to absorption on the graft. Among clinical factors, only recipient age was associated with subclinical CMR. Clinical factors associated with subclinical AMR were recipient age, positive cytotoxic crossmatch prior to desensitization and two mismatches of HLA DR 51, 52 and 53 alleles. Surveillance biopsies during the first year post-transplantation for these high-risk patients uncover clinically occult processes and phenotypes, which without intervention diminish allograft survival and function.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Adulto , Alelos , Biopsia , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/patología , Creatinina/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Antígenos HLA-DR/genética , Antígenos HLA-DR/inmunología , Cadenas HLA-DRB4 , Cadenas HLA-DRB5 , Humanos , Incidencia , Riñón/patología , Riñón/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Am J Transplant ; 8(10): 2163-8, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18828774

RESUMEN

Providing transplantation opportunities for patients with incompatible live donors through kidney paired donation (KPD) is seen as one of the important strategies for easing the crisis in organ availability. It has been estimated that an additional 1000-2000 transplants per year could be accomplished if a national KPD program were implemented in the United States. While most of these transplants could be arranged within the participants' local or regional area, patients with hard-to-match blood types or broad HLA sensitization would benefit from matching across larger geographic areas. In this case, either patients or organs would need to travel in order to obtain maximum benefit from a national program. In this study, we describe how a triple KPD enabled a highly sensitized patient (PRA 96%) to receive a well-matched kidney from a live donor on the opposite coast. The kidney was removed in San Francisco and transported to Baltimore where it was reperfused 8 h later. The patient had prompt function and 1 year later has a serum creatinine of 1.1 mg/dl. This case provides a blueprint for solving some of the complexities that are inherent in the implementation of a national KPD program in a large country like the United States.


Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA/terapia , Glomerulonefritis/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Enfermedades Renales Poliquísticas/terapia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reperfusión , Asignación de Recursos , Factores de Tiempo
14.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 78(3): 722-3, 1994 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8126148

RESUMEN

Patients with premature ovarian failure (POF) have been reported to have an increased frequency of the major histocompatibility class (MHC) class II antigen HLA-DR3. Here we attempt to confirm this association. We performed MHC class II immunophenotyping of HLA-DR antigens 1-10 on 102 North American caucasians with confirmed POF and 102 control caucasian women. All patients had experienced amenorrhea before the age of 40 yr and had elevated serum gonadotropins on repeated study. We found no significant increase in HLA-DR3 frequency in patients with POF when compared to our control group (P = 0.52) or even when compared to a large reference population (n = 1927) that did not differ significantly from our control group (P = 0.47). Our patients did have an increased frequency of HLA DR4 compared to this large reference population (41% vs. 23%; P < 0.001), but we were unable to demonstrate increased HLA DR4 frequency using our control group (31%; P = 0.14). In conclusion, despite a power of 99%, we were unable to confirm a significant increase in MHC class II HLA-DR3 frequency in patients with POF.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase II/análisis , Cariotipificación , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/genética , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-DR/análisis , Humanos , Valores de Referencia
15.
Arch Neurol ; 44(8): 853-5, 1987 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3498470

RESUMEN

Tissue typing was performed on 14 narcoleptics as defined by both strict sleep laboratory and clinical criteria. Six of these patients were blacks from North America, a race underrepresented in previous studies. All patients were HLA-DR2-antigen positive and had the same HLA-DR2 subtype. Clinical severity of disease was not correlated with HLA-DR2 heterozygosity or (putative) homozygosity. This study confirms that the extremely high association between HLA-DR2 and narcolepsy holds across comparisons of the three races studied to date when both clinical and sleep laboratory data are used. The presence or absence of HLA-DR2 in patients presenting with hypersomnolence may help support or exclude, respectively, a diagnosis of idiopathic narcolepsy.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA-D/análisis , Antígenos HLA-DR/análisis , Narcolepsia/genética , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Pueblo Asiatico , Población Negra , Femenino , Antígeno HLA-DR2 , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/epidemiología , América del Norte , Población Blanca
16.
Transplantation ; 60(12): 1600-6, 1995 Dec 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8545897

RESUMEN

HLA-specific antibody, present before or after transplantation, may adversely effect graft outcome. Antibody testing by cytotoxicity (CYT) is laborious, requires viable lymphocytes, does not differentiate non-HLA cytotoxic antibody, and cannot be used readily on specimens from patients being treated with cytotoxic antibodies. We have evaluated PRA-STAT, an antibody screening kit that uses an ELISA test with soluble HLA class I molecules as targets. We performed 219 tests on a variety of serum specimens, 128 of which were also tested by CYT. There was a highly significant correlation (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) between PRA-STAT (PS) and CYT for the detection of IgG antibodies. Of 66 sera reactive in both assays, 18% had identical specificities defined in both, 27% were more reactive in PS than in CYT, 8% were more reactive in CYT, and 47% had different specificities in the 2 assays, with overlap in slightly more than half the cases. Of 13 sera reactive only in PS, 2 were from non-transfused, nontransplanted males with no evidence of lymphocyte-reactive antibody by antiglobulin tests. PS uses an IgG-specific conjugate, therefore IgM class I-specific antibodies cannot be identified--however, their presence does affect test outcome. This, as well as the panel composition and interlot reproducibility, are areas we believe need to be addressed. The PRA-STAT system is rapid, does not require viable cells or complement, and can be automated in part. Resolution of the problems identified here and availability of an IgM-specific conjugate should make this test system a valuable tool in histocompatibility testing.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/sangre , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/instrumentación , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
17.
Transplantation ; 60(5): 498-503, 1995 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7676500

RESUMEN

Multiple variations of the basic lymphocytotoxicity test have been reported to increase test sensitivity. Although these modifications are used routinely in crossmatch tests, as required by federal regulation, there has been no methodical assessment of the relative sensitivities and specificities of these techniques with the exception of the well-studied antiglobulin method. We have performed such a comparison and found that these modifications do not, uniformly, increase test sensitivity. We also observed that the effect of a technique modification on test sensitivity as measured by overall lymphocytotoxic antibody titer does not reflect, necessarily, the effect on HLA-specific antibody. It is widely believed that the antiglobulin method is the most sensitive of the lymphocytotoxicity techniques. We observed that while the antiglobulin method increased overall test sensitivity dramatically, we achieved a comparable level of sensitivity by either substituting B cells for T cells or doubling both the serum and the complement incubation times. However, no other technique modification detected as many HLA antibody specificities as did the antiglobulin method. The data presented here provide useful guidelines for selecting techniques for HLA typing, antibody screening, and cross-matching.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Inmunológicas de Citotoxicidad/métodos , Linfocitos/inmunología , Anticuerpos/análisis , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Supervivencia Celular , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
18.
Transplantation ; 58(10): 1119-30, 1994 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7974720

RESUMEN

We have analyzed HLA data from the UNOS registry on 20,230 patients on the renal waiting list in 1991 and 18,708 donors from 1988-1992. Significant differences were found in the distribution of HLA antigens for comparisons of the total donor pool and the various racial groups of patients as well as for inter- and intraracial comparisons of donors and patients. Within a racial group, the frequencies of blanks and of broad antigens were usually higher in patients while those of splits were usually higher in donors. Comparisons between the total donor pool and the various racial groups of patients showed that the likelihood of mismatch was greater for African-Americans and Hispanics than for Caucasians but that the chance of mismatch is high for all groups and the average number of antigens mismatched will not vary greatly among the different races. Heterogeneity, as measured by the percentage of the population with different phenotypes, was higher in African-Americans (97.2-99.7%) and Hispanics (97.7-99.4%) than in Caucasians (83.3-86.5%) because of multiple occurrences of a few phenotypes, most containing A1, B8 and DR3, in Caucasians. However, the most common phenotypes of Caucasian donors differed from those of Caucasian patients. All phenotypes were rare (0.007-0.61%) and, with the exception of a small group of Caucasian patients, the likelihood of achieving a good match is low, regardless of race. These data explain the observations that, with the exception of the phenotypically identical match, HLA matching does not influence organ distribution significantly.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA/genética , Trasplante de Órganos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Fenotipo , Grupos Raciales/clasificación , Donantes de Tejidos
19.
Transplantation ; 62(2): 272-83, 1996 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8755828

RESUMEN

HLA allele and haplotype frequencies are used in transplantation, anthropology, forensic medicine, and studies of the associations between HLA factors and the immune response. The cost of determining these frequencies through family studies can be avoided by estimating them from population data. We have utilized the data in the UNOS donor registry and kidney transplant waiting list to estimate allele and haplotype frequencies for the HLA-A, -B, and -DR(B1) loci and report the allele and a portion of the haplotype data here. Using programs written in A Program Language (APL) we were able to perform all analyses on a personal computer. We have found that the distribution of haplotype frequencies varies among the races, with Caucasians having a greater number of both more common and extremely rare haplotypes. Despite the sizes of the groups studied, only one-third to two-thirds of the haplotypes theoretically possible were actually observed. Although the data confirm the well-known fact that the distributions of alleles and haplotypes varies among races, they also reveal that certain common haplotypes are shared among all racial groups and represent an opportunity for well-matched transplants between donors and recipients of different races.


Asunto(s)
Alelos , Antígenos HLA/genética , Fallo Renal Crónico/genética , Trasplante de Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Listas de Espera , Población Negra/genética , Humanos , Fenotipo , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/genética
20.
Transplantation ; 72(3): 433-7, 2001 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11502972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized patients often have antibodies directed against the HLA Bw4 and Bw6 epitopes. Because of the high frequency of these epitopes, when present, these antibodies result in a high incidence of positive cross-matches. We sought to determine whether antibodies specific for Bw4 or Bw6 affected renal allograft outcome. METHODS: The effect of mismatches for the HLA class I public epitopes, Bw4 and Bw6, was examined in 72 recipients of one haplotype matched recipients of living, related donor renal allografts selected to control for degree of HLA mismatch. Analysis of the production of HLA-specific antibody was performed for 180 recipients of failed cadaveric allografts by complement-dependent cytotoxicity tests and by an enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the incidence of acute rejection, number of rejection episodes or 1-year allograft survival among Bw4/6 matched versus mismatched recipients of one haplotype matched allografts. Additionally, no significant difference in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy was noted among 56 recipients followed long-term (> or =3 years). In the recipients of failed cadaveric transplants, Bw4/6 mismatching was associated with the frequency and magnitude of production of HLA-specific antibody. However, the panel reactive antibodies correlated with the number of HLA-A and -B mismatches, and there was no additional impact of Bw4/6 mismatching. IgG, HLA-specific antibodies were found to be significantly increased among patients homozygous for Bw4 or Bw6, whether or not there was a Bw4/6 mismatch. CONCLUSIONS: Mismatching for Bw4 or Bw6 does not confer any independent, increased risk for humoral sensitization or renal allograft failure.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/análisis , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Antígenos HLA-B/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Enfermedad Aguda , Formación de Anticuerpos , Enfermedad Crónica , Epítopos , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunización , Incidencia , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA