RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Analgesic treatment, including with opioids, can safely be given to patients who are suspected of having appendicitis. The study examined factors which may influence the treatment of pain in appendicitis in the adult emergency department (ED). A secondary objective was to determine if analgesia affected clinical outcomes. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study examined medical records of all adult patients with a discharge diagnosis of appendicitis. Patients were categorized based on the type of analgesia received in the ED. Variables included the day of week and staffing shift of presentation, gender, age, and triage pain scale, as well as time to ED discharge, imaging, operation, and hospital discharge. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to determine which factors influenced treatment and affected outcomes. RESULTS: Records of 1839 patients were categorized into three groups - 883 (48%) did not receive analgesia, 571 (31%) received only non-opioid medications, and 385 (21%) received at least one opioid. Patients with a higher triage pain level were significantly more likely to receive analgesia (4-6: OR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.2-2.84, 7-9: OR = 3.36; 95% CI = 2.18-5.17, 10: OR = 10.78; 95% CI = 6.38-18.23) and at least one opioid (4-6: OR = 2.88; 95% CI = 1.13-7.34, 7-9: OR = 4.36; 95% CI = 1.73-11.01, 10: OR = 6.23; 95% CI = 2.42-16.09). Male gender was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of receiving analgesia (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.61-0.9), but a significantly greater likelihood of receiving at least one opioid given that they received any pain medication (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.41-2.48). Patients aged 25-64 years old were significantly more likely to receive at least one opioid if they received any pain medication (25-44: OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.08-2.02, 45-64: OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.15-2.76). Presentation to the ED on Sundays was associated with lower rates of opioid treatment (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.42-0.94). Regarding clinical outcomes, patients who received analgesia waited longer for imaging (+0.58 h; 95% CI = 0.31-0.85), stayed longer in the ED (+2.2 h; 95% CI = 1.60-2.79), and had a slightly longer hospitalization (+0.62d; 95% CI = 0.34-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of patients with appendicitis didn't receive analgesia, with most of those treated receiving only non-opioid analgesia. Older age and Sunday presentations were associated with less opioid treatment. Patients who received analgesia waited longer for imaging, stayed longer in the ED, and had a longer hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Manejo del Dolor , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blood culture contamination leads to unnecessary interventions and costs. It may be caused by bacteria in deep skin structures unsusceptible to surface decontamination. This study was designed to test whether diversion of blood obtained at venipuncture into a lithium heparin tube prior to aspiration of blood culture reduces contamination. METHODS: The order of blood draws for biochemistry and blood cultures was randomized. Following standard disinfection and venipuncture, blood was either aspirated into a sterile lithium heparin tube before blood culture bottles (diversion group) or blood cultures first and then lithium heparin tube (control group). All study personnel were blinded with the exception of the phlebotomist. RESULTS: After exclusions, 970 blood culture/biochemistry sets were analyzed. Contamination occurred in 24 of 480 (5.0%) control vs 10 of 490 (2.0%) diversion group cultures (P = .01). True pathogens were identified in 26 of 480 (5.4%) control vs 18 of 490 (3.7%) diversion cultures (P = .22). Despite randomization, demographic differences were apparent between the 2 groups. A post hoc analysis of 637 cultures from 610 medical patients admitted from home neutralized demographic differences. Culture contamination remained more frequent in the control vs diversion group (17/312 [5%] vs 7/325 [2%]; P = .03). Fewer diversion group patients were admitted to hospital (control: 200/299 [66.9%] vs diversion: 182/311 [58.5%]; P = .03), and length of stay was shorter (control: 30 hours [interquartile range {IQR}, 6-122] vs diversion: 22 [IQR, 5-97]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Use of lithium heparin tubes for diversion prior to obtaining blood cultures led to a 60% decrease in contamination. This technique is easy and inexpensive and might decrease overall hospital length of stay. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03966534.
Asunto(s)
Cultivo de Sangre , Flebotomía , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Contaminación de Equipos , Pruebas Hematológicas , Humanos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Population screening of three common BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) apparently fulfills screening criteria. We compared streamlined BRCA screening via self-referral with proactive recruitment in medical settings. METHODS: Unaffected AJ, age ≥25 years without known familial mutations, were either self-referred or recruiter-enrolled. Before testing, participants received written information and self-reported family history (FH). After testing, both non-carriers with significant FH and carriers received in-person genetic counseling. Psychosocial questionnaires were self-administered 1 week and 6 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Of 1,771 participants, 58% were recruiter-enrolled and 42% were self-referred. Screening uptake was 67%. Recruited enrollees were older (mean age 54 vs. 48, P < 0.001) and had less suggestive FH (23 vs. 33%, P < 0.001). Of 32 (1.8%) carriers identified, 40% had no significant FH. Post-test counseling compliance was 100% for carriers and 89% for non-carrier women with FH. All groups expressed high satisfaction (>90%). At 6 months, carriers had significantly increased distress and anxiety, greater knowledge, and similar satisfaction; 90% of participants would recommend general AJ BRCA screening. CONCLUSION: Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations.Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016.
Asunto(s)
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Efecto Fundador , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Asesoramiento Genético/métodos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Judíos/genética , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important modality with many advantages. At the Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, we developed a case-based course to teach POCUS to internal medicine residents and attendings. The topics include: "Introduction to Point-of-Care Ultrasound", "Focused Assessment with Sonography of Trauma", "Basic Cardiac, Pulmonary and Vascular Ultrasound", "Rapid Ultrasound in Shock" and "Ultrasound Guided Central Lines". The use of POCUS should aid in rapid diagnosis, decrease complications associated with bed-side procedures, and ultimately improve patient care.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Interna/instrumentación , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , MédicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blood culture contamination is associated with health care costs and potential patient harm. Diversion of the initial blood specimen reduces blood culture contamination. We report results of the "real-life" clinical implementation of this technique. METHODS: Following an educational campaign, use of a dedicated diversion tube was recommended prior to all blood cultures. Blood culture sets taken from adults using a diversion tube were defined as "diversion sets," those without, "non-diversion" sets. Blood culture contamination and true positive rates were compared for diversion and nondiversion sets and to nondiversion historical controls. A secondary analysis investigated efficacy of diversion by patient age. RESULTS: Out of 20,107 blood culture sets drawn, the diversion group included 12,774 (60.5%) and the nondiversion group 8,333 (39.5%) sets. The historical control group included 32,472 sets. Comparing nondiversion to diversion, contamination decreased by 31% (5.5% [461/8333] to 3.8% [489/12744], P < .0001]. Contamination was also 12% lower in diversion than historical controls [3.8% (489/12744) vs 4.3% (1,396/33,174) P = .02)]. The rate of true bacteremia was similar. In older patients, contamination rate was higher, and the relative reduction associated with diversion decreased (54.3% amongst 20-40-year-olds vs 14.5% amongst >80-year-olds). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a diversion tube in the ED reduced blood culture contamination in this large real life observational study. Efficacy decreased with increasing age, which requires further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Cultivo de Sangre/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Contaminación de EquiposRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic may cause significant morbidity and mortality in adults, yet severe cases are rare among children. The indirect impact of the pandemic on health care delivery in general and pediatric emergency department (PED) visits in particular has been widely reported. AIMS: To assess the impact of the pandemic and the social restrictions imposed in its wake on PED visits and hospitalization rates in our Israeli medical center. We also sought to track these data in relation to the variation in pandemic severity and social restrictions over time. A comparison of this data with that of the adult emergency department was also performed. METHODS: Data for this study were drawn from the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC), Jerusalem, Israel computerized databank. The daily number of PED and adult ER visits as well as hospitalizations resulting from these visits during the months January-July during the years 2018, 2019, 2020 were recorded. We compared the risk ratio for hospitalization in 2019 and 2020, as well as the incidence rate ratio. RESULTS: During March and April there was a decrease in PED visits from 4,588 visits in 2019 to 2,527 visits in 2020 (ratio = .551, 95%CI [.52,.58]. Despite the drop in PED visits, the rate of hospitalizations rose with respect to 2019 (Risk Ratio = 1.31, p < .001, 95%CI [1.17,1.47]). Similar but more moderate trends were seen in the adult ED. From May-July 2020, after the lockdown was lifted, PED visits remained 30% below the same time period from 2018 and 2019, while the hospitalization rate returned to its pre-pandemic level. CONCLUSIONS: A significant drop in PED visits is seen to extend well beyond the peak of the pandemic and the lockdown period. This highlights the potential risk of children with serious emergencies becoming casualties of the pandemic by their not being brought to medical attention. Efforts should be made to raise public awareness among parents and other caretakers of children regarding this matter.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Since 2014, the annual number of patients entering our emergency department (ED) has increased significantly. These were primarily Internal Medicine (IM) patients, and of these, 25-30% were admitted. The present governmental policy presents a deterrent to adding IM beds for these patients, and Emergency and IM departments cope with ever-increasing number of IM patients. We describe a quality improvement intervention to increase outflow of IM patients from the ED to the IM departments. METHODS: We conducted a quality improvement intervention at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center from 2014 to 2018. The first stage consisted of an effort to increase morning discharges from the IM departments. The second stage consisted of establishing a process to increase the number of admissions to the IM departments from the ED. RESULTS: Implementation of the first stage led to an increased morning discharge rate from a baseline of 2-4 to 18%. The second stage led to an immediate mean (± SD) morning transfer of 35 ± 7 patients to the medical departments (8-12 per department), providing significant relief for the ED. However, the additional workload for the IM departments' medical and nursing staff led to a rapid decrease in morning discharges, returning to pre-intervention rates. Throughout the period of the new throughput intervention, morning admissions increased from 30 to > 70%, and were sustained. The number of patients in each department increased from 36 to 38 to a new steady state of 42-44, included constant hallway housing, and often midday peaks of 48-50 patients. Mean length of stay did not change. IM physician and nurse dissatisfaction led to increased number of patients being admitted during the evening and night hours and fewer during the morning. CONCLUSION: We describe a quality improvement intervention to improve outflow of medical patients from the ED in the morning hours. The new ED practices had mixed effects. They led to less ED crowding in the morning hours but increased dissatisfaction among the IM department medical and nursing staff due to an increased number of admissions in a limited number of hours. The present governmental reimbursement policy needs to address hospital overcrowding as it relates to limited community healthcare beds and an aging population.
Asunto(s)
Aglomeración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Anciano , Hospitalización , Humanos , Israel , Alta del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Religious fasting is associated with headache. This has been documented as "Yom Kippur Headache" and "First-of-Ramadan Headache." Rofecoxib (Vioxx®), a cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitor with a 17-hour half-life, has been shown to be effective in preventing fasting headache when taken just prior to the 25-hour Yom Kippur fast. Unfortunately for fasters rofecoxib is no longer available. We hypothesized that etoricoxib, another Cox-2 inhibitor with a longer half-life, would also be effective in preventing fasting headache. METHODS: We performed a double-blind randomized prospective trial of etoricoxib 120 mg vs placebo, taken just prior to the onset of fasting, Yom Kippur 2008. Healthy adults aged 18-65 years were enrolled from the community. Subjects completed a demographic data form and questions regarding headache history and a post-fast survey on headache during the fast. We compared incidence, time of onset and intensity of headache, general ease of fasting, and side effects in control and treatment groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 211 patients and 195 completed the post-fast questionnaire (92%). Of those subjects receiving etoricoxib (n=99), 36 or 36.4% vs 65 or 67.7% of the placebo group (n=96) developed any headache during the fast (P< .0001). Median severity of headache in the treatment group was significantly lower for the treatment group (3.0 vs 5.0 on a visual analog scale of 10; P= .024). Also, participants in the treatment group reported an easier fast than the placebo group, as compared with previous fasting experience (4.0 vs 3.5 on a scale of 1-5; P< .0001). CONCLUSION: Etoricoxib 120 mg taken prior to a 25-hour ritual fast decreases incidence of and attenuates fasting headache.
Asunto(s)
Ayuno/efectos adversos , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea/prevención & control , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Etoricoxib , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Vacaciones y Feriados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Estudios Prospectivos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Religión , Sulfonas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding is an international phenomenon dependent on input, throughput, and output factors. This study aims to determine whether patterns of potentially unnecessary referrals from either primary care physicians (PCPs) or urgent care centers (UCCs) can be identified, thereby to reduce ED visits by patients who could be treated elsewhere. Literature from the United States reports up to 35% unnecessary referrals from UCCs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients referred to an ED in Jerusalem by either their PCP or a group of UCCs with a full range of laboratory tests and basic imaging capabilities between January 2017 and December 2017. The data were analyzed to identify referrals involving diagnoses, specialist consultations, and examinations unavailable in the PCP's office or UCC (e.g., ultrasound, CT, echocardiogram, or stress test); these referrals were considered necessary for completion of the patient work-up. If patients were evaluated by an ED physician and sent home after an examination or laboratory test available at least in the UCC, the referrals were considered potentially unnecessary. RESULTS: Significantly more referrals were made by PCPs than UCCs (1712 vs. 280, p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed for orthopedics, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology referrals (p = 0.039, p < 0.001, p = 0.003). A higher percentage of patients referred by PCPs had potentially unnecessary visits compared to patients referred by UCCs (13.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: A robust UCC system may help further reduce potentially unnecessary visits (including complex patients) to the ED.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serial biochemical blood tests in the diagnosis of biliary colic. METHODS: Files were reviewed of 1039 patients who were admitted to the Share'e Zedek Medical Center emergency department between the years 2012-2013, and received the coding of acute biliary disease. Of these, the first 100 cases were selected that met the following criteria: (1) a diagnosis of biliary colic or symptomatic cholelithiasis; (2) at least two biochemical blood tests performed; and (3) 18 years of age or older. Patients with other acute biliary diseases were excluded. The biochemical profile of the patients was analyzed as were their clinical and radiological findings. RESULTS: Three-quarters of the patients were women, whose average age of 37 years was younger than the average of the men, at 50 years. According to their histories, 47% of the patients had previously known cholelithiasis. Pain in either the right upper quadrant or the epigastrium was the presenting symptom in 93% cases. The greatest change in serum biochemical results was seen during the first day of the patients' admissions. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) showed the highest initial rise above the reference range, followed by aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) - all these increases were statistically significant (P < 0.05). AST showed the sharpest decline followed by bilirubin and ALT. GGT and ALKP did not fall. A sharp rise and fall in liver enzymes, especially during the first day, most prominently in AST and ALT, was seen in 70% percent of cases. In 65% of cases trans-abdominal sonography did not give diagnostic findings. CONCLUSION: Serial serum liver enzyme measurements are helpful in the initial diagnosis of acute biliary colic.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abdominal computed tomography scan (CT) is the preferred radiographic study for the diagnosis of appendicitis in the United States, while radiologist-operated ultrasound (US) is often used in Israel. This comparative international study evaluates the performance of CT vs. US in the evaluation of acute appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis was conducted at two tertiary care teaching hospitals, one in each country. Adult patients (age 18-99) with an Emergency Department (ED) working diagnosis of appendicitis between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006 were reviewed. Included patients had at least one imaging study, went to the OR, and had documented surgical pathology results. RESULTS: Of 136 patients in the United States with the ED diagnosis of appendicitis, 79 met inclusion criteria for the CT cohort. Based on pathology, CT had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 95.4-100%). The negative appendectomy rate in patients with positive CT was 0%. Total median ED length of stay was 533 min [IQR (450-632)] and median time from CT order to completion was 184 min [IQR (147-228)]. Of 520 patients in Israel, 197 were included in the US cohort. Based on final pathology, US had a sensitivity of 68.4% (95% CI 61.2-74.8%). The negative appendectomy rate in patients with positive US was 5.5%. The median ED length of stay for these patients was 387 min [IQR (259-571.5)]. Of the patients, 23.4% had subsequent CT scans. Median time from US order to completion was 20 min [IQR (7-49)]. Both time values were p < 0.001 when compared with CT. We furthermore calculate that a "first pass" approach of using US first, and then performing a confirmatory CT scan in patients with negative US, would have saved an average of 88.0 minutes per patient in the United States and avoided CT in 65% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologist-operated US had inferior sensitivity and positive predictive value when compared with CT, though was significantly faster to perform, and avoided radiation and contrast in a majority of patients. A "first-pass" approach using US first and then CT if US is not diagnostic may be desirable in some institutions.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value of the chest radiograph for the diagnosis of pneumonia in bedridden patients, using non-contrast-enhanced high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) as the gold standard. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated bedridden patients hospitalized with moderate to high clinical probability of pneumonia. Chest radiographs were interpreted in a blinded fashion by 3 observers and classified as definite, normal, or uncertain for pneumonia. Chest CT was obtained within 12 hours of chest radiograph. We applied Bayesian analysis to assess the accuracy of chest radiograph in the diagnosis of pneumonia. RESULTS: In a 5-month period, 58 patients were evaluated, 31 (53%) were female. Their chest radiographs were interpreted as negative, uncertain, or positive for pneumonia in 31 (53%), 15 (26%), and 12 (21%) patients, respectively, while CT confirmed pneumonia in 11 (35%), 10 (67%), and in 10 (83%). The sensitivity of the chest radiograph to diagnose pneumonia was 65%, the specificity was 93%, the positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 83% and 65%, while the overall accuracy was 69% (95% confidence interval, 50%-79%). CONCLUSIONS: In bedridden patients with suspected pneumonia, a normal chest radiograph does not rule out the diagnosis, hence, a chest CT scan might provide valuable diagnostic information.