RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: QP001, a novel meloxicam formulation, has been developed to manage moderate to severe postoperative pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QP001 injections for moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery. METHOD: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery. These patients were randomized to receive either QP001 injections (30 mg or 60 mg) or a placebo pre-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the total morphine consumption within 24 h after the first administration. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled, and 106 patients completed the study. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg group and 60 mg group, versus placebo group, were significantly lower over the following 24 h (5.11[5.46] vs 8.86[7.67], P = 0.011; 3.11[3.08] vs 8.86[7.67], P < 0.001), respectively. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48 h, including the 24-48 h period (P ≤ 0.001). The QP001 30 mg and 60 mg groups, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump over the 24 h and 48 h periods (P < 0.05). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant different in Adverse Events or Adverse Drug Reactions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative/preemptive QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain following abdominal surgery, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Analgésicos Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Meloxicam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Morfina/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Postpartum depressive symptoms (PDS) are not an uncommon mood disorder in postpartum women. Our previous research indicated a role for increased tryptophan (TRP) metabolism along the kynurenine pathway (KP) in the pathogenesis of PDS. Accordingly, this study was going to investigate the association of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO, a key enzyme of KP) genetic polymorphisms with PDS. Seven hundred twenty-five women receiving cesarean section were enrolled in this study. PDS was determined by an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score ≥ 13. Subsequently, 48 parturients with PDS and 48 parturients without PDS were selected for investigation of perinatal serum concentrations of TRP, kynurenine (KYN), and KYN/TRP ratio, the latter is the representative of IDO activity. In addition, seven single nucleotide polymorphisms of the IDO gene were examined. Following this genotyping, 50 parturients carrying the IDO rs10108662 AA genotype and 50 parturients carrying the IDO rs10108662 AC + CC genotype were selected for comparisons of TRP, KYN, and KYN/TRP ratio levels. This study showed the PDS incidence of 6.9% in the Chinese population, with PDS characterized by increased IDO activity (p < 0.05), versus women without PDS. We also found that the variations of IDO1 gene rs10108662 were significantly related to PDS incidence (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in IDO activity between the IDO rs10108662 CA + AA, versus CC, genotypes. Our findings indicate a role of the kynurenine pathway in the development of PDS, rs10108662 genetic polymorphism resulting in changes of IDO activity might contribute to PDS pathogenesis.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/psicología , Depresión Posparto/genética , Indolamina-Pirrol 2,3,-Dioxigenasa/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , China/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Quinurenina/sangre , Embarazo , Triptófano/sangreRESUMEN
The Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common postpartum psychiatric disorder, afflicting approximately 10%-20% of new mothers. Clinical symptoms of the PPD include depressive disorder, agitation, insomnia, anxiety and confusion, resulting in an increase in suicidal tendencies, thereby having significant impacts on the puerpera, newborn and their family. A growing body of data indicate a role for alterations in tryptophan metabolism in the PPD. The metabolism of tryptophan produces an array of crucial factors that can differentially regulate key physiological processes linked to the PPD. Importantly, an increase in stress hormones and immune-inflammatory activity drives tryptophan to the production of neuroregulatory kynurenine pathway products and away from the serotonin and melatonin pathways. This links the PPD to other disorders of depressed mood, which are classically associated with decreased serotonin and melatonin, coupled to increases in kynurenine pathway products. Several kynurenine pathway products, such as kynurenic acid and quinolinic acid, can have neuroregulatory effects, with consequences pathological underpinnings of the PPD. The current article reviews the role of alterations in tryptophan metabolism in the PPD.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/metabolismo , Depresión/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/metabolismo , Quinurenina/metabolismo , Triptófano/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Quinolínico/metabolismoRESUMEN
The efficacy of perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusion as a precaution against postpartum depression (PPD) in women undergoing cesarean section has not been substantiated systematically. A literature search for RCTs on DEX against PPD was retrieved in the following databases from inception to January 3, 2024: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, VIP, etc. A total of 13 RCTs with 1711 participants were included. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 and Stata16 using a random-effects model. EPDS scores were significantly decreased in the DEX group within one week or over one week postpartum compared to the control group (SMD = -1.25, 95 %CI: -1.73 to -0.77; SMD = -1.08, 95 %CI: -1.43 to -0.73). The prevalence of PPD was significantly inferior to the control at both time points (RR = 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.24 to 0.54; RR = 0.39, 95 %CI: 0.26 to 0.57). Univariate meta-regression suggested that age influenced the heterogeneity of the EPDS scores (P = 0.039), and DEX infusion dose was a potential moderator (P = 0.074). The subgroup analysis results of PPD scores at both time points were consistent, showing that: â Mothers younger than 30 years old had better sensitivity to DEX for treating PPD. â¡ The anti-PPD efficacy of continuous infusion of DEX by PCIA was superior to both single infusion and combined infusion. ⢠DEX showed a better anti-PPD effect when the total infusion dose was ≤ 2 µg/kg. Moreover, DEX improved analgesia and sleep quality, provided appropriate sedation, and reduced the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and chills. The current evidence confirmed the prophylaxis and superiority of DEX for PPD. More high-quality, large-scale RCTs are required for verifying the reliability and formulating administration methods.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Depresión Posparto , Dexmedetomidina , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Depresión Posparto/prevención & control , Embarazo , Infusiones Intravenosas , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Atención Perioperativa/métodosRESUMEN
Importance: Postpartum depression (PPD) is emerging as a major public health problem worldwide. Although the particular period and context in which PPD occurs provides an opportunity for preventive interventions, there is still a lack of pharmacologic prevention strategies for PPD. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine for prevention of PPD among women with prenatal depression undergoing cesarean delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled 338 women who screened positive for prenatal depression at 2 hospitals in Hunan, China from March 28, 2022, to April 16, 2023. Women with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9 who were 18 years of age or older and were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were eligible. Interventions: Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the dexmedetomidine group or the control group via centrally computer-generated group randomization. Dexmedetomidine, 0.5 µg/kg and 0.9% saline were intravenously infused for 10 minutes after delivery in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively. After infusion, sufentanil or dexmedetomidine plus sufentanil was administered via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for 48 hours in the control group and dexmedetomidine group, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was positive PPD screening results at 7 and 42 days post partum, defined as a postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of more than 9. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: All 338 participants were female, with a mean (SD) age of 31.5 (4.1) years. Positive PPD screening incidence at 7 and 42 days post partum in the dexmedetomidine group vs the control group was significantly decreased (day 7, 21 of 167 [12.6%] vs 53 of 165 [32.1%]; risk ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.25-0.62]; P < .001; day 42, 19 of 167 [11.4%] vs 50 of 165 [30.3%]; risk ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.23-0.61]; P < .001). The dexmedetomidine group showed no significant difference in adverse events vs the control group (46 of 169 [27.2%] vs 33 of 169 [19.5%]; P = .10), but the incidence of hypotension increased (31 of 169 [18.3%] vs 16 of 169 [9.5%]; risk ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.13-4.10]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Dexmedetomidine administration in the early postpartum period significantly reduced the incidence of a positive PPD screening and maintained a favorable safety profile. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200057213.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Dexmedetomidina , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Administración Intravenosa , Depresión Posparto/tratamiento farmacológico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapéutico , SufentaniloRESUMEN
Background: The present study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and absolute bioavailability (Fabs) of Dex nasal spray in healthy adult subjects, which serves as a bridge for the subsequent study in children. Methods: Part 1: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study was performed on 48 subjects. For 20-/40-µg groups, every 6/2 subjects received either Dex/placebo nasal spray or Dex/placebo injection in two periods. In total, 12/4 subjects each received 100 µg Dex/placebo nasal spray. Part 2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; 12/4 subjects received 150 µg Dex/placebo nasal spray. Part 3: a randomized, open, self-crossover study; 12 subjects received 20 µg and 100 µg Dex nasal spray in two periods alternately. The method of administration was optimized in Part 2 and Part 3. Results: In part 1, Dex nasal spray was well tolerated up to the maximum dose of 100 µg, whereas the Fabs was tolerated to only 28.9%-32.3%. In Part 2 and Part 3, the optimized nasal spray method was adopted to promote the Fabs of Dex nasal spray to 74.1%-89.0%. A severe adverse event was found in Part 2. In Part 3 (100 µg), the Ramsay score increased the most and lasted the longest, whereas the BIS score decreased most significantly. Conclusion: Using the optimized nasal spray method, a single dose of 20/100 µg of the test drug was safe and tolerable, and 100 µg may have approached or reached the plateau of sedation. In addition, it is found that the optimized method can greatly improve the bioavailability of the test drug, leading to its higher reference value.
RESUMEN
Background: With the development of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of various pulmonary diseases, the anesthesia/sedation requirements are becoming more demanding, posing great challenges for patient safety while ensuring a smooth examination/surgery process. Remimazolam, a brand-new ultra-short-acting anesthetic, may compensate for the shortcomings of current anesthetic/sedation strategies in bronchoscopy. Methods: This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel positive controlled phase 3 clinical trial. Subjects were randomized to receive 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam besylate or 2 mg/kg propofol during bronchoscopy to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam. Results: A total of 154 subjects were successfully sedated in both the remimazolam group and the propofol group, with a success rate of 99.4% (95%CI of the adjusted difference -6.7 × 10%-6% to -5.1 × 10%-6%). The sedative effect of remimazolam was noninferior to that of propofol based on the prespecified noninferiority margin of -5%. Compared with the propofol group, the time of loss of consciousness in the remimazolam group (median 61 vs. 48s, p < 0.001), the time from the end of study drug administration to complete awakening (median 17.60 vs. 12.80 min, p < 0.001), the time from the end of bronchoscopy to complete awakening (median 11.00 vs. 7.00 min, p < 0.001), the time from the end of study drug administration to removal of monitoring (median 19.50 vs. 14.50 min, p < 0.001), and the time from the end of bronchoscopy to removal of monitoring (median 12.70 vs. 8.60 min, p < 0.001) were slightly longer. The incidence of Adverse Events in the remimazolam group and the propofol group (74.8% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.59) was not statistically significant, and none of them had Serious Adverse Events. The incidence of hypotension (13.5% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001), hypotension requiring treatment (1.9% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.017), and injection pain (0.6% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group. Conclusion: Moderate sedation with 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam besylate is effective and safe during bronchoscopy. The incidence of hypotension and injection pain was less than with propofol, but the time to loss of consciousness and recovery were slightly longer. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR2000039753.