Implication of different frailty criteria in older people with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: the prevalence of physical and multidimensional frailty and their prognostic impact on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: to evaluated frailty in a cohort of patients with AF according to different criteria, and studied the prevalence and its prognostic impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: in this multicenter prospective cohort, 197 inpatients ≥ 65 years old with AF were recruited from September 2018 to April 2019.We used Fried Frailty phenotype (Fried) to assess physical frailty, and comprehensive geriatric assessment-frailty index (CGA-FI) to assess multidimensional frailty. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization. RESULTS: the prevalence of frailty was determined as 34.5% by Fried, 42.6% by CGA-FI. Malnutrition and ≥ 7 medications were independently associated with frailty. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the presence of frailty by CGA-FI had significantly lower all-cause mortality or rehospitalization survival rate (log-rank P = 0.04) within 1 year. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for age and sex showed that the frailty by CGA-FI was significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.10-2.90). However, those associations were absent with the physical frailty. After broader multivariate adjustment, those associations were no longer statistically significant for both types of frailty. CONCLUSIONS: in older people with AF, Multidimensional frailty is more significantly associated with a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year than physical frailty, but these association are attenuated after multivariate adjustment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1800017204; date of registration: 07/18/2018.

Effects of empagliflozin on cardiac structure, function and biomarkers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled prospective trial.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become the main type of HF worldwide. Although large randomised controlled studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors among patients with HFpEF, the mechanisms remain unclear. Basic research suggests that empagliflozin inhibits myocardial fibrosis. Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) can be calculated using cardiac MRI (CMRI), which can reflect the degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Studies show that empagliflozin can reduce ECV and left ventricular mass (LVM) assessed by CMRI in patients with diabetes with coronary heart disease and patients without diabetes with HF with reduced ejection fraction. However, whether empagliflozin reduces ECV and LVM among patients with HFpEF is unclear. This study intends to use CMRI to evaluate ECV and LVM, combined with echocardiography and an assessment of related biomarkers, to determine whether empagliflozin can improve myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular remodelling in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This report describes the study design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel-group clinical study. A total of 180 participants with HFpEF aged 40-80 years old who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into an empagliflozin treatment group or a placebo control group. The empagliflozin treatment group will receive 10 mg of empagliflozin per day for 6 months in addition to guideline-directed medical treatment, while the control group will receive placebo oral administration with guideline-directed medical therapy for 6 months. The primary outcomes are ECV and LVM changes measured by CMRI after 6 months of treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study design is approved by the ethical committee of Beijing Hospital (2022BJYYEC-070-02). The trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn). The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200060862).

Prevalence and Incidence of Heart Failure Among Urban Patients in China: A National Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale and population-based studies of heart failure (HF) incidence and prevalence are scarce in China. The study sought to estimate the prevalence, incidence, and cost of HF in China. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study using records of 50.0 million individuals ≥25 years old from the national urban employee basic medical insurance from 6 provinces in China in 2017. Incident cases were individuals with a diagnosis of HF (International Classification of Diseases code, and text of diagnosis) in 2017 with a 4-year disease-free period (2013-2016). We calculated standardized rates by applying age standardization to the 2010 Chinese census population. RESULTS: The age-standardized prevalence and incidence were 1.10% (1.10% among men and women) and 275 per 100 000 person-years (287 among men and 261 among women), respectively, accounting for 12.1 million patients with HF and 3.0 million patients with incident HF ≥25 years old. Both prevalence and incidence increased with increasing age (0.57%, 3.86%, and 7.55% for prevalence and 158, 892, and 1655 per 100 000 person-years for incidence among persons who were 25-64, 65-79, and ≥80 years of age, respectively). The inpatient mean cost per-capita was $4406.8 and the proportion with ≥3 hospitalizations among those hospitalized was 40.5%. The outpatient mean cost per-capita was $892.3. CONCLUSIONS: HF has placed a considerable burden on health systems in China, and strategies aimed at the prevention and treatment of HF are needed. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: ChiCTR2000029094.

Performance of Prognostic Risk Scores in Elderly Chinese Patients with Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: Elderly heart failure (HF) patients have different clinical characteristics and poorer prognosis compared with younger patients. Prognostic risk scores for HF have not been validated well in elderly patients. We aimed to validate the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) and the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score in an elderly Chinese HF cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 675 elderly HF patients (age≥70 years) discharged from our hospital between 2012 and 2017. The performance of the two risk scores was evaluated in terms of discrimination, using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, and calibration using a calibration plot and Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test. Absolute risk reclassification was used to compare the two scores. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up time of 32.6 months, 193 patients (28.6%) died, and 1-year mortality was 10.5%. The predicted median 1-year mortality was 8% for the SHFM and 18% for the MAGGIC score. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated that event rates of all-cause mortality significantly increased with increasing SHFM and MAGGIC scores. The discriminatory capacity of the SHFM was greater than that of the MAGGIC score (c-statistics were 0.72 and 0.67, respectively; P = 0.05). The calibration plot for the SHFM was better than that for MAGGIC score for 1-year mortality (SHFM: H-L χ2 =8.2, P = 0.41; MAGGIC: H-L χ2 =18.8, P =0.02). Compared with the MAGGIC score, the net reclassification index (NRI) of the SHFM was 2.96% (Z=5.88, P< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The SHFM performs better than MAGGIC score, having good discrimination, calibration and risk classification for the prediction of 1-year mortality in elderly Chinese HF patients.