Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(10): 8072-8083, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825101

RESUMEN

Supplemental dietary rumen available fats show promise as enteric methane (eCH4) mitigators for lactating dairy cows. However, concerns include variability in eCH4 response and possible negative effects on dairy cow performance. Successful implementation of this mitigation option requires better prediction of responses specifically to rumen available fatty acids (FA) as well as understanding the modulating effects of other dietary and animal characteristics. Using meta-analytic and meta-regression techniques, 35 published studies with diet definition were used to assess changes in eCH4 emissions and lactation performance associated with supplemental fat, specific supplemental rumen available FA types, and other dietary characteristics. Enteric CH4 (g/d) was reduced by 3.77% per percentage unit of supplemental rumen available ether extract (EE). Supplemental rumen available PUFA (C18:2 and C18:3) and UFA (C18:1, C18:2, C18:3) mitigated eCH4 (g/d) emissions in dairy cows by 6.88 and 4.65% per percentage unit increase, respectively. The anti-methanogenic effects of PUFA, MUFA and MCFA increased with correspondingly greater basal dietary levels of each FA type. Higher rumen-degradable starch (RDS; >18% DM) in the basal diet promoted greater reductions in eCH4 yield (eCH4/DMI, g/kg) with supplemental rumen available PUFA and UFA. Both milk fat percentage and yield (kg/d) were reduced with rumen available fat supplementation with a reduction of 7.8% and 6.0%, respectively, relative to control diets. Our results highlight the importance of determining basal levels of the rumen available FA before providing supplemental rumen available FA as an option for enteric eCH4 mitigation. Dairy nutritionists can use estimates generated from this analysis to predict changes in eCH4 emissions and dairy cow performance associated with dietary supplementation of rumen available EE and specific rumen available FA types for the purpose of eCH4 mitigation.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal , Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Lactancia , Metano , Leche , Rumen , Animales , Bovinos , Rumen/metabolismo , Metano/biosíntesis , Metano/metabolismo , Femenino , Dieta/veterinaria , Leche/química , Leche/metabolismo , Ácidos Grasos
2.
Data Brief ; 55: 110666, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044904

RESUMEN

Data and descriptive information were gathered from 226 peer-reviewed scientific publications from beef cattle experiments in which enteric methane and other animal response variables were measured. The dataset was based on the bibliography used by Arndt et al. (2022) but expanded to also include more recent studies published from 2019 to 2023. All articles were identified for inclusion in the dataset using the "Web of Science Core Collection", the "Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International (CABI)", and the "EBSCO Discovery Service" databases with the search terms "methane" and "enteric" in combination with "beef", "cattle", "rumen", and "ruminant". Additionally, the search term "rumen" was used in combination with "energy balance", "energy metabolism", or "energy partitioning". For dataset inclusion, it was necessary for all studies to be written in English and at a minimum, quantify feed dry matter intake and enteric methane emissions as well as provide measures of variance for these estimates. Studies were primarily designed as completely randomized, randomized block, or crossover experiments. The dataset includes 895 records (rows) and 138 variables (columns). Reported variables include publication information, experimental design, animal description, methane measurement method, diet nutrient composition, and means and measures of variance for feed dry matter intake and enteric methane emissions. Additionally, depending on the study, data reported on rumen fermentation parameters, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, weight gain, and carbon dioxide and hydrogen emissions were included. This dataset can be used to explore the efficacy of enteric methane mitigation strategies and their impact on beef cattle nutrition and production. Furthermore, the dataset can potentially be used to investigate possible nutrient and feed additive interactions.

3.
Data Brief ; 49: 109459, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37577736

RESUMEN

A dataset of descriptive information was compiled from 213 peer-reviewed scientific publications that focused on dairy cow experiments and measured enteric methane emissions. This dataset was primarily based on the bibliography used by Arndt et al. (2022), with the addition of studies conducted from 2019 to 2022. The articles were identified for inclusion in the dataset using the "Web of Science Core Collection" database, using various combinations of search terms related to methane, dairy, cattle, rumen, ruminant, energy balance, energy metabolism, energy partitioning, and enteric emissions. For inclusion in the dataset, studies had to be written in English and provide information on enteric methane emission, as well as report feed dry matter intake along with measures of variance. Both continuous and crossover design studies were included, resulting in a comprehensive dataset with 797 records (rows) and 162 variables (columns). The variables cover various aspects such as publication information, experimental design, animal description, methane measurement method, and diet nutrient composition. Additionally, when available, the dataset includes treatment means and measures of variance for feed dry matter intake, rumen fermentation parameters, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, milk yield, milk components, as well as enteric methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen emissions. Researchers can use this dataset to assess the effectiveness of different enteric methane mitigation strategies and their impact on milk yield and other essential dairy cow nutrition and performance variables. Furthermore, it offers the opportunity to explore potential interactions between nutrients and feed additives.

4.
Data Brief ; 38: 107358, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34557573

RESUMEN

Dairy cows convert human-indigestible forages and byproducts nutrients into edible food for humans [1]. Because of microbiota located in their rumen, dairy cows can digest fibrous forages and feeds which are not exploited by humans and monogastric animals like pigs. Dairy cows in the U.S. have been fed byproduct feeds as part of their diet for decades [2], [3]. Dairy nutritionists use complex nutrition models to develop economical and nutritious diets composed of grains, byproduct feeds, and forages. Accurate, complete, up-to-date information on byproduct feed consumption by dairy cows would be useful for both public and private researchers seeking to understand the type and extent of byproduct usage on US dairies. In collaboration with the American Feed Industry Association (AFIA), a survey was sent to US feed company representatives inquiring about the types and amounts of byproducts sold as dairy cow feed during the last year, the number of lactating cows serviced, the amount of milk produced by these lactating cows, and the states where these cows were located. A similar survey was sent to practicing US dairy nutritionists inquiring about their typical daily feeding rates of byproduct feeds by type, the number of cows consuming these byproducts, the amount of milk produced by the lactating cows, and the states where these cows were located. Survey data are representative of 33.5% of US lactating cows and 35.7% of US milk production in 2019 [4]. Amounts of each type of byproduct feed consumed per US milking cow (including replacement heifers and dry cows) and per kg of milk produced were calculated for the US and its four regions [5]. Total 2019 regional and US byproduct consumption by type was calculated. Nutrient compositions of each byproduct feed were reported.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA