Dose-dense therapy is of benefit in primary treatment of ovarian cancer: contra.

Several studies in the past have tried to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer by increasing the dose intensity of platinum. Only 2 out of 12 randomized studies showed survival benefit at the cost of significant long-term toxicity. Dose-dense induction therapy with combined weekly paclitaxel (at a dose of 90 mg/m(2)) and weekly carboplatin [at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4 mg·ml/min] followed by 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin was very effective in platinum-resistant patients (response 58%, progression-free survival 10 months). In first-line, however, no survival benefit was found with the same dose-dense weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen over standard-dosed 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in a randomized study. Very recently, the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) study no. 3016, randomizing patients in first-line between dose-dense weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) plus 3-weekly carboplatin AUC 6 and 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin, showed a significant increase in progression-free survival (median 28 versus 17.2 months in the control arm; hazard ratio for progression, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.88; P=0.0015). The 3-year overall survival was 72% versus 65% (P=0.03), respectively. The hematologic toxicity was substantial in both arms and substantially higher than observed with the weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin induction regimen. Many patients had treatment delays, dose reductions and stopped treatment prematurely. The JGOG 3016 study is the only dose-dense study with such a significant survival benefit. It is also the only dose-intensity study performed in Asian patients. Genotypes and phenotypes are thought to represent important determinants of drug efficacy in ovarian cancer. Therefore, confirmatory studies with this JGOG regimen together with translational research are needed in both Caucasian and Asian patients.

Chemosensitivity and outcome of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy compared with sporadic ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Because it is insufficiently clear whether BRCA-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more chemosensitive than sporadic EOC, we examined response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated versus sporadic EOC patients. METHODS: Data about patient characteristics, response to and outcome after primary therapy, including chemotherapy, were collected from 99 BRCA1, 13 BRCA2 and 222 sporadic patients. Analyses were carried out using a chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: Complete response (CR) or no evidence of disease (NED) was observed in 87% of the BRCA1 patients, progressive disease (PD) in 2%, being 71% and 15%, respectively, in sporadic EOC patients (P = 0.002). In BRCA2 patients, 92% had CR/NED, and none PD (P = 0.27). Median PFS in BRCA1, BRCA2 and sporadic patients was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.5] years (P = 0.006), 5.6 (95% CI 0.0-11.5) years (P = 0.008) and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) years, respectively. Median OS in the three groups was 5.9 (95% CI 4.7-7.0) years (P < 0.001), >10 years (P = 0.008), and 2.9 (95% CI 2.2-3.5) years, respectively. A trend for a longer PFS and OS in BRCA2 compared with BRCA1 patients was observed. CONCLUSION: Compared with sporadic EOC patients, both BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated patients have improved outcomes after primary therapy, including chemotherapy.

The prediction of progression-free and overall survival in women with an advanced stage of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Prognosis in women with ovarian cancer mainly depends on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and the ability to perform optimal cytoreductive surgery. Since ovarian cancer has a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course, predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the individual patient is difficult. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of PFS and OS in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after primary cytoreductive surgery and first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals and one university hospital in the south-western part of the Netherlands. POPULATION: Women with advanced stage EOC. METHODS: All women who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC followed by first-line platinum-based chemotherapy between January 1998 and October 2004 were identified. To investigate independent predictors of PFS and OS, a Cox' proportional hazard model was used. Nomograms were generated with the identified predictive parameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was OS and the secondary outcome measures were response and PFS. RESULTS: A total of 118 women entered the study protocol. Median PFS and OS were 15 and 44 months, respectively. Preoperative platelet count (P = 0.007), and residual disease <1 cm (P = 0.004) predicted PFS with a optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.63. Predictive parameters for OS were preoperative haemoglobin serum concentration (P = 0.012), preoperative platelet counts (P = 0.031) and residual disease <1 cm (P = 0.028) with a optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.67. CONCLUSION: PFS could be predicted by postoperative residual disease and preoperative platelet counts, whereas residual disease, preoperative platelet counts and preoperative haemoglobin serum concentration were predictive for OS. The proposed nomograms need to be externally validated.

Management of recurrent endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: an overview.

In this paper, an overview of the literature on the management of recurrent endometrial cancer is presented, focusing on patients with histopathologic endometrioid type of tumors. The different treatment modalities are described, and a management recommendation scheme is presented. Indications for surgical treatment depend on resectability, site and size of the tumor, and performance status of the patient. Indications for radiotherapy depend on the site of the recurrence and also on the initial therapy received. When considering systemic treatment for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, it is important to take into account the general health status and condition of the patient as well as which prior therapy the patient has received. The treatments of choice for patients with hormone-sensitive tumors (positive receptor levels, low-grade tumors, and long disease-free interval) are progestagens as first-line treatment and tamoxifen as second-line treatment. Patients with high-grade tumors, negative hormone receptor levels, and short treatment-free interval are best treated with chemotherapy. Paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin are the most active combination therapy for these patients but with significant toxicity. In phase II studies, the combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin seems to be as effective but less toxic and can be administered in outpatient clinic. The literature on the management of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer is discussed in detail. The different sites of recurrent disease (ie, local, regional, and/or distant) are evaluated separately; management recommendations are proposed, and alternative approaches are given.

Management of surgical stage III and IV endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: an overview.

This paper covers an overview of the literature on the management of advanced endometrial cancer, concentrating on patients with histopathologic endometrioid type of tumors. The different treatment modalities are described and management recommendations are proposed.The standard surgical procedure includes an extrafacial total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, collection of peritoneal washings for cytology, and exploration of the intraabdominal contents. In cases of extensive disease in the abdomen, an optimal surgical cytoreduction is associated with improved survival. Further treatment with radiotherapy may be indicated based on the pathological staging information to improve loco-regional control. Primary radiotherapy is indicated in cases where surgery is contraindicated. Systemic treatment can either be hormone therapy or chemotherapy. Progesterons are the cornerstone of hormone therapy. Prognostic factors for response are the presence of high levels of progesterone and estrogen receptors and low grade histology. Paclitaxel is the most active single agent drug. The combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin is adopted as first choice in patients with endometrial cancer because of the efficacy and low toxicity, although not proven in a randomized trial.The literature on the management of patients with advanced endometrial cancer is discussed in detail. Each stage of advanced disease is presented separately, and management recommendations are proposed, and alternative approaches are given.Ongoing clinical trials are described, and the focuses of ongoing research are mentioned.

Serum proteomic patterns for ovarian cancer monitoring.

We set out to discover ovarian cancer biomarkers useful for monitoring progression during and after chemotherapy and possibly for diagnosis. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to create serum protein profiles of ovarian cancer patients before chemotherapy or at progression (n = 51) (trial initiated by the Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial) that were compared with those of healthy individuals (n = 31). In addition, sera profiles from ovarian cancer patients after chemotherapy (n = 12) were compared with those of ovarian cancer patients at progression (n = 24). One of the discovered biomarkers was identified and subsequently confirmed and validated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eight primary (sens = 94%, spec = 97%, P < 0.0001) and seven progression tumor biomarkers (sens = 91%, spec = 97%, P < 0.0001) were discovered. In addition, we discovered eight potential progression monitoring biomarkers (sens = 75%, spec = 83%, P = 0.0008) of which one, a biomarker of 11.7 kd, was further identified as serum amyloid A1. Independent validation (ELISA) showed an elevated expression of this protein at relapse in four of the seven ovarian cancer patients tested. Combining the eight newly discovered progression monitoring biomarkers with CA125 resulted in a clear increase of the sensitivity (91-100%). These biomarkers, in combination with for instance CA125, should be validated in large ovarian cancer and control groups. The resulting multimarker assay could be suitable for disease monitoring during and after therapy and might also be useful for ovarian cancer screening.

Preoperative predictors for residual tumor after surgery in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Suboptimal debulking (>1 cm residual tumor) results in poor survival rates for patients with an advanced stage of ovarian cancer. The purpose of this study was to develop a prediction model, based on simple preoperative parameters, for patients with an advanced stage of ovarian cancer who are at risk of suboptimal cytoreduction despite maximal surgical effort. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 187 consecutive patients with a suspected clinical diagnosis of advanced-stage ovarian cancer undergoing upfront debulking between January 1998 and December 2003. Preoperative parameters were Karnofsky performance status, ascites and serum concentrations of CA 125, hemoglobin, albumin, LDH and blood platelets. The main outcome parameter was residual tumor >1 cm. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was employed for testing possible prediction models. A clinically applicable graphic model (nomogram) for this prediction was to be developed. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of CA 125 and blood platelets in the group with residual tumor >1 cm were higher in comparison to the optimally cytoreduced group (p < 0.0001 and <0.01, respectively). Serum albumin and hemoglobin levels were lower in the group with residual tumor (p < 0.0001 and <0.05, respectively). The frequency of preoperative ascites was higher in the group with residual tumor (p < 0.0005). The prediction model, consisting of CA 125 and albumin, for remaining with residual tumor showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.79. A nomogram for probability of residual tumor >1 cm based on serum levels of CA 125 and albumin was established. CONCLUSION: Postoperative residual tumor despite maximal surgical effort can be predicted by preoperative CA 125 and serum albumin levels. With a nomogram based on these two parameters, probability of postoperative residual tumor in each individual patient can be predicted. This proposed nomogram may be valuable in daily routine practice for counseling and to select treatment modality.

Alterations in the p53 pathway and prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer: a multi-factorial analysis of the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer group (study 55865).

PURPOSE: The study was designed to determine independent prognostic variables in suboptimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer patients entered in the randomised phase III study EORTC 55865. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Retrospectively collected paraffin blocks from 169 patients with stages IIb-IV epithelial ovarian cancer, taken at primary debulking surgery, were analysed. All patients were treated with cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (CP), and followed up for a median of 10 years. Expression of p53, bcl-2, P21, Ki-67 and HER-2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Expression of p21, a downstream effector of the p53 gene, was found to be a favourable prognostic factor for survival (HR 0.58, CI 0.36-0.94, p=0.025) in addition to FIGO stage (HR 1.54, CI 1.08-2.21, p=or<0.02). For progression free survival (PFS), both p21 (HR 0.52) and Ki-67 (HR 0.6) were significant factors. CONCLUSION: P21 overexpression is a positive prognostic factor for survival and PFS in advanced ovarian carcinoma with residual lesions of more than 1 cm.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the novel indoloquinone bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic drug E09.

BACKGROUND: A novel bioreductive alkylating indoloquinone compound, E09 [3-hydroxy-5-aziridinyl-1-methyl-2-(1H-indole-4,7-indione)- prop-F128b-en-alpha-ol], has been shown to have distinct antitumor activity against solid tumors, excellent activity under hypoxic conditions, but no notable bone marrow toxicity in preclinical models. PURPOSE: A phase I study was carried out to determine the toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacology, and antitumor response of E09. METHODS: E09 was administered as a 5-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks to 32 patients with solid tumors. The starting dose of 2.7 mg/m2 was one tenth of the mouse equivalent of lethal dose to 10% of animals (MELD10). Dose was escalated by 100% until the area under the curve (AUC) at the MELD10 was reached, following a Fibonacci-like schedule. The pharmacokinetics of E09 and its metabolite E05A with an open aziridine ring was determined using a new high-pressure liquid chromatographic method and noncompartmental calculation of kinetic parameters. The sigmoid Emax model was used to fit pharmacokinetic parameters to toxicity. The renal function and proteinuria were quantitated and were further evaluated by determining renal clearance ratios of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to albumin and pancreatic amylase to salivary amylase. RESULTS: The 32 patients were treated with a total of 85 assessable courses of E09. The dose-limiting toxicity was proteinuria, which was accompanied by sodium and water retention. All symptoms were reversible on day 15 except in two patients, who developed acute renal failure. The ratios of IgG to albumin and pancreatic amylase to salivary amylase suggested a loss of glomerular negative charge consistent with a minimal change glomerulopathy. The pharmacokinetics of E09 showed its rapid elimination from the central compartment but with wide interpatient variation in the overall disposition of the drug. Total plasma clearance of E09 ranged from 3.2 to 24 L/min. The AUC of E09 was linearly related to the administered dose. The relationship between the AUC and proteinuria was best fitted by the sigmoid Emax model (r = .98). In two patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site and in a third patient with bile duct cancer, a partial response was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of E09 was determined to be 27 mg/m2. The standard approach of drug administration is considered unsuitable because of potential renal toxicity and wide variability in the pharmacokinetics of E09. Individual dose adjustments based on plasma concentration measurements are recommended to combine maximally achievable exposure with tolerable toxicity.

Predictability of the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Based on material from two clinical trials performed by The Netherlands Joint Study Group for Ovarian Cancer, we constructed a prognostic index (PI) with considerable predictive power for long-term survival of patients treated with cytotoxic combination chemotherapy including cisplatin. The pretreatment characteristics needed for the calculation of the PI are the Karnofsky index, the site of metastases expressed as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, the size of residual tumor, the Broders' grade, and the presence of ascites. In the subgroup comprising the 10% of the patients with the best prognosis, 4-year survival was 75%, whereas all of the patients in the subgroup comprising the 10% with the poorest prognosis died within 4 years, which illustrates the large variability of the prognosis among patients. The PI was found to retain its value after response was achieved. The information provided by the PI can be expected to be useful in treatment planning and for proper stratification of patients in clinical trials.

Phase I study of 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetic interaction, and possible sequence-dependent effects of the irinotecan/cisplatin combination given every 3 weeks, and to assess the influence of additional granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received no more than one prior combination chemotherapy regimen or two single-agent regimens were entered. Treatment consisted of a 90-minute irinotecan infusion followed by a 3-hour cisplatin infusion on day 1, with cycles repeated once every 3 weeks. After the maximum-tolerated dose was determined, the sequence of administration was reversed. In a separate cohort of six patients, we assessed the effect of G-CSF on the experienced hematologic toxicity and dose-intensity. Irinotecan doses ranged from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) and cisplatin doses ranged from 60 to 80 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients entered the study; one was not eligible, and two were not assessable for response. Twenty-five patients were pretreated, and 26 were not. Fifty-one patients received a total of 223 courses. The dose-limiting toxicity was a combination of neutropenic fever, diarrhea, and fatigue at a dose level combining irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was common (grades 3 to 4, 68%). Irinotecan pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied. No sequence-dependent side effects were observed. Tumor responses included three complete responses and eight partial responses. CONCLUSION: For phase II studies, we recommend irinotecan 260 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks for chemotherapy-naive patients in good physical condition, and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) for other patients.

Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5HT3 antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained.

PURPOSE: Several investigators have reported that the efficacy of 5HT3 receptor antagonists is maintained over repeated cycles of chemotherapy. These investigators presented conditional probabilities of protection. Because conditional analyses by definition only include patients with protection in previous cycles, the results are flattered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We applied a novel statistical approach to investigate whether the efficacy of the 5HT3 receptor antagonist ICS 205-930 (tropisetron) is maintained over repeated cycles of weekly high-dose cisplatin. Overall protection was determined based on cumulative probabilities with the Kaplan-Meier method. Complete protection was calculated with a three state model for transitional probabilities. Eighty-three patients were studied. RESULTS: Over six consecutive cycles, protection against both acute and delayed emesis decreased significantly. The initial complete and overall protection rates against acute emesis of 71% and 95%, respectively, decreased to 43% and 72% in the sixth cycle of chemotherapy. Similarly, the protection rates of 31% and 68% against delayed emesis decreased to 6% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that overall and complete long-term protection is more accurately measured by cumulative probabilities than with a method that is based on conditional probabilities. Our statistical approach shows that the efficacy of 5HT3 antagonists is not maintained.

European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion.

PURPOSE: Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) is a new anticancer agent with activity in a number of human tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer. In nonrandomized trials, doses studied have ranged from 135 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours with premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). This study addressed two questions: the dose-response relationship of Taxol in relapsed ovarian cancer and the safety of a short infusion given with premedication. METHODS: Women with platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized in a bifactorial design to receive either 175 or 135 mg/m2 of Taxol over either 24 or 3 hours. Major end points were the frequency of significant HSRs and objective response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 407 patients randomized, 391 were eligible and 382 assessable for response. Analysis was performed according to the bifactorial design. Severe HSRs were rare (1.5% patients) and were not affected by either dose or schedule. Response was slightly higher at the 175-mg/m2 dose (20%) than at 135 mg/m2 (15%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .2). However, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group (19 v 14 weeks; P = .02). Significantly more neutropenia was seen when Taxol was administered as a 24-hour infusion. Response rates were similar in the 24- and 3-hour groups (19% and 16%, respectively; P = .6). No survival differences were noted. CONCLUSION: The 3-hour infusion of Taxol is safe when given with premedication and is associated with less neutropenia. There is a modest dose effect with longer time to progression at 175 mg/m2. The observation that longer infusion produces more myelosuppression but does not yield higher response rates should lead to further studies to determine the optimal dose and schedule of this interesting new agent.

Randomized trial comparing two combination chemotherapy regimens (CHAP-5 v CP) in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

One hundred ninety-one patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with either a combination of doxorubicin and a five-day course of cisplatin alternating with cyclophosphamide and hexamethylmelamine orally for 14 days (CHAP-5) or cyclophosphamide and cisplatin both administered intravenously (IV) on a single day at 3-week intervals (CP). At a median follow-up time of 45 months, treatment with each of these combinations resulted in the same remission rates (80% and 74%, respectively) and exactly the same progression-free survival and overall survival (median, 26 months). Despite adequate hydration, more renal toxicity was encountered in the CP-treated patients than in those who received CHAP-5. Disabling neurotoxicity and severe myelosuppression were encountered more frequently in the patients treated with CHAP-5. Because the toxicity was lower and CP treatment required shorter hospitalization, the single-day regimen was considered preferable for future use. The Karnofsky index was the only independent predictor for response, whereas both this index and the size of residual tumor before chemotherapy were predictive of survival. After correcting for other prognostic factors, it was determined that tumor size associated with improved survival was less than 1 cm. The site of metastases in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV patients did not influence survival within this category. The results of this study confirm our previous findings that patients with microscopic remnants at second-look have a survival similar to that of patients who are histopathologically free of disease. This makes the significance of so-called pathologically confirmed complete remission questionable. The survival benefit of debulking surgery performed during chemotherapy seems only minimal for patients in whom debulking has already been attempted before treatment. Like others, we have found the CP regimen to have a good therapeutic index.

Phase II and pharmacologic study of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous infusion to patients with colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Preclinical data have indicated that topoisomerase I inhibitors demonstrate more efficacy and have a greater therapeutic index with prolonged continuous exposure. The feasibility of this concept in humans using a 21-day continuous infusion of topotecan has been reported. We conducted a phase II study of this 21-day continuous topotecan administration schedule in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan, initially applied at a dose of 0.6 mg/m2/d, was administered as a continuous infusion via an ambulatory pump for 21 days repeated every 4 weeks. The starting dose was reduced to 0.5 mg/m2/d, because in five of the first 11 patients, the second course had to be delayed due to prolonged myelosuppression. Forty-two patients entered the study; one patient was ineligible and was excluded from further analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 10%, with one complete and three partial responses. The median response duration was 7 months (range, 4 to 11). With this schedule, the major toxicity was prolonged cumulative myelosuppression, including a marked inhibition of erythropoiesis. A total transfusion of 250 U of erythrocytes was needed to maintain a hemoglobin level greater than 6.0 mmol/L. Other side effects were mild, and included alopecia (47%), periodic nausea (40%)/vomiting (22%), and fatigue (16%). Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed a mean steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of topotecan of 0.62 ng/mL (range, 0.33 to 1.1), with a significant relationship between the Css of topotecan and common cytotoxicity criteria (CTC) grade of leukocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous infusion exerts minor activity as single-agent therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase I pharmacologic study of oral topotecan and intravenous cisplatin: sequence-dependent hematologic side effects.

PURPOSE: In in vitro studies, synergism and sequence-dependent effects were reported for the combination of topotecan and cisplatin. Recently, an oral formulation of topotecan became available. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination of oral topotecan and cisplatin, the pharmacokinetic interaction, and sequence-dependent effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan was administered orally (PO) daily for 5 days in escalating doses and cisplatin was given intravenously (IV) at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) either before topotecan administration on day 1 (sequence CT) or after topotecan administration on day 5 (sequence TC) once every 3 weeks. Patients were treated in a randomized cross-over design. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were entered onto the study; one patient was not eligible. Sequence CT induced significantly more severe myelosuppression than did sequence TC, and the maximum-tolerated dosage of topotecan in sequence CT was 1.25 mg/m(2)/d x 5. In sequence TC, the maximum-tolerated dosage of topotecan was 2.0 mg/m(2)/d x 5. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of myelosuppression and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetics of topotecan and cisplatin were linear over the dose range studied; no sequence-dependent effects were observed. In addition, topotecan did not influence the protein binding of cisplatin or the platinum-DNA adduct formation in peripheral leukocytes in either sequence. CONCLUSION: The recommended dosages for phase II studies involving patients like the patients in our study are topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2)/d PO x 5 preceded by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV day 1 once every 3 weeks, and topotecan 2.0 mg/m(2)/d PO followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV day 5. No pharmacokinetic interaction could be discerned in our study. The antitumor efficacy of both schedules should be evaluated in a randomized phase II study.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects with an emphasis on sequence-dependent side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were not pretreated with taxanes or cisplatin derivatives and who had received no more than one prior combination chemotherapy regimen or two single-agent regimens were entered. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion followed by cisplatin as a 3-hour infusion (schedule A), or cisplatin followed by docetaxel (schedule B). Docetaxel doses ranged from 55 to 100 mg/m2 and cisplatin doses from 50 to 100 mg/m2. RESULTS: Leukocytopenia and granulocytopenia were common (overall, 90%; grade 3 or 4, 87%), short-lasting, and docetaxel dose-dependent. Infections and neutropenic fever occurred in 10% and 4.5% of courses, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, neurotoxicity, fluid retention, and skin and nail toxicity. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between schedules A and B. Tumor responses included one complete response (CR) and nine partial responses (PRs). CONCLUSION: The dose levels docetaxel 100 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 appeared to be manageable. At these dose levels, the median relative dose-intensity was high and 81% and 88% of all cycles, respectively, could be given at full dose. Schedule A is advocated for further treatment.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral (PEG-1000) 9-aminocamptothecin in adult patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: 9-Amino-20(S)-camptothecin (9-AC) is a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase-I. Recently, a bioavailability of approximately 48% for the oral PEG-1000 formulation was reported. We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral PEG-1000 formulation of 9-AC to define the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profiles, pharmacokinetic-dynamic relationships, and preliminary antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with oral (PEG-1000) 9-AC given once a day for 7 or 14 days at doses ranging from 0.25 to 1.1 mg/m(2)/d; cycles were repeated every 21 days. For pharmacokinetic analysis, plasma sampling was performed on days 1 and 6 or 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. RESULTS: Thirty patients were entered onto the study; three patients were not assessable for toxicity and response. Twenty-seven patients received a total of 89 courses. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were myelosuppression and diarrhea at a dose of 1.1 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days. Pharmacokinetics showed a substantial interpatient variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 9-AC. The intrapatient variability was extremely small. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in WBC count and the AUC of 9-AC lactone (r(2) = 0.86). One partial response was noted in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: DLTs in this phase I study of oral 9-AC daily for 14 days every 21 days were myelosuppression and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 0.84 mg/m(2)/d. In view of the substantial interpatient variability in AUC and the availability of a limited sampling model, a pharmacokinetic guided phase II study should be considered.

A phase I and pharmacologic study of the MDR converter GF120918 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to chemotherapy can partly be explained by the activity of membrane bound P-glycoprotein. Competitive inhibition of P-glycoprotein, by multidrug resistance (MDR) converters, may overcome this MDR. Previously studied MDR converters either have serious intrinsic side effects or considerably influence the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic agents at concentrations theoretically required to convert MDR. GF120918 is a third-generation MDR converter with high affinity for P-glycoprotein and can be given orally. We performed a phase 1 study with escalating doses of GF120918 in combination with doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 46 patients with advanced solid tumors. Doxorubicin was administered on day 1 (cycle 1), GF120918 on days 22-24 (cycle 2), and on days 29-33 with doxorubicin administered on day 31 (cycle 3). Pharmacokinetics of both GF120918 and doxorubicin were studied. The starting daily dose of GF120918 was 50 mg and was to be increased in subsequent cohorts until a steady state plasma level of 100 ng/ml was reached. The starting dose of doxorubicin was 50 mg/m2 and was to be increased after reaching the target dose level of GF120918. RESULTS: In 37 of the 46 patients, full pharmacokinetic data from the three scheduled cycles were obtained. Pharmacokinetics of GF120918 showed a less than linear increase in Cmax with increasing doses, with considerable interpatient variation. The target steady-state plasma level for GF120918 was exceeded in 12 out of 19 patients who received 400 mg GF120918 alone twice daily and in 12 of 17 patients who received 400 mg GF120918 twice daily in combination with doxorubicin. GF120918 pharmacokinetics were not influenced by coadministration of doxorubicin. The doxorubicin AUC was only marginally influenced by GF120918 and only at the highest dose levels. In these patients there was a significant increase in the AUC of doxorubicinol in cycle 3 as compared to cycle 1. Hematologic toxicity mainly consisted of neutropenia and was more severe in cycle 3 than in cycle 1 (13 vs 5 patients with grade 4 neutropenia, P=0.003). Neutropenic fever was the dose-limiting toxicity at a doxorubicin dose of 75 mg/m2 with 400 mg GF120918 twice daily. The toxicity of GF120918 was limited to somnolence in eight patients and occasional gastrointestinal complaints. CONCLUSION: GF120918 is an MDR converter with only minimal side effects at a dose level yielding concentrations able to convert the action of P-glycoprotein in vitro. A doxorubicin dose of 60 mg/m2 on day 3 in combination with 400 mg GF120918 twice daily on days 1-5 is an acceptable regimen for further clinical trials.

The orally administered P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 does not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

This Phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of combining docetaxel with the new P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 and to determine the dose limiting toxicity of this combination. Fifteen patients received oral R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 200 to 300 mg twice daily (b.i.d.; cycle 0), an escalating i.v. dose of docetaxel (60, 75, and 100 mg/m2) as a 1-h infusion (cycle 1), and the combination (cycle 2 and further). Dose limiting toxicity consisting of mucositis and neutropenic fever was reached at the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933, 300 mg b.i.d., and the maximum tolerated dose was established at docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933, 200 mg b.i.d. Plasma concentrations of R101933 achieved in patients were in the same range as required in preclinical rodent models to overcome paclitaxel resistance. The plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not influenced by the R101933 regimen at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 26.5 +/- 7.78 liters/h/m2 and 23.4 +/- 4.52 liters/h/m2 (P = 0.15) in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. These findings indicate that the contribution of a P-glycoprotein inhibitor to the activity of anticancer chemotherapy can now be assessed in patients for the first time independent of its effect on drug pharmacokinetics.