Elderly multiple myeloma patients experience less deterioration in health-related quality of life than younger patients compared to a normative population: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry.

The objectives of this study were to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between multiple myeloma (MM) patients aged ≤65 and >65 years and to compare this with a normative population. Factors associated with HRQOL were identified. The population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was used to select MM patients diagnosed from 1999 to 2010. Patients (n = 289) were invited to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module 20 (QLQ-MY20), and 212 patients responded (73 %). Data from the normative population (n = 568) were used for comparison. MM patients >65 years scored better on emotional functioning (p < 0.05) and financial problems (p < 0.01) compared to patients ≤65 years. Patients ≤65 years reported better body image and future perspective (p < 0.01). Compared to the normative population, patients ≤65 years scored worse on all EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales and on global health/QOL, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, appetite loss, and financial problems (p < 0.01). Patients >65 years scored worse on social, physical, and role functioning and on global health/QOL, fatigue, pain, and dyspnea (p < 0.01). Younger patients had worse HRQOL compared to the normative population than elderly patients. Patients with comorbidities reported lower QOL. The longer the time since diagnosis, the better the physical functioning. No major differences in HRQOL were found between younger and older MM patients. Compared to that of the normative population, HRQOL in younger patients was worse than that in older patients. The number of comorbidities and time since diagnosis were associated with HRQOL. MM patients reported that a high symptom burden and therapy should, besides prolonging survival, be aimed at improving HRQOL.

Factors that influence treatment decision-making in elderly DLBCL patients: a case vignette study.

Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are frequently not treated with standard immunochemotherapy, and this influences survival negatively. The purpose of this study was to gain more insight into treatment decision-making by hematologists. Case vignettes concerning patients with DLBCL were presented to hematologists in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics (age, comorbidity) differed per case. Respondents were asked in each case if they would treat the patient with curative intent by means of full-dose chemotherapy or chemotherapy with dose reduction or if they would not treat the patient with curative intent. The vast majority of respondents would treat an elderly patient diagnosed with DLBCL without a relevant medical history with full-dose chemotherapy irrespective of age. In the presence of comorbidity, lack of social support, cognitive disorders, and untreated depression dose reductions in advance are frequently applied or patients are not treated with curative intent. This is most pronounced for patients aged older than 80 years. Respondents working in a university hospital more frequently refrain form full-dose chemotherapy with curative intent compared to respondents working in tertiary medical teaching hospitals or general hospitals. Patients without a relevant medical history are generally treated with curative intent irrespective of age. Cognitive disorders, comorbidity, and depression reduce the change of being treated with curative intent. This is most prominent in the eldest patient category.

Quality of life more impaired in younger than in older diffuse large B cell lymphoma survivors compared to a normative population: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry.

The objective of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors of different age categories (18-59/60-75/76-85 years) and to compare their HRQOL with an age- and sex-matched normative population. The population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry was used to select all patients diagnosed with DLBCL from 1999 to 2010. Patients (n = 363) were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire, and 307 survivors responded (85 %). Data from an age- and sex-matched normative population (n = 596) were used for comparison. DLBCL survivors aged 18-59 years scored better on physical functioning, quality of life, appetite loss and constipation than survivors of 76-85 years old (all p < 0.05). Financial problems more often occurred in survivors aged 18-59 years compared to survivors of 76-85 years old (p < 0.01). Compared to the normative population, DLBCL survivors aged 18-59 years showed worse scores on cognitive and social functioning and on dyspnea and financial problems (p < 0.01, large- and medium-size effects). In survivors of the other age categories, only differences with trivial or small-size effects were found. Although younger DLBCL survivors have better HRQOL than older survivors, the differences found between younger survivors and normative population were the largest. This suggests that having DLBCL has a greater impact on younger than older survivors and that the worse HRQOL observed in older DLBCL survivors in comparison with younger survivors is caused mostly by age itself and not by the disease.

Cognitive Functioning in Survivors of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With a Matched General Population Sample-The Maastricht Observational Study of Late Effects After Stem Cell trAnsplantation Study.

Although cognitive problems can recover over time, a subgroup of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) survivors experience persistent cognitive problems in the long term. Despite these implications, studies assessing cognitive functioning in HCT survivors are limited. The aim of the present study was (1) to quantify the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients treated with HCT who survived at least 2 years and to compare these with a matched reference group representing the general population; (2) to identify potential determinants of cognitive functioning within the HCT survivor group. Within the single-center Maastricht Observational study of late effects after Stem cell trAnsplantation, cognitive performance was assessed by a neuropsychological test battery divided into 3 cognitive domains: memory, information processing speed, and executive function and attention. An overall cognition score was calculated as the average of the domain scores. A total of 115 HCT survivors were group-matched on a 1:4 ratio to the reference group by age, sex, and level of education. Regression analyses adjusted for different sets of covariates including demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors were used to test for differences in cognition between HCT survivors and the reference group resembling the general population. A limited set of clinical characteristics (diagnosis, type of transplant, time since treatment, conditioning regimen with total body irradiation and age at time of transplantation) were assessed as potential determinants of neurocognitive dysfunction among HCT survivors. Cognitive impairment was defined as scores in the cognitive domains < -1.5 standard deviation (SD) from what can be expected based on someone's age, sex, and education. The mean age at time of transplantation was 50.2 (SD ± 11.2) years, and the mean number of years after transplant was 8.7 (SD ± 5.7) years. The majority of HCT survivors were treated with autologous HCT (n = 73 [64%]). The prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was 34.8% in HCT survivors and 21.3% in the reference group (p = .002.) When adjusted for age, sex, and level of education, HCT survivors had a worse overall cognition score (b = -0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to -0.16; p < .001), translating into 9.0 years of higher cognitive age. Analyses of specific cognitive domain scores showed that HCT survivors scored worse on memory (b = -0.43; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.13; p = .005), information processing speed (b = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.55 to -0.11; p = .003), and executive function and attention (b = -0.29; 95% CI, -.55 to -.03; p = .031) than the reference group. The odds of cognitive impairment were on average 2.4 times higher among HCT survivors than the reference group (odd ratio = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.47-4.07; p = .001). Within the HCT survivor group none of the tested clinical determinants of cognitive impairment were significantly associated with cognition. This cohort study showed evidence for worse cognitive functioning in HCT survivors encompassing all three cognitive domains, respectively memory, information processing speed, and executive and attention compared to a reference group that represents the general population translating into nine years of faster cognitive ageing in HCT survivors than can be expected based on their chronological age. It is important to increase awareness for signs of neurocognitive dysfunction after HCT in clinicians and HCT survivors.

Addition of the nuclear export inhibitor selinexor to standard intensive treatment for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Treatment results of AML in elderly patients are unsatisfactory. In an open label randomized phase II study, we investigated whether addition of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor to intensive chemotherapy would improve outcome in this population. 102 AML patients > 65 years of age (median 69 (65-80)) were randomly assigned to standard chemotherapy (3 + 7) with or without oral selinexor 60 mg twice weekly (both arms n = 51), days 1-24. In the second cycle, cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-6 with or without selinexor was given. CR/CRi rates were significantly higher in the control arm than in the investigational arm (80% (95% C.I. 69-91%) vs. 59% (45-72%; p = 0.018), respectively). At 18 months, event-free survival was 45% for the control arm versus 26% for the investigational arm (Cox-p = 0.012) and overall survival 58% vs. 33%, respectively (p = 0.009). AML and infectious complications accounted for an increased death rate in the investigational arm. Irrespective of treatment, MRD status after two cycles appeared to be correlated with survival. We conclude that the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy does negatively affect the therapeutic outcome of elderly AML patients. (Netherlands Trial Registry number NL5748 (NTR5902), www.trialregister.nl ).

Correction: Lenalidomide added to standard intensive treatment for older patients with AML and high-risk MDS.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Lenalidomide added to standard intensive treatment for older patients with AML and high-risk MDS.

More effective treatment modalities are urgently needed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of older age. We hypothesized that adding lenalidomide to intensive standard chemotherapy might improve their outcome. After establishing a safe lenalidomide, dose elderly patients with AML were randomly assigned in this randomized Phase 2 study (n = 222) to receive standard chemotherapy ("3 + 7") with or without lenalidomide at a dose of 20 mg/day 1-21. In the second cycle, patients received cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-6 with or without lenalidomide (20 mg/day 1-21). The CR/CRi rates in the two arms were not different (69 vs. 66%). Event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months was 19% for the standard arm versus 21% for the lenalidomide arm and overall survival (OS) 35% vs. 30%, respectively. The frequencies and grade of adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Cardiovascular toxicities were rare and equally distributed between the arms. The results of the present study show that the addition of lenalidomide to standard remission induction chemotherapy does not improve the therapeutic outcome of older AML patients. This trial is registered as number NTR2294 in The NederlandsTrial Register (www.trialregister.nl).

Comorbidity and treatment decision-making in elderly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a survey among haematologists.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are often not treated with standard immunochemotherapy and this might have a negative impact on their survival. Little is known about the determinants that play a role in treatment decision-making of clinicians regarding elderly patients with NHL. The objective of this study was to gain more insight into these determinants. METHODS: A survey was conducted amongst haematologists in the Netherlands. The survey contained questions about comorbidity, polypharmacy, social setting, nutritional status, depression, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in relation to treatment decisions in elderly NHL patients. RESULTS: Of all comorbidities, respondents designated cognitive disorders and cardiovascular comorbidity as the most important factors when assessing whether an older patient with NHL is eligible for curative treatment. Also in decreasing degree of importance ADL, IADL and depressive disorder are frequently included in treatment decision-making. Almost half of the respondents feel that treatment of the elderly person is complicated as a result of a lack of scientific evidence. CONCLUSION: Haematologists are aware of coexisting problems in elderly patients and they frequently take comorbidities, cognitive disorders and functional status into consideration in treatment decision-making. Future studies are needed to determine the exact role that these factors should play in the treatment of elderly patients. Furthermore, haematologists feel that treatment of the elderly is complicated and there is a lack of scientific evidence, and therefore older adults should be better represented in clinical trials.