CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen for core binding factor acute myeloid leukaemia with measurable residual disease.

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t (8;21) or inv (16), called core binding factor (CBF) AML, has a favourable prognosis. However, some CBF-AML patients have persistent measurable residual disease (MRD) and are more likely to relapse after standard chemotherapy treatment. The CAG regimen, composed of cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, has been proven to be effective and safe in treating refractory AML patients. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of the CAG regimen to eliminate MRD detected by RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFß::MYH11 transcript levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) among 23 patients. Molecular response was defined as the ratio of fusion transcript after treatment to that before treatment less than or equal to 0.5. The molecular response rate and median decrease ratio of fusion transcripts at the molecular level of the CAG regimen were 52% and 0.53, respectively. The median fusion transcripts before CAG treatment was 0.25% whereas after CAG was 0.11%. Among the 15 patients who had a poor molecular response to the high/intermediate-dose cytarabine regimen, the median decrease ratios of transcripts at the molecular level of high/intermediate-dose cytarabine and CAG were 1.55 and 0.53 (P = 0.028), respectively, and 6 of 15 patients achieved a molecular response to CAG (40%). The median disease-free survival was 18 months, and the overall survival rate at 3 years among all patients was 72.7% ± 10.7%. The common grades 3-4 adverse events were nausea (100%), thrombocytopenia (39%) and neutropenia (37.5%). The CAG regimen may have activity in CBF-AML patients and could provide a new option for patients who have a poor molecular response to high/intermediate-dose cytarabine.

Decitabine combined with CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with CAG ((cytarabine + aclacinomycin + granulocyte colony stimulating factor)) regimen and CAG regimen alone in the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: 96 elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia who were admitted to our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with CAG regimen, while the patients in the observation group were treated with decitabine on the basis of the control group. The clinical curative effect, changes of immune indicators, occurrence of adverse reactions and survival rate at different time after treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the indicators of cellular immunity in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the indicators of cellular immunity in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The 9-month survival rate and 1-year survival rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of decitabine and CAG regimen is effective in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The therapy can fully inhibit cellular immune function and improve long-term survival rate, and its safety has a small difference with that of CAG regimen alone. It is worth clinical promotion.

Low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of relapsed or primary refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia: a retrospective study of 25 Chinese patients.

Despite improvements in treatment, the prognosis of relapsed or primary refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) remains poor, and outcomes are worse in older adults with the short first complete remission (CR). Attainment of the second CR by salvage therapy would improve the survival of these patients and may enable them to undergo curative treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The fact that there are diverse salvage protocols for these adult patients but without a striking CR-induction efficacy indicates that efforts are still needed to indentify new effective reinduction regimens. In this study, the CAG regimen (cytarabine, 10 mg/m(2) subcutaneously every 12 h on days 1-14; aclarubicin, 5-7 mg/m(2) intravenously daily on days 1-8; and concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 200 µg/m(2) /day subcutaneously) was administered to 25 patients with relapsed or refractory ALL, including 11 T-cell ALL (T-ALL) and 14 B-cell (B-ALL) patients (age range, 11-61 years; median age, 26 years), to assess its efficacy as a salvage therapy. One course of the CAG regimen resulted in an overall response [CR or partial remission (PR)] rate of 64%, a CR rate of 56% and generally mild adverse effects. An overall response was observed in all 11 T-ALL patients (10 CR and 1 PR) and 35.7% of B-ALL patients (p = 0.0009). The significant treatment potential of CAG regimen for relapsed or primary refractory ALL, especially for T-ALL patients, described in this report would prepare them for a second CR to pursue longer survival.

A phase II study of chidamide, cytarabine, aclarubicin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and donor lymphocyte infusion for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Chemotherapy followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a promising treatment for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the best strategy for administering this therapy is still unclear. This study sought to explore the efficacy and safety of chidamide and CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) (CCAG) regimen followed by DLI in relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. This was a single-arm, phase II trial in patients with relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. CCAG regimen followed by DLI was given according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty adult patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 12 months. The complete remission (CR) rate was 45% and the partial remission (PR) rate was 5%. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 56.7% (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 31.6-75.6%), and the median OS was 19 months. The 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 83.3% (95% CI, 27.3-97.5%). Patients relapsing more than 6 months after HSCT and achieving CR/PR after CCAG plus DLI regimen attained significantly higher survival rates. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 9.4%. There was no treatment-related mortality (TRM). These data suggest that CCAG plus DLI regimen is safe and induces durable remission and superior survival in patients with relapsed AML/MDS after allo-HSCT. Trial registration number: ChiCTR.org identifier: ChiCTR1800017740 and date of registration: August 12, 2018.

[Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Modified CAG Regimen in Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in patients aged ≥70 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: The clinical data of 59 AML patients (≥70 years old) who were newly diagnosed and treated in the Hematology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from November 2010 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 59 AML patients, 28 were males and 31 were females, with a median age of 74 (70-86) years. The complete remission (CR) rate was 69.4% (34/49), and the median duration of CR was 10.7 (0.6-125.4) months after 2 courses of D-CAG treatment. According to the British Medical Research Council (MRC) classification, there was only one patient in the favorable-risk group, and the CR rate was 71.8% (28/39) in the intermediate-risk group, and 55.6% (5/9) in the adverse-risk group, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the CR rate between the intermediate-risk and adverse-risk group. Referring to ELN 2017 genetic risk classification, CR rate was 88.2% (15/17) in the favorable-risk group, 45.5% (5/11) in the intermediate-risk group, and 66.7% (14/21) in the adverse-risk group. There was no significant difference in CR rate between the favorable-risk and adverse-risk categories, but both were significantly higher than that in the intermediate-risk group (P <0.05). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis showed that 11 gene mutations with a frequency of more than 10%, including TET2 mutation (35.6%), ASXL1 mutation (30.5%), NPM1 mutation (28.8%), FLT3-ITD mutation (27.1%), DNMT3A mutation (22.0%), IDH1 mutation (15.3%), CEBPA single mutation (13.6%), TP53 mutation (13.6%), IDH2 mutation (11.9%), RUNX1 mutation (11.9%), and NRAS mutation (10.2%). There were no statistical differences in mutation frequency of these 11 genes between CR group and non-CR group. Compared with normal karyotypes, patients with complex karyotypes were more likely to develop TP53 mutations (P <0.001), while FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations were more likely to occur in patients with normal karyotypes (P =0.04, P =0.047). The median follow-up, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) of all the patients was 11.7 (1.5-128.2) months, 12.3 (1.5-128.2) months, and 8.5 (1.5-128.2) months, respectively. The median OS and EFS of CR patients were 19.8 and 13.3 months, respectively, which were significantly longer than 6.4 and 5.7 months in patients experiencing treatment failure (P < 0.001, P =0.009). In regard to genes with mutation frequency >10%, there were no statistical differences in CR rate, median OS, and median EFS between mutated and wild-type patients by Chi-square test and survival analysis. Univariate analysis showed that age, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetics and CR were factors affecting prognosis, while multivariate analysis showed that only CR failure was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. The major adverse reactions to D-CAG regimen were grade 3-4 myelosuppression, pulmonary infection, and fever (infection focus was not identified). CONCLUSION: D-CAG regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of AML patients ≥70 years old, and can partially improve the prognosis of elderly and high-risk patients.

Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents and the CAG regimen in relapsed/refractory AML: a single-center clinical trial.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents and CAG (VEN-DCAG) regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). Methods: The treatment response was analyzed by retrospective methods in R/R AML patients treated with the VEN-DCAG regimen at our institution. This included, but was not limited to, CR/CRi (complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) rate, measurable residual disease (MRD) negative rate, and overall survival (OS). Results: 20 patients with R/R AML were recruited, with a median age of 40 years (10-70), 11 of whom were male (55%), and a median follow-up of 10.4 months (0.7-21.8). The overall response rate (ORR) after receiving 1 course of VEN-DCAG was 90% (18/20), with 17 (85%) CR/CRi (10 MRD-CR), 1 (5%) PR, and 2 (10%) NR. Subsequently, 12 patients (7 MRD-CR, 4 MRD+CR, 1 NR) were treated with the VEN-DCAG regimen, and 3 MRD+CR patients turned negative, and 13 patients finally achieved MRD-CR. Among them, 7 patients were in the relapse group, all achieving CR/CRi (6 MRD-CR), and 13 patients in the refractory group, with 10 CR/CRi (7 MRD-CR). The ORR for patients in the relapse and refractory groups was 100% (7/7) and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Further, all patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of varying degrees of severity, with hematologic AEs primarily consisting of myelosuppression, while non-hematologic AEs were more common in the form of fever, gastrointestinal distress, and infections. 11 patients were followed up with bridging allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) therapy. At the last follow-up, 11 patients (7 MRD-CR, 4 MRD+CR) who received allo-HSCT, 1 (MRD+CR) died, and 9 patients (6 MRD-CR, 1 PR, 2 NR) who did not receive allo-HSCT, 5 (2 MRD-CR, 1 PR, 2 NR) died as well. Conclusion: The VEN-DCAG regimen may be an effective treatment option for R/R AML patients, with high ORR and MRD negative remission rates in both the relapsed and refractory groups. It is recommend that patients should be bridged to allo-HSCT as soon as possible after induction to CR by the VEN-DCAG regimen, which can lead to a significant long-term survival benefit. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2300075985.

Venetoclax with CAG regimen for early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case report and literature review.

This article describes a potential treatment for early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL), a relatively rare and highly aggressive hematologic malignancy. A 59-year-old woman admitted to our hospital with enlarged cervical lymph nodes, weight loss, abnormal count, and morphology of peripheral blood cells was diagnosed with ETP-ALL according to morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular biology. The patient initially received two cycles of the VICP regimen, including vincristine, idarubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone, and had a response with positive minimal residual disease (MRD). The patient was then given venetoclax plus the CAG regimen, including aclarubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. After one cycle, the patient achieved complete remission with negative MRD and was eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Patients with AML-MRC benefit from decitabine in combination with low-dose G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin: A single center cohort study.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are insensitive to conventional chemotherapy and, therefore, have a poor prognosis. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in combination with small-dose CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in treating AML-MRC, a total of 80 patients with newly diagnosed AML-MRC from September 2015 to January 2020 in our center were included in the study. Amongst these patients, 43 and 37 patients received two courses of the D-CAG and CAG regimens, respectively. The complete remission (CR) and complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate in the D-CAG group was higher than that of the CAG group (62.2% vs. 48.8%, P = 0.013). Among patients with less than 9 months of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) history and poor karyotypes, the (CR+CRi) rate of the D-CAG group was statistically higher than that of the CAG group. Except for patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation, among patients with less than 9 months of MDS history, the D-CAG group showed a better probability of overall survival than the CAG group did. In conclusion, patients with AML-MRC may benefit from the D-CAG regimen as an induction therapy, especially patients with less than 9 months of MDS history or with poor karyotypes.

[Efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in MDS-EB and AML-MRC].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen (G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin; D-CAG regimen) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), compared to standard CAG regimen. Methods: A total of 42 patients with newly diagnosed MDS-EB and AML-MRC from May 2011 to March 2017 were included in the retrospective study. 21 cases were initially treated with G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 14 days and aclarubicin of 20 mg/d for 4 days (CAG regimen) and the other 21 cases were initially treated with decitabine of 20 mg/m(2) for 5 days and lower-dose CAG regimen (cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 7 days, aclarubicin of 10 mg/d for 4 days, and G-CSF for priming (D-CAG regimen). After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, the patients who obtained complete remission(CR) received consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results: Among a total of 42 patients, the median age was 52.5 years (18-65 years) and 64.3% of them were male. Baseline characteristics of patients between D-CAG group and CAG group showed no significant differences. The CR for patients in D-CAG group was 81.0% (17/21), compared to 52.4% (11/21) in CAG group after 2 cycles of therapy (χ(2)=3.857, P=0.050). The overall response rate (ORR) for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 85.7% (18/21) and 76.2% (15/21) respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.273, P=0.259). By December 2017, the median follow-up of D-CAG group and CAG group was 13(6-32) months and 15(2-36) months respectively. Finally, 10 patients in D-CAG group and 7 patients in CAG group received HSCT respectively. Except patients receiving HSCT, the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) time for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 18.0 (95%CI 6.6-29.4) months and 11.0 (95%CI 0-23.9) months respectively. Probabilities of 12 months LFS for D-CAG group and CAG group were (63.6±14.5)% and (50.0±13.4)% respectively, without difference (χ(2)=0.049, P=0.824). Except patients receiving HSCT, there were 2 deaths in D-CAG group and 7 deaths in CAG group respectively. The cumulative probabilities of 12 months OS for non-HSCT patients in D-CAG group and CAG group were (90.9±8.7)% and (61.5±13.5)% respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.840, P=0.175). The incidences of side effects between D-CAG group and CAG group did not show significant differences (P=0.479), and the main side effects included cytopenias, pneumonia, infections of skin and soft tissues, neutropenic patients with fever, liver dysfunction. Conclusion: The decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen improved CR for patients with MDS-EB and AML-MRC, and was a promising choice.

Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Modified CAG Regimen in Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia / 中国实验血液学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in patients aged ≥70 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 59 AML patients (≥70 years old) who were newly diagnosed and treated in the Hematology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from November 2010 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Among the 59 AML patients, 28 were males and 31 were females, with a median age of 74 (70-86) years. The complete remission (CR) rate was 69.4% (34/49), and the median duration of CR was 10.7 (0.6-125.4) months after 2 courses of D-CAG treatment. According to the British Medical Research Council (MRC) classification, there was only one patient in the favorable-risk group, and the CR rate was 71.8% (28/39) in the intermediate-risk group, and 55.6% (5/9) in the adverse-risk group, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the CR rate between the intermediate-risk and adverse-risk group. Referring to ELN 2017 genetic risk classification, CR rate was 88.2% (15/17) in the favorable-risk group, 45.5% (5/11) in the intermediate-risk group, and 66.7% (14/21) in the adverse-risk group. There was no significant difference in CR rate between the favorable-risk and adverse-risk categories, but both were significantly higher than that in the intermediate-risk group (P <0.05). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis showed that 11 gene mutations with a frequency of more than 10%, including TET2 mutation (35.6%), ASXL1 mutation (30.5%), NPM1 mutation (28.8%), FLT3-ITD mutation (27.1%), DNMT3A mutation (22.0%), IDH1 mutation (15.3%), CEBPA single mutation (13.6%), TP53 mutation (13.6%), IDH2 mutation (11.9%), RUNX1 mutation (11.9%), and NRAS mutation (10.2%). There were no statistical differences in mutation frequency of these 11 genes between CR group and non-CR group. Compared with normal karyotypes, patients with complex karyotypes were more likely to develop TP53 mutations (P <0.001), while FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations were more likely to occur in patients with normal karyotypes (P =0.04, P =0.047). The median follow-up, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) of all the patients was 11.7 (1.5-128.2) months, 12.3 (1.5-128.2) months, and 8.5 (1.5-128.2) months, respectively. The median OS and EFS of CR patients were 19.8 and 13.3 months, respectively, which were significantly longer than 6.4 and 5.7 months in patients experiencing treatment failure (P < 0.001, P =0.009). In regard to genes with mutation frequency >10%, there were no statistical differences in CR rate, median OS, and median EFS between mutated and wild-type patients by Chi-square test and survival analysis. Univariate analysis showed that age, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetics and CR were factors affecting prognosis, while multivariate analysis showed that only CR failure was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. The major adverse reactions to D-CAG regimen were grade 3-4 myelosuppression, pulmonary infection, and fever (infection focus was not identified).@*CONCLUSION@#D-CAG regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of AML patients ≥70 years old, and can partially improve the prognosis of elderly and high-risk patients.

Low-dose cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen versus idarubicin plus cytarabine regimen as induction therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

With limited data available on the low-dose cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG) regimen in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this study aimed at comparing the efficacy and toxicity of CAG with idarubicin plus cytarabine (IA) remission induction therapy in these patients. A total of 154 consecutive patients (52 with CAG and 102 with IA) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients in the CAG group had a higher median age (68 vs. 65 years, p = 0.002) and a higher proportion of previous myelodysplastic syndrome (25.0% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.0001) compared to those in the IA group. The complete remission rates with the CAG and IA regimens were 55.8% and 52.9% (p = 0.864). The median overall survival (12.1 vs. 11.7 months, p = 0.650) and 3-year disease-free survival rates (29.6% vs. 48.6%, p = 0.657) were not statistically different in the two groups. The CAG regimen might be an alternative to conventional chemotherapy in older patients with AML.

Increasing aclarubicin dose in low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) is efficacious as salvage chemotherapy for relapsed/refractory mixed-phenotype acute leukemia.

We treated 60 relapsed/refractory mixed-phenotype acute leukemia patients (MPAL-1) with increasing the aclarubicin dose in CAG regimen (HD-CAG, cytarabine (10 mg/m(2)/12 h, days 1-14), aclarubicin (5-7 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-14), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (200 µg/m(2)/day, days 1-14). This was compared to 64 relapsed/refractory MPAL patients (MPAL-2) treated with DOAP regimen (daunorubicin, vincristine/vindesine, cytarabine and prednisone), 113 relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 78 acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with HD-CAG regimen. After one course, complete remission (CR) and overall response [OR, CR+partial remission (PR)] rates for MPAL-1 exceeded MPAL-2 (CR, 61.02% vs. 28.13%, P=0.000; OR, 72.88% vs. 34.38%, P=0.000), but these data were similar to AML and ALL (P>0.05). In MPAL-1 group, CR and OR rates of T-lymphoid+myeloid immunophenotype were higher than B-lymphoid+myeloid immunophenotype (CR, 81.82% vs. 44.12%, P=0.005; OR, 90.91% vs. 58.82%, P=0.009). The overall survival at 3 years in MPAL-1, MPAL-2, AML and ALL groups were 14.2%±6.8%, 14.1%±6.4%, 17.3%±5.0% and 15.0%±5.3% (P>0.05). Side effects were similar between HD-CAG and DOAP (P>0.05). HD-CAG regimen is efficacious for relapsed/refractory MPAL, especially for T+My patients.

Efficacy of low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) compared to Hyper-CVAD regimen as salvage chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We treated 90 relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(-)-ALL) patients with CAG regimen [cytarabine (10mg/m(2)/12h, days 1-14), aclarubicin (5-7 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-8), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (200 µg/m(2)/day, days 1-14)], 82 relapsed/refractory Ph(-)-ALL patients were treated with increasing aclarubicin dose CAG (5-7 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-14, HD-CAG). 96 relapsed/refractory Ph(-)-ALL patients treated with Hyper-CVAD regimen (control group). After one therapy course, among all groups, there were no statistically significant differences with complete remission (CR) and overall response [OR, CR+partial remission (PR)] rates (P>0.05). In CAG group, CR and OR rates for T-ALL exceeded those for B-ALL (P=0.001, 0.007), while in HD-CAG and control groups, those were not statistically significantly different (P>0.05). CR and OR rates of CAG group for B-ALL were lower than control group (P=0.004, 0.012). Among all groups, there were no statistically significant differences with CR and OR rates for T-ALL (P>0.05). CAG had lesser adverse event than Hyper-CVAD. The overall survival at 3 years for all groups were similar. Efficacy of CAG regimen was similar in comparison to Hyper-CVAD for relapsed/refractory Ph(-)-T-ALL. HD-CAG could not improve efficacy than CAG regimen.

Efficacy of cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG) regimen compared to FLAG regimen for adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

In this study, we retrospectively assess the results in comparing the efficacies and toxicities of the three chemotherapy regimens: CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), n=87), HD-CAG (increasing the dose of aclarubicin in CAG regimen, n=73), and FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF, n=41) regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph--ALL). Our study indicated that after one therapy course, the overall response (OR, complete reimssion (CR)+partial remission (PR)) rate was higher in CAG than that in FLAG regimen (55.2% vs. 31.7%, P=0.013), while the CR (50.7% vs. 26.8%, P =0.013) and OR (64.4% vs. 31.7%, P=0.001) rates in HD-CAG regimen were both higher than that in FLAG regimen. Furthermore, the results were more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with T cell and refractory Ph--ALL. There were no significant differences in CR and OR rates between the CAG and HD-CAG regimens. Meanwhile, the adverse effects of CAG regimen were less toxic than the FLAG and HD-CAG regimens. There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival rates at two years among the three groups (FLAG: 9.8%±4.6%, CAG: 11.8%±4.5%, HD-CAG: 11.1%±4.0%; P>0.05). Our preliminary results indicated that CAG and HD-CAG regimens could be more effective and safer than FLAG regimen for relapsed/refractory Ph--ALL.

Palliative chemotherapy followed by methylation inhibitor in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: An in vitro and clinical study.

Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; DAC) is a well-tolerated alternative to aggressive chemotherapy for leukemia, which induces differentiation and apoptosis of leukemic cells as a DNA hypomethylating agent. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of DAC sequentially combined with chemotherapy to reverse drug resistance. HL-60/ADR multidrug-resistant leukemia cells cultured in 96-well plates were pretreated with DAC for 72 h; varying concentrations of aclacinomycin (ACLA) were then added to the wells, cell proliferation was tested using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, and DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein expression was detected by western blot analysis. Furthermore, we analyzed the therapeutic efficacy in 7 patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving induction therapy with DAC sequentially combined with cytarabine, ACLA and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (CAG regimen). The proliferation inhibition rate of HL-60/ADR cells treated with DAC at concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 µmol/l sequentially combined with ACLA was significantly higher compared with that with ACLA alone (P<0.001 for both). DNMT1 expression was significantly repressed following treatment with 1.0 µmol/l DAC. Of the 11 patients, 8 (72.7%) received induction therapy with DAC sequentially combined with CAG agents and achieved complete remission (CR) after 2 cycles of treatment; however, 3 (27.3%) patients did not achieve remission. Myelosuppression was observed in all 11 patients and pulmonary infections developed in 9 patients (81.8%) during the course of the study. At the last follow-up, 7 of the 8 patients who achieved CR remained in remission. The median follow-up was 6 months (range, 3-18 months). Therefore, pretreatment with DAC may increase the sensitivity of HL-60/ADR cells to ACLA via the epigenetic modulation of demethylation and the sequential administration of DAC and CAG regimen appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with high-risk AML.

Clinical efficacy of low-dose decitabine and homoharringtonine combined with CAG regimen in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine and homoharringtonine combined with CAG regimen (cytarabine, aclarubicin and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) (DHCAG regimen) in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Nineteen patients who were treated with DHCAG regimen in the 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force from July 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 cases were newly diagnosed, 6 cases were ineffective or relapsed; 2 cases were elderly (≥60 years old); 15 cases had pulmonary infection before chemotherapy, and 4 cases had no lesions in the lungs when admitted to hospital. The remission rate and chemotherapy-related adverse reactions were analyzed. Results After 19 patients received one course of DHCAG regimen, 16 patients had complete remission, 1 patient had partial remission, 2 patients had no remission, and the overall response rate was 89.5% (17/19). Four patients with undetected lung disease before chemotherapy had no infection in the lungs after treatment. Among 15 patients with pulmonary infection before treatment, 1 patient died of pulmonary infection progress, the remaining 14 cases were grade 1-2 infection. 7 cases had bleeding, and 3 cases had nausea and vomiting, all of which were grade 1-2. Conclusion The remission rate of DHCAG regimen in treatment of AML is high, and its adverse reactions are tolerable.

Efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in MDS-EB and AML-MRC / 中华血液学杂志

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen (G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin; D-CAG regimen) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), compared to standard CAG regimen. Methods: A total of 42 patients with newly diagnosed MDS-EB and AML-MRC from May 2011 to March 2017 were included in the retrospective study. 21 cases were initially treated with G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 14 days and aclarubicin of 20 mg/d for 4 days (CAG regimen) and the other 21 cases were initially treated with decitabine of 20 mg/m(2) for 5 days and lower-dose CAG regimen (cytarabine of 10 mg/m(2) q12h for 7 days, aclarubicin of 10 mg/d for 4 days, and G-CSF for priming (D-CAG regimen). After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, the patients who obtained complete remission(CR) received consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Results: Among a total of 42 patients, the median age was 52.5 years (18-65 years) and 64.3% of them were male. Baseline characteristics of patients between D-CAG group and CAG group showed no significant differences. The CR for patients in D-CAG group was 81.0% (17/21), compared to 52.4% (11/21) in CAG group after 2 cycles of therapy (χ(2)=3.857, P=0.050). The overall response rate (ORR) for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 85.7% (18/21) and 76.2% (15/21) respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.273, P=0.259). By December 2017, the median follow-up of D-CAG group and CAG group was 13(6-32) months and 15(2-36) months respectively. Finally, 10 patients in D-CAG group and 7 patients in CAG group received HSCT respectively. Except patients receiving HSCT, the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) time for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 18.0 (95%CI 6.6-29.4) months and 11.0 (95%CI 0-23.9) months respectively. Probabilities of 12 months LFS for D-CAG group and CAG group were (63.6±14.5)% and (50.0±13.4)% respectively, without difference (χ(2)=0.049, P=0.824). Except patients receiving HSCT, there were 2 deaths in D-CAG group and 7 deaths in CAG group respectively. The cumulative probabilities of 12 months OS for non-HSCT patients in D-CAG group and CAG group were (90.9±8.7)% and (61.5±13.5)% respectively, without significant difference (χ(2)=1.840, P=0.175). The incidences of side effects between D-CAG group and CAG group did not show significant differences (P=0.479), and the main side effects included cytopenias, pneumonia, infections of skin and soft tissues, neutropenic patients with fever, liver dysfunction. Conclusion: The decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen improved CR for patients with MDS-EB and AML-MRC, and was a promising choice.

Efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in MDS-EB and AML-MRC / 中华血液学杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen (G-CSF, cytarabine and aclarubicin; D-CAG regimen) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts (MDS-EB) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), compared to standard CAG regimen.@*Methods@#A total of 42 patients with newly diagnosed MDS-EB and AML-MRC from May 2011 to March 2017 were included in the retrospective study. 21 cases were initially treated with G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10 mg/m2 q12h for 14 days and aclarubicin of 20 mg/d for 4 days (CAG regimen) and the other 21 cases were initially treated with decitabine of 20 mg/m2 for 5 days and lower-dose CAG regimen (cytarabine of 10 mg/m2 q12h for 7 days, aclarubicin of 10 mg/d for 4 days, and G-CSF for priming (D-CAG regimen). After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, the patients who obtained complete remission(CR) received consolidation chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).@*Results@#Among a total of 42 patients, the median age was 52.5 years (18-65 years) and 64.3% of them were male. Baseline characteristics of patients between D-CAG group and CAG group showed no significant differences. The CR for patients in D-CAG group was 81.0% (17/21), compared to 52.4% (11/21) in CAG group after 2 cycles of therapy (χ2=3.857, P=0.050). The overall response rate (ORR) for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 85.7% (18/21) and 76.2% (15/21) respectively, without significant difference (χ2=1.273, P=0.259). By December 2017, the median follow-up of D-CAG group and CAG group was 13(6-32) months and 15(2-36) months respectively. Finally, 10 patients in D-CAG group and 7 patients in CAG group received HSCT respectively. Except patients receiving HSCT, the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) time for patients in D-CAG group and CAG group was 18.0 (95%CI 6.6-29.4) months and 11.0 (95%CI 0-23.9) months respectively. Probabilities of 12 months LFS for D-CAG group and CAG group were (63.6±14.5)% and (50.0±13.4)% respectively, without difference (χ2=0.049, P=0.824). Except patients receiving HSCT, there were 2 deaths in D-CAG group and 7 deaths in CAG group respectively. The cumulative probabilities of 12 months OS for non-HSCT patients in D-CAG group and CAG group were (90.9±8.7)% and (61.5±13.5)% respectively, without significant difference (χ2=1.840, P=0.175). The incidences of side effects between D-CAG group and CAG group did not show significant differences (P=0.479), and the main side effects included cytopenias, pneumonia, infections of skin and soft tissues, neutropenic patients with fever, liver dysfunction.@*Conclusion@#The decitabine in combination with lower-dose CAG regimen improved CR for patients with MDS-EB and AML-MRC, and was a promising choice.

Clinical analysis of low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen in treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes patients with intermediate- or high-risk / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective To investigate the clinical value of low-dose decitabine (DAC) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients with intermediate-or high-risk. Methods Low-dose DAC (10 mg/d, 7 days) combined with CAG regimen were given to 19 elderly patients with AML and intermediate- or high-risk MDS patients. The efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated after a course of treatment, and the patients were followed up for survival. Results After a course of treatment, 8 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 7 patients achieved partial remission (PR). After 4 courses of treatment, 68.4 % (13/19) of patients achieved CR, the overall response rate reached 78.9% (15/19). Fewer side effects were seen associated with chemotherapy. After 42 months of follow-up, there were 12 survival cases, the median survival time was 13.5 months (3-42 months). Conclusion Low-dose DAC combined with CAG regimen have a better efficacy, higher safety, and lower economic burden for elderly AML patients and intermediate- or high-risk MDS patients, which is beneficial to greatly improve patients' compliance.