Clinical Significance of Antibodies to DFS70 in Immunoinflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

The relevance of the problem of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) for modern medicine is determined by their high prevalence in the population, the difficulty of early diagnosis, the rapid development of disability and poor life prognosis. Recent data on the significance of anti-DFS70 have opened up new possibilities for optimizing the step-by-step diagnosis of IIRD. The detection of these antibodies can help in the interpretation of a positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (IIFA-HEp-2) in the absence of autoantibodies specific for IIRD. Detection of anti-DFS70 in antinuclear factor (ANF) seropositive patients without clinical and/or serological markers characteristic of a certain disease from the IIRD group can be considered as a potential marker that excludes this group of diseases.

Infusion of anti-DFS70 antibodies prolonged survival of lupus-prone mice.

BACKGROUND: Systemic-lupus-nephritis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by immune complex deposition and a flare of autoantibodies and leading to renal injury. OBJECTIVES: To expose anti-Dense-Fine-Speckled-70 (DFS70)-antibodies to genetically-prone-lupus-mice. METHODS: NZBXW/F1 female mice were monitored for the onset of glomerulonephritis by proteinuria upon infusion of anti-DFS70 (40 µg/mouse), commercial-human-IgG (cIgG) or phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) as controls. The survival time was detected by mice death. Circulating anti-dsDNA were tested by ELISA. Proteinuria, was defined by a standard semi-quantitative-Bayer-Multistix-dipstick. Kidney histology was analyzed by periodic-acid-Schiff-PAS staining. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of anti-DFS70-infused mice exhibited prolonged survival time as compared with cIgG and PBS-subjected mice (p < 0.022). One mouse out of 10 mice injected with anti-DFS70-antibodies died at week 36, whereas, 6 out of 10 mice subjected with PBS found dead at this time. Eighty percent of anti-DFS70 injected mice did not show severe glomerulonephritis by histology. CONCLUSIONS: anti-DFS70 attenuated the progression of glomerulonephritis and prolonged the survival time. Circulating anti-DFS70-autoantibodies may confer a protective role against renal injury in murine-lupus-nephritis. Our data may propose a novel therapy approach for lupus patients.

[Clinical significance of determination of DFS70 antibodies to rule out connective tissue diseases]. / Klinische Wertigkeit der Bestimmung von DFS70-Antikörpern für den Ausschluss von Kollagenosen.

BACKGROUND: Connective tissue diseases (CTD) are autoimmune diseases highly associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Since ANA and musculoskeletal symptoms are not uncommon in the general population, differential diagnostic challenges frequently occur for the treating physician. Dense fine speckled antibodies (DFS70) were recently discovered but their presence appeared to be rare in CTD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study a total of 270 patients treated in the Rheumatism Center of the Ruhr Area (Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet) were preferentially included, when they were ANA+ (≥1:80). Other autoantibodies and DFS70 antibodies were also investigated. The diagnosis of CTD was confirmed by rheumatologists. The sensitivity, specificity and the positive predictive value of DFS70 antibodies were differentially evaluated for various ANA titers. RESULTS: In 91 (33.7%) of the ANA+ patients (33.7%) the diagnosis of CTD was confirmed and in 84 (92.3%) the ANA titer was ≥1:160. The DFS70 antibodies were detected in 17 out of 130 ANA+ patients without CTD (13.1%) versus 2 ANA+ patients (2.2%) with CTD (p = 0.027). None of the patients with ANA 1:80 had DFS70 antibodies. The specificity of DFS70 antibodies to detect the absence of CTD was 97.6%, the sensitivity was 13.1% and the positive predictive value was 89.5%. There was almost no effect of the strength of the different ANA titers. CONCLUSION: It was found that DFS70 antibodies are rarely present in ANA+ patients with CTD but the diagnosis of CTD cannot be reliably ruled out solely by the presence of DFS70 antibodies; however, the high specificity of DFS70 antibodies can be of clinical importance in unclear situations and in cases of anxious patients.

[Antinuclear antibodies in the diagnostics of rheumatic diseases]. / Antinukleäre Antikörper in der Diagnostik rheumatischer Erkrankungen.

Testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) on human epithelial cell lines (HEp-2) using indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is central for ruling out or for diagnosing connective tissue diseases and other diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis as well as drug-induced ANA. The comprehensive description of 29 different ANA-IIF patterns by the international consensus of ANA patterns (ICAP) facilitates the harmonization of ANA-IIF diagnostics. Positive ANA tests are frequently observed in healthy individuals and a reason for referral to rheumatologists. In these cases, the detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies can be helpful to exclude systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera.

Background International autoantibody standards, traditionally based on material obtained from plasmapheresis of single subjects, represent individual immune response and may not comprehend the heterogeneity of the general population. The anti-DFS70 autoantibody yields a characteristic dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern on indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) and speaks against autoimmunity. We propose a novel strategy for developing autoantibody reference standards, based on stepwise pooling of serum samples from hundreds of individuals with anti-DFS70 antibodies. Methods Within a 2-year period, serum samples were selected from routine HEp-2 IFA according to the following criteria: DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern at titer ≥1:640; anti-DFS70 reactivity in three analyte-specific tests (Western blot [WB], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and chemiluminescent immunoassay [CLIA]). Aliquots of individual samples were combined into progressively larger pools with stepwise validation of intermediary pools as for individual samples. Validated intermediary pools were merged into a final pool for lyophilization. Results A total of 741 validated samples yielded a 750 mL final pool that was lyophilized into thousands of 200 µL-aliquots. Reconstituted aliquots yielded the expected anti-DFS70 reactivity in ELISA, CLIA and WB, as well as high-titer DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern. The appropriate anti-DFS70 reactivity of the lyophilized pool was confirmed by seven international expert centers, using HEp-2 IFA, ELISA, WB and immunoprecipitation. Conclusions This proof-of-concept study provides an innovative and efficient strategy to build serum reference standards for autoantibody testing. The anti-DFS70 standard will integrate the panel of standards of Autoantibody Standardization Committee (ASC, www.autoab.org), contributing to education for proper assay validation and interpretation of the DFS pattern and other HEp-2 IFA patterns.

Anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in undifferentiated connective tissue diseases subjects: what's on the horizon?

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to determine the prevalence of anti-dense fine speckled (DFS70) antibodies in a stable population of undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) to better define their potential role. METHODS: Immunological and clinical records of 91 long-standing UCTD patients were studied. DFS pattern was determined using the IIF ANA test on HEp-2 cells and anti-DFS70 antibodies were tested by chemiluminescence assay and by DFS70 line immunoassay. RESULTS: Twelve (13.2%) of 91 serum samples were positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies by chemiluminescence assay and line immunoassay. There was no statistical significance between the prevalence of anti-ENA and anti-DNA autoantibodies in patients with and without anti-DFS70 antibodies. No differences were found in the clinical characteristics of both groups. The presence of the anti-DFS70 antibodies was related to the younger age class. CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in the UCTD patients suggested the potential role of these autoantibodies as a marker in the evolution of UCTD to CTD.

The importance of detecting anti-DFS70 in routine clinical practice: comparison of different care settings.

BACKGROUND: Screening for antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence (ANA-IIF) is essential in the diagnostic workup of ANA-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AARDs). However, also healthy individuals may test positive, making the interpretation challenging. Recent reports suggest that dense fine speckled 70 antibodies (anti-DFS70) may facilitate this challenge. Here, we investigate their clinical importance based on data from four Belgian laboratories (one primary, two secondary and one tertiary care). METHODS: At least one specific DFS70 assay (DFS70 IgG ELISA or lineblot [Euroimmun, full length antigen] and/or DFS70 IgG CLIA [Inova Diagnostics, truncated antigen]) was performed on four consecutive cohorts of homogeneous-like ANA-IIF samples (n=697). Co-occurrence with AARD-specific ANA and clinical information were documented in the anti-DFS70-positive samples. RESULTS: Using a combination of solid phase techniques, we found between 7.6% and 26% anti-DFS70 in the different cohorts. Focusing on anti-DFS70 CLIA-positive samples without co-occurrence of AARD-specific ANA, we observed a trend towards lower frequency in tertiary (8% [p=0.0786]) and secondary care (12% [p=0.1275] and 6% [p<0.001]) compared to primary care (21%). Moreover, in this specific subpopulation, AARD was less frequent (0%-50% compared to 6%-77% in the total anti-DFS70-positive group). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-DFS70 prevalence depends on the applied assay and care setting. Our data suggest that, for an ANA-IIF-positive patient, it is rather the absence of AARD-associated ANA and clinical symptoms that contribute to the exclusion of AARD than the presence of anti-DFS70. Nevertheless, isolated anti-DFS70 helps to clarify positive ANA-IIF results, especially if pretest probability for AARD is low.

[Modern look at the problems of investigation of antinuclear antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (literature review).]

In the review, topical aspects of the study of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are considered. ANA is the main serological marker of SLE. In the sera of patients with SLE, antibodies to DNA, histones, nucleosomes, extractable nuclear antigens (Sm, U1 ribonucleoprotein, Ro / SSA, La / SSB, ribosomal protein P), nucleolar antigens and other cellular structures are detected. The ANA study using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells (IIF-HEp-2) is recommended as a standard screening test for the diagnosis of SLE. The use of automated systems for the interpretation of cellular fluorescent tests contributes to the standardization and improvement of the reproducibility of the IIF. A new international nomenclature of types of nuclear, nucleolar (nucleolar), cytoplasmic and mitotic luminescence of ANA in IIF-HEp-2, including 28 variants of anticell ("Anti-cell" - AC) patterns was developed. In the practice of clinical diagnostic laboratories, high-performance automated methods for the determination of ANA based on ELISA, immunoblot, fluorescent, chemiluminescent and multiplex immunoassay are widely used. New mono- and multiplex methods of solid-phase analysis are expediently used as confirmatory reflex tests for the detection of varieties of antigen-specific ANA in patients with SLE with positive results of IIF-HEp-2. Identification of ANA profiles using multiplex technologies is a useful tool for implementing a personalized approach to diagnosis, evaluation of activity, prognosis, clinical and immunological subtypes, and the effectiveness of SLE therapy. The need for an ANA study not only to confirm the diagnosis of SLE, but also to identify the disease in the early and preclinical stages with the intention to prevent the development of the pathological process is discussed. Detection of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies allows to exclude the diagnosis of SLE inANA IIF-HEp-2 positive subjects. Presented is a modern algorithm for testing ANA with SLE.

The prevalence and determinants of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in an international inception cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Autoantibodies to dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) are purported to rule out the diagnosis of SLE when they occur in the absence of other SLE-related autoantibodies. This study is the first to report the prevalence of anti-DFS70 in an early, multinational inception SLE cohort and examine demographic, clinical, and autoantibody associations. Patients were enrolled in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) inception cohort within 15 months of diagnosis. The association between anti-DFS70 and multiple parameters in 1137 patients was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The frequency of anti-DFS70 was 7.1% (95% CI: 5.7-8.8%), while only 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6-1.9%) were monospecific for anti-DFS70. In multivariate analysis, patients with musculoskeletal activity (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.24 [95% CI: 1.10, 1.41]) or with anti-ß2 glycoprotein 1 (OR 2.17 [95% CI: 1.22, 3.87]) were more likely and patients with anti-dsDNA (OR 0.53 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.92]) or anti-SSB/La (OR 0.25 [95% CI: 0.08, 0.81]) were less likely to have anti-DFS70. In this study, the prevalence of anti-DFS70 was higher than the range previously published for adult SLE (7.1 versus 0-2.8%) and was associated with musculoskeletal activity and anti-ß2 glycoprotein 1 autoantibodies. However, 'monospecific' anti-DFS70 autoantibodies were rare (1.1%) and therefore may be helpful to discriminate between ANA-positive healthy individuals and SLE.

Confirmation of anti-DFS70 antibodies is needed in routine clinical samples with DFS staining pattern.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of nuclear dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is not easy. Thus, confirming the presence of these antibodies might be needed. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of DFS pattern in our diagnostic laboratory and to investigate the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in samples showing DFS pattern by two commercially available research kits retrospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-four sequential serum samples with DFS pattern on HEp2010 cell substrates by IIF were included in this study. The semiquantitative DFS70 ELISA Kit (MBL International Corporation, Woburn, UK) was used for detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies in these samples. Twenty selected samples were tested for the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies using ANA Line Immunoassay (LIA) (Immco Diagnostics, New York, USA). RESULTS: Sixty-two (83.8%) of 74 serum samples were found positive with ELISA, when 15 U/ml was taken as a reference value. Among 18 samples that were found positive by ELISA, five were negative for anti-DFS70 antibodies by LIA, while 13 were found positive. The lowest ELISA result of the sample that was positive by LIA was found to be 45.3 U/ml. When 45.3 U/ml was considered as a reference value, 45 (60.8%) of 74 serum samples were positive by ELISA. Nineteen of 20 patients had no SARD, while one had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CONCLUSIONS: DFS pattern should be confirmed with an objective method such as ELISA, LIA, or IB. We think that confirmation tests for detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies should be included in diagnostic algorithms.

Specificity of antinuclear autoantibodies recognizing the dense fine speckled nuclear pattern: Preferential targeting of DFS70/LEDGFp75 over its interacting partner MeCP2.

Human antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) targeting the dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear protein DFS70, commonly known as lens epithelium derived growth factor p75 (LEDGFp75), present a clinical puzzle since their significance remains elusive. While their frequencies are low in ANA-positive autoimmune rheumatic diseases, they are relatively elevated in clinical laboratory referrals, diverse inflammatory conditions, and 'apparently' healthy individuals. We reported previously that DFS70/LEDGFp75 is an autoantigen in prostate cancer that closely interacts with another 70kD DFS nuclear protein, methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). This led us to investigate if anti-DFS sera exclusively target DFS70/LEDGFp75 or also recognize MeCP2. Using several complementary autoantibody detection platforms and cellular/molecular approaches we evaluated 65 human sera producing anti-DFS autoantibodies. Our results show that these antibodies are highly specific for DFS70/LEDGFp75 and do not target MeCP2. Establishing the specificity of anti-DFS autoantibodies has implications for increasing our understanding of their biological significance and clinical utility.

Neuronal autoantibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of 148 patients with schizophrenia and 151 healthy controls.

Schizophrenia is a syndrome with multiple etiologies, one of which is the potential for an autoimmune disease of the brain such as N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, which can induce psychosis resembling schizophrenia. Here, we examined anti-neuronal autoantibodies related to psychosis using both cell- (CBA) and tissue-based assays (TBA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with chronic schizophrenia and control participants. First, we screened for the antibodies against leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABABR), dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-like protein 6 (DPPX), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR1/R2), and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) in 148 patients with schizophrenia. No antibodies were detected. Next, we performed CBA for NMDAR antibodies in 148 patients with schizophrenia and 151 age- and sex-matched controls. Although we detected relatively weak immunoreactivity for NMDAR in the CSFs of two patients with schizophrenia and three controls, no samples were positive when strict criteria were applied. For TBA in the rat hippocampus and cerebellum, we detected positive signals in the CSFs of 13 patients with schizophrenia and eight controls. Positive samples were analyzed for paraneoplastic syndrome and antinuclear antibodies using immunoblotting. The CSFs of nine patients and six controls were positive for dense fine speckle 70 (DFS70) antibodies. Additionally, antibodies against centromere protein (CENP)-A and CENP-B were detected in patients with schizophrenia. Our results suggest that autoantibodies against NMDAR, LG1, GABABR, DPPX, AMPAR1/R2, and CASPR2 are not associated with the pathogenesis of chronic schizophrenia. Moreover, we emphasize the importance of considering the effect of anti-DFS70 antibodies when analyzing autoantibodies in CSF samples. Conclusively, we obtained no evidence suggesting that the most frequent neuronal autoantibodies in the CSF play a role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia, even in our sample.

High serum prevalence of autoreactive IgG antibodies against peripheral nerve structures in patients with neurological post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.

Background: Patients suffering from neurological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination (post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome (PCVS)) have imposed an increasing challenge on medical practice, as diagnostic precision and therapeutic options are lacking. Underlying autoimmune dysfunctions, including autoantibodies, have been discussed in neurological disorders after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Here, we describe the frequency and targets of autoantibodies against peripheral nervous system tissues in PCVS. Methods: Sera from 50 PCVS patients with peripheral neurological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination and 35 vaccinated healthy controls were used in this study. IgG autoreactivity was measured via indirect immunofluorescence assays on mouse sciatic nerve teased fibers. The frequencies of autoantibodies were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Serum anti-ganglioside antibodies were measured in ganglioside blots. Autoantibody target identification was performed using immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry. Subsequent target confirmation was conducted via cell-based assays and ELISA. Results: Compared with controls, PCVS patients had a significantly greater frequency of autoantibodies against peripheral nervous system structures (9/50(18%) vs 1/35(3%); p=0.04). Autoantibodies bound to paranodes (n=5), axons (n=4), Schmidt-Lanterman incisures (n=2) and Schwann cell nuclei (n=1). Conversely, antibodies against gangliosides were absent in PCVS patients. Target identification and subsequent confirmation revealed various subunits of neurofilaments as well as DFS-70 as autoantibody epitopes. Conclusion: Our data suggest that autoantibodies against nervous system tissue could be relevant in PCVS patients. Autoantibodies against neurofilaments and cell nuclei with so far non-established links to this disease spectrum should be further elucidated to determine their biomarker potential.

Discriminating between Homogeneous (AC-1) and Dense Fine Speckled (AC-2) Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: Re-Evaluation of Immunofluorescence Imaging.

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are essential diagnostic markers in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Among the 30 ANA patterns, homogeneous (AC-1) and dense fine speckled (AC-2) should be focused on owing to their somewhat indistinct presentation in immunofluorescence imaging and distinct correlation with clinical conditions. This study aimed to develop a flowchart to guide discrimination between AC-1 and AC-2 patterns and to re-evaluate ANA samples according to this flowchart to verify its detection ability. We re-evaluated immunofluorescence imaging of 62 ANA blood samples simultaneously subjected to solid-phase assays for autoantibodies against dsDNA, nucleosomes, histones, and DFS70. The results showed statistically significant odd ratios (ORs) of detection of anti-DFS70 using AC-2 after re-evaluation of total samples (OR 101.9, 95% CI 11.7-886.4, p-value < 0.001) and subgroup analysis of patients' samples (OR 53.8, 95% CI 5.9-493.6, p-value < 0.001). The OR of anti-nucleosome/histone/dsDNA detection using AC-1 in re-evaluated data increased to 5.43 (95% CI 1.00-29.61, p-value = 0.05). In the analysis of specific autoantibodies, more than half of the samples with an AC-2 pattern (54.2%) had specific autoantibodies other than anti-DFS70. We conclude that the flowchart for discriminating between AC-1 and AC-2 ANA patterns in this study is a viable practical guide for other laboratories when encountering equivocal ANA results.

A novel magnetic bead-based immunoprecipitation method for anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibodies.

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) on HEp-2 cells has been widely used for screening anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) that are associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). Sera containing ANA display multiple distinct fluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells. Among them, a dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern caused by anti-DFS70 antibodies has been reported to have higher prevalence in healthy individuals than in patients with SARD. This DFS pattern is often difficult to distinguish amongst other SARD-associated ANA patterns, in particular a mixed homogeneous and speckled pattern. Furthermore, a strong DFS pattern can mask other SARD-associated patterns. Hence, we developed a novel immunoprecipitation method using magnetic beads to remove anti-DFS70 antibodies in serum prior to running IIFA. We also aimed to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 and to uncover any SARD-associated ANA patterns masked by a strong DFS pattern. The sera used in our study were from 70 individuals who had routine ANA screen, of which 35 sera had an isolated DFS pattern with monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies confirmed by a complementary assay, and 35 were control sera without a DFS pattern. An immunoprecipitation method using magnetic beads coated with recombinant human full length DFS70 protein was developed. The performance of this new method was evaluated in comparison to an immunoadsorption method using the same DFS70 protein. Our newly developed immunoprecipitation method demonstrated excellent sensitivity (91.4%) and specificity (100%) in confirming the DFS pattern associated with anti-DFS70 in sera. Additionally, our method was able to remove anti-DFS70 and uncover SARD-associated ANA patterns masked by a strong DFS pattern. It also showed a clearer background on IIFA than that of the immunoadsorption method. The novel magnetic bead-based immunoprecipitation method demonstrated satisfactory performance in removing anti-DFS70 without interfering with the detection of other antibodies. It can be easily integrated with IIFA to confirm anti-DFS70 associated DFS pattern. Additionally, it can simultaneously unmask other ANA patterns, which cannot be achieved by a conventional protocol that requires a complementary anti-DFS70 specific assay to be performed. Therefore, the novel method provides a more effective and accurate solution for ANA screening.

The Nuclear Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Immunofluorescence Pattern: Not All Roads Lead to DFS70/LEDGFp75.

The monospecific dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) pattern is considered a potential marker to aid in exclusion of antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). This pattern is typically produced by autoantibodies against transcription co-activator DFS70/LEDGFp75, which are frequently found in healthy individuals and patients with miscellaneous inflammatory conditions. In AARD patients, these antibodies usually co-exist with disease-associated ANAs. Previous studies reported the occurrence of monospecific autoantibodies that generate a DFS-like or pseudo-DFS IFA pattern but do not react with DFS70/LEDGFp75. We characterized this pattern using confocal microscopy and immunoblotting. The target antigen associated with this pattern partially co-localized with DFS70/LEDGFp75 and its interacting partners H3K36me2, an active chromatin marker, and MLL, a transcription factor, in HEp-2 cells, suggesting a role in transcription. Immunoblotting did not reveal a common protein band immunoreactive with antibodies producing the pseudo-DFS pattern, suggesting they may recognize diverse proteins or conformational epitopes. Given the subjectivity of the HEp-2 IFA test, the awareness of pseudo-DFS autoantibodies reinforces recommendations for confirmatory testing when reporting patient antibodies producing a putative DFS pattern in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on defining the potential diagnostic utility of the pseudo-DFS pattern and its associated antigen(s).

An Investigation of the Relationship Between Isolated Anti-dense Fine-Speckled 70 Autoantibodies and Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E.

Background Although the mechanisms of the formation of anti-dense fine-speckled 70 (anti-DFS70) antibodies are not fully known, there is evidence in the literature that allergic reactions may play a role in their formation. Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immunopathological mechanisms are increasingly being elucidated in diseases such as atopic dermatitis and urticaria-related diseases. We aimed to reveal its relationship with anti-DFS70 in allergen-sensitive patients with positive specific IgE (sIgE) levels. Methodology The study included samples of 758 patients who underwent antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening and allergen-sIgE testing between January 2019 and January 2022. Patients' clinical diagnoses were retrospectively obtained from the hospital information management system. ANA was tested according to the instructions of the manufacturer by the indirect immunofluorescent antibody method using HEp-2 cell substrates (Euroimmun Luebeck, Germany). Allergen-sIgE was determined by chemiluminescence on the Immulite 2000 XPI system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Marburg, Germany) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Results ANA pattern was detected in 74 samples included in the study. ANA-positive patients were divided into DFS70 (+) and DFS70 (-) groups. A statistically significant increase in the DFS70 pattern was observed in patients with a positive allergen-sIgE test (p < 0.0001). Both allergen-sIgE and DFS70 positivity were statistically significant in younger age groups (p < 0.05). The most common diagnosis was urticaria-related conditions in 23 (31%) patients with a positive allergy test. Conclusions Our study shows that the positivity of the DFS70 pattern is increased in allergen-sensitive patients. Therefore, the allergen-sIgE-mediated allergic disease should be considered in patients with isolated anti-DSF70. Studies with related disease groups are needed to determine whether there is a relationship between anti-DFS70 and allergy-related disease in these patients. If an immunopathological mechanism is not found, these false-positive results can be considered clinically insignificant, and unnecessary consultations can be avoided.

The significance of dense fine speckled pattern in antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease and coexisting autoantibodies: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the prevalence of antinuclear antibody (ANA) -associated rheumatic diseases (AARD) and the presence of dense fine speckled (DFS) and homogeneous patterns in ANA tests. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled adult patients with either a DFS or homogeneous pattern in their ANA test. A mixed pattern was defined as the presence of more than one pattern reported in the test. The presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies and other common autoantibodies were detected using EUROLINE ANA Profile 23. A 1:2 propensity score matching was applied to control for demographic and other interfering factors. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients with a DFS pattern were enrolled and compared with a matched homogeneous group. The DFS group had a significantly lower prevalence of AARD (3.4% vs. 16.9%, p = .008) and the subgroup with anti-DFS70 antibodies showed an even lower prevalence (2% vs. 20%, p = .002). Among the 33 patients with monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies, five had a mixed pattern, and all patients with common autoantibodies had an isolated DFS pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that patients with a DFS pattern in their ANA test may have a lower prevalence of AARD compared with those with a homogeneous pattern. However, an isolated DFS pattern in ANA testing does not necessarily indicate the presence of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies or AARD. Confirmatory testing for the monospecific anti-DFS70 antibody is mandatory to exclude AARD.