RESUMEN
Population growth and changing climate are expected to increase human exposure to pathogens in tropical coastal waters. We examined microbiological water quality in three rivers within 2.3 km of each other that impact a Costa Rican beach and in the ocean outside their plumes during the rainy and dry seasons. We performed quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to predict the risk of gastroenteritis associated with swimming and the amount of pathogen reduction needed to achieve safe conditions. Recreational water quality criteria based on enterococci were exceeded in >90% of river samples but in only 13% of ocean samples. Multivariate analysis grouped microbial observations by subwatershed and season in river samples but only by subwatershed in the ocean. The modeled median risk from all pathogens in river samples was between 0.345 and 0.577, 10-fold above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) benchmark of 0.036 (36 illnesses/1,000 swimmers). Norovirus genogroup I (NoVGI) contributed most to risk, but adenoviruses raised risk above the threshold in the two most urban subwatersheds. The risk was greater in the dry compared to the rainy season, due largely to the greater frequency of NoVGI detection (100% versus 41%). Viral log10 reduction needed to ensure safe swimming conditions varied by subwatershed and season and was greatest in the dry season (3.8 to 4.1 dry; 2.7 to 3.2 rainy). QMRA that accounts for seasonal and local variability of water quality contributes to understanding the complex influences of hydrology, land use, and environment on human health risk in tropical coastal areas and can contribute to improved beach management. IMPORTANCE This holistic investigation of sanitary water quality at a Costa Rican beach assessed microbial source tracking (MST) marker genes, pathogens, and indicators of sewage. Such studies are still rare in tropical climates. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) found that rivers impacting the beach consistently exceeded the U.S. EPA risk threshold for gastroenteritis of 36/1,000 swimmers. The study improves upon many QMRA studies by measuring specific pathogens, rather than relying on surrogates (indicator organisms or MST markers) or estimating pathogen concentrations from the literature. By analyzing microbial levels and estimating the risk of gastrointestinal illness in each river, we were able to discern differences in pathogen levels and human health risks even though all rivers were highly polluted by wastewater and were located less than 2.5 km from one another. This variability on a localized scale has not, to our knowledge, previously been demonstrated.
Asunto(s)
Gastroenteritis , Norovirus , Humanos , Natación , Aguas Residuales , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces/microbiología , Medición de Riesgo , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Microbiología del AguaRESUMEN
AIMS: Beach water quality is regulated by faecal indicator bacteria levels, sand is not, despite known human health risk from exposure to beach sand. We compared the performance of three methods to extract bacterial DNA from beach sand as a step toward a standard method. METHODS AND RESULTS: The analytical sensitivity of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for Enterococcus was compared for the slurry (suspension, agitation, membrane filtration of supernatant), versus direct extraction using PowerSoil™ or PowerMax Soil™ kits. The slurry method had the lowest limit of detection at 20-80 gene copies g-1 , recovered significantly more DNA, and the only method that detected Enterococcus by qPCR in all samples; therefore, the only method used in subsequent experiments. The slurry method reflected the spatial variability of Enterococcus in individual transect samples. Mean recovery efficiency of the microbial source tracking marker HF183 from wastewater spiked marine and freshwater beach sand was 100.8% and 64.1%, respectively, but varied, indicating that the mixing protocol needs improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Among the three methods, the slurry method had the best analytical sensitivity and produced extracts that were useful for culture or molecular analysis. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Standardization of methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from sand facilitates comparisons among studies, and ultimately contributes to the safety of recreational beaches.
Asunto(s)
Playas , Microbiología del Agua , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , Arena , Agua de Mar/microbiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: The DNA marker HF183 is a partial 16S rRNA gene sequence highly specific to human-associated Bacteroides including Bacteroides dorei. While HF183 is used to assess human faecal contamination in aquatic environments worldwide, little is known about the existence of HF183 and B. dorei in human microbiomes outside of the human gastrointestinal tract and faeces. METHODS AND RESULTS: Previously published human skin and urine microbiome data sets from five independent human body skin studies, the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) and three independent human urine studies were analysed. The HF183 gene sequence was detected in all skin data sets, with the ratios of positive samples ranging from 0.5% to 36.3%. Popliteal fossa (knee), volar forearm and inguinal (groin) creases were identified as hot spots. HF183 was detected in two of three urine data sets, with ratios of positive samples ranging from 0% to 37.5%. All HF183-containing sequences from these data sets were classified as associated with B. dorei. CONCLUSIONS: HF183 is widespread on human skin and present in urine. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Skin and urine microbiomes could be sources of HF183 to environmental waters. Such non-faecal sources of HF183 might explain low concentrations of HF183 in recreational waters when swimmers are present.
Asunto(s)
Aguas del Alcantarillado , Microbiología del Agua , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Heces , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genéticaRESUMEN
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for human/sewage marker genes have demonstrated sporadic positive results in animal feces despite their high specificities to sewage and human feces. It is unclear whether these positive reactions are caused by true occurrences of microorganisms containing the marker gene (i.e., indicator organisms) or nonspecific amplification (false positive). The distribution patterns of human/sewage indicator organisms in animals have not been explored in depth, which is crucial for evaluating a marker gene's true- or false-positive reactions. Here, we analyzed V6 region 16S rRNA gene sequences from 257 animal fecal samples and tested a subset of 184 using qPCR for human/sewage marker genes. Overall, specificities of human/sewage marker genes within sequencing data were 99.6% (BacV6-21), 96.9% (Lachno3), and 96.1% (HF183, indexed by its inferred V6 sequence). Occurrence of some true cross-reactions was associated with atypical compositions of organisms within the genera Blautia or Bacteroides For human/sewage marker qPCR assays, specificities were 96.7% (HF183/Bac287R), 96.2% (BacV6-21), 95.6% (human Bacteroides [HB]), and 94.0% (Lachno3). Select assays duplexed with either Escherichia coli or Enterococcus spp. were also validated. Most of the positive qPCR results in animals were low level and, on average, 2 orders of magnitude lower than the copy numbers of E. coli and Enterococcus spp. The lower specificity in qPCR assays compared to sequencing data was mainly caused by amplification of sequences highly similar to the marker gene and not the occurrence of the exact marker sequence in animal fecal samples.IMPORTANCE Identifying human sources of fecal pollution is critical to remediate sanitation concerns. Large financial investments are required to address these concerns; therefore, a high level of confidence in testing results is needed. Human fecal marker genes validated in this study showed high specificity in both sequencing data and qPCR results. Human marker sequences were rarely found in individual animals, and in most cases, the animals had atypical microbial communities. Sequencing also revealed the presence of closely related organisms that could account for nonspecific amplification in certain assays. Both the true cross-reactions and the nonspecific amplification had low signals well below E. coli or Enterococcus levels and likely would not impact the assay's ability to reliably detect human fecal pollution. No animal source had multiple human/sewage marker genes present; therefore, using a combination of marker genes would increase the confidence of human fecal pollution detection.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Heces/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Australia , Humanos , ARN Bacteriano/análisis , ARN Ribosómico 16S/análisis , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
As part of a sustainable water resources management, the Lisbon municipality identified groundwater and treated wastewater use increase as two opportunities for better and sustainable water use, with natural safeguard for public health as a priority. In this context, the aim of our research was to assess the suitability of the human-associated marker gene Bacteroides HF183 and the cattle feces-associated CowM2, in routine water quality monitoring as indicators for water use and reuse, providing a tool to more accurately assess public health risks. To this intent, Real-Time quantitative PCR was used for detection of human-associated marker gene Bacteroides HF183 and the bovine-associated CowM2, in a total of 67 samples - groundwater and wastewater at three different treatment stages of a Waste Water Treatment Plant, in Lisbon. HF183 marker gene was detected in treated and untreated wastewater samples, with significant concentration reductions from untreated (6,07 E+07 copies/mL) to secondary treated effluent (1,86 E+05 copies/mL) and a further decrease in tertiary treatment (5,74 E+04 copies/mL). In groundwater samples, this marker was also detected in concentrations ranging from 2,63 E+02 copies/mL to 2,24 E+03 copies/mL. CowM2 marker gene on the other hand was only detected in wastewater samples, with concentrations ranging from 2,47 E+02 copies/mL to 1,17 E+04 copies/mL. Our research indicates that the use of Bacteroides spp. in association with traditional fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) is advantageous for water managing entities in urban settings, such as Lisbon, were drainage system failures may occur. An integrated approach thus provides crucial and more adequate information towards mitigation and correction measures when fecal contamination is detected in environmental waters.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Agua/análisis , Calidad del Agua , Animales , Bacterias , Bacteroides , Bovinos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces , Humanos , Microbiología del AguaRESUMEN
The identification of sewage contamination in water has primarily relied on the detection of human-associated Bacteroides using markers within the V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Despite the establishment of multiple assays that target the HF183 cluster (i.e., Bacteroides dorei) and other Bacteroides organisms (e.g., Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron), the potential for more human-associated markers in this genus has not been explored in depth. We examined the Bacteroides population structure in sewage and animal hosts across the V4V5 and V6 hypervariable regions. Using near-full-length cloned sequences, we identified the sequences in the V4V5 and V6 hypervariable regions that are linked to the HF183 marker in the V2 region and found these sequences were present in multiple animals. In addition, the V4V5 and V6 regions contained human fecal marker sequences for organisms that were independent of the HF183 cluster. The most abundant Bacteroides in untreated sewage was not human associated but pipe derived. Two TaqMan quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting the V4V5 and V6 regions of this organism were developed. Validation studies using fecal samples from seven animal hosts (n = 76) and uncontaminated water samples (n = 30) demonstrated the high specificity of the assays for sewage. Freshwater Bacteroides were also identified in uncontaminated water samples, demonstrating that measures of total Bacteroides do not reflect fecal pollution. A comparison of two previously described human Bacteroides assays (HB and HF183/BacR287) in municipal wastewater influent and sewage-contaminated urban water samples revealed identical results, illustrating the assays target the same organism. The detection of sewage-derived Bacteroides provided an independent measure of sewage-impacted waters.IMPORTANCEBacteroides are major members of the gut microbiota, and host-specific organisms within this genus have been used extensively to gain information on pollution sources. This study provides a broad view of the population structure of Bacteroides within sewage to contextualize the well-studied HF183 marker for a human-associated Bacteroides The study also delineates host-specific sequence patterns across multiple hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene to improve our ability to use sequence data to assess water quality. Here, we demonstrate that regions downstream of the HF183 marker are nonspecific but other potential human-associated markers are present. Furthermore, we show the most abundant Bacteroides in sewage is free living, rather than host associated, and specifically found in sewage. Quantitative PCR assays that target organisms specific to sewer pipes offer measures that are independent of the human microbiome for identifying sewage pollution in water.
Asunto(s)
Bacteroides/aislamiento & purificación , Agua Dulce/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Animales , Bacteroides/clasificación , Bacteroides/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Contaminación del Agua/análisisRESUMEN
Some molecular methods for tracking fecal pollution in environmental waters have both PCR and quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays available for use. To assist managers in deciding whether to implement newer qPCR techniques in routine monitoring programs, we compared detection limits (LODs) and costs of PCR and qPCR assays with identical targets that are relevant to beach water quality assessment. For human-associated assays targeting Bacteroidales HF183 genetic marker, qPCR LODs were 70 times lower and there was no effect of target matrix (artificial freshwater, environmental creek water, and environmental marine water) on PCR or qPCR LODs. The PCR startup and annual costs were the lowest, while the per reaction cost was 62% lower than the Taqman based qPCR and 180% higher than the SYBR based qPCR. For gull-associated assays, there was no significant difference between PCR and qPCR LODs, target matrix did not effect PCR or qPCR LODs, and PCR startup, annual, and per reaction costs were lower. Upgrading to qPCR involves greater startup and annual costs, but this increase may be justified in the case of the human-associated assays with lower detection limits and reduced cost per sample.
Asunto(s)
Charadriiformes , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Límite de Detección , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Agua/química , Animales , Bacteroidetes/aislamiento & purificación , Bioensayo/economía , Bioensayo/métodos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Determinación de Punto Final/economía , Determinación de Punto Final/métodos , Contaminación Ambiental/análisis , Heces/química , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Microbiología del Agua/normas , Calidad del Agua/normasRESUMEN
The lack of standardized methods and large differences in virus concentration and extraction workflows have hampered Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) wastewater surveillance and data reporting practices. Numerous studies have shown that adsorption-extraction (AE) method holds promise, yet several uncertainties remain regarding the optimal AE workflow. Several procedural components may influence the recovered concentrations of target nucleic acid, including membrane types, homogenization instruments, speed and duration, and lysis buffer. In this study, 42 different AE workflows that varied these components were compared to determine the optimal workflow by quantifying endogenous SARS-CoV-2, human adenovirus 40/41 (HAdV 40/41), and a bacterial marker gene of fecal contamination (Bacteroides HF183). Our findings suggest that the workflow chosen had a significant impact on SARS-CoV-2 concentrations, whereas it had minimal impact on HF183 and no effect on HAdV 40/41 concentrations. When comparing individual components in a workflow, such as membrane type (MF-Millipore™ 0.45 µm MCE vs. Isopore™ 0.40 µm), we found that they had no impact on SARS-CoV-2, HAdV 40/41, and HF183 concentrations. This suggests that at least some consumables and equipment are interchangeable. Buffer PM1 + TRIzol-based workflows yielded higher concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 than other workflows. HF183 concentrations were higher in workflows without chloroform. Similarly, higher homogenization speeds (5000-10,000 rpm) led to increased concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 and HF183 but had no effect on HAdV 40/41. Our findings indicate that minor enhancements to the AE workflow can improve the recovery of viruses and bacteria from the wastewater, leading to improved outcomes from wastewater surveillance efforts.
Asunto(s)
Adenovirus Humanos , Ácidos Nucleicos , Aguas Residuales , Humanos , Adsorción , Monitoreo Epidemiológico Basado en Aguas Residuales , Flujo de Trabajo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Outdoor defecation by people experiencing homelessness is frequently perceived as a potentially large source of human fecal pollution and a significant source of health risk in urban waterbodies with recreational contact. The goal of this study was to count the number of people experiencing homelessness and quantifies their sanitation habits in an urban river corridor setting, then use this information for estimating human fecal pollutant loading on a watershed scale. Two types of census counts were conducted including periodic point-in-time counts over six years and weekly counts of encampments. While the population census varied from count-to-count, the range of population estimates in the river corridor varied from 109 to 349 individuals during the six-year span, which mirrored the weekly counts of encampments. A face-to-face survey of people experiencing homelessness assessed the sanitation habits of the unsheltered population (N = 63), including outdoor defecation frequency and containment practices. Overall, 95 % of survey respondents reported defecating outdoors; 36 % practiced outdoor defecation between 4 and 7 days/week and 27 % practiced outdoor defecation <1 day/week. Of those that did practice outdoor defecation, 75 % contained their feces in a bucket or bag, thereby limiting fecal material contributions to the river; 6.7 % reported defecating on low ground near the river that could wash off when flood waters rise during a storm event. Only a single survey respondent reported defecating directly into the river. Based on literature values for average HF183 output for an adult human, and the average rainfall in the urban watershed, the total watershed contribution of HF183 averaged 1.2 × 1010 gene copies per storm event (95 % CI: 0.9 × 1010-1.6 × 1010) along the 41 km stretch of river in this study. This human fecal loading estimate is at least two orders of magnitude less than cumulative HF183 loading from all human sources measured at the bottom of the watershed.
Asunto(s)
Defecación , Calidad del Agua , Humanos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Microbiología del Agua , Heces , Contaminación del AguaRESUMEN
Surface waters are vulnerable to contamination by human and animal feces, posing risks to human health due to potential exposure to enteric pathogens. This research developed a colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (cLAMP) assay to detect sewage associated Bacteroides dorei HF183/BacR287 (HF183) marker in wastewater and environmental water samples. The host sensitivity and host specificity of the assay were evaluated, and their performance was compared to the Bacteroides HF183 qPCR assay using control materials (gBlocks), environmental water samples seeded with untreated sewage, and ambient environmental water samples. In serial dilutions of control materials, qPCR produced quantifiable data across all dilutions, while cLAMP detected the marker down to 0.001 pg/µL of control materials, which was two orders of magnitude less sensitive than qPCR. All untreated sewage samples (n = 12) tested positive for HF183 by both the qPCR and cLAMP assays, demonstrating a host sensitivity value of 1.00 (maximum value of 1.00). The host specificity by analysing 70 non-human fecal nucleic acid samples revealed cLAMP's specificity value of 0.81 compared to qPCR's 0.64. When testing sewage-seeded environmental water samples, both methods detected HF183 for the lowest amount of sewage, indicating similar detection sensitivity. The application of cLAMP for tracking sewage pollution in environmental waters showed promising results, with moderate agreement between cLAMP and qPCR (κ = 0.510). However, cLAMP occasionally missed detections compared to qPCR, particularly in low-concentration samples. Overall, the cLAMP HF183 assay demonstrated promising potential as a rapid and sensitive method for detecting sewage pollution, offering a viable alternative to qPCR in certain environmental monitoring scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Bacteroides , Aguas del Alcantarillado , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Bacteroides/genética , Colorimetría/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , Contaminación del Agua , Técnicas de Diagnóstico MolecularRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of HF183 Bacteroides for estimating pathogen exposures during recreational water activities. We compared the use of Bacteroides-based exposure assessment to exposure assessment that relied on pathogen measurements. We considered two types of recreational water sites: those impacted by combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and those not impacted by CSOs. Samples from CSO-impacted and non-CSO-impacted urban creeks were analysed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for HF183 Bacteroides and eight human gastrointestinal pathogens. Exposure assessment was conducted two ways for each type of site (CSO-impacted vs. non-CSO impacted): 1) by estimating pathogen concentrations from HF183 Bacteroides concentrations using published ratios of HF183 to pathogens in sewage and 2) by estimating pathogen concentrations from qPCR measurements. QMRA (quantitative microbial risk assessment) was then conducted for swimming, wading, and fishing exposures. Overall, mean risk estimates varied from 0.27 to 53 illnesses per 1,000 recreators depending on exposure assessment, site, activity, and norovirus dose-response model. HF183-based exposure assessment identified CSO-impacted sites as higher risk, and the recommended HF183 risk-based threshold of 525 genomic copies per 100 mL was generally protective of public health at the CSO-impacted sites but was not as protective at the non-CSO-impacted sites. In the context of our urban watershed, HF183-based exposure assessment over- and under-estimated risk relative to exposure assessment based on pathogen measurements, and the etiology of predicted pathogen-specific illnesses differed significantly. Across all sites, the HF183 model overestimated risk for norovirus, adenovirus, and Campylobacter jejuni, and it underestimated risk for E. coli and Cryptosporidium. To our knowledge, this study is the first to directly compare health risk estimates using HF183 and empirical pathogen measurements from the same waterways. Our work highlights the importance of site-specific hazard identification and exposure assessment to decide whether HF183 is applicable for monitoring risk.
Asunto(s)
Bacteroides , Recreación , Microbiología del Agua , Medición de Riesgo , Bacteroides/aislamiento & purificación , Bacteroides/genética , Humanos , Ciudades , Norovirus , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodosRESUMEN
The coastal communities of Lee County, Florida, USA have grown rapidly since the 1970s. In this county, drainage ditches, canals, creeks, and the Caloosahatchee River Estuary often have high concentrations of nutrients and bacteria limiting their designated uses. Septic systems have previously been identified as a major pollution source in some areas of Lee County; therefore, this study sought to identify the extent of this issue throughout the county. To accomplish this, surface water samples were collected at 25 ditch, creek, or canal sites suspected of human waste contamination from septic systems in various drainage basins throughout Lee County during January 2020-January 2021. Water samples were analyzed for nutrients, dual stable nitrate isotopes (δ15N-NO3-, δ18O-NO3-), fecal indicator bacteria (enterococci, Escherichia coli), a molecular tracer of human waste (HF183), and chemical tracers of human waste (the artificial sweetener sucralose, pharmaceuticals). Particulate organic matter (POM) and macrophytes were also collected and analyzed for stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopes, as well as elemental composition (C:N:P). To broaden the assessment of stable isotope values and C:N:P, archived macrophyte samples from 2019 were also included in analyses. Ammonium concentrations were high (> 4.3 µM) in 55 % of samples. Fecal bacteria were high in 66 % of samples. HF183 was detected in 50 % of samples and positively correlated with enterococci (r = 0.32). Sucralose concentrations were high (> 380 ng/L) in 54 % of samples, while carbamazepine was detected in 40 % of samples. Human waste N sources were indicated by δ15N > 3.00 at 44 % of sites by δ15N-NO3-, 68 % of sites by POM, and at 100 % of sites where macrophyte samples were collected. This large-scale study provides evidence of widespread human waste pollution throughout Lee County and can help guide infrastructure improvements to promote sustainable development. These findings should be applicable to urbanized regions globally that are experiencing declines in water quality and harmful algal blooms due to development with inadequate infrastructure.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Humanos , Florida , Nitrógeno/análisis , Calidad del Agua , Ríos/química , Bacterias , Enterococcus , Isótopos de Nitrógeno/análisis , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Nitratos/análisisRESUMEN
The lack of standardized methods and large differences in virus concentration and extraction workflows have hampered severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) wastewater surveillance and data reporting practices. Numerous studies have shown that adsorption-extraction (AE) method holds promise, yet several uncertainties remain regarding the optimal AE workflow. Several procedural components that may influence the recovered concentrations of target DNA/RNA, including membrane types, homogenization instruments, speed and duration, and lysis buffer. In this study, 42 different AE workflows that varied these components were compared to determine the optimal method by quantifying endogenous SARS-CoV-2, human adenovirus (HAdV 40/41) and a bacterial marker gene of fecal pollution (Bacteroides HF183). Our findings suggest that the certain selected workflow had a significant impact on SARS-CoV-2 concentrations, whereas it had minimal impact on HF183 and no effect on HAdV 40/41 concentrations. When comparing individual components in a workflow, such as membrane type (MF-Millipore™ 0.45⯵m MCE vs. Isopore™ 0.40⯵m) and homogenization instruments (Precellys 24 homogenizer vs. Vortex-Genie®-2), we found that they had no impact on SARS-CoV-2, HAdV 40/41, and HF183 concentrations. This suggests that at least some consumables and equipment are interchangeable. Buffer PM1â¯+â¯TRIzol based workflows yielded higher concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 than other workflows. HF183 concentrations were higher in workflows without chloroform. Similarly, higher homogenization speeds (5000-10,000â¯rpm) led to increased concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 and HF183 but had no effect on HAdV 40/41. Our findings indicate that minor enhancements to the AE workflow can improve the recovery of viruses and bacteria from the wastewater, leading to different outcomes from wastewater surveillance efforts.
RESUMEN
Waterborne diseases are transmitted to humans through the fecal contamination of water, where homeothermic species are the main reservoir. Fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) are often used to determine the occurrence of fecal contamination. However, FIB cannot provide the source of fecal contamination. Furthermore, as fecal inputs and contamination could originate from multiple sources (e.g., human, livestock, wildlife), multiple source tracking markers are required to identify fecal sources. From a previous study, we developed a mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) metabarcoding approach to assess the presence of multiple homeotherms in four surface waters. Here, we have broadened our approach by sampling 86 surface water samples from the L'Assomption River and Ville-Marie watersheds (Province of Quebec, Canada). Fecal coliform levels were higher than the expected sanitary recommendations for recreational water (> 200 CFU/100 mL) in 73 % samples. The occurrence of mtDNA from human, livestock, domestic animals, wild mammals and wild birds was found in 40-88 % of the samples. Multivariate analyses showed significant covariations between homeothermic taxa and fecal coliforms, enterococci, ß-D-glucuronidase, conductivity, the human-specific Bacteroidales Hf183 genetic marker, and the human population, in the watersheds of L'Assomption River (p = 0.001) and Ville-Marie (p = 0.015) (Province of Quebec, Canada). Through the application of Bayes Theorem, it was determined that fecal coliforms co-occurred with the detection of bovine, beaver, robin and chicken mtDNA in 100 % of cases in the L'Assomption River watershed, and human mtDNA co-occurred with fecal coliforms in 93 % and 76 % of cases in L'Assomption River watershed and Ville-Marie sub-catchment, respectively. This study suggests that fecal contamination could be the result of multiple species, among which some wild animals may contribute to fecal inputs in surface waters, resulting in potential risk to human health. This reinforces the necessity of using the mtDNA metabarcoding method to monitor multi-animal species.
Asunto(s)
Código de Barras del ADN Taxonómico , ADN Mitocondrial , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Animales Domésticos , Bacterias , Animales Salvajes , Contaminación del Agua , Agua , Heces/microbiología , Microbiología del Agua , MamíferosRESUMEN
Human fecal biomarkers (HFBs) have a longstanding history in the field of microbial source tracking (MST) serving as indicators of human fecal contamination in drinking and recreational water. Further, HFBs have aided in recent efforts to monitor human pathogen transmission within communities. The dilution of wastewater from various sources throughout the sewershed cannot be controlled and human fecal biomarkers (HFBs) can be used to normalize target human pathogen concentrations so that fluctuations in fecal matter in wastewater can be accounted for. In the current study, we monitored the prevalence of four HFBs - including two viruses, Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), cross-assembly phage (crAssphage), as well as two human-associated Bacteroides markers, HF183 and BacHuman - in wastewater samples from ten Southern Ontario wastewater treatment plants and evaluated their temporal and spatial variation in context of environmental factors that may impact the ability of HFB to normalize pathogen concentrations in wastewater. Environmental variables including precipitation, wastewater flow rate, temperature, and concentrated mass were also analyzed for their potential correlation with HFB variation in wastewater. The four HFBs were detected at high concentrations across all 10 sampling locations. The median concentrations across all sampling sites were: PMMoV 3.6 Log gene copies (GC)/mL; crAssphage 5.0 Log GC/mL; HF183 6.8 Log GC/mL and BacHuman 6.9 Log GC/mL. All HFBs were found to be similarly stratified across all 10 sites, and the bacterial markers were consistently found at higher concentration compared to the viral HFBs at all sites. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each HFB was used to characterize the variability of each biomarker at each sewershed. BacHuman and crAssphage were found to have lower CV than PMMoV and HF183, indicating that BacHuman and crAssphage may perform better in reflecting the variations in abundance of human feces in wastewater or MST applications.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriófagos , Aguas Residuales , Humanos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminación del Agua/análisis , Ontario , Biomarcadores , Heces/microbiología , Microbiología del Agua , Aguas del AlcantarilladoRESUMEN
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is used as a genetic marker to track fecal contamination in surface water. Its potential to effectively discriminate between the nonpoint sources of fecal pollution (e.g. human, livestock) in water environments is relevant for water quality management. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the environmental persistence of mtDNA in relation to those of other microbial parameters, such as fecal indicator bacteria (FIB). In this study, mesocosms composed of water collected from four rivers and tap water were spiked with raw wastewater to mimic human fecal contamination. Mesocosms composed of raw wastewater were also studied. The mesocosms were incubated at 4 °C or at 22 °C for 189 days, from which the levels of human mtDNA (HumtDNA) and human Bacteroidales (Hf183) were measured by qPCR. The levels of FIB (fecal coliforms and enterococci) and heterotrophs were determined by culture methods along with the determination of physicochemical attributes. The decay rates of the genetic markers and FIB were determined with first-order decay rate models. The decay rates of HumtDNA (0.004-0.059 d-1), Hf183 (0.007-0.082 d-1), and the two FIBs (0.005-0.066 d-1) were similar at 4 °C, while the genetic markers both had higher decay rates (0.013-0.919 d-1) at 22 °C. Different HumtDNA decay rates were observed between the river mesocosms (0.043-0.919 d-1) and the wastewater and tap water mesocosms (0.004-0.095 d-1). Covariations of pH and conductivity among the HumtDNA, Hf183 and FIB decay rates were observed. HumtDNA and Hf183 had similar environmental persistence, whereas fecal coliforms and enterococci persisted longer at 22 °C. Finally, HumtDNA had the same trends of persistence in the four river mesocosms, suggesting a relative stability of this marker in different rivers. Our results suggest that HumtDNA could be more suitable for tracking the source of a recent fecal contamination in complement to FIB.
Asunto(s)
Enterococcus , Calidad del Agua , Bacterias/genética , Bacteroidetes/genética , ADN Mitocondrial , Enterococcus/genética , Heces/microbiología , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Temperatura , Aguas Residuales , Microbiología del Agua , Contaminación del AguaRESUMEN
Green stormwater infrastructure systems, such as biofilters, provide many water quality and other environmental benefits, but their ability to remove human pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from stormwater runoff is not well documented. In this study, a field scale biofilter in Southern California (USA) was simultaneously evaluated for the breakthrough of a conservative tracer (bromide), conventional fecal indicators, bacterial and viral human-associated fecal source markers (HF183, crAssphage, and PMMoV), ARGs, and bacterial and viral pathogens. When challenged with a 50:50 mixture of untreated sewage and stormwater (to mimic highly contaminated storm flow) the biofilter significantly removed (p < 0.05) 14 of 17 microbial markers and ARGsin descending order of concentration reduction: ermB (2.5 log(base 10) reduction) > Salmonella (2.3) > adenovirus (1.9) > coliphage (1.5) > crAssphage (1.2) > E. coli (1.0) â¼ 16S rRNA genes (1.0) â¼ fecal coliform (1.0) â¼ intl1 (1.0) > Enterococcus (0.9) â¼ MRSA (0.9) â¼ sul1 (0.9) > PMMoV (0.7) > Entero1A (0.5). No significant removal was observed for GenBac3, Campylobacter, and HF183. From the bromide data, we infer that 0.5 log-units of attenuation can be attributed to the dilution of incoming stormwater with water stored in the biofilter; removal above this threshold is presumably associated with non-conservative processes, such as physicochemical filtration, die-off, and predation. Our study documents high variability (>100-fold) in the removal of different microbial contaminants and ARGs by a field-scale stormwater biofilter operated under transient flow and raises further questions about the utility of human-associated fecal source markers as surrogates for pathogen removal.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Escherichia coli , Bromuros , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/genética , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Microbiología del AguaRESUMEN
Microbial source tracking (MST) can identify and locate surf zone fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) sources. However, DNA-based fecal marker results may raise new questions, since FIB and DNA marker sources can differ. Here, during 2 years of summertime (dry season) MST for a Goleta, California recreational beach, surf zone FIB were mainly from gulls, yet low level human-associated DNA-based fecal marker (HF183) was detected in 25 and 14% of surf zone water samples, respectively. Watershed sources were hypothesized because dry weather creek waters had elevated FIB, and runoff-generating rain events mobilized human (and dog) fecal markers and Salmonella spp. into creeks, with human marker HF183 detected in 40 and 50% of creek water samples, dog markers detected in 70 and 50% of samples, and Salmonella spp. in 40 and 33.3% of samples, respectively over 2 years. However, the dry weather estuary outlet was bermed in the first study year; simultaneously, creek fecal markers and pathogens were lower or similar to surf zone results. Although the berm breached in the second year, surf zone fecal markers stayed low. Watershed sediments, intertidal beach sands, and nearshore sediments were devoid of HF183 and dog-associated DNA markers. Based on dye tests and groundwater sampling, beach sanitary sewers were not leaking; groundwater was also devoid of HF183. Offshore sources appeared unlikely, since FIB and fecal markers decreased along a spatial gradient from the surf zone toward nearshore and offshore ocean waters. Further, like other regional beaches, surf zone HF183 corresponded significantly to bather counts, especially in the afternoons when there were more swimmers. However, morning detections of surf zone HF183 when there were few swimmers raised the possibility that the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) offshore outfall discharged HF183 overnight which transported to the surf zone. These findings support that there may be lowest achievable limits of surf zone HF183 owing to several chronic and permanent, perhaps diurnal, low concentration sources.
RESUMEN
Worldwide, fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) evidence coastal water contamination for which sources are unknown. Here, for two FIB-impacted Santa Barbara recreational beaches, hypothesized fecal sources were investigated over three dry seasons (summers) using nearly 2000 field samples of water (ocean, creek, groundwater), sand, sediments, effluent and fecal sources. In years 1 and 2, gull and dog feces were identified as the probable main FIB sources to surf zone waters, yet HF183 human fecal markers were consistently detected. Determining HF183 sources was therefore prioritized, via year 3 sub-studies. In lower watersheds, human and dog wastes were mobilized by small storms into creeks, but no storm drain outfalls or creeks discharged into surf zones. Beach area bathrooms, sewers, and a septic system were not sources: dye tracing discounted hydraulic connections, and shallow groundwater was uncontaminated. Sediments from coastal creeks and downstream scour ponds, nearshore marine sediments, and sands from inter- and supratidal zones contained neither HF183 nor pathogens. Two nearby wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) outfalls discharged HF183 into plumes that were either deep or distant with uncertain onshore transport. Regardless, local sources were evidenced, as surf zone HF183 detection rates mostly exceeded those offshore and nearshore (around boat anchorages). The presence of swimmers was associated with surf zone HF183, as swimmer counts (on weekdays, holidays, weekends, and during races) significantly correlated (p<0.05, n = 196) to HF183 detections. Besides comprehensively assessing all possible fecal sources, this study provides new explanations of chronic low-level human markers in recreational beach surf zones, suggesting likely lowest achievable HF183 thresholds.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Agua , Purificación del Agua , Animales , Perros , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces , Humanos , Microbiología del AguaRESUMEN
Bathing water quality may be negatively impacted by diffuse pollution arising from urban and agricultural activities and wildlife, it is therefore important to be able to differentiate between biological and geographical sources of faecal pollution. crAssphage was recently described as a novel human-associated microbial source tracking marker. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the crAssphage marker in designated bathing waters. The sensitivity and specificity of the crAss_2 marker was evaluated using faecal samples from herring gulls, dogs, sewage and a stream impacted by human pollution (n = 80), which showed that all human impacted samples tested positive for the marker while none of the animal samples did. The crAss_2 marker was field tested in an urban marine bathing water close to the discharge point of human impacted streams. In addition, the bathing water is affected by dog and gull fouling. Analysis of water samples taken at the compliance point every 30 min during a tidal cycle following a rain event showed that the crAss_2 and HF183 markers performed equally well (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.84). The levels of these marker and faecal indicators (Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci, somatic coliphages) varied by up to 2.5 log10 during the day. Analysis of a high-tide transect perpendicular to the shoreline revealed high levels of localised faecal contamination 1 km offshore, with a concomitant spike in the gull marker. In contrast, both the crAss_2 and HF183 markers remained at a constant level, showing that human faecal contamination is homogenously distributed, while gull pollution is localised. Performance of the crAss_2 and HF183 assay was further evaluated in bimonthly compliance point samples over an 18-month period. The co-occurrence between the crAss_2 and HF183 markers in compliance sampling was 76%. A combination of both markers should be applied in low pollution impacted environments to obtain a high confidence level.