Differential inhibition of sildenafil and macitentan on saxagliptin metabolism.

The development of diabetes mellitus (DM) is generally accompanied by erectile dysfunction (ED) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), which increases the use of combination drug therapy and the risk of drug-drug interactions. Saxagliptin for the treatment of DM, sildenafil for the treatment of ED and PAH, and macitentan for the treatment of PAH are all substrates of CYP3A4, which indicates their potential involvement in drug-drug interactions. Therefore, we investigated potential pharmacokinetic interactions between saxagliptin and sildenafil/macitentan. We investigated this speculation both in vitro and in vivo, and explored the underlying mechanism using in vitro hepatic metabolic models and molecular docking assays. The results showed that sildenafil substantially inhibited the metabolism of saxagliptin by occupying the catalytic site of CYP3A4 in a competitive manner, leading to the alterations in the pharmacokinetic properties of saxagliptin in terms of increased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUC(0-∞)), decreased clearance rate (CLz/F), and prolonged terminal half-life (t1/2). In contrast, a slight inhibition was observed in saxagliptin metabolism when concomitantly used with macitentan, as no pharmacokinetic parameters were altered, except for CLz/F. Thus, dosage adjustment of saxagliptin may be required in combination with sildenafil to achieve safe therapeutic plasma concentrations and reduce the risk of potential toxicity, but it is not necessary for co-administration with macitentan.

Stability Indicating RP-HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous estimation of tadalafil and macitentan in synthetic mixture for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: High Performance liquid chromatography is an integral analytical tool in assessing drug product stability. A simple, selective, precise, accurate and stability indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for analysis of Tadalafil and Macitentan in synthetic mixture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Chromatographic separation was performed using Phenomex Gemini C18 (25cm×4.6nm, 5µm) Column. The mobile phase consists of (10mM Ammonium Acetate in water and [Methanol: ACN 20: 80% v/v]) (40: 60% v/v). The flow rate was set to be 1.0mL/min. The injection volume was 10.00µL. The detection was carried out at 260nm at column temperature 35°C. RESULTS: The method was validating according to ICH Q2R1 guideline for accuracy, precision, reproducibility, specificity, robustness and detection and quantification limits. Stability testing was performed on Tadalafil and Macitentan and it was found that these degraded sufficiently in all applied chemical and physical conditions. Linearity for Tadalafil and Macitentan was observed 0.4-100µg/mL and 0.1-25µg/mL with correlation coefficient at 0.9999. LOD and LOQ 0.008µg/mL and 0.024µg/mL and 0.001µg/mL and 0.0029µg/mL for Tadalafil and Macitentan respectively. CONCLUSION: The developed RP-HPLC method was found to be suitable for the determination of both the drugs.

Long-term safety of macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), but its safety, especially for long-term use, needs to be further explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of long-term use of macitentan in patients with PH. METHODS: A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of PH with macitentan, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Estimated effects of included studies were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Six RCTs (enrolling 1003 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Anaemia (RR 3.86, 95% CI 2.05-7.30), headache (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.26) and bronchitis (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.30-3.87) were more frequent in the macitentan groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE), AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment, all-cause death, right ventricular failure (RVF) and peripheral oedema between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term use of macitentan is safe for patients with PH, although with a higher risk of anaemia, headache and bronchitis.

Effects of Concomitant Administration of PXR Ligand Drugs on the Anticoagulant Effects of Warfarin.

We encountered cases in which the anticoagulant effects of warfarin (CYP2C9 substrate) were reversibly attenuated by the concomitant administration of rifampicin or bosentan, which are potent pregnane X receptor (PXR) ligands. The purpose of the present study is to report the previous case with rifampicin, and to evaluate the changes in the warfarin anticoagulant effects when withdrawing or switching bosentan treatment. The former is a case study of a 4-year-old girl undergoing warfarin treatment. The latter is a longitudinal study of 20 pediatric patients receiving stable warfarin treatment. The prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT-INR) values were extracted from the medical records and normalized by the daily-dose per body size as an index for the warfarin anticoagulant effects. Rifampicin treatment resulted in a 52.0% decrease in the anticoagulant index. On the other hand, 10 of 20 patients started bosentan and their anticoagulant index was reduced by a median of 2.00. Bosentan was withdrawn in 4 of 20 patients and their anticoagulant index increased by a median of 3.67. Six of 20 patients switched from bosentan to macitentan, which is considered not to activate PXR in clinical settings. However, switching from bosentan to macitentan resulted in a median of 2.25 reduction of the anticoagulant index rather than recovery of the response to warfarin. This study suggests not only the possibility of heterogeneity in the response to PXR activation and deactivation, but also the importance of long-term monitoring of drug-drug interactions when switching from bosentan to macitentan.

Evaluation of the combination of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in pathologic human pulmonary arteries in an ex-vivo organ bath model.

PURPOSE: Medical combination therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may alleviate the drawbacks of monotherapy by avoiding drug tolerance and by increasing effectiveness, as shown by the combination of ambrisentan and tadalafil (AMBITION trial). The present ex-vivo study evaluated the combination of the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) macitentan and bosentan with the phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor vardenafil in pulmonary arteries from patients suffering from terminal lung disease as a model of PAH. METHODS: Segments of the pulmonary vessels were excised from resected lungs of patients requiring lung transplantation (LTX). Contraction of pulmonary arteries (PA) was elicited by consecutive dose-response curves of endothelin-1 (ET-1) followed by norepinephrine (NE) to allow inhibition by different pathways. Forces were measured isometrically in an organ bath in the presence and absence of ERA and PDE-5 inhibitors and their combination. RESULTS: PA of 38 patients were examined between October 2016 and November 2019. Bosentan (1E-7 M) and macitentan (1E-8 M, 3E-8 M, 1E-7 M) inhibited ET-1 induced contractions, whereas vardenafil (1E-6 M, 3E-6 M, 1E-5 M) inhibited only the NE induced part of the contractions. Vardenafil enhanced bosentan-induced inhibition of vasoconstriction in a dose-dependent fashion. Combination effects exceeded single bosentan at 3E-6 M and 1E-5 M vardenafil, and they exceeded single vardenafil at the lower vardenafil concentrations. Macitentan showed a more pronounced inhibition than bosentan regardless of the lower concentrations. Accordingly, combination effects with vardenafil resembled those of macitentan alone. CONCLUSIONS: Macitentan and bosentan were potent antagonists of vasoconstriction in PA of LTX patients. The benefit of drug combinations was demonstrated at selected concentrations only owing to a narrow therapeutic range of vardenafil in this ex-vivo model. These results suggest the utility of drug combinations other than the established pair of ambrisentan and tadalafil in PAH treatment but also make a case for a further assessment of vasodilator properties of drugs complementing ERA.

Primary Human Hepatocyte Spheroids as Tools to Study the Hepatotoxic Potential of Non-Pharmaceutical Chemicals.

Drug-induced liver injury, including cholestasis, is an important clinical issue and economic burden for pharmaceutical industry and healthcare systems. However, human-relevant in vitro information on the ability of other types of chemicals to induce cholestatic hepatotoxicity is lacking. This work aimed at investigating the cholestatic potential of non-pharmaceutical chemicals using primary human hepatocytes cultured in 3D spheroids. Spheroid cultures were repeatedly (co-) exposed to drugs (cyclosporine-A, bosentan, macitentan) or non-pharmaceutical chemicals (paraquat, tartrazine, triclosan) and a concentrated mixture of bile acids for 4 weeks. Cell viability (adenosine triphosphate content) was checked every week and used to calculate the cholestatic index, an indicator of cholestatic liability. Microarray analysis was performed at specific time-points to verify the deregulation of genes related to cholestasis, steatosis and fibrosis. Despite the evident inter-donor variability, shorter exposures to cyclosporine-A consistently produced cholestatic index values below 0.80 with transcriptomic data partially supporting its cholestatic burden. Bosentan confirmed to be hepatotoxic, while macitentan was not toxic in the tested concentrations. Prolonged exposure to paraquat suggested fibrotic potential, while triclosan markedly deregulated genes involved in different types of hepatotoxicity. These results support the applicability of primary human hepatocyte spheroids to study hepatotoxicity of non-pharmaceutical chemicals in vitro.

Macitentan Attenuates Chronic Mountain Sickness in Rats by Regulating Arginine and Purine Metabolism.

Chronic mountain sickness (CMS) is a high altitude complication with high rates of morbidity and mortality. CMS is characterized by high-altitude polycythemia (HAPC) and high-altitude pulmonary hypertension (HAPH). In this study, macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, was used to treat CMS, and the induced metabolomics changes were studied. CMS was induced in rats in a hypobaric hypoxia chamber (simulating a 5500 m plateau) for 4 weeks. Macitentan was administered in the third and fourth weeks (30 mg·kg-1·day-1). At the end of the follow-up period, we performed echocardiography, measured hemodynamic parameters and hematocrit, and performed histological staining. Furthermore, ultraperformance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS)-based metabolic analysis was applied to explore metabolic changes associated with hypobaric hypoxia, with or without macitentan. qRT-PCR and kits for the determination of xanthine oxidase (XO) activity were used for validation experiments. Macitentan was effective in attenuating CMS, including CMS-induced right ventricle hypertrophy, HAPC, and HAPH. The levels of 48 metabolites were significantly changed in the CMS model group compared to the control group. Of these changes, 21 were reversed by treatment with macitentan. Enrichment analysis revealed that the purine metabolism pathway, as well as the arginine/proline metabolism pathway, might be the key pathways adjusted by macitentan. Furthermore, we verified macitentan played a beneficial role by directly regulating the expression of arginine1 and arginine2 in the arginine/proline metabolic pathway, and the activity of xanthine oxidase in the purine metabolic pathway. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that macitentan significantly ameliorated CMS in rats, and the mechanism was attributed to the reversion of the disorder in purine and arginine/proline metabolism, via direct regulation of XO activity and arginine1/2 expression. These findings are expected to provide new insights into the therapeutics and mechanism of macitentan in CMS.

Evaluation of Macitentan in Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Eisenmenger syndrome describes congenital heart disease-associated severe pulmonary hypertension accompanied by right-to-left shunting. The multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 16-week, phase III MAESTRO study (Macitentan in Eisenmenger Syndrome to Restore Exercise Capacity) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. METHODS: Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome aged ≥12 years and in World Health Organization functional class II-III were randomized 1:1 to placebo or macitentan 10 mg once daily for 16 weeks. Patients with complex cardiac defects, Down syndrome and background PAH therapy were eligible. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 16 in 6-minute walk distance. Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 16 in World Health Organization functional class. Exploratory end points included NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) at end of treatment expressed as a percentage of baseline. In a hemodynamic substudy, exploratory end points included pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRi) at week 16 as a percentage of baseline. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty six patients (macitentan n=114; placebo n=112) were randomized. At baseline, 60% of patients were in World Health Organization functional class II and 27% were receiving phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors. At week 16, the mean change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance was 18.3 m and 19.7 m in the macitentan and placebo groups (least-squares mean difference, -4.7 m; 95% confidence limit (CL), -22.8, 13.5; P=0.612). World Health Organization functional class improved from baseline to week 16 in 8.8% and 14.3% of patients in the macitentan and placebo groups (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CL, 0.23, 1.24). NT-proBNP levels decreased with macitentan versus placebo (ratio of geometric means, 0.80; 95% CL, 0.68, 0.94). In the hemodynamic substudy (n=39 patients), macitentan decreased PVRi compared with placebo (ratio of geometric means, 0.87; 95% CL, 0.73, 1.03). The most common adverse events with macitentan versus placebo were headache (11.4 versus 4.5%) and upper respiratory tract infection (9.6 versus 6.3%); a hemoglobin decrease from baseline of ≥2 g/dL occurred in 36.0% versus 8.9% of patients. Five patients (3 macitentan; 2 placebo) prematurely discontinued treatment and 1 patient died (macitentan group). CONCLUSIONS: Macitentan did not show superiority over placebo on the primary end point of change from baseline to week 16 in exercise capacity in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01743001.

Bioequivalence of macitentan and tadalafil given as fixed-dose combination or single-component tablets in healthy subjects.

AIMS: To demonstrate the bioequivalence of macitentan/tadalafil fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets with single-component tablets of macitentan and tadalafil in healthy subjects. METHODS: Studies AC-077-101 and AC-077-103 were single-centre, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, randomized, crossover Phase 1 studies conducted in healthy subjects. Two FDCs were investigated: FDC-1 and FDC-2 in Study AC-077-101 and FDC-2 in Study AC-077-103. Both FDCs contained 10 mg/40 mg of macitentan/tadalafil and differed in excipients and coating materials used. In both studies, pharmacokinetic sampling over 216 hours was conducted, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Bioequivalence of macitentan, its active metabolite ACT-132577, and tadalafil was established for FDC-2 in both studies AC-077-101 and AC-077-103 in which tadalafil as a single component was sourced from the USA and EU, respectively, to fulfil regional regulatory requirements. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration with 90% confidence intervals of all components were entirely within the bioequivalence limits (0.8000-1.2500). No subject died and no serious adverse events were reported in either studies. CONCLUSION: The FDC-2 tablet containing 10 mg/40 mg of macitentan/tadalafil was bioequivalent to the free combination of 10 mg macitentan and 40 mg tadalafil (both US and EU sourced). Macitentan and tadalafil were well tolerated when administered as FDC or as a free combination.

PK/PD modeling based on NO-ET homeostasis for improving management of sunitinib-induced hypertension in rats.

Sunitinib is an oral small molecule multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which is currently used to treat severe cancers. Clinical research has shown that patients treated with sunitinib develop hypertension. As soon as sunitinib-induced hypertension appears, it is usual to administer anti-hypertension agent. But this treatment may cause acute blood pressure fluctuation which may lead to additional cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study is to establish a mathematical model for managing sunitinib-induced hypertension and blood pressure fluctuation. A mechanism-based PK/PD model was developed based on animal experiments. Then this model was used to perform simulations, thus to propose an anti-hypertension indication, according to which the anti-hypertension treatment might yield relative low-level AUC and fluctuation of blood pressure. The simulation results suggest that the anti-hypertension agent may yield low-level AUC and fluctuation of blood pressure when relative ET-1 level ranges from -15% to 5% and relative NO level is more than 10% compared to control group. Finally, animal experiments were conducted to verify the simulation results. Macitentan (30 mg/kg) was administered based on the above anti-hypertension indication. Compared with the untreated group, the optimized treatment significantly reduced the AUC of blood pressure; meanwhile the fluctuation of blood pressure in optimized treatment group was 70% less than that in immediate treatment group. This work provides a novel model with potential translational value for managing sunitinib-induced hypertension.

Changes in REVEAL risk score in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with macitentan in clinical practice: results from the PRACMA study.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist indicated for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We evaluated the change over time in REVEAL risk score in incident and prevalent patients receiving macitentan for the first time. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study including adult patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH or PAH associated with connective tissue disorders or congenital heart disease treated with macitentan for ≥6-month follow-up in Spain. The REVEAL risk score and risk strata were computed at the start of macitentan and after ≥6-month in patients with ≥7 out of 12 valid REVEAL components. RESULTS: Overall, 81 patients (57 for the REVEAL score) were analysed, 77.8% women. The mean age was 57.2 years and 50.6% of patients had idiopathic/heritable PAH. Prevalent patients were 59.3 and 40.7% were incident. Main therapies for PAH included macitentan monotherapy (42.0%) and macitentan in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (44.4%). With a median time of macitentan treatment of 10.5 months, the mean REVEAL score was 8.7 points at baseline and was 7.2 points after ≥6-month follow-up. The mean change (95% CI) in REVEAL risk score was - 1.4 (- 2.0, - 0.9) points (p < 0.0001), being - 1.8 (- 3.0, - 0.7) points (p = 0.0040) and - 1.2 (- 1.8, - 0.5) points (p = 0.0010), in incident and prevalent patients, respectively. The reduction was also significant by risk stratum (36.8% of patients in the high-very high risk strata at baseline versus 14.0% after ≥6-month, p < 0.05) and therapy group. The REVEAL components that significantly improved were WHO functional class (FC) (63.9% FC III at macitentan initiation and 23.6% after ≥6-month, p < 0.0001), 6-min walk test (mean change: 41.8 m, p < 0.01), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) (mean change of - 157.6 pg/mL and - 530.0 pg/mL, respectively, p < 0.05 both), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (mean change: - 3.4 WU, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, treatment with macitentan improved the REVEAL risk strata and score in both incident and prevalent PAH patients, and in all patients regardless of the therapy strategy. Macitentan significantly improved some of REVEAL components including WHO FC, BNP/NT-proBNP, PVR, and 6-min walk test after at least 6-month follow-up.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switch from bosentan to macitentan in children and young adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension: extended study results.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is an orally active, potent, dual endothelin receptor antagonist and is the only registered treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension that significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in a long-term study. AIM: We have recently reported that switch from bosentan to macitentan significantly improved exercise capacity in children and young adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a 24-week prospective study and well tolerated without adverse events. We now aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy, safety of switch in a larger patient population, in a 24-month prospective study. METHODS: This is a single-institution, 24-month prospective study. Patients ≥12 years with idiopathic/heritable, pulmonary arterial hypertension, or related to CHD or residual pulmonary arterial hypertension due to repaired congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and on bosentan treatment were included. Concomitant treatment with oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors/inhaled prostanoids was allowed. Outcome measures included change from baseline to 24 months, in the 6-minute walk distance, functional class, oxygen saturation at rest/after walk distance test, and natriuretic peptide levels. Safety end points included adverse events, laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (19 adults/8 children, mean age: 21.1 ± 6.3 years (12-36), weight: 53.1 ± 15.7 kgs (26-87)) were included. Mean duration of macitentan treatment: 22.3 ± 3.9 months (9-24). Six-minute walk distance significantly improved from baseline (mean: 458 ± 79 m (300-620)) at 6 months (mean: 501 ± 73 m (325-616) + 43 m) (p < 0.05), at 12 months (mean: 514 ± 82 m (330-626) + 56 m) (p < 0.05), and at 24 months (mean: 532 ± 85 m (330-682) + 74 m) (p < 0.05). We observed a significant improvement during the first 6 months but no incremental improvement after 6 months (p > 0.05). Macitentan did not significantly change functional class, oxygen saturation, and natriuretic levels (p > 0.05). None of the patients had anaemia, hepatotoxicity, and peripheral edema. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first study which showed that switch from bosentan to macitentan improved exercise capacity in children and young adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension significantly in the first 6 months and compared to baseline in 24 months and well tolerated without adverse events.

The Clinical Efficacy of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Therapeutic strategies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have made remarkable progress over the last two decades. Currently, 3 types of drugs can be used to treat PAH; prostacyclins, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, and endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA). In Japan, the first generation ERA bosentan was reimbursed in 2005, following which the 2nd generation ERAs ambrisentan and macitentan were reimbursed in 2009 and 2015, respectively. The efficacy of each ERA on hemodynamics in PAH patients remains to be elucidated. The aims of this study were to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of ERAs and compare these effects among each generation of ERAs.We retrospectively examined the clinical parameters of 42 PAH patients who were prescribed an ERA (15 bosentan, 12 ambrisentan, and 15 macitentan) and who underwent a hemodynamic examination before and after ERA introduction at our institution from January 2007 to July 2019.In a total of 42 patients, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly decreased and cardiac index was significantly increased after ERA introduction (P < 0.001) and the World Health Organization-Functional class (WHO-Fc) was significantly improved after ERA introduction (P = 0.005). Next, in a comparison between 1st and 2nd generation ERAs, 2nd generation ERAs were found to have brought about greater improvements in hemodynamic parameters (mPAP and PVR. P < 0.01), heart rate, brain natriuretic peptide, arterial oxygen saturation, and mixed venous oxygen saturation than the 1st generation ERA bosentan.We conclude that all ERAs could successfully improve the hemodynamics of PAH patients and that the newer generation ERAs, ambrisentan and macitentan, seemed to be preferable to bosentan.

A dual blocker of endothelin A/B receptors mitigates hypertension but not renal dysfunction in a rat model of chronic kidney disease and sleep apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by recurrent episodes of pharyngeal collapse during sleep, resulting in intermittent hypoxia (IH), and is associated with a high incidence of hypertension and accelerated renal failure. In rodents, endothelin (ET)-1 contributes to IH-induced hypertension, and ET-1 levels inversely correlate with glomerular filtration rate in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we hypothesized that a dual ET receptor antagonist, macitentan (Actelion Pharmaceuticals), will attenuate and reverse hypertension and renal dysfunction in a rat model of combined IH and CKD. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received one of three diets (control, 0.2% adenine, and 0.2% adenine + 30 mg·kg-1·day-1 macitentan) for 2 wk followed by 2 wk of recovery diet. Rats were then exposed for 4 wk to air or IH (20 short exposures/h to 5% O2-5% CO2 7 h/day during sleep). Macitentan prevented the increases in mean arterial blood pressure caused by CKD, IH, and the combination of CKD + IH. However, macitentan did not improve kidney function, fibrosis, and inflammation. After CKD was established, rats were exposed to air or IH for 2 wk, and macitentan feeding continued for 2 more wk. Macitentan reversed the hypertension in IH, CKD, and CKD + IH groups without improving renal function. Our data suggest that macitentan could be an effective antihypertensive in patients with CKD and irreversible kidney damage as a way to protect the heart, brain, and eyes from elevated arterial pressure, but it does not reverse toxin-induced tubule atrophy.

Combination Therapy of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension with Vardenafil and Macitentan Assessed in a Human Ex Vivo Model.

PURPOSE: Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) by vasodilator drug monotherapy is often limited in its effectiveness. Combination therapy may help to improve treatment and to reduce drug toxicity. This study assessed the combination of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan and the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil in a human ex vivo model. METHODS: Study patients did not suffer from PAH. Human pulmonary arteries (PA) and veins (PV) were harvested from resected pulmonary lobes. Contractile forces of blood vessel segments in the presence and absence of the vasodilator drugs macitentan, its main metabolite ACT-132577, and vardenafil were determined isometrically in an organ bath. RESULTS: Macitentan 1E-7 M was sufficient to significantly abate endothelin-1-induced vasoconstriction in PA. A concentration of 1E-6 M was required for significant effects of macitentan on PV and of ACT-132577 on both vessel types. Combination of 1E-7 M macitentan and 1E-6 M vardenafil inhibited sequential constriction with endothelin-1 and norepinephrine of PA significantly more than either compound alone. Effects of 3E-7 M and 1E-6 M macitentan and effects of all doses of ACT-132577 were not further enhanced by 1E-6 M vardenafil. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that vasodilator effects of macitentan and vardenafil combined may surpass monotherapy in vivo if drug doses are adjusted properly. Vasodilation by the longer-acting metabolite ACT-132577 was not further enhanced by vardenafil.

Bosentan or Macitentan Therapy in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension?

OBJECTIVE: Research comparing bosentan and macitentan in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is scarce, although macitentan might have superior pharmacologic properties. We present the first real-world, 2-year follow-up results and compare clinical outcomes of both drugs in CTEPH. METHODS: All consecutive, technical inoperable or residual CTEPH patients receiving bosentan or macitentan, diagnosed in our multidisciplinary team between January 2003 and January 2019, were included. We report and compare survival, clinical worsening (CW), adverse events, WHO FC, NT-proBNP and 6-min walking test (6MWT) until 2 years after medication initiation. RESULTS: In total, 112 patients receiving bosentan or macitentan (58% female, mean age 62 ± 14 years, 68% WHO FC III/IV, 51% bosentan) could be included. Mean treatment duration was 1.9 ± 0.4 years for bosentan and 1.2 ± 0.6 years for macitentan. Two-year survival rate was 91% for bosentan and 80% for macitentan (HR mortality macitentan 1.85 [0.56-6.10], p = 0.31). Two-year CW-free survival was 81% and 58%, respectively (HR CW macitentan 2.16 [0.962-4.87], p = 0.06). Right atrial pressure, cardiac output (for mortality alone) and 6MWT lowest saturation were multivariate predictors at baseline. Overall adverse event rates were comparable and WHO FC, NT-proBNP and 6MWT distance improved similar for both drugs till 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: CTEPH patients receiving bosentan or macitentan have improved clinical outcomes till 2-year follow-up, without significant differences in outcomes between both therapies.

A novel, rapid and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of macitentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Macitentan is an endothelin receptor antagonist commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). A novel, rapid, simple and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for pharmacokinetic study and the determination of macitentan in PAH patients. Macitentan and bosentan, which are used as internal standards, were detected using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization in positive ion and multiple reaction monitoring mode by monitoring the mass transitions m/z 589.1 → 203.3 and 552.6 → 311.5, respectively. Chromatographic separation was performed on a reverse-phase C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm) with an isocratic mobile phase, which consisted of water containing 0.2% acetic acid-acetonitrile (90:10, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Retention times were 1.97 and 1.72 min for macitentan and IS, respectively. The calibration curve with high correlation coefficient (0.9996) was linear in the range 1-500 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantitation and average recovery values were determined as 1 ng/mL and 89.8%, respectively. This method is the first UPLC-MS/MS method developed and validated for the determination of macitentan from human plasma. The developed analytical method was fully validated for linearity, selectivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, stability, matrix effect and recovery according to US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. The developed method was applied successfully for pharmacokinetic study and the determination of macitentan in PAH patients.

Rivaroxaban and macitentan can be coadministered without dose adjustment but the combination of rivaroxaban and St John's wort should be avoided.

AIMS: We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady-state with single-dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open-label, monocentre, two-period, one-sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady-state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady-state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 µg). RESULTS: Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of Cmax by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and Cmax decreased by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.

SERAPHIN haemodynamic substudy: the effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan on haemodynamic parameters and NT-proBNP levels and their association with disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Aims: The effect of macitentan on haemodynamic parameters and NT-proBNP levels was evaluated in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients in the SERAPHIN study. Association between these parameters and disease progression, assessed by the primary endpoint (time to first morbidity/mortality event), was explored. Methods and results: Of the 742 randomized patients, 187 with right heart catheterization at baseline and month 6 participated in a haemodynamic sub-study. Prespecified endpoints included change from baseline to month 6 in cardiac index (CI), right atrial pressure (RAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mixed-venous oxygen saturation, and NT-proBNP. Exploratory analyses examined associations between CI, RAP, and NT-proBNP and disease progression using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models. Macitentan improved CI, RAP, mPAP, PVR and NT-proBNP vs. placebo at month 6. Absolute levels of CI, RAP and NT-proBNP at baseline and month 6, but not their changes, were associated with morbidity/mortality events. Patients with CI > 2.5 L/min/m2, RAP < 8 mmHg, or NT-proBNP < 750 fmol/ml at month 6 had a lower risk of morbidity/mortality than those not meeting these thresholds (HR 0.49, 95% CL 0.28-0.86; HR 0.72, 95% CL 0.42-1.22; and HR 0.22, 95% CL 0.15-0.33, respectively). Conclusions: For all treatment groups, baseline and month 6 values of CI, RAP, and NT-proBNP, but not their changes, were associated with morbidity/mortality events, confirming their relevance in predicting disease progression in patients with PAH. By improving those parameters, macitentan increased the likelihood of reaching threshold values associated with lower risk of morbidity/mortality.

Clinical efficacy and safety of switch from bosentan to macitentan in children and young adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Macitentan is an orally active, potent, dual endothelin receptor antagonist and is the only registered treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension that significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in a long-term event-driven study. Aim Few studies compared the clinical efficacy and safety of switch from bosentan to macitentan only in adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of switch from bosentan to macitentan in children and young adults. METHODS: This is a single-institution, 24-week prospective study. Patients ⩾12 years of age with idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension or related to CHD or residual pulmonary arterial hypertension due to repaired congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and on bosentan therapy were included. Concomitant treatment with oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and inhaled prostanoids was allowed. Outcome measures included change from baseline to week 24, in the 6-minute walk distance, functional class, oxygen saturation at rest/after 6-minute walk distance test, systolic pulmonary artery pressure estimated by echocardiography, and brain natriuretic peptide levels. Safety end points included adverse events laboratory abnormalities. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients - 5 male and 8 female - completed the study. The mean age was 20.3±6.5 years (12-35) and weight was 54.0±14.5 kg (27-75). Five patients were ⩽18 years of age. Macitentan improved 6-minute walk distance from baseline (mean: 466±35 m (300-590)), at 12 weeks (mean: 494±78 m (325-590), +28 m) (p0.05). None of the patients had anaemia, hepatotoxicity, and peripheral oedema. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first study that showed that switch from bosentan to macitentan significantly improved exercise capacity in children and young adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension and is well tolerated without any adverse events.