RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The complication rate of modern antireflux surgery or paraesophageal hernia repair is unknown, and previous estimates have been extrapolated from institutional cohorts. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study of patient injury cases involving antireflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair from the Finnish National Patient Injury Centre (PIC) register between Jan 2010 and Dec 2020. Additionally, the baseline data of all the patients who underwent antireflux and paraesophageal hernia operations between Jan 2010 and Dec 2018 were collected from the Finnish national care register. RESULTS: During the study period, 5734 operations were performed, and the mean age of the patients was 54.9 ± 14.7 years, with 59.3% (n = 3402) being women. Out of all operations, 341 (5.9%) were revision antireflux or paraesophageal hernia repair procedures. Antireflux surgery was the primary operation for 79.9% (n = 4384) of patients, and paraesophageal hernia repair was the primary operation for 20.1% (n = 1101) of patients. A total of 92.5% (5302) of all the operations were laparoscopic. From 2010 to 2020, 60 patient injury claims were identified, with half (50.0%) of the claims being related to paraesophageal hernia repair. One of the claims was made due to an injury that resulted in a patient's death (1.7%). The mean Comprehensive Complication Index scores were 35.9 (± 20.7) and 47.6 (± 20.8) (p = 0.033) for antireflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair, respectively. Eleven (18.3%) of the claims pertained to redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of antireflux surgery has diminished and the rate of paraesophageal hernia repair has risen in Finland during the era of minimally invasive surgery. Claims to the PIC remain rare, but claims regarding paraesophageal hernia repairs and redo surgery are overrepresented. Additionally, paraesophageal hernia repair is associated with more serious complications.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Hernia Hiatal , Laparoscopía , Mala Praxis , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) has been proven to improve patient outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated the details of litigation and its prevention in terms of systemic and diagnostic errors as potentially preventable problems. The present study explored factors associated with accepted claims (surgeon-loss). We retrospectively searched the national Japanese malpractice claims database between 1961 and 2017. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed the association between medical malpractice variables (systemic and diagnostic errors, facility size, time, place, and clinical outcomes) and litigation outcomes (acceptance). We evaluated whether or not the factors associated with litigation could have been prevented with the SURPASS checklist. We identified 339 malpractice claims made against general surgeons. There were 159 (56.3%) accepted claims, and the median compensation paid was 164,381 USD. In multivariable analyses, system (odds ratio, 27.2 95% confidence interval 13.8-53.5) and diagnostic errors (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 2.7-10.5) had a significant statistical association with accepted claims. The SURPASS checklist may have prevented 7% and 10% of the accepted claims and systemic errors, respectively. It is unclear what proportion of accepted claims indicated that general surgeon loses should be prevented from performing surgery if the SURPASS checklist were used. In conclusion, systemic and diagnostic errors were associated with accepted claims. Surgical teams should adhere to the SURPASS checklist to enhance patient safety and reduce surgeon risk.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Errores Médicos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Japón , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidental finding (IF) follow-up is of critical importance for patient safety and is a source of malpractice risk. Laboratory, imaging, or other types of IFs are often uncovered incidentally and are missed, not addressed, or only result after hospital discharge. Despite a growing IF notification literature, a need remains to study cost-effective non-electronic health record (EHR)-specific solutions that can be used across different types of IFs and EHRs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility and cost-effectiveness of an EHR-independent emergency medicine-based quality assurance (QA) follow-up program in which an experienced nurse reviewed laboratory and imaging studies and ensured appropriate follow-up of results. METHODS: A QA nurse reviewed preceding-day abnormal studies from a tertiary care hospital, a community hospital, and an urgent care center. Laboratory values outside preset parameters or radiology over-reads resulting in clinically actionable changes triggered contact with an on-call emergency physician to determine an appropriate intervention and its implementation. RESULTS: Of 104,125 visits with 1,351,212 laboratory studies and 95,000 imaging studies, 6530 visits had IFs, including 2659 laboratory and 4004 imaging results. The most common intervention was contacting a primary care physician (5783 cases [88.6%]). Twenty-one cases resulted in a patient returning to the ED, at an average cost of $28,000 per potential life-/limb-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although abnormalities in laboratory results and imaging are often incidental to patient care, a dedicated emergency department QA follow-up program resulted in the identification and communication of numerous laboratory and imaging abnormalities and may result in changes to patients' subsequent clinical course, potentially increasing patient safety.
Asunto(s)
Hallazgos Incidentales , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Atención AmbulatoriaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to analyze a nationwide database of malpractice lawsuits involving pediatric surgical patients to identify contributing factors in liability claims. METHODS: Using the CRICO (Controlled Risk Insurance Company Strategies' Comparative Benchmarking System) database, malpractice claims involving patients ≤18 y old were reviewed from 2008 to 2017. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 844 claims, 76% of the patients were older than age 5. While the average total indemnity paid was $544,325, cases with claimants <1-year-old accounted for 24% of the total indemnity paid, with an average of $1,135,240 per claimant. The most frequently named responsible services were Orthopedics (34%), General Surgery (15%), and Otolaryngology (11%). Fracture or dislocation, appendectomy, skin/breast surgery, arthroscopy, and tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy were among the frequently involved procedures for the cohort of cases. The most common contributing factors for the top procedures involve issues surrounding patient assessment, technical performance, and communication. Cases with a contributing factor of failure to appreciate and reconcile relevant sign/symptom/test results were associated with a higher likelihood of payment (OR 6.6, P < 0.05). Issues surrounding the selection of therapy also led to an increased likelihood of an indemnity payment (OR 2.8, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malpractice claims related to pediatric surgical procedures involve a wide range of specialties. Patient evaluations, technical performance, and communication are modifiable factors to improve surgical care in children. The contributing factors assigned to each procedure may represent an opportunity for focused improvement to improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Medicina , Ortopedia , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Purpose:The burden of medicolegal claims in neurosurgery is increasing in the UK. Trepidation associated with malpractice claims has the potential to negatively impact surgical practice and patient safety. What are the causes of these claims and can we address them? The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and total burden of litigation claims related to neurosurgery in a London tertiary center.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive cases of claims in neurosurgery that were reported to NHSR between March 2013 and April 2018 by St George's Hospital legal department. This was an extension of previous study by Mukherjee et al., who studied the medicolegal claims in our institution in the preceding 9-year period (2004-2013).Results:There were 18 litigation claims against neurosurgery. Claims were reviewed for clinical event, cause, likelihood of pay-out and legal outcome. Eleven claims were settled in court and seven were settled without court proceeding. All claims were spinal cases, 56% emergency admissions. Causes included faulty surgical technique (39%), delayed treatment (33%), delayed diagnosis/misdiagnosis (17%), and lack of information (11%) with a likelihood of financial success of 43%, 67%, 33%, and 100%, respectively. The highest median pay-outs were for lack of information (£2.8 million) and faulty surgical technique (£1 million). When compared to the preceding 9-year period, there a modest reduction in claims per year, despite an increase in workload. Distribution of litigation causes remained similar but overall financial burden was higher.Conclusion:Spinal surgery has the highest malpractice claim risk in neurosurgical practice. Our review shows that faulty surgical technique is the leading cause of neurosurgical claims. Claims against lack of information, although less frequent, resulted in the highest median pay-out. This study reinforces previously published data that good surgical technique and thorough process of informed consent may reduce litigation in neurosurgery.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Neurocirugia , Humanos , Neurocirujanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Orthopedic foot/ankle surgery is a high risk specialty when it comes to malpractice claims. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, characteristics and outcome of claims in this area. METHODS: This was a retrospective, 10-year claim analysis, with data from an anonymous database. Baseline claim/claimant characteristics were collected from all orthopedic foot/ankle-related cases. RESULTS: Of 460 claims in total, most were related to delay in/wrong diagnosis or to (complications of) elective surgical procedures. Whether a claim was settled was related to type of injury (fracture) and type of claim (diagnostic mistake). Median amount disbursed in settled claims was 12,549. Claim incidence did not increase over the years. CONCLUSION: Missed fracture diagnosis and "failed"/disappointing results of elective surgical procedures were the most common causes for claims. Sufficient knowledge of missed (foot) fractures and clear communication/expectation management before elective procedures could help to improve quality of healthcare and patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Tobillo/cirugía , Pie/cirugía , Mala Praxis , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patient treatment within the Swedish medical service system can claim negligence injuries to the malpractice insurance review board and request financial compensation. The aim of this paper was to analyse the consequences of a negligence claim after arterial surgery between two periods with increasing use of endovascular treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of the arterial surgery negligence claims from two three year periods 2005-2007 (Period A) and 2012-2014 (Period B) from the County Council's Mutual Insurance Company. The analysis was restricted to aortic, carotid, and lower limb arterial diseases. The magnitude of surgery for vascular diseases was obtained from the Swedish vascular register (Swedvasc). RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing arterial procedures increased from 16 628 to 20 709 (p = .01). There was an increase of 54% in the number of negligence claims between the periods. In Period A, the number of compensated claims was 22 out of 83 (29%) and in Period B 60 out of 151 (41%) (p = .06). Patients treated for aortic disorders and peripheral arterial surgery received compensation with increasing frequency whereas carotid diseases decreased. Claimants treated for aortic disorders were compensated in four out of 23 (17%) and 21 out of 54 (39%) in the two periods (p = .07), and after lower limb arterial surgery in six out of 34 (18%) and in 24 out of 71 (34%) (p = .09). After carotid surgery the corresponding figures were 12 out of 26 (46%) and 14 out of 25 (46%) (p = .48). The increasing use of endovascular procedures (but not in carotid artery surgery) did not seem to influence the pattern of negligence claims. CONCLUSIONS: Between the two three year periods there has been an increase in negligence claims but not in compensated ones. The increased use of endovascular procedures has not influenced the pattern of compensated negligence claims.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil , Mala Praxis , Enfermedades de la Aorta/economía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/economía , Compensación y Reparación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/tendencias , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Mala Praxis/tendencias , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed operator-related differences in endodontic malpractice claims in Finland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data comprised the endodontic malpractice claims handled at the Patient Insurance Centre (PIC) in 2002-2006 and 2011-2013. Two dental advisors at the PIC scrutinized the original documents of the cases (n = 1271). The case-related information included patient's age and gender, type of tooth, presence of radiographs, and methods of instrumentation and apex location. As injuries, we recorded broken instrument, perforation, injuries due to root canal irrigants/medicaments, and miscellaneous injuries. We categorized the injuries according to the PIC decisions as avoidable, unavoidable, or no injury. Operator-related information included dentist's age, gender, specialization, and service sector. We assessed level of patient documentation as adequate, moderate, or poor. Chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression modelling served in statistical analyses. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 44.7 (range 8-85) years, and 71% were women. The private sector constituted 54% of claim cases. Younger patients, female dentists, and general practitioners predominated in the public sector. We found no sector differences in patients' gender, dentists' age, or type of injured tooth. PIC advisors confirmed no injury in 24% of claim cases; the advisors considered 65% of injury cases (n = 970) as avoidable and 35% as unavoidable. We found no operator-related differences in these figures. Working methods differed by operator's age and gender. Adequate patient documentation predominated in the public sector and among female, younger, or specialized dentists. CONCLUSIONS: Operator-related factors had no impact on endodontic malpractice claims.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Formulario de Reclamación de Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro Odontológico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Formulario de Reclamación de Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro Odontológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sector Privado , Sector Público , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: The number of reports of dental malpractice cases has been increasing in recent years. The purpose of this study was to assess the data and outcomes related to dental malpractice claims in Madina City, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This study conducts a retrospective study of dental malpractice claims in Madina city, Saudi Arabia assessing 97 cases of dental malpractice claims from the year 2016 to 2022. Results: the study showed that the highest percentage of cases (29.9%) were reported guilty in the year 2021. with the highest number of claims (30%) related to the prosthodontic specialty. Most of the cases were against general practitioners (64.9%). Most of the cases (71.1%) lacked signed informed consent. Conclusion: To decrease the number of dental claims, valuing specialties and obtaining informed consent should be considered by all dentists.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections are the main reported adverse event in healthcare, with significant economic costs that include those caused by medical malpractice claims. In Italy, there is a fault-based compensation system, but in this specific field, the burden of proof on the hospitals is particularly heavy. Hence, we aimed to verify the economic impact of the inclusion of experts in hospital infection surveillance into internal committees for claims assessment and to evaluate what would have been the economic impact of a mandatory no-fault system rather than the current system. Materials and methods: We compared two 4-year periods (T1: 2015-2018 and T2: 2019-2022), investigating the medical malpractice claims related to healthcare-associated infections in a large tertiary public hospital in Florence, Italy. Decisions of the internal committee, evolutions of the claims after the decision, and conclusions of the claims were registered. No-fault system simulations were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the model. Results: We observed a decrease in the number of claims after the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) experts into the committee (a 24% decrease in rejections and a 19% increase in admissions). We found a 6806.98 euros difference (not statistically significant) in compensations in T1 and T2. Moreover, our simulations found that a no-fault compensation system - if alternative to the traditional fault-based approach - could lead to gains or losses for the plaintiffs depending on the approach chosen. (We observed a 52% mean decrease in compensations with a 150000 euros maximal indemnity and a 134% mean increase with an indemnity tailored considering also life expectancy). Discussion: Introducing experts in IPC into hospital committees for medico-legal claims management has proven to be cost-effective, offering a no-fault compensation system as an alternative to the traditional fault-based approach, supported by a properly evaluated maximal indemnity. Due to the limitations of our models, multicentric studies are recommended to verify our results.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although audio-video recordings of clinic visits improve patient satisfaction and recall, the associated presumed risk of increased malpractice claims limits their use. In this study, we identified whether video recording clinic visits was associated with increases in professional liability claims. METHODS: From 2015 to 2017, the institution's loss run was analyzed, and the rates of medical malpractice claims per physician-year were compared between physicians who used video recordings of clinic visits (V-RoCs) and those who did not. The term "users" was applied to all physicians whose mean percentage of patient visits with video recording was greater than the mean percentage for the practice overall. RESULTS: Over three years, 15,254 patients used V-RoCs. The use of video recordings for clinic visits increased at a rate of 23% per year. No association was found between video recordings and increased malpractice claims. The rate of all claims between users and nonusers did not differ significantly (P=0.66). Of seven paid claims or lawsuits from 2000 to 2017, none were against physicians who used video recordings. CONCLUSION: Video recording of patient-physician encounters was not associated with an increase in malpractice lawsuits. According to federal law, a patient can legally record a clinic encounter without physician consent, which has many ethical implications. Formalizing the recording process is beneficial for both parties and allows the resource to be used to its maximum potential.
RESUMEN
Background: Chest pain accounts for 5% of all emergency department visits and accounts for the highest malpractice payout against emergency physicians. To clarify the impact of defensive medicine, we assessed whether admission rates of low-risk chest pain patients are associated with malpractice claims rates. Methods: A cross-sectional time-series analysis of state-year level malpractice claims rates, admission rates for low-risk chest pain (LRCP; requiring ED physician discretion), and admission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI; requiring minimal physician judgment for admission, used as a control) from 2008 to 2017 was performed. Admission rates were derived from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. LRCP visits were defined by primary ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes of 786.5, R07.9, or R07.89; length of stay of 2 or fewer days; and no previous major cardiac diagnosis and AMI visits with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes 410, I21.3, or I121.9. Malpractice claims rates (MPCRs) were derived from the National Practitioner Database (NPD). The association between state-year level MPCR and admission rates for LRCP and AMI was estimated using state fixed-effects models. Standardized costs were inflation adjusted and are expressed in US dollar rate as of 2019. Results: There were 40,482,813 ED visits during the 10-year study period, of which 2,275,757 (5.6%) were for chest pain, and 1,163,881 met LRCP criteria. Mean age of LRCP patients was 67.8 years, 60.9% were female, and 16.6% were hospitalized, at a mean cost of $17,120. During the same period, 75,266 (0.2%) visits were for AMI, with 87% admitted. The MPCR by state-year varied widely, from 2.6 to 8.6 claims per 100,000 population. A state fixed-effects model showed that an additional physician malpractice claim per 100,000 population was associated with a 3.66% (95% CI 2.02%-5.30%) increase in the admission rate of LRCP. An analogous model showed no association between MPCR and admission rates for AMI (-1.52%, 95% CI -4.06% to 1.02%). Conclusion: Higher MPCRs are associated with increased admission rates for LRCP, at substantial cost, which may be attributable to defensive medicine in the ED.
RESUMEN
Incident reporting is an important method to identify risks because learning from the reports is crucial in developing and implementing effective improvements. A medical malpractice claims analysis is an important tool in any case. Both incident reports and claims show cases of damage caused to patients, despite incident reporting comprising near misses, cases where no event occurred and no-harm events. We therefore compare the two worlds to assess whether they are similar or definitively different. From 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2021, the claims database of Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS collected 843 claims. From 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021, the incident-reporting database collected 1919 events. In order to compare the two, we used IBNR calculation, usually adopted by the insurance industry to determine loss to a company and to evaluate the real number of adverse events that occurred. Indeed, the number of reported adverse events almost overlapped with the total number of events, which is indicative that incurred-but-not-reported events are practically irrelevant. The distribution of damage events reported as claims in the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 and related to incidents that occurred in the months of the same period, grouped by quarter, was then compared with the distribution of damage events reported as adverse events and sentinel events in the same period, grouped by quarter. The analysis of the claims database showed that the claims trend is slightly decreasing. However, the analysis of the reports database showed that, in the period 2020-2021, the reports trend was increasing. In our study, the comparison of the two, malpractice claims and incident reporting, documented many differences and weak areas of overlap. Nevertheless, this contribution represents the first attempt to compare the two and new studies focusing on single types of adverse events are, therefore, desirable.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Humanos , Gestión de Riesgos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
Foot and hallux valgus surgery are amongst the most commonly performed surgeries, with a growing number of procedures leading to litigation. The aim of this conference is to provide an update on the causes of malpractice claims and the associated risk factors. What are the causes of litigation? Acute or chronic residual pain, stiffness, metatarsalgia, consolidation delays, secondary displacements, suboptimal results are the most common causes found in litigious proceedings. What are the risk factors? Surgeon-related and patient-related risk factors exist. Percutaneous surgery or the development of outpatient hospitalization are not specific risk factors. From the point of view of practitioners, the application and traceability of recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis, for thromboembolic disease, or for the checklist are essential, allowing causes of blame to be easily avoided. Information is fundamental. Since the Law of the 4th of March 2002, the surgeon-patient relationship has changed. Pre-operative information archived in the practitioner's file is essential. This includes written and oral information which is consented to and understood by the patient. Thus, the understanding and compliance with immediate post-operative instructions or adherence to the post-operative program are success factors regarding the surgical outcome. The patient must also be informed and aware of their own individual risk factors (e.g. smoking and immunosuppression, particularly) which require greater caution. What is the best way to reduce the risk of these claims being made? It is about traceability: traceability of clinical examination, procedures, information and exchanges with the patient. It is only under this principle that the surgeon-patient relationship can be clearer, respectful and consequently less conducive to litigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.
Asunto(s)
Hallux Valgus , Mala Praxis , Cirujanos , Hallux Valgus/cirugía , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Recent data on number of claims, final judgement of claims and their costs are scarce. This study analyzes 15 years of malpractice claims in the Netherlands. All claims filed, and all claims closed by two insurance companies (which insure approximately 95% of all hospitals in the Netherlands) between 2007-2021 are included. Trends in number of claims, medical specialties involved, final judgements and costs from malpractice claims are analyzed, as well as the impact of COVID-19 on malpractice claims. In total, 20,726 claims were filed and 21,826 claims were closed. Since 2013, the number of claims filed decreased. Of all claims filed, 64% were aimed at surgical specialties and 18% at contemplative specialties. Of all claims closed, 24.49% were accepted, 19.26% were settled and 48.94% got rejected. The financial burden of all claims closed quadrupled between 2007 and 2021; this increase was caused by rare cases with excessively high costs. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a decrease in the number of claims filed, and the number of incidents reported. This study provides valuable insights into trends and developments in the number and costs of liability claims, which is the first step towards improving patient safety and preventing incidents and malpractice claims.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the reasons that lead judges to qualify malpractice as a lack of information, then rule in favour or not of the health professional (HP). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of case law relating to the breach of disclosure obligations over a ten-year period from 2010 to 2020. We used 3 legal databases: Légifrance, Dalloz and Lexis 360, all identified as the most exhaustive. RESULTS: Of the 514 law cases included: judges found malpractice owing to lack of information in 377 (73.3%) cases. Among the latter, malpractices were lack of risk information (N = 257, 68.2%), lack of proof of information (N = 243, 64.5%) and/or lack of information on therapeutic alternatives (N = 49, 13.0%). These malpractices resulted in a conviction of the HP in 268 (71.1%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: Case law is an important source of information for improving the quality of HP, lawyers, and judges' practices. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This review suggests that.
Asunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado , Mala Praxis , HumanosRESUMEN
No prediction models using use conventional logistic models and machine learning exist for medical litigation outcomes involving medical doctors. Using a logistic model and three machine learning models, such as decision tree, random forest, and light-gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), we evaluated the prediction ability for litigation outcomes among medical litigation in Japan. The prediction model with LightGBM had a good predictive ability, with an area under the curve of 0.894 (95% CI; 0.893-0.895) in all patients' data. When evaluating the feature importance using the SHApley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) value, the system error was the most significant predictive factor in all clinical settings for medical doctors' loss in lawsuits. The other predictive factors were diagnostic error in outpatient settings, facility size in inpatients, and procedures or surgery settings. Our prediction model is useful for estimating medical litigation outcomes.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the nature and extent of oncology-related errors accounting for malpractice allegations in diagnostic radiology. METHODS: The Comparative Benchmarking System of the Controlled Risk Insurance Company, a database containing roughly 30% of medical malpractice claims in the United States, was searched retrospectively for the period 2008 to 2017. Claims naming radiology as a primary service were identified and were stratified and compared by oncologic versus nononcologic status, allegation type (diagnostic versus nondiagnostic), and imaging modality. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, radiology was the primary responsible service for 3.9% of all malpractice claims (2,582 of 66,061) and 12.8% of claims with diagnostic allegations (1,756 of 13,695). Oncology (neoplasms) accounted for 44.0% of radiology cases with diagnostic allegations, a larger share than any other category of medical condition. Among radiology cases with diagnostic allegations, high-severity harm occurred in 79% of oncologic but just 42% of nononcologic cases. Of all oncologic radiology cases, 97.4% had diagnostic allegations, and just 55.0% of nononcologic radiology cases had diagnostic allegations. Imaging misinterpretation was a contributing factor for a large majority (80.7% [623 of 772]) of oncologic radiology cases with diagnostic allegations. The modalities most commonly used in oncologic radiology cases with diagnostic allegations involving misinterpretation were mammography and CT. CONCLUSION: Oncology represents the largest source of radiology malpractice cases with diagnostic allegations. Oncologic radiology malpractice cases are more likely than nononcologic radiology cases to be due to diagnostic errors. Furthermore, compared with those that are nononcologic, oncologic radiology cases with diagnostic allegations are more likely to be associated with high-severity harm. Efforts are warranted to reduce misinterpretations of oncologic imaging.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis , Radiología , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Errores Médicos , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery is a specialty associated with high risk of malpractice claims, which can be influenced by quality and safety of care. Diagnostic errors have gained increasing attention as a potentially preventable problem. Despite the burden of diagnostic errors, few studies have analyzed diagnostic errors in neurosurgery. We aimed to delineate the effect of diagnostic errors on malpractice claims involving a neurosurgeon. METHODS: This retrospective study used the national Japanese malpractice claims database and included cases closed between 1961 and 2017. To examine the effect of diagnostic errors in neurosurgery, we compared diagnostic error-related claims (DERCs) with non-DERCs in indemnity, clinical outcomes, and factors relating to neurosurgeons. RESULTS: There were 95 closed malpractice claims involving neurosurgeons during the study period. Of these claims, 36 (37.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.7%-47.9%) were DERCs. Patient death was the most common outcome associated with DERCs. Wrong, delayed, and missed diagnosis occurred in 25 (69.4%, 95% CI 53.1%-82.0%), 4 (11.1%, 95% CI 4.4%-25.3%), and 7 (19.4%, 95% CI 9.8%-35.0%) cases, respectively. The most common presenting medical condition in DERCs was stroke. Subarachnoid hemorrhage, accounting for 85.7% of stroke cases, led to 27.8% of the total indemnity paid in DERCs. CONCLUSIONS: DERCs are associated with higher numbers of accepted claims and worse outcomes. Identifying diagnostic errors is important in neurosurgery, and countermeasures are required to reduce the burden on neurosurgeons and improve quality. This is the first study to focus on diagnostic errors in malpractice claims arising from neurosurgery.
Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/tendencias , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/tendencias , Mala Praxis/tendencias , Neurocirujanos/tendencias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/tendencias , Adulto , Errores Diagnósticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Errores Médicos/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurocirugia/tendencias , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Objectives Medical litigation resulting from diagnostic errors leads to lawsuits that are time-consuming, expensive, and psychologically burdensome. Few studies have focused on internists, who are more likely to make diagnostic errors than others, with assessments of litigation in terms of system and diagnostic errors. This study explored factors contributing to internists losing lawsuits and examined whether system or diagnostic errors were more important on the outcome. Methods Data regarding 419 lawsuits against internists closed between 1961 and 2017 were extracted from a public Japanese database. Factors affecting litigation outcomes were identified by comparative analysis focusing on system and diagnostic errors, environmental factors, and differences in initial diagnoses. Results Overall, 419 malpractice claims against internists were analyzed. The rate of lawsuits being decided against internists was high (50.1%). The primary cause of litigation was diagnostic errors (213, 54%), followed by system errors (188, 45%). The foremost initial diagnostic error was "no abnormality" (17.2%) followed by ischemic heart disease (9.6%) and malignant neoplasm (8.1%). Following cause-adjustment for loss, system errors were 21.37 times more likely to lead to a loss. Losses were 6.26 times higher for diagnostic error cases, 2.49 times higher for errors occurring at night, and 3.44 times higher when "malignant neoplasm" was the first diagnosis. Conclusions This study found that system errors strongly contributed to internists' losses. Diagnostic errors, night shifts, and initial diagnoses of malignant neoplasms also significantly affected trial outcomes. Administrators must focus on both system errors and diagnostic errors to enhance the safety of patients and reduce internists' risk exposure.