Multimorbidity in people living with HIV and cancer in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of older people living with HIV (PLWH) has increased. Non-communicable diseases occur earlier in PLWH than in the general population. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of comorbidities in PLWH and cancer in a tertiary referral center in Mexico City. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included PLWH > 40 years with a history of cancer, coming to Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia from 2010 through 2019. All patients needed to be on antiretrovirals for at least six months. Data collected included cancer type, comorbidities, frequency of polypharmacy, FRAX score and 10-year cardiovascular risk. Patients were evaluated for depression with the Beck Inventory Depression-II Scale. Variables associated to multimorbidity (2 or more comorbidities) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 125 patients, 69% had at least one comorbidity; 32% had ≥ 2. Common comorbidities were dyslipidemia (54%), hypertension (19%), obesity (14%) and Diabetes (12%). In patients ≥ 50 years, 29 (62%) already undergone a densitometry and 9 (31%) had osteoporosis; 56 depression questionnaires were used: 30% had mild-to-severe depression. Being ≥ 50 years was associated with multimorbidity (aOR 2.57 (1.18-5.58), p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of multimorbidity and poor screening of bone disease and mental health is reported in patients with PLWH and cancer. A holistic approach to the PLWH in the Infectious Diseases consultation is needed to improve the detection and management of non-communicable diseases, to go beyond viral suppression and towards an improved quality of life.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La proporción de personas mayores que viven con VIH (PVVIH) va en aumento, y las enfermedades no transmisibles ocurren antes en PVVIH comparado con la población general. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la prevalencia de las comorbilidades en PVVIH con cáncer de un centro de tercer nivel de la Ciudad de México. MÉTODOS: Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó todas las PVVIH > 40 años con cáncer, que acudieron al Instituto Nacional de Cancerología entre 2010 y 2019). Se incluyeron datos sobre el tipo de cáncer, comorbilidades y polifarmacia. Se calcularon la puntuación FRAX, el riesgo cardiovascular a 10 años, y se aplicó un cuestionario para evaluar depresión (Beck Inventory Depression-II Scale). RESULTADOS: De 125 pacientes, 69% tenía al menos una comorbilidad; 32% tenía ≥ 2. Las comorbilidades más comunes fueron dislipidemia (54%), hipertensión (19%), obesidad (14%) y diabetes (12%). En pacientes ≥ 50 años, 29% tenía una densitometría osea; 31% tenía osteoporosis. Se aplicaron 56 cuestionarios: 30% tenía algún grado de depresión. Tener ≥ 50 años se asoció con multimorbilidad (aOR 2.57, 1.18-5.58), p = 0.017. CONCLUSIONES: Se reporta una alta prevalencia de multimorbilidad en PVVIH y cancer, con pobre escrutinio de enfermedad ósea y salud mental. Se requiere un enfoque holístico para las PVVIH en la consulta de infectología, para mejorar el manejo de las enfermedades no transmisibles, yendo más alla de la supresión virológica.

[Self-management in people with multimorbility: Contributions from salutogenesis and health assets model]. / Automanejo en personas con multimorbilidad: aportes desde la salutogénesis y el modelo de activos en salud.

Different models of care in context of chronicity and multimorbidity include community, health system, clinical practice, health policies, prevention, and health promotion. Among these, the role of the health team as a facilitator of self-management is pointed out, being people the protagonists of their process. Multimorbidity approach is mostly carried out from a risk and disease focused point of view, which limits the exploration of resources of people and their environment. Incorporating a positive health approach can contribute to a greater comprehensiveness. The purpose of this article is to propose an approach from the synergy model of health, integrating salutogenesis and health assets model, to help facilitate self-management promoting people's agency capacity. Potential areas of application of these models are presented to work in the context of multimorbidity, promoting health and well-being conditions in people and their families.

[Health care for patients with multimorbidity. The perception of professionals]. / La atención sanitaria a pacientes con multimorbilidad. La percepción de los profesionales.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perceptions of health professionals about the characteristics of health care for patients with multimorbidity. DESIGN: Qualitative study of phenomenological trajectory made between January and September 2015 through 3 group interviews and 15 individual interviews. LOCATION: Aragonese Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Medical and nursing professionals of the Aragon Health Service belonging to various services: Internal Medicine, Primary Care, Emergency and Management. A pharmacist was also included. METHODS: A non-probabilistic intentional sampling was carried out that allowed for the selection of professionals in terms of discourse representation criteria, allowing to know and interpret the phenomenon studied in depth, in its different visions. We interviewed health professionals with different profiles who knew in depth the characteristics of care provided to patients with multimorbidity. The interviews were recorded, transcribed literally and interpreted, through the social analysis of the discourse. RESULTS: Professional culture oriented to individual pathologies, lack of coordination among professionals, high prevalence of multi-prescriptions, Clinical Practice Guidelines oriented to individual pathologies and specialist training focused on individual diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Both the professional culture and the organization of the healthcare system have been oriented towards the attention to individual pathologies, which results in the difficulty to offer a more integrated care to patients with multimorbidity.

[Clinical validation of 2 morbidity groups in the primary care setting]. / Validación clínica de 2 agrupadores de morbilidad en el ámbito de atención primaria.

INTRODUCTION: Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMAs) and the Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) are population morbidity based stratification tools which classify patients into mutually exclusive categories. OBJETIVE: To compare the stratification provided by the GMAs, CRGs and that carried out by the evaluators according to the levels of complexity. DESIGN: Random sample stratified by morbidity risk. LOCATION: Catalonia. PARTICIPANTS: Forty paired general practitioners in the primary care, matched pairs. INTERVENTIONS: Each pair of evaluators had to review 25 clinical records. MAIN OUTPUTS: The concordance by evaluators, and between the evaluators and the results obtained by the 2 morbidity tools were evaluated according to the kappa index, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predicted values. RESULTS: The concordance between general practitioners pairs was around the kappa value 0.75 (mean value=0.67), between the GMA and the evaluators was similar (mean value=0.63), and higher than for the CRG (mean value=0.35). The general practitioners gave a score of 7.5 over 10 to both tools, although for the most complex strata, according to the professionals' assignment, the GMA obtained better scores than the CRGs. The professionals preferred the GMAs over the CRGs. These differences increased with the complexity level of the patients according to clinical criteria. Overall, less than 2% of serious classification errors were found by both groupers. CONCLUSION: The evaluators considered that both grouping systems classified the studied population satisfactorily, although the GMAs showed a better performance for more complex strata. In addition, the clinical raters preferred the GMAs in most cases.

[Effectiveness of interventions based on telemedicine on health outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in Primary Care: A systematic review]. / Efectividad de las intervenciones basadas en telemedicina sobre resultados en salud en pacientes con multimorbilidad en atención primaria: revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions to improve health outcomes in patients with multiple morbidities in Primary Health Care. DESIGN: A systematic review. DATA SOURCES: INAHTA, Health Guidelines, NICE, Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed and EMBASE up to April 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria: patients (adults with 2 or more chronic diseases or a Charlson index greater than three); intervention (telemedicine intervention developed entirely in Primary Health Care); comparator (usual care); health outcomes (mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction); study design(clinical practice guideline, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomised controlled clinical trial),and quasi-experimental design). English and Spanish language publication. A total of236 references were located. DATA EXTRACTION: Duplicated articles were removed. Titles, abstracts, and full text of references identified were assessed using the selection criteria; methodological quality assessment; data extraction, and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Five articles, corresponding to 3 studies, were included, with 2 randomised controlled clinical trials and one quasi-experimental design. No significant results were observed in reducing mortality or improving health-related quality of life. The effectiveness of telemedicine on the number of hospital admissions or emergency visits showed contradictory results. Satisfaction was not measured in the studies included. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively small number of studies, heterogeneity characteristics, and methodological limitations did not confirm the effectiveness of telemedicine intervention on the improvement of mortality, number of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and health-related quality of life, compared to usual care.

[Adjusted morbidity groups: Characteristics and comorbidities in patients with chronic conditions according to their risk level in Primary Care]. / Grupos de morbilidad ajustados: características y comorbilidades de los pacientes crónicos según nivel de riesgo en Atención Primaria.

AIMS: To describe the characteristics of patients with chronic conditions according to their risk levels assigned by the adjusted morbidity groups (AMG). To analyse the factors associated with a high risk level and to study their effect. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study with an analytical focus. LOCATION: Primary care (PC), Madrid Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Population of 18,107 patients stratified by their risk levels with the AMG in the computerised clinical records of Madrid PC. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The variables studied were: socio-demographic, clinical-nursing care and use of services. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of the 18,107 patients, 9,866(54.4%) were identified as chronic patients, with 444 (4.5%) stratified as high risk, 1784 (18,1%) as medium risk, and 7,638 (77.4%) as low risk. The high risk patients, compared with medium and low risk, had an older mean age [77.8 (SD=12.9), 72.1 (SD=12.9), 50.6 (SD=19.4)], lower percentage of women (52.3%, 65%, 61.1%), a higher number of chronic diseases [6.7 (SD=2.4), 4.3 (SD=1.5), 1.9 (SD=1.1)], polymedication (79.1%, 43.3%, 6.2%), and contact with PC [33.9 (28), 21.4 (17.3), 7.9 (9.9)] (P<.01). In the multivariate analysis, the high risk level was independently related to age>65 [1.43 (1.03-1.99), male gender (OR=3.46, 95% CI=2.64-4.52), immobility (OR=6.33, 95% CI=4.40-9.11), number of chronic conditions (OR=2.60, 95% CI=2.41-2.81), and PC contact>7 times (OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.36-2.80)] (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the population is classified by the AMG as a chronic, and it is stratified into 3 risk levels that show differences in gender, age, functional impairment, need for care, morbidity, complexity, and use of Primary Care services. Age>65, male gender, immobility, number of chronic conditions, and contact with PC>7 times were the factors associated with high risk.

[Validity of adjusted morbidity groups with respect to clinical risk groups in the field of primary care]. / Validez de los grupos de morbilidad ajustados respecto a los clinical risk groups en el ámbito de la atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance in terms of goodness of fit and explanatory power of 2morbidity groupers in primary care (PC): adjusted morbidity groups (AMG) and clinical risk groups (CRG). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LOCATION: PC in the Catalan Institute for the Health (CIH), Catalonia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Population allocated in primary care centers of the CIH for the year 2014. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Three indicators of interest are analyzed such as urgent hospitalization, number of visits and spending in pharmacy. A stratified analysis by centers is applied adjusting generalized lineal models from the variables age, sex and morbidity grouping to explain each one of the 3variables of interest. The statistical measures to analyze the performance of the different models applied are the Akaike index, the Bayes index and the pseudo-variability explained by deviance change. RESULTS: The results show that in the area of the primary care the explanatory power of the AMGs is higher to that offered by the CRGs, especially for the case of the visits and the pharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of GMAs in the area of the CIH PC is higher than that shown by the CRGs.

[Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on the consumption of resources in Primary Care according to Clinical Risk Groups]. / Impacto de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en el consumo de recursos en Atención Primaria según los Grupos de Riesgo Clínico.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors (CVRF) in the context of a Basic Health Area and the impact they generate on morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources in the stratified population according to the Clinical System Risk Groups (CRG) in Primary Care, with the purpose of identifying the population with multimorbidity to apply preventive measures, as well as the one that generates the highest care burden and social needs. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional and population-based study for a basic health area during 2013. LOCATION: Department of Health 2 (Castellón), Comunidad Valenciana (CV). Includes outpatient care in Primary Care and specialized. PARTICIPANTS: All citizens registered in the Population Information System, N=32,667. MEASUREMENTS: From the computerized system Abucasis we obtained the demographic, clinical and consumption variables of health resources. We consider the prevalence of CVRF based on the presence or absence of the ICD.9.MC diagnostic codes. The relationship of the CVRF with the 9 CRG health states was analyzed and a predictive analysis was performed with the logistic regression model to evaluate the explanatory capacity of each variable. In addition, an explanatory model of ambulatory pharmaceutical expenditure was obtained through multivariate regression. RESULTS: The population of health status CRG4 and above had multimorbidity. The CRG7 and 6 health states have a higher prevalence of CVRF; it was predictive that the higher the morbidity, the greater the consumption of resources through OR above the mean, p<0.05 and the 95% confidence intervals. It was observed that 59.8% of ambulatory pharmaceutical expenditure was explained by the CRG system and all the CVRF (p<0.05 and R2 corrected=0.598). Regarding the effect of the CVRF on the CRG health states, there was a significant association (p<0.05) for the alteration of blood glucose, dyslipidemia and HBP in all the CRG states. CONCLUSIONS: The study of CVRF in a stratified population using the CRG system identifies and predicts where the greatest impact on morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources is generated. It allows us to know the groups of patients where to develop prevention and chronicity strategies. At the level of clinical practice, a new concept of multimorbidity is provided, defined from the state of health CRG 4 and above.

[Concepts. Minimally disruptive medicine]. / Conceptos. Medicina mínimamente disruptiva.

This paper presents some concepts about overdiagnosis and its consequences: overtreatment and the medicalization of the society. It recalls the origin of the term, that comes from the screening and diagnosis of cancer, and it reviews the strategies to overdiagnose. Furthermore, it analyses the conversion of illnesses diagnostic thresholds as well as the transformation of normal and vital processes and risk factors in illnesses. It shows some strategies to confront overdiagnosis at the time of medical consultation, including the management of uncertainty and the shared decision making through the right interpretation of the diagnosis results and treatment estimators. Finally, it shows the minimally disruptive medicine as the best strategy to face the disease burden induced by the overtreatment in patients suffering from multimorbidity.

[Multimorbidity in general practice and the Ariadne principles. A person-centred approach]. / Multimorbilidad en medicina de familia y los principios Ariadne. Un enfoque centrado en la persona.

Multimorbidity, defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions in one same individual, has negative consequences for people suffering from it and it poses a real challenge for health systems. In primary care, where most of these patients are attended, the clinical management of multimorbidity can be a complex task due, among others, to the high volume of clinical information that needs to be handled, the scarce scientific evidence available to approach multimorbidity, and the need for coordination among multiple health providers to guarantee continuity of care. Moreover, the adequate implementation of the care plan in these patients requires a process of shared decision making between patient and physician. One of the available tools to support this process, which is specifically directed to patients with multimorbidity in primary care, is described in the present article: the Ariadne principles.

[Profile and evolution of chronic complex patients in a subacute unit]. / Perfil y evolución de pacientes crónicos complejos en una unidad de subagudos.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the management of geriatric pluripathologic patients in Catalonia, the identification of chronic complex patient (PCC) or patients with advanced chronic disease (MACA) has been promoted. Patients with exacerbated chronic diseases are promoted to be admitted in subacute units (SG) located in intermediate hospitals and specialized in geriatric care, as an alternative to acute hospital. The results of the care process in patients identified as PCC/MACA in SG have not been evaluated. DESIGN: Descriptive-comparative, cross-sectional, and quantitative study. LOCATION: SG located in intermediate care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients admitted in the SG during 6months. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: We compared baseline characteristics (demographic, clinical and geriatric assessment data), results at discharge and 30days post-discharge between PCC/MACA patients versus other patients. RESULTS: Of 244 patients (mean age±SD=85,6±7,5; 65.6%women), 91 (37,3%) were PCC/MACA (PCC=79,1%, MACA=20,9%). These, compared with unidentified patients, had greater comorbidity (Charlson index=3,2±1,8 vs 2,0; p=0,001) and polypharmacy (9,5±3,7 drugs vs 8,1±3,8; p=0,009). At discharge, the return to usual residence and mortality were comparable. PCC/MACA had higher mortality adding the mortality at 30day post-discharge (15,4% vs 8%; p=0,010). In a multi-variable analysis, PCC/MACA identification (p=0,006), as well as a history of dementia (p=0,004), was associated with mortality. Although PCC/MACA patients had higher readmission rate at 30day (18,7% vs 10,5%; p=0,014), in the multivariable analyses, only male, polypharmacy, and heart failure were independently associated to readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having more comorbidity and polypharmacy, the outcomes of patients identified as PCC/MACA at discharge of SG, were comparable with other patients, although they experienced more readmissions within 30days, possibly due to comorbidity and polypharmacy.

[Multimorbidity patterns in young adults in Catalonia: an analysis of clusters]. / Patrones de multimorbilidad en adultos jóvenes en Cataluña: un análisis de clústeres.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify multimorbidity patterns in patients from 19 to 44 years attended in primary care in Catalonia in 2010. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: 251 primary care centres. PARTICIPANTS: 530,798 people with multimorbidity, aged 19 to 44 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multimorbidity was defined as the coexistence of ≥2 more International Classification system (ICD-10) registered in the electronic health record. Multimorbidity patterns were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis and by sex and age group (19-24 and 25-44). RESULTS: Of the 882,708 people from initial population, 530,798 (60.1%) accomplished multimorbidity criterion. Mean age was 33.0 years (SD: 7.0) and 53.3% were women. Multimorbidity was higher in the 25-to 44-years-old group with respect the younger group (60.5 vs. 58.1%, p<0.001), being higher in women. Most prevalent cluster in all groups included, among others, by dental caries, smoking, dorsalgia, common cold and other anxiety disorders. For both sexes in the 25-to 44-years-old group appeared the cardiovascular-endocrine-metabolic pattern (obesity, lipid disorders and arterial hypertension). CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity affects more than half of persons between 19 to 44-years-old. The most prevalent cluster is formed by grouping common diseases (dental caries, common cold, smoking, anxiety disorders and dorsalgias). Another pattern to highlight is the cardiovascular-endocrine-metabolic pattern in the 25- to 44 years-old group. Knowledge of patterns of multimorbidity in young adults could be used to design individualized preventive strategies.

[Adjusted morbidity groups: A new multiple morbidity measurement of use in Primary Care]. / Los grupos de morbilidad ajustados: nuevo agrupador de morbilidad poblacional de utilidad en el ámbito de la atención primaria.

The Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA) is a new morbidity measurement developed and adapted to the Spanish healthcare System. It enables the population to be classified into 6 morbidity groups, and in turn divided into 5 levels of complexity, along with one healthy population group. Consequently, the population is divided into 31 mutually exclusive categories. The results of the stratification in Catalonia are presented. GMA is a method for grouping morbidity that is comparable to others in the field, but has been developed with data from the Spanish health system. It can be used to stratify the population and to identify target populations. It has good explanatory and predictive results in the use of health resources indicators. The Spanish Ministry of Health is promoting the introduction of the GMA into the National Health System.

Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity among the elderly in Burkina Faso: cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and distribution patterns of multimorbidity among urban older adults in Burkina Faso. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among community-dwelling elderly people aged ≥60 in Bobo-Dioulasso. We performed interviews, clinical examination and medical record review. Multimorbidity was defined as co-occurrence of at least two chronic diseases in one person whether as a coincidence or not. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of multimorbidity among older adults was 65%. Age ≥70 was associated with multimorbidity in multivariate analysis: adjusted OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.01-2.68, P = 0.04). The most common chronic diseases were hypertension (82%) 95% CI (78; 86), malnutrition (39%) 95% CI (34; 44), visual impairments (28%) 95% CI (24; 33) and diabetes mellitus (27%) 95% CI (22; 31). Those aged ≥70 had significantly more malnutrition (50% vs. 31%, P = 0.0003) and osteoarthritis (8% vs. 3%, P = 0.01) than those aged 60-69. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of multimorbidity requires a reorganization of healthcare systems in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Burkina Faso. Interventions and care guidelines usually focused on individual diseases should be improved to better reflect this reality.

[Multiple comorbidities from the perspective of primary care health professionals]. / La multimorbilidad vista desde la perspectiva de los profesionales de atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perception of primary care health professionals in the Basque Country (Spain) of multiple comorbidities and their influence on clinical practice and the organization of health services. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on interviews, a storytelling workshop and cocreation. SETTING: The autonomous community of the Basque Country. Primary care in the Basque health system. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen health professionals: 6 specialists in family medicine, 3 hospital specialists (internal medicine, pneumology, and geriatrics), 4 nurses, and 1 community pharmacist. METHODS: A qualitative, exploratory study was carried out, based on a cocreation workshop (12 participants) and 10 interviews with health professionals. The research was performed between February and June 2013. All interviews and the group workshop were audio recorded and some were video recorded. RESULTS: The emerging dominant themes were as follows: a) the challenges posed by multiple comorbidities for a "disease-centered" health system; b) the manifestation of these challenges in daily clinical practice in aspects such as the patient-health professional relationship, clinical decision-making, polypharmacy management, and coordination between healthcare settings; c) the barriers to the appropriate care of these patients: training, decision-making tools, lack of time, etc.; and d) the question of the most appropriate professional competencies and profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in multiple comorbidities is a reality that worries primary care professionals, who express the need for adequate training, decision-making tools and support in daily clinical practice dealing with the most frequent situations and combinations of multiple comorbidities. The most effective approach to these problems requires a shift in the healthcare model toward an integrated view of the patient, a transition from a paternalist approach to a more proactive approach, and the development of healthcare integration.

[Validation of a prognostic model for polypathological patients (PP) in Primary Health Care: "PROFUND STUDY-AP"]. / Validación de un modelo pronóstico para pacientes pluripatológicos en atención primaria: Estudio PROFUND en atención primaria.

AIMS: to validate the PROFUND index in PP in Primary Health Care (PHC). DESIGN: two-year prospective multicenter study. LOCATION: three health care centers in Seville Province (Spain). SUBJECTS OF THE ASSESSMENT: PP with signed informed consent. SAMPLE: n=446 (p=20%; α=5%; ß=99%); consecutive sampling. MEASUREMENT: Dependent variable: mortality (2 years). INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: socio-demography, clinic, anthropometric, laboratory, pharmacologic prescriptions, functional, cognitive and socio-familiar evaluation and the use of health resources. INFORMATION SOURCE: interview with patients and clinical charts. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: uni and multivariate analysis according to the variables; Accuracy was assessed in the cohort by risk terciles calibration, and discrimination power, by ROC curves. Finally, accuracy of the index was compared with that of the Charlson index. RESULTS: 446 subjects were included (53.8% men); average age was 75.44yr (Confidence interval 95% 74.58-76.31). Average of diagnostic categories was 2.37 (Confidence interval 95% 2.30-2.44). Prevalent categories were: A (64.1%), F (41.7%) and E (33.5%). Mortality within 2 years was 24.1%. Calibration in predicted/observed mortality along the three established risk strata was 16%/16.7% for PP with 0-2 points, 22%/19.5% for PP with 3-6, and 34%/36% for PP with 7 or more points (Hosmer-Lemeshow test with p=0.119). Discrimination power of PHC PROFUND's by area under the curve was (AUC) ROC was 0.622 (Confidence interval 95% 0.556-0.689; p<0.001), and that of Charlson index 0.510 (Confidence interval 95% 0.446 - 0.575; p>0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The PROFUND index is a good indicative tool in the stratification of 2-year mortality risk polypathological patients in PHC.

[Development of clinical practice guidelines for patients with comorbidity and multiple diseases]. / Desarrollo de guías de práctica clínica en pacientes con comorbilidad y pluripatología.

The management of patients with comorbidity and polypathology represents a challenge for all healthcare systems. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have limitations when applied to this population. The aim of this study is to propose the terminology and methodology for optimally approach comorbidity and polypathology in the CPGs. Based on a literature review, we suggest a number of proposals for the approach in different phases of CPG preparation, with special attention to the inclusion of clusters of comorbidity in the initial questions the implementation of indirect evidence, the burden of disease management for patients and their environment, when establishing recommendations, as well as the strategies of dissemination and implementation. These proposals should be developed in greater depth with the implication of more agents in order to have valid and useful tools for this population.

Disease-modifying treatments for patients with multiple sclerosis in Spain. / Tratamientos modificadores de la enfermedad en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple en España.

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and long-term disabling. Different disease-modifying treatments are available. These patients, despite being generally young, have high comorbidity and risk of polymedication due to their complex symptomatology and disability. OBJECTIVE PRIMARY: To determine the type of disease-modifying treatment in patients seen in Spanish hospital pharmacy departments. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: To determine concomitant treatments, determine the prevalence of polypharmacy, identify the prevalence of interactions and analyse pharmacotherapeutic complexity. METHOD: Observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study. All patients with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and active disease-modifying treatment who were seen in outpatient clinics or day hospitals during the second week of February 2021 were included. Modifying treatment, comorbidities and concomitant treatments were collected to determine multimorbidity pattern, polypharmacy, pharmacotherapeutic complexity (Medication Regimen Complexity Index) and drug-drug interactions. RESULTS: 1,407 patients from 57 centres in 15 autonomous communities were included. The most frequent form of disease presentation was the relapsing remitting form (89.3%). The most prescribed disease-modifying treatment was dimethyl fumarate (19.1%), followed by teriflunomide (14.0%). Of the parenteral disease-modifying treatments, the two most prescribed were glatiramer acetate and natalizumab with 11.1% and 10.8%. 24.7% of the patients had one comorbidity and 39.8% had at least 2 comorbidities. 13.3% belonged to at least one of the defined patterns of multimorbidity and 16.5% belonged to 2 or more patterns. The concomitant treatments prescribed were psychotropic drugs (35.5%); antiepileptic drugs (13.9%) and antihypertensive drugs and drugs for cardiovascular pathologies (12.4%). The presence of polypharmacy was 32.7% and extreme polypharmacy 8.1%. The prevalence of interactions was 14.8%. Median pharmacotherapeutic complexity was 8.0 (IQR: 3.3 -- 15.0). CONCLUSIONS: We have described the disease-modifying treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis seen in Spanish pharmacy services and characterised concomitant treatments, the prevalence of polypharmacy, interactions, and their complexity.

[Translated Article] Disease-modifying treatments for patients with multiple sclerosis in Spain.

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and long-term disabling. Different disease-modifying treatments are available. These patients, despite being generally young, have high comorbidity and risk of polymedication due to their complex symptomatology and disability. OBJECTIVE PRIMARY: To determine the type of disease-modifying treatment in patients seen in Spanish hospital pharmacy departments. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to determine concomitant treatments, determine the prevalence of polypharmacy, identify the prevalence of interactions and analyze pharmacotherapeutic complexity. METHOD: Observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study. All patients with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and active disease-modifying treatment who were seen in outpatient clinics or day hospitals during the second week of February 2021 were included. Modifying treatment, comorbidities and concomitant treatments were collected to determine multimorbidity pattern, polypharmacy, pharmacotherapeutic complexity (Medication Regimen Complexity Index) and drug-drug interactions. RESULTS: 1407 patients from 57 centres in 15 autonomous communities were included. The most frequent form of disease presentation was the relapsing remitting form (89.3%). The most prescribed disease-modifying treatment was dimethyl fumarate (19.1%), followed by teriflunomide (14.0%). Of the parenteral disease-modifying treatments, the two most prescribed were glatiramer acetate and natalizumab with 11.1% and 10.8%. 24.7% of the patients had 1 comorbidity and 39.8% had at least 2 comorbidities. 13.3% belonged to at least one of the defined patterns of multimorbidity and 16.5% belonged to 2 or more patterns. The concomitant treatments prescribed were psychotropic drugs (35.5%); antiepileptic drugs (13.9%) and antihypertensive drugs and drugs for cardiovascular pathologies (12.4%). The presence of polypharmacy was 32.7% and extreme polypharmacy 8.1%. The prevalence of interactions was 14.8%. Median pharmacotherapeutic complexity was 8.0 (IQR: 3.3-15.0). CONCLUSIONS: We have described the disease-modifying treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis seen in Spanish pharmacy services and characterized concomitant treatments, the prevalence of polypharmacy, interactions, and their complexity.

Clinical and functional assessment in patients admitted with pluripathological dysphagia according to the mode of feeding: Through a gastrostomy tube or oral.

INTRODUCTION: Multipathological patients are a vulnerable population with high comorbidity, functional impairment, and nutritional risk. Almost 50% of these hospitalized patients have dysphagia. There is no consensus on whether placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube provides greater clinical benefit. The purpose of this study was to know and compare 2 groups of multipathological patients with dysphagia according to the mode of feeding: PEG vs. oral. METHOD: Retrospective descriptive study with hospitalized patients (2016-19), pluripathological, with dysphagia, nutritional risk, over 50 years with diagnoses of: dementia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), neurological disease, or oropharyngeal neoplasia. Terminally ill patients with jejunostomy tube or parenteral nutrition were excluded. Sociodemographic variables, clinical situation, and comorbidities were evaluated. Bivariate analysis was performed to compare both groups according to their diet, establishing a significance level of p < .05. RESULTS: 1928 multipathological patients. The PEG group consisted of 84 patients (n122). A total of 84 were randomly selected to form the non-PEG group (n434). This group had less history of bronchoaspiration/pneumonia (p = .008), its main diagnosis was stroke versus dementia in the PEG group (p < .001). Both groups had more than a 45% risk of comorbidity (p = .77). CONCLUSIONS: multipathological patients with dysphagia with PEG usually have dementia as their main diagnosis, however, stroke is the most relevant pathology in those fed orally. Both groups have associated risk factors, high comorbidity, and dependence. This causes their vital prognosis to be limited regardless of the mode of feeding.