Correlation of sino-nasal outcome test and nasal polyp score in dupilumab-treated chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: The alignment between objective scores and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is underexplored. This study aimed to assess changes in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) patients undergoing dupilumab treatment and explore correlations between these scores. METHODS: CRSwNP patients received dupilumab therapy for six months. SNOT-20 German Adapted Version (GAV)/SNOT-22 scores were assessed weekly, and NPS was measured at baseline and after one, three, and six months. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation and regression analysis. RESULTS: 69 patients were included. After one, three and six months of dupilumab therapy, SNOT and NPS scores improved significantly. Correlation analysis of SNOT and NPS showed significant correlations only within the nasal subscores, along with a weak trend for SNOT-20. Absolute changes over time lacked significance. However, correlation analysis revealed significant associations between relative changes in SNOT score and NPS, irrespective of timing, and when stratified by baseline NPS of 8, 6, and 4 (r = -0.54, p = 0.01; r = -0.44, p < 0.001; r = -0.7, p < 0.001). This was supported by linear regression modeling, suggesting potential predictive capability of NPS reduction on relative SNOT score improvement. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab therapy significantly improved subjective and objective CRSwNP scores, exhibiting weak correlations in absolute values for nasal subscores. Furthermore, evidence indicated a correlation between relative changes in SNOT score and NPS, substantiated by predictive capability. This might be due to subjective perception variability, highlighting the suitability of relative change correlation analysis.

Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab for nasal polyposis in an open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) frequently remains uncontrolled despite maximal medical therapy and sinonasal surgery, presenting several unmet needs and challenges. Omalizumab previously demonstrated efficacy in CRSwNP in duplicate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (POLYP 1, POLYP 2). OBJECTIVE: This open-label extension evaluated the continued efficacy, safety, and durability of response of omalizumab in adults with CRSwNP who completed POLYP 1 or 2. METHODS: After 24 weeks of omalizumab or placebo in POLYP 1 and 2, patients (n = 249) received open-label omalizumab plus background nasal mometasone therapy for 28 weeks and were subsequently followed for 24 weeks after omalizumab discontinuation. Efficacy end points assessed change from baseline for the coprimary end points, Nasal Polyp Score and Nasal Congestion Score, and the secondary end points of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Total Nasal Symptom Score and its components, and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores. Safety objectives included incidence of adverse events and adverse events leading to omalizumab discontinuation. RESULTS: Patients who continued omalizumab experienced further improvements across coprimary end points and secondary end points through 52 weeks. Patients who switched from placebo to omalizumab experienced favorable responses across end points through week 52 that were similar to POLYP 1 and 2 at week 24. After omalizumab discontinuation, scores gradually worsened over the 24-week follow-up, but remained improved from pretreatment levels for both groups. The safety profile was similar to previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile from this study supports extended omalizumab treatment up to 1 year for CRSwNP with inadequate response to nasal corticosteroids.

Peak nasal inspiratory flow assessment of polyp size and response from SYNAPSE.

Background: In the phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab plus standard of care reduced total endoscopic nasal polyp score (NPS) versus that with placebo in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Objective: Our aim was to investigate relationships between NPS and (1) peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and (2) patient-reported outcomes. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, patients randomized 1:1 received mepolizumab, 100 mg, or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks (plus standard of care). Changes from baseline in PNIF (week 52), visual analog scale scores (overall symptoms, nasal obstruction, and loss of smell [weeks 49-52]), and total 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (week 52) were assessed in patients with or without improvements in NPS (improvement of ≥1 point) or without (improvement of <1 point or worsening). Results: Patients with improvements in NPS had greater improvements in PNIF (a median of 50 L per minute [interquartile range (IQR) = 10.5-87.5] with mepolizumab vs a median of 40 L per minute [IQR = 0-85.0] with placebo) than did those patients without improvements in NPS (a median of 0.0 L per minute [IQR = -10.0 to 45.0] with mepolizumab vs a median of 0.0 L per minute [IQR = -30.0 to 30.0] with placebo). Similar results were seen for the following: change from baseline in overall symptoms (a median of -5.8 [IQR = -8.1 to -3.80] with mepolizumab and a median of -4.1 [IQR = -7.0 to -1.2] with placebo with improvement in NPS vs a median of -1.3 [IQR = -6.3 to 0.0] with mepolizumab and a median of -0.1 [IQR = -3.4 to 0.0] with placebo without improvement in NPS); change in nasal obstruction (a median of -5.7 [IQR = -8.2 to -3.5] with mepolizumab and a median of -4.5 [IQR = -7.3 to -1.2] with placebo with improvement in NPS vs a median of -1.3 [IQR = -6.6 to 0.0] with mepolizumab and a median of 0.0 [IQR = -3.6 to 0.0] with placebo without improvement in NPS); change in loss of smell (a median of -2.8 [IQR = -7.9 to 0.0] with mepolizumab and a median of -0.7 [IQR = -4.0 to 0.0] with placebo with improvement in NPS vs a median of 0.0 [IQR = -2.4 to 0.0] with mepolizumab and a median of 0.0 [IQR = -0.3 to 0.0]) with placebo without improvement in NPS); and change in visual analog scale score and 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test total score (a median of -37.0 [IQR = -52.0 to -24.0] with mepolizumab and a median of -29.0 [IQR = -43.0 to -9.0] with placebo with improvement in NPS vs a median of -16.0 [IQR = -42.0 to 0.0] with mepolizumab and a median of 0.0 [IQR = -27.0 to 0.0] with placebo without improvement in NPS). Conclusion: Improvement in NPS was associated with improvements in PNIF and patient-reported outcomes irrespective of treatment. PNIF could be a useful noninvasive tool for monitoring nasal polyp size.

Real-Life Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients affected by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in real-life. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on severe CRSwNP patients treated with mepolizumab. Nasal endoscopic polyp score (NPS), visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom score, sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), asthma control test (ACT) score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), eosinophils blood cells and prednisone intake were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. A total of 55 patients were included; 49 patients (89%) presented with asthma; aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in 28 patients (51%). A statistically significant decrease in the SNOT-22 score was observed (median difference -63; 95% CI: -68; -58; p < 0.001) with median t0 76 and IQR (61;90) to t6 10 (5;15). A reduction in NPS, median t0 NPS 4; (IQR:4;6), median t6 NPS 1; (IQR:0;1) p < 0.001, was greater in patients with AERD. The median baseline VAS score was 6 (IQR:6;7) and the differences between t0 and t6 were statistically significant p < 0.001. Significant changes in blood eosinophils cells, median t0 500 cell/mcl (IQR:340;830), median t6 97 cell/mcl (IQR:60;160) p < 0.001, were greater in patients with AERD. Mepolizumab treatment effects have been demonstrated with significantly reduced symptoms, polyp scores, blood eosinophils and systemic corticosteroid use, resulting in an increased health-related quality of life in patients with severe CRSwNP, regardless of the presence or absence of asthma or AERD.

Real-Life Effects of Omalizumab on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal and sinus mucosa. This inflammatory process is supported by a multitude of cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 produced by Th2 cells, as well as by IgE produced by B lymphocytes in response to a stimulus. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody with well-recognized roles in allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of omalizumab in a cohort of 13 patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis with CRSwNP. The inclusion criteria considered were as follows: 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with severe nasal polyposis expressed by an NPS greater than or equal to 5 and/or a SNOT-22 greater than or equal to 50. In addition, in the enrolled patients, the classic treatment with corticosteroids had to have been suspended due to recurrence after surgery or lack of response. Our results highlighted that omalizumab treatment for 16 weeks improved the parameters analyzed: SNOT-22, NPS, NRS, and NCS. The clinical efficacy of omalizumab was further strengthened by a significant improvement in respiratory function as well as reductions in the nasal polyps' size and in the associated symptoms.

Levels of eicosanoids in nasal secretions associated with nasal polyp severity in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Severe nasal polyposis and mucosal inflammation, in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may include a dysregulated eicosanoid profile, but a clinical role for eicosanoids in CRS with nasal polyps (NP; CRSwNP) remains to be elucidated. This study focused on assessing levels and clinical implications of inflammatory mediators in nasal secretions and urine from patients with different NP severity or Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD). Levels of leukotrienes E4 and B4, prostaglandins D2 and E2 as well as 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid were measured with enzyme immunoassays and cytokines with magnetic bead immunoassays. Patients with CRSwNP were subdivided based on NP score; CRSwNP-low (NP score ≤ 4, n = 11) or CRSwNP-high (NP score ≥ 5, n = 32) and compared to CRS without polyps (CRSsNP, n = 12), CRSwNP-AERD (n = 11) and individuals without CRS (n = 25). Smell test score, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophils and Sinonasal outcome test-22 were assessed as clinical markers. Leukotriene E4, prostaglandin D2 and 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid in nasal secretions correlated with NP score. Nasal leukotriene E4 also correlated with FeNO and smell test score, with highest levels found in CRSwNP-AERD. Levels of prostaglandin D2 in nasal secretion as well as urinary levels of the prostaglandin D2 metabolite 11ß-prostaglandin F2α differed between CRSNP-high and CRSwNP-low. Urinary 11ß-prostaglandin F2α was associated with asthma comorbidity whereas a similar association with prostaglandin D2 in nasal secretions was not observed. In conclusion, subdividing patients based on NP severity in combination with analysis of eicosanoids in non-invasively collected nasal secretions, may have clinical implications when assessing CRS disease severity.

Rapid and Continuing Improvements in Nasal Symptoms with Dupilumab in Patients with Severe CRSwNP.

Purpose: In the phase 3 SINUS-24 (NCT02912468) and SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) studies in adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), dupilumab significantly improved the co-primary endpoints of change from baseline to Week 24 in nasal polyp score (NPS) and nasal congestion/obstruction (NC) vs placebo on background intranasal corticosteroids (standard of care [SOC]). This post hoc analysis of SINUS-24/-52 investigated the direction and magnitude of within-patient change in these endpoints over time. Methods: NPS (scale 0-8) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 40, and 52 in SINUS-52 and Weeks 8, 16, and 24 in SINUS-24. Daily patient-reported NC scores (0 [no symptoms]-3 [severe symptoms]) were averaged over 28 days. Within-patient changes from baseline were assessed through Week 24 in pooled SINUS-24/-52 (n = 438/286 dupilumab/SOC) and through Week 52 in SINUS-52 (n = 150/153). Results: In SINUS-52, NPS improved in 70.0% of dupilumab-treated patients at Week 4 vs 31.8% with SOC (odds ratio [OR] 5.2 [95% confidence interval 3.1-8.8]) and 78.7% vs 28.2% at Week 52 (OR 10.6 [6.0-18.7]) (all p < 0.0001). NC improved in 73.3% of dupilumab-treated patients at Week 4 vs 46.7% with SOC (OR 3.2 [2.0-5.3]) and 86.9% vs 50.7% at Week 52 (OR 6.4 [3.5-11.5]) (all p < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful (≥1 point) improvements in NPS occurred in 55.7% and 72.3% of dupilumab-treated patients at Weeks 4 and 52, respectively, vs 16.9% and 16.2% with SOC. Clinically meaningful (≥1 point) improvements in NC occurred in 16.7% and 67.6% of dupilumab-treated patients at Weeks 4 and 52, respectively, vs 3.9% and 20.8% with SOC. At Week 52, NPS worsening from baseline was observed in 5.7% of dupilumab-treated patients vs 40.1% with SOC and NC worsening in 2.1% vs 20.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Dupilumab provided rapid, continuing, and clinically relevant improvements over time in NPS and NC in most patients with severe CRSwNP in the SINUS studies.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: how to identify eligible patients for biologics in clinical practice.

Objective: This study compared three severity measures for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The outcome was to identify patients who are eligible for biological therapy. Methods: 330 adult patients with CRSwNP were examined. Nasal polyp score (NPS), sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) and clinical-cytological grading (CCG) were compared. Clinical history, past surgery and asthma control test were also considered. Results: Only 45 (13.6%) patients had a contextual positivity to the three severity measures. The concordance among tests was slight/fair. Patients with severe disease (all tests positive) had more impaired parameters. The mixed cytotype (OR = 4.07), nasal obstruction (OR = 10.06), post-nasal drip (OR = 1.98), embarrassment (OR = 2.53) and difficulty falling asleep (OR = 1.92) were significantly associated with severe CRSwNP. Conclusions: To identify candidates for biological therapy, the contextual use of NPS, SNOT-22 and CCG is preferable. In this way, global assessment of CRSwNP, including morphology, inflammation, comorbidity, symptoms and quality of life is possible.

Interpretation of Clinical Efficacy of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps via Understanding the Local and Systemic Pathomechanisms.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease treated with medication or surgery. For recalcitrant type 2 CRSwNP, biological agents have been effectively used to improve nasal polyp score, nasal congestion score, daily symptoms related to CRSwNP, and time to systemic corticosteroid use or revision surgery. Although general guidelines for using biologics to treat CRSwNP were proposed by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps in 2020 and various studies have tested their efficacy, there is much more to learn about biologics-specific indication and choice of biologics based on the endotypes, for instance. Understanding the vascular distribution of monoclonal antibodies and the differences in the vascularity of the non-polyp mucosa and nasal polyp tissue will not only aid understanding of each biologic's clinical effect but also provide insights to establishing a more personalized approach to treating recalcitrant CRSwNP with biologics.

Mepolizumab Improves Outcomes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in Severe Asthmatic Patients: A Multicentric Real-Life Study.

Objective: The upcoming introduction of mepolizumab represents a promising treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of mepolizumab on sinonasal outcomes of comorbid CRSwNP and severe asthma in a real-life setting. The primary endpoint was to evaluate changes in the SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 score, Nasal Polyp (NP) score, and blood eosinophil count during a 12-month treatment with mepolizumab. Secondary endpoints were to quantify mepolizumab's effects on the mentioned parameters, identify clinical variables influencing the degree of response to treatment, and portray responder and nonresponder patients. Methods: A multicentric retrospective no-profit observational study on severe asthmatic patients, treated with mepolizumab, and comorbid CRSwNP was conducted. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. SNOT-22 score, NP score, and blood eosinophil count (and other CRS-specific variables) were collected at baseline and after 12 months. Results: Forty-three patients were included. A statistically significant reduction was observed for SNOT-22 score (mean t0 SNOT-22 54.8 ± 25.9; mean t12 SNOT-22 31.5 ± 21.3, p < 0.0001), NP score (median t0 NPS 3 (IQR 3); median t12 NPS 2 (IQR 4), p < 0.0001), and blood eosinophil count (mean t0 blood eosinophils 804.7 ± 461.5 cell/µL; mean t12 blood eosinophils 107.5 ± 104.6 cell/µL, p < 0.0001) after 12 months of treatment. Twenty patients (47%) gained improvement both in clinical and endoscopic outcome. Mepolizumab responder patients presented a t0 SNOT-22 significantly higher than nonresponders (p = 0.0011). Conclusions: Mepolizumab improved CRSwNP outcomes in a population of severe asthmatic patients. No clinical feature emerged to outline the profile of a "typical" responder patient, except for baseline SNOT-22 score, which seemed to affect the response to treatment. Further studies would be necessary to supplement these preliminary evaluations.

Defining the Efficacy of Omalizumab in Nasal Polyposis: A POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 Subgroup Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease with variable underlying pathophysiologies. Numerous patient factors have been linked to differences in disease severity, control, and response to treatment, including asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, previous sinonasal surgery, and blood eosinophil levels. OBJECTIVE: The present study examines the efficacy of the anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, omalizumab, versus placebo in patients with CRSwNP from the replicate POLYP 1 (NCT03280550) and POLYP 2 (NCT03280537) trials, grouped by inherent patient characteristics to determine the response to therapy. METHODS: Patients in prespecified subgroups from POLYP 1 and POLYP 2 (studies pooled for analysis) were examined. Subgroups included blood eosinophil count at baseline (>300 or ≤300 cells/µL), previous sinonasal surgery (yes or no), asthma status (yes or no), and aspirin sensitivity status (yes or no). Subgroups were examined for subgroup-specific adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) (omalizumab-placebo) in change from baseline at week 24 in Nasal Congestion Score (NCS), Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), and University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). RESULTS: Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) (omalizumab-placebo) in NCS, NPS, SNOT-22, TNSS, and UPSIT change from baseline at week 24 consistently favored omalizumab treatment over placebo in patients with blood eosinophil count >300 and ≤300 cells/µL, with or without previous sinonasal surgery, asthma, and aspirin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Together, these data suggest broad efficacy of omalizumab across clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with CRSwNP, independent of the underlying patient factors examined, including those with high eosinophil levels and those who have undergone previous surgery, which are associated with high recurrence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: POLYP 1: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280550 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280550); POLYP 2: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03280537 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280537).