Clinical evolution of Parkinson's disease and prognostic factors affecting motor progression: 9-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been few long-term studies that have characterized and charted the clinical progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study was therefore undertaken to understand the natural clinical evolution of treated PD patients and to identify the variables that predict greater progression in these patients. METHODS: A longitudinal linear mixed model analysis of motor score progression was performed on 576 PD patients derived from the National Neuroscience Institute Movement Disorders Database. Clinical and demographic variables were taken at baseline and formed the subgroups for comparison (gender, age at diagnosis, subtype, Mini-Mental State Examination score and baseline motor score). Motor score progression was calculated at each patient follow-up time point as the difference between Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score at baseline and follow-up scores. RESULTS: The overall annual motor score progression as measured by the change of UPDRS motor scores from baseline ranged from 0.62% to 3.67%. There are three distinct phases: improvement, stability, and steady progression. Patients returned to baseline score 2-2.5 years after diagnosis, with stability lasting to 7 years, followed by a period of steady progression. When analyzed longitudinally, male gender (P < 0.03), older age at diagnosis (P < 0.05), akinetic-rigid subtype (P < 0.04), cognitive impairment (P < 0.005) and lower baseline motor score (P < 0.04) were associated with greater progression of motor scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, when measured clinically, motor progression was non-linear and that it occurred in distinct phases, all of which were affected by baseline demographic and clinical variables such as gender, age at diagnosis, disease subtype, cognitive status and baseline motor score.

Postoperative symptoms of psychosis after deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECT: Cases of postoperative psychosis in Parkinson's disease patients receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment have previously been published. However, the magnitude of symptom incidence and the clinical risk factors are currently unknown. This retrospective study sheds light on these issues by investigating psychosis in a group of 128 Parkinson's disease patients who received DBS implants. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain surgery dates, follow-up clinic visit dates, and associated stimulation parameter settings (contacts in use and the polarity of each along with stimulation voltage, frequency, and pulse width) for each patient. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II Thought Disorder scores, used as a clinical assessment tool to evaluate the presence of psychosis at each visit, were also collected. The data were compiled into a database and analyzed. RESULTS: The lifetime incidence of psychosis in this cohort of patients was 28.1%. The data suggest that risk of psychosis remains fairly constant throughout the first 5 years after implantation of a DBS system and that patients older at the time of receiving the first DBS implant are not only more likely to develop psychosis, but also to develop symptoms sooner than their younger counterparts. Further analysis provides evidence that psychosis is largely independent of the clinically used electrode contact and of stimulation parameters prior to psychosis onset. CONCLUSIONS: Although symptoms of psychosis are widely seen in patients with Parkinson's disease in the years following stimulator placement, results of the present suggest that most psychoses occurring postoperatively are likely independent of implantation and stimulation settings.

Circulatory 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D as differential biomarkers between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is sufficient evidence to support vitamin D's noncalcemic effects and the role of vitamin D deficiency in the development of a wide range of neurological disorders. This study aimed to evaluate whether serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D could be used as biomarkers to differentiate between healthy subjects (HS), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients of both genders. METHODS: A total of 107 subjects were included in this study, divided into three groups: 1- HS (n = 61), 2- MSA patients (n = 19), and 3- PD patients (n = 27). The patients were assessed using UMSARS II, UPDRS III, H&Y, MMSE and MoCA rating scales. The levels of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D in serum were determined using the radioimmunoassay technique. RESULTS: The levels of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D in HS were 26.85 +/- 7.62 ng/mL and 53.63 +/- 13.66 pg/mL respectively. 25(OH)D levels were lower in both MSA and PD by 61% and 50%, respectively (P = 0.0001 vs. HS). 1,25(OH) 2 D levels were lower in MSA by 29%(P = 0.001 vs HS). There was a correlation between 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D in MSA and PD, but not in HS. 1,25(OH) 2 D regressed with MMSE (ß = 0.476, P = 0.04, R 2 = 0.226) in MSA, and with UPDRS III (ß = -0.432, P = 0.024, R 2 = 0.187) and MoCA (ß = 0.582, P = 0.005,R 2 = 0.279) in PD. 25(OH)D displayed considerable differentiative strength between HS and MSA (Wald = 17.123, OR = 0.586, P = 0.0001; AUC = 0.982, sensitivity and Youden index = 0.882, P = 0.0001) and PD (Wald = 18.552, OR = 0.700, P = 0.0001; AUC = 0.943, sensitivity = 0.889, YI = 0.791, P = 0.0001). 1,25(OH) 2 D distinguished MSA from PD (Wald 16.178, OR = 1.117, P = 0.0001; AUC = 0.868, sensitivity = 0.926, Youden index =0.632, P = 0.0001). H&Y exhibited the highest sensitivity, AUC, and significant distinguishing power between MSA and PD. CONCLUSIONS: Serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D could be useful biomarkers for MSA and PD. 25(OH)D and H&Y provided the highest sensitivity and group classification characteristics.

Associations between Early Markers of Parkinson's Disease and Sarcopenia.

Introduction: Sarcopenia and Parkinson's disease (PD) are both common age-related syndromes, and there is preliminary evidence that the probability of the co-occurrence of these syndromes within one individual is higher than expected. However, it is unclear to date whether one of the syndromes induces the other, or whether there may be common underlying causes. This pilot study thus aimed at investigating the association of the features of increased risk for PD with early stage sarcopenia (ESS). Method: Two hundred and fifty-five community-dwelling individuals were recruited from the Tübinger evaluation of Risk factors for Early detection of NeuroDegeneration (TREND) study. The following features that are associated with an increased risk for future PD were evaluated: the motor part of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS-III), hyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra, prevalence of lifetime depression, hyposmia, REM sleep behavior disorder and the recently introduced probability score for prodromal PD. Sarcopenia was defined according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, which was adapted to this cohort of healthy adults. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify associations of PD-related features with ESS. Results: The UPDRS-III score was significantly associated with ESS. The result remained significant after the adjustment for age, gender and physical activity. No association was found between the other PD-related features and ESS. Conclusion: The significant association of the UPDRS-III score with ESS in this cohort might indicate a common and early pathway in both diseases and supports the existence of an "extended neurodegenerative overlap syndrome." Moreover, the potential of EES to serve as a prodromal marker of PD should be evaluated in future studies.