Disparities in Care for Low-Income Patients with Cirrhosis: Implementing an Innovative Outpatient Clinic for Refractory Ascites in a Safety Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in life-saving interventions for low-income patients with cirrhosis necessitate innovative models of care. AIM: To implement a novel generalist-led FLuid ASPiration (FLASP) clinic to reduce emergency department (ED) care for refractory ascites. SETTING: A large safety net hospital in Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: MediCal patients with paracentesis in the ED from 6/1/2020 to 1/31/2021 or in FLASP clinic or the ED from 3/1/2021 to 4/30/2022. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: According to RE-AIM, adoption obtained administrative endorsement and oriented ED staff. Reach engaged ED staff and eligible patients with timely access to FLASP. Implementation trained FLASP clinicians in safer, guideline-based paracentesis, facilitated timely access, and offered patient education and support. PROGRAM EVALUATION: After FLASP clinic opened, significantly fewer ED visits were made by patients discharged after paracentesis [rate ratio (RR) of 0.33 (95% CI 0.28, 0.40, p < 0.0001)] but not if subsequently hospitalized (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.70, 1.11). Among 2685 paracenteses in 225 FLASP patients, complications were infrequent: 39 (1.5%) spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, 265 (9.9%) acute kidney injury, and 2 (< 0.001%) hypotension. FLASP patients rated satisfaction highly on a Likert-type question. DISCUSSION: Patients with refractory ascites in large safety net hospitals may benefit from an outpatient procedure clinic instead of ED care.

Description of the Western Sydney and Nepean Blue Mountains local health districts' influenza prevention programme.

BACKGROUND: Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In 2011, influenza vaccination was provided free for people at greatest risk of severe disease: people aged 65 years and over, Aboriginal Australians 15 years and older, pregnant women, and individuals aged 6 months and over who suffered chronic medical conditions. AIMS: To evaluate the Western Sydney and Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District Influenza Prevention Program and to identify some of the enablers and barriers to vaccination in the hospital outpatient setting. METHODS: Western Sydney and Nepean Blue Mountains local health districts' influenza prevention programme provided influenza vaccine in hospital outpatient settings between 21 March 2011 and 30 June 2011. Accredited nurse immunisers vaccinated 2824 individuals and recorded their primary reason for vaccination. Nurse immunisers were interviewed to identify barriers and enablers to influenza immunisation uptake. RESULTS: Two thousand, eight hundred and twenty-four doses of influenza vaccine were administered to people at high risk of influenza in four hospitals in the region: two tertiary facilities and two district hospitals. The primary indication for vaccination was chronic disease in 50% and pregnancy in 37%. Estimated direct cost of the programme was $19 per dose. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital-based influenza vaccination programme can be an effective way to improve influenza vaccination rates among specific population groups at high risk of severe disease with influenza, particularly pregnant women and those younger than 65 years with a chronic medical condition.

Uso ambulatorio de cefalosporinas en una población colombiana: estudio de prescripción-indicación / Outpatient cephalosporin use in a Colombian population: prescription-indication study

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso indebido de cefalosporinas puede provocar resistencia de las bacterias. OBJETIVO: Determinar el perfil de prescripción e indicación de cefalosporinas en un grupo de pacientes afiliados al Sistema de Salud de Colombia. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal. A partir de una base de datos poblacional se obtuvo una muestra aleatoria de pacientes atendidos en consulta ambulatoria para identificar las indicaciones de cefalosporinas en registros clínicos. Se evaluaron variables farmacológicas relacionadas con formulación no indicada según guías de práctica clínica. RESULTADOS: En 381 pacientes, con edad media 41,2 ± 15,4 años, el 61,4% (n = 234) eran mujeres. Cefalexina fue la más utilizada (n=318; 83,5%), con duración media del tratamiento de 7,3 ± 3,2 días, seguida de cefradina (n = 43, 11,3%) y ceftriaxona (n = 20, 5,2%). Se prescribieron para infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (n = 177; 46,4%, de las cuales 47,5% eran purulentas), del tracto urinario (n = 70; 18,4%), de vías respiratorias superiores (n = 57; 15,0%), e infecciones de transmisión sexual (n = 21; 5,5%). Estaban indicadas en 169 pacientes (44,4%), pero sólo 103 (60,9%) tenían prescripciones que cumplían las recomendaciones de dosificación. CONCLUSIONES: Más de la mitad de pacientes prescritos con cefalosporinas en un contexto ambulatorio tenían prescripciones consideradas no indicadas, en particular por su uso en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos purulentas.

BACKGROUND: Misuse of cephalosporins can lead to bacterial resistance. Aim: To determine the prescription profile and indication of cephalosporins in the patients affiliated to the Colombian Health System. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. From a population database, a random sample of patients treated in an outpatient consultation was obtained, to identify the indications of the prescribed cephalosporins in their clinical record. Pharmacological variables, and those related to non-indicated formulations were evaluated according to the clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: In 381 patients, the mean age was 41.2 ± 15.4 years, and 61.4% (n = 234) were women. Cefalexin was the most widely used (n=318; 83.5%), with a mean duration of treatment of 7.3 ± 3.2 days; followed by cefradine (n = 43; 11.3%), and ceftriaxone (n = 20; 5.2%). The most common uses were for skin and soft tissue infections (n = 177; 46.4% of which 47.5% were purulent), urinary tract infections (n = 70; 18.4%), upper respiratory airway infections (n = 57; 15.0%) and sexually transmitted diseases (n = 21; 5.5%). The use was considered indicated in 169 patients (44.4%), but only 103 (60.9%) had prescriptions that met the dosage recommendations from the clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients prescribed with cephalosporins in the outpatient setting had prescriptions considered not indicated, particularly for their use in purulent skin and soft tissue infections.

Information perception, wishes, and satisfaction in ambulatory cancer patients under active treatment: patient-reported outcomes with QLQ-INFO25.

BACKGROUND: Information is vital to cancer patients. Physician-patient communication in oncology presents specific challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate self-reported information of cancer patients in ambulatory care at a comprehensive cancer centre and examine its possible association with patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included adult patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy at the Institute Jules Bordet's Day Hospital over a ten-day period. EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-INFO25 questionnaires were administered. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used. RESULTS: 101 (99%) fully completed the questionnaires. They were mostly Belgian (74.3%), female (78.2%), with a mean age of 56.9 ± 12.8 years. The most frequent tumour was breast cancer (58.4%). Patients were well-informed about the disease and treatments, but presented unmet information domains. The Jules Bordet patients desired more information on treatment side effects, long-term outcome, nutrition, and recurrence symptoms. Patients on clinical trials reported having received less information about their disease and less written information than patients outside clinical trials. Higher information levels were associated with higher quality of life (QoL) scores and higher patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Patients were satisfied with the information they received and this correlated with higher QoL, but they still expressed unmet information wishes. Additional studies are required to investigate the quality of the information received by patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation - rehabilitation models and shortcomings in outpatient aftercare.

BACKGROUND: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the bronchial asthma are widespread diseases. They need long-lasting and sustainable rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this HTA is to describe the present supply and the economic relevance of out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation in conjunction with its social aspects. A further target is to derivate options for actions in the health-care system and possible research necessities. METHODS: Relevant publications are identified by means of a structured search in 37 database accessed through the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI). In addition a manual search of identified reference lists has been done. The present report includes German and English literature published from 2004 to 2009. The methodological quality was assessed by two independent researchers according to pre-defined quality criteria of evidence based medicine. RESULTS: Among 860 publications 31 medical studies, four economic studies and 13 ethical studies meet the inclusion criteria. The studies cover rehabilitation programmes in 19 countries. The majority of them has a high level of evidence (1A to 2C). The pulmonary rehabilitation programmes differ by the setting (in-patient, out-patient, in-home, community-based), by the length of intervention (from two weeks to 36 months), by the way and the frequency of intervention and by the duration of the follow-up treatment. Overall out-patient rehabilitation programmes achieve the same positive effects for COPD patients as in-patient programmes do. This is especially true for physical performance and health related quality of life. There are only a few studies dealing with asthma. Therefore, valid statements cannot be given. The results for cost-effectiveness are not distinct enough. DISCUSSION: Goals of pulmonary rehabilitation like prevention and adequate treatment of acute exacerbations, the minimisation of hospitalisation and the reduction of mortality are attained in out-patient as well as in in-patient pulmonary rehabilitation. Regarding the best frequency of training units per week or the duration and the content of a unit further research is needed. Final results for the ideal length of an in-patient rehabilitation are still missing. None of the studies deals with the analysis of the different treatment forms of a COPD which are frequently defined by an alteration of in-patient and out-patient treatments and participation in sports clubs or self-help groups. There are some other limitations of the studies. The results concerning self-management programmes are not distinct. (Self-) Selection leads to high drop-out rates. Many studies have only small sample sizes. Confounder and long-time effects are seldom researched, relevant economic evaluations do not exist The improvement of health related quality of life is primarily obtained by an improved disease management than by an improvement of a medical parameter. CONCLUSION: Out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation is as effective as in-patient pulmonary rehabilitation. But there is a critical shortage of out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation supply in Germany. Domains for further research are the evaluation of models for integrated care, the length, frequency and content of training programmes, psychiatric assessments and the cost-effectiveness of out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation.