Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(3): 153-158, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, cobalt chloride 0.5% has been included in the baseline series since the mid-1980s. A recent study from Stockholm showed that cobalt chloride 1% petrolatum (pet.) was more suitable than 0.5%. Cobalt chloride at 1.0% has been patch tested for decades in many European countries and around the world. OBJECTIVES: To study the suitability of patch testing to cobalt 1.0% vs 0.5% and to analyze the co-occurrence of allergy to cobalt, chromium, and nickel. RESULTS: Contact allergy to cobalt was shown in 90 patients (6.6%). Eighty (5.9%) patients tested positive to cobalt 1.0%. Thirty-seven of the 90 patients (41.1%) with cobalt allergy were missed by cobalt 0.5% and 10 (0.7%) were missed by cobalt 1.0% (P < .001). No case of patch test sensitization was reported. Allergy to chromium was seen in 2.6% and allergy to nickel in 13.3%. Solitary allergy to cobalt without nickel allergy was shown in 61.1% of cobalt-positive individuals. Female patients had larger proportions of positive reactions to cobalt (P = .036) and nickel (P < .001) than males. CONCLUSION: The results speak in favor of replacing cobalt chloride 0.5% with cobalt chloride 1.0% pet. in the Swedish baseline series, which will be done 2021.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Cobalto/administración & dosificación , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Níquel/administración & dosificación , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Dicromato de Potasio/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suecia , Adulto Joven
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 72(2): 106-14, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25407465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cobalt is a strong skin sensitizer and a prevalent contact allergen. Recent studies have recognized exposure to leather articles as a potential cause of cobalt allergy. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between contact allergy to cobalt and a history of dermatitis resulting from exposure to leather. METHODS: A questionnaire case-control study was performed: the case group consisted of 183 dermatitis patients with a positive patch test reaction to cobalt chloride and a negative patch test reaction to potassium dichromate; the control group consisted of 621 dermatitis patients who did not react to either cobalt or chromium in patch testing. Comparisons were made by use of a χ(2) -test, Fisher's exact, and the Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression analyses were used to test for associations while taking confounding factors into consideration. RESULTS: Leather was observed as the most frequent exposure source causing dermatitis in the case group. Although the case group significantly more often reported non-occupational dermatitis caused by leather exposure (p < 0.001), no association was found between cobalt allergy and dermatitis caused by work-related exposure to leather. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a positive association between cobalt allergy and a history of dermatitis caused by non-occupational exposure to leather articles.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Cobalto/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Curtiembre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(3): 699-704, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin B12 (Vit B12) deficiency affects approximately 20% of those above the age of 60 years in the United Kingdom and United States. If untreated, it leads to detrimental health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a cohort of patients with Vit B12 hypersensitivity (VB12H) referred to 3 UK allergy centers and design a pathway for the investigation of VB12H. METHODS: A total of 29 patients seen between 2014 and 2022 underwent skin prick testing (1 mg/mL) with cyanocobalamin (CC) and hydroxycobalamin (HC) and intradermal testing (0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL). Patients with negative skin tests underwent a Vit B12 drug provocation test (DPT) with either the index or the alternative drug. RESULTS: Of 29 patients, 18 (62%) presented with immediate VB12H. Eight experienced anaphylaxis (4 to HC and 4 to CC) and had positive skin tests to the index drug. One patient reacted to oral and 7 patients to injectable Vit B12. Seven patients sensitized to one form of Vit B12-tolerated DPT with an alternative Vit B12. One patient with immediate VB12H reacted to polyethylene glycol (PEG) in oral cobalamin. Of 29 patients, 8 presented with delayed hypersensitivity reaction; 4 patients tolerated the intramuscular index formulation, whereas 2 patients tolerated the per oral formulation. One patient presented with symptoms consistent with symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema. Three patients were referred because of cobalt allergy. CONCLUSION: Confirmed VB12H is rare. We propose a comprehensive evaluation protocol that includes Vit B12 skin tests and considers PEG allergy in patients presenting with VB12H.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Polietilenglicoles , Pruebas Cutáneas/efectos adversos , Vitamina B 12/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 69(5): 280-7, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23848375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A spot test was recently developed for easy and rapid testing to detect whether cobalt is available on surfaces in contact with skin. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential use of the cobalt spot test as a tool for skin dose assessment, and to verify the sensitivity under laboratory conditions. METHODS: A cobalt dilution series (cobalt standards mixed with cobalt spot test reagent solution) was prepared to determine the threshold for colour change. Defined doses of cobalt were applied to the fingers of 5 volunteers. Acid wipe sampling was used to measure the recovery of applied cobalt skin doses on one hand, and cobalt-exposed areas on the other hand were spot tested. RESULTS: A weak colour gradient was visible from approximately 1 to 1.5 µg cobalt/ml in the dilution series. For a skin dose of 0.125 µg cobalt/cm(2) , 80% of the cobalt dose was collected by acid wipe sampling. Spot tests gave positive results in all cases (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: The cobalt spot test can be used to show cobalt on the skin. More experience is needed to understand and describe the most suitable test conditions.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/análisis , Cobalto/análisis , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Piel/química , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Cobalto/administración & dosificación , Dedos , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA