Clinical Outcomes and Complications Following Hip Fusion Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy, clinical outcomes, and complications following hip fusion conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery have been explored in several studies with controversial findings and no consensus. METHODS: Comprehensive search of online databases was performed through December 2022 for prepost clinical trials using MeSH keywords. Harris hip score (HHS), leg length discrepancy (LLD), pain score, and range of motion (ROM) were considered as clinical outcomes along with implant survival and complications. The retrieved studies were assessed for methodologic quality. Weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis taking into account for heterogeneity. Subgroup meta-analysis as well as sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Findings of meta-analysis on 34 trials showed that HHS increase after THA (WMD: 42.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 38 to 47). Subgroup analyses indicated that cementless prosthesis, length of arthrodesis <12 years, age <45 years, and studies with good quality have more HHS improvement. The LLD decreased 21 mm (95% CI: 19 to 24 mm) based on 21 trials. The range of motion (ROM) reached to 89 (95% CI: 84 to 95) for flexion, 32 (95% CI: 27 to 37) for abduction, 25 (95% CI: 21 to 29) for adduction, 29 (95% CI: 25 to 33) for external rotation, and 25 (95% CI: 20 to 31) for internal rotation after surgery. The most common complication was heterotopic ossification (14%). CONCLUSION: Conversion of an ankylosed hip to THA leads to improved hip function and leg discrepancy with relatively notable rate of complications. Our findings could provide a framework to guide surgeons and decision makers.

[Dynamic and Static Complementary Balance Theory-Based Functional Exercise Combined With Stepwise Rehabilitation Training Improves Postoperative Hip Function Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement]. / åŠ¨é™äº’è¡¥å¹³è¡¡è®ºåŠŸèƒ½é”»ç‚¼ç»“åˆé˜¶æ¢¯æ€§åº·å¤è®­ç»ƒåˆ©äºŽå ¨é«‹å ³èŠ‚ç½®æ¢è€ æœ¯åŽé«‹å ³èŠ‚åŠŸèƒ½æ¢å¤.

Objective: To analyze the application value of dynamic and static complementary balance theory-based functional exercise combined with stepwise rehabilitation training in postoperative hip function recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). Methods: The clinical data of 118 inpatients undergoing THR between June 2022 and June 2023 were retrospectively collected. Among the patients, 57 were given perioperative stepwise rehabilitation training (the control group), and 61 were given a combination of functional exercise based on static and dynamic complementary balance theory and stepwise rehabilitation training during the perioperative period (the combination group). The postoperative recovery status and the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were recorded. During postoperative recovery, the patients were assessed for pain with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and for self-efficacy with the Self-Efficacy for Rehabilitation Outcome Scale (SER). Hip function was measured and compared between the two groups at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after surgery. Results: With regard to the primary outcome indicator, the postoperative length-of-stay was (7.63±1.36) d in the combination group, which was shorter than the (8.22±1.48) d in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.257, P=0.026). As for the secondary outcome indicators, no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (4.92% vs. 14.04%) (P>0.05). The perioperative VAS scores in the two groups showed an interaction effect according to the repeated measurement variance test (P<0.05). The postoperative VAS scores in both groups declined significantly compared to the preoperative scores (P<0.05), and the VAS score decreased gradually over time after surgery (P<0.05). The VAS scores in the combination group at 7 and 14 days after surgery were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). At 14 days after surgery, the scores for the coping and the task dimensions and the total score of SER increased in both groups compared with those at 3 days after surgery (P<0.05), with the combination group showing higher scores than the control group did (P<0.05). After surgery, the scores for the dimensions of deformity, pain, function, and joint mobility and the total score of the Harris Hip Scale revealed interaction effects in the two groups according to the repeated measurement variance test (P<0.05), with these scores increasing gradually over time after surgery (P<0.05), and the scores in the combination group were higher at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery compared to those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The combination of functional exercise based on dynamic and static complementary balance theory and stepwise rehabilitation training shows an advantage over stepwise rehabilitation training alone in enhancing the self-efficacy of THR patients, relieving the postoperative pain, shortening the length-of-stay, and improving the hip function in patients.

Hip function in patients undergoing conservative treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

PURPOSE: Once collapsed, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) generally obtains collapse cessation naturally and surgical intervention can be avoided in the long term. This study aimed to investigate the process of hip function and secondary osteoarthritis changes in ONFH patients undergoing conservative treatment. METHODS: We included 54 patients with symptomatic ONFH at the first visit with a minimum follow-up of three years with conservative treatment. Patients were divided into two groups based on collapse cessation < 3 mm (stable group) or progression to > 3 mm (progression group). Additionally, we investigated age, sex, body mass index (BMI), etiology, contralateral side hip joint, the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) type classification, Harris hip score (HHS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), and survival rate with secondary osteoarthritis as the endpoint. RESULTS: The stable and progression groups had 31 and 23 patients, respectively. No significant differences in age, sex, BMI, and aetiology were observed between the two groups, except for the contralateral side hip joint and JIC type classification. The HHS and JHEQ were significantly improved at the final follow-up than at the first visit in the stable group. However, there were no significant differences in HHS and JHEQ at the final follow-up than at the first visit in the progression group. The five year survival rates with secondary osteoarthritis as the endpoint were significantly higher in the stable group (100%) than in the progression group (32.5%). CONCLUSION: Hip joint function improved by continuing conservative treatment in ONFH patients with collapse cessation < 3 mm.

Hip Function Was Not Associated with the Incidence of Preoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The prevalence of preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to be relatively high in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. We investigated the prevalence of DVT, the association between hip function and preoperative DVT, and the effect of a history of surgery in patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of the patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between April 2013 and February 2020 at our institution. We evaluated the prevalence of preoperative DVT based on the results of the patients' ultrasound screening. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the association between the incidence of DVT and patient factors including age, sex, hip function, medical histories, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification. We analyzed 451 patients (494 hips). The prevalence of DVT was 14.2% (64 patients). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased age was an independent significant risk factor for DVT. The prevalence of preoperative DVT was relatively high among patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative DVT tended to be more prevalent in older patients. Hip function was not associated with the incidence of DVT.

Primary hemiarthroplasty for the elderly patient with cognitive dysfunction and a displaced femoral neck fracture: a prospective, observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: At least one-third of hip fracture patients have some degree of impaired cognitive status, which may complicate their postoperative rehabilitation. AIM: We aimed to describe the outcome for elderly patients with cognitive dysfunction operated with hemiarthroplasty (HA) for a femoral neck fracture and to study the impact postoperative geriatric rehabilitation has on functional outcome up to 1 year after surgery. METHODS: 98 patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture with a mean age of 86 years were included and followed up to 1 year. The outcomes were hip-related complications and reoperations, the capacity to return to previous walking ability, health-related quality of life, hip function and mortality. RESULTS: The prevalence of hip complications leading to a major reoperation was 6% and the 1-year mortality rate was 31%. The lack of geriatric rehabilitation was correlated with poorer outcomes overall and those who receive geriatric rehabilitation were less likely to be confined to a wheelchair or bedridden at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty is an acceptable option for elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture and cognitive dysfunction. A lack of structured rehabilitation is associated with a significant deterioration in walking ability despite a well-functioning hip. However, the causality of this could be due to selection bias of healthier patients being sent to geriatric rehabilitation.

Functional improvement in hip pathology is related to improvement in anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing: an intricate link between physical and mental well-being.

BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression are risk factors for poor functional outcomes and worse post-treatment pain that can be treated alongside physical care given to orthopedic patients. While these factors have been shown to be common in patients with hip pathology, there is limited literature that follows these conditions throughout treatment. The purpose of this study was to track psychological factors in patients with various hip pathology to determine if they improved alongside functional measures following treatment. METHODS: Patients presenting to a specialist hip clinic were prospectively evaluated for outcomes of pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and hip function. Pre- and post-treatment assessments were undertaken: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the Hip Outcome Survey, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Patient characteristics were recorded. A correlation analysis, using the Spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs), was conducted to evaluate the relationship between change in psychological factors with change in functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients (78 male, 123 female) with a mean age of 53.75 ± 18.97 years were included, with diagnoses of hip dysplasia (n = 35), femoroacetabular impingement (n = 35), lateral trochanteric pain syndrome (n = 9), osteoarthrosis (n = 109), and avascular necrosis of the hip (n = 13). Statistical analysis revealed a significant negative relationship between change in function level (as measured by HOOS ADL) and change in pain catastrophizing (rs = - 0.373, p < 0.0001), depression (rs = - 0.363, p < 0.0001), and anxiety (rs = - 0.264, p = 0.0002). Pain catastrophizing, depression, and anxiety improved with function. Spearman correlation coefficients also revealed that pain catastrophizing, HADS anxiety, and HADS depression improved with improvement in other patient-reported functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hip pathology often exhibit pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression, but improvements in hip functionality are associated with decreased severity of these psychological comorbidities. Exploring this connection demonstrates the correlation between musculoskeletal impairment and psychosocial outcomes and mental health. Perioperative multidisciplinary assessment may be a beneficial part of comprehensive orthopaedic hip care.

The influence of depression on patient-reported outcomes for hip-fracture patients 1 year after surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in elderly hip-fracture patients and together with cognitive impairment is associated with increased risk of mortality. AIM: We aimed to examine the influence depression has on patient-reported outcome up to 1 year after acute hip fracture. METHODS: 162 hip-fracture patients participated in the prospective observational cohort study and were followed up at baseline, and 3 and 12 months using patient-reported outcome scores. Patients with cognitive impairment were excluded. Depression was defined as a score ≥ 8 on the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS D), having a diagnosis of depression or being treated with anti-depressant medication. Hip function was assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), EQ-5D was used to assess health status and Quality of life, and the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PRNS) was used to assess pain levels. A linear regression model adjusted for group, age, sex, and ASA class was used to identify risk factors for functional outcome 12 months after fracture. RESULTS: 35 patients were included in the depression group versus 127 in the control group. No statistical differences were found in the demographic data (age, sex, ASA class, fracture type, operation method, living situation, activities of daily living ADL and clinical pathway) between the groups. In the regression model, we found no correlation between depression and the patient-reported outcome. CONCLUSION: In young elderly hip fracture patients without cognitive dysfunction, depression may not be of major importance for the rehabilitation of hip function in the short term.

Relationship between stride length and maximal ball velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers.

[Purpose] To evaluate the relationship between stride length during a pitch and maximal ball velocity and define the determinants of stride length in collegiate baseball pitchers. [Participants and Methods] Eighteen collegiate baseball pitchers participated in this study. Using a standard tape measure, the distance between each participant's legs was measured after maximal abduction of both hip joints in a standing position. The pitchers threw fastballs on an indoor pitching mound at an official pitching distance. The throwing motion was recorded with four high-speed video cameras (240 Hz), while the ball velocity was measured using a radar gun. The stride length at foot contact was calculated at the maximal ball velocity using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. [Results] The maximal ball velocity (mean 129.8 km/h) had a significant positive correlation with the absolute stride length during a pitch (r=0.55), but no correlation with the relative stride length (% body height, % lower extremity length, and % maximal open legs' width). Stride length during a pitch did not significantly correlate with the pitcher's body height, lower extremity length, and maximal open legs' width. [Conclusion] A longer stride length contributes to a higher ball velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers.

Return to Sport Rates in Physically Active Individuals 6 Months After Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

CONTEXT: Six months is the expected time frame to return to sport (RTS) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). OBJECTIVE: The primary aims of this study were to (1) report the RTS rate of physically active individuals 6 months after arthroscopic surgery for FAIS and (2) compare the self-reported hip function between those who were able to RTS against those who had not. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. PATIENTS: A total of 42 physically active individuals scheduled for hip arthroscopy for FAIS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported function, including preinjury and current activity levels and ability to participate in sport, were collected on 42 individuals with FAIS prior to surgery and at 6-month follow-up. Participants were allocated into 2 groups based on self-reported RTS status at 6-month follow-up. Separate 2-way analyses of variance were used to test the interaction of groups (those who did/did not RTS). Main effects were reported in the absence of statistically significant interactions (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Altogether, 28 of 42 participants (66%) returned for 6-month follow-up; 5 of the 14 participants (35.7%) lost to follow-up underwent contralateral hip surgery within the study time frame. At the 6-month follow-up, 16 of the remaining 28 participants (57.1%) reported that they had returned to sport, 5 of whom returned at their prior level of participation. There was no statistically significant interaction of group and time for either hip outcome score subscale (P ≥ .20). Self-reported hip function improved over time, regardless of group (P ≤ .001). Participants in the yRTS group demonstrated higher hip outcome score-sport scores than did the nRTS group, regardless of time (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Though just over half of participants returned to sport 6 months after hip arthroscopy for FAIS, only 18% returned to their previous level of sports participation. Participants who returned to sport reported better function than those who did not, but self-reported hip function improved over time regardless of group. The most commonly reported reasons for not returning to sport were weakness (69.6%), fear (65.2%), and pain (56.5%).

Correlation between hip function and knee kinematics evaluated by three-dimensional motion analysis during lateral and medial side-hopping.

[Purpose] Kinematic and kinetic characteristics of the limb during side-hopping and hip/knee interaction during this motion have not been clarified. The purposes of this study were to examine the biomechanical parameters of the knee during side hop and analyze its relationship with clinical measurements of hip function. [Subjects and Methods] Eleven male college rugby players were included. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to assess motion characteristics of the knee during side hop. In addition, hip range of motion and muscle strength were evaluated. Subsequently, the relationship between knee motion and the clinical parameters of the hip was analyzed. [Results] In the lateral touchdown phase, the knee was positioned in an abducted and externally rotated position, and increasing abduction moment was applied to the knee. An analysis of the interaction between knee motion and hip function showed that range of motion for hip internal rotation was significantly correlated with external rotation angle and external rotation/abduction moments of the knee during the lateral touchdown phase. [Conclusion] Range of motion for hip internal rotation should be taken into consideration for identifying the biomechanical characteristics in the side hop test results.

Effect of inflammatory response on joint function after hip fracture in elderly patients: A clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Excellent hip joint function facilitates limb recovery and improves the quality of survival. This study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors affecting postoperative joint functional activity and outcomes in elderly hip fractures patients and to provide evidence for patient rehabilitation and clinical management. AIM: To explore the relationship between inflammatory factors and hip function and the interaction between inflammation and health after hip fracture in elderly patients. METHODS: The elderly patients who had hip fracture surgery at our hospital between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022 were chosen for this retrospective clinical investigation. Patients with excellent and fair postoperative hip function had their clinical information and characteristics gathered and compared. Age, gender, fracture site, surgical technique, laboratory indices, and other variables that could have an impact on postoperative joint function were all included in a univariate study. To further identify independent risk factors affecting postoperative joint function in hip fractures, risk factors that showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis were then included in a multiple logistic regression analysis. In addition to this, we also compared other outcome variables such as visual analogue scale and length of hospital stay between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 119 elderly patients with hip fractures were included in this study, of whom 37 were male and 82 were female. The results of univariate logistic regression analysis after excluding the interaction of various factors showed that there was a statistically significant difference in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, C-reactive protein (CRP), and complement C1q (C1q) between the fair and excellent joint function groups (P < 0.05). The results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6 > 20 pg/mL [(Odds ratio (OR) 3.070, 95%CI: 1.243-7.579], IL-8 > 21.4 pg/ mL (OR 3.827, 95%CI: 1.498-9.773), CRP > 10 mg/L (OR 2.142, 95%CI: 1.020-4.498) and C1q > 233 mg/L (OR 2.339, 95%CI: 1.094-5.004) were independent risk factors for poor joint function after hip fracture surgery (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After hip fractures in older patients, inflammatory variables are risk factors for fair joint function; therefore, early intervention to address these markers is essential to enhance joint function and avoid consequences.

[Comparison of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach with the standard Kocher-Langenbeck(K-L) approach in the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures and to explore a more optimal approach for the treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures. METHODS: Total of 26 patients with posterior acetabulum wall fractures were retrospectively analysed and divided into two groups:the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter group (test group) and the standard K-L approach group (control group). In the test group, there were 24 patients including 16 males and 8 females with an average age of (42.00±4.52) years old, the time of injury to surgery was (6.75±1.15) d. In the control group, there were 23 patients including 16 males and 7 females with an average age of (41.00±5.82) years old, the time of injury to surgery was (7.09±1.20) days. The total hospital stay, length of incision, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, discharge, fracture reduction quality (Matta criteria), hip abduction muscle strength, hip function (Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score), postoperative complications and the incidence of ectopic ossification were compared. RESULTS: All cases were followed up for 6 months. There was no significant difference in incision length, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage between two groups(P>0.05). However, the operation time of the test group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in fracture reduction and hip function between two groups (P>0.05). The hip abduction muscle strength of test group was better than that of control group(P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and heterotopic ossification between two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard K-L approach, the posterior hemipelvectomy of the greater trochanter approach can shorten the operative time, has better recovery of the postoperative hip abduction muscle strength, exposes the view of the fracture involving the more comminuted posterior acetabulum wall or the fracture of the roof of the socket, improved the rate of fracture anatomical repositioning, provides a new idea for the clinical treatment of posterior acetabulum wall fractures, and allows patients to perform functional exercises at an early stage.

Factors influencing the survival status of the hip joint in post-collapse femoral head necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite hip function typically deteriorating in the post-collapse stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), some patients can still demonstrate long-term favorable hip function, a state termed "survival with collapse". This study aims to identify the characteristics of patients suitable for "survival with collapse" in cases of ONFH. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 65 patients (87 hips) diagnosed with post-collapse ONFH for ≥ 3 years (average 9.1 years, range 3-23 years). Hip function was assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were compared between the favorable group (HHS > 80) and the poor group (HHS ≤ 80). Independent protective factors for hip function were identified by multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was further applied to evaluate these factors' diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: The favorable and poor groups included 46 and 41 hips, respectively. Significant differences were found in body mass index (BMI), Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage, collapse degree, Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, necrotic size, and hip subluxation between the two groups (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified collapse < 3 mm(OR:14.49, 95%CI: 3.52-59.68, p < 0.001), JIC types B (OR: 11.08, 95% CI: 1.07-115.12, p < 0.05) and C1(OR: 5.18, 95% CI: 1.47-18.20, p < 0.05) as independent protective factors for hip function, while BMI (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, p = 0.029) was an independent risk factor. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that both collapse degree (AUC = 0.798, sensitivity = 91.3%, specificity = 68.3%, p < 0.0001) and JIC classification (AUC = 0.787, sensitivity = 80.4%, specificity = 73.2%, p < 0.0001) had satisfactory diagnostic value for hip function. Combining JIC classification and collapse degree (AUC = 0.868, sensitivity = 76.1%, specificity = 85.4%, p < 0.0001) significantly enhanced diagnostic efficacy compared to using either alone (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In ONFH, femoral head collapse does not necessarily determine a poor prognosis. Patients with mild collapse (< 3 mm) and preserved anterolateral wall are more likely to retain satisfactory hip function, making them candidates for "survival with collapse."

Hip Preservation Surgery in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Acetabular Dysplasia Improves Functional Measures and Pain Catastrophizing.

Background Chronic hip pain is a debilitating condition that severely reduces one's quality of life. Prior studies uncovered a link between hip pathologies and pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether hip preservation surgery in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and acetabular dysplasia (AD) improves functional outcomes and pain catastrophizing. Methods Patients with FAIS and AD were requested to complete a hip questionnaire both preoperatively and postoperatively at a single academic center (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA). Pain catastrophizing was evaluated using the pain catastrophizing scale, and pain level was assessed using the visual analog scale. Assessments of hip functional outcomes included the hip outcome score (HOS) and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS). Outcome measures before and after treatment were compared using the dependent samples t-test. A correlation analysis, using the Spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs), was conducted to evaluate the relationship between variables. Results The results indicated a clinically significant improvement in functional measures and pain catastrophizing in patients who underwent hip preservation surgery. The most significant discovery was an inverse relationship between both HOOS quality of life (rs=-0.293, p=0.0065, false discovery rate (FDR)=0.0210) and HOS activities of daily living (rs=-0.242, p=0.0254, FDR=0.0423) and pain catastrophizing; however, similar improvements were seen in pain catastrophizing with improvements in other functional outcomes. Conclusion Undergoing hip preservation surgery for patients with AD or FAIS improved their hip functional measures and decreased pain catastrophizing postoperatively. The improvement of hip function, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing reveals an intricate link between the functional outcomes of hip preservation surgery and pain catastrophizing.

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Lateral Position.

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial total hip arthroplasty(THA) for femoral neck fracture between direct anterior approach(DAA) in lateral position and posterior lateral approach(PLA). Methods: Comparison of 200 cases of patients who underwent THA collected between September 2019 and August 2021 was done. Incision length, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, difference in postoperative haemoglobin from preoperative levels, length of hospital stay, postoperative time to get off the floor, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, preoperative and postoperative Harris scores for the hip, and measurements of the acetabular abduction angle and anterior acetabular tilt angle at 6 months postoperatively were collected, and all the cases were followed up for at least 2 years. Results: Compared with the PLA group, the DAA group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative haemoglobin reduction compared with the preoperative period, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier first time to get off the floor after surgery, however, the comparison of operative times was not statistically significant; Patients in the DAA group had a lower VAS in the early postoperative period compared to PLA; Patients in the DAA group had higher hip Harris scores at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively; There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle and acetabular anterior tilt angle between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Compared to PLA, DAA in THA is minimally invasive, has less pain, less bleeding, earlier time out of bed, shorter hospital stay, better early hip function, faster rehabilitation, and better joint stability.

Relationship between Spinopelvic Parameters and Hip Function in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement at Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine correlation between the spinopelvic parameters in sitting and standing positions (sacral slope [SS], lumbar lordosis [LL], spinopelvic tilt [SPT], pelvic incidence [PI], and pelvic femoral angle [PFA]), with hip function assessed using the modified Harris hip scores (mHHs) in patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) at diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 52 patients diagnosed with symptomatic FAI was conducted. Evaluation of the spinopelvic complex in terms of SS, LL, SPT, PI and PFA was performed using lateral radiographs of the pelvis and lumbosacral spine in standing and sitting positions. Assessment of hip function at diagnosis was performed using the mHHs. Calculation of spinopelvic mobility was based on the difference (Δ) between measurements performed in standing and sitting position. Results: The median time of pain evolution was 11 months (interquartile range [IQR], 5-24 months) with a median mHHs of 66.0 points (IQR, 46.0-73.0) at diagnosis. The mean change of LL, SS, SPT, and PFA was 20.9±11.2°, 14.2±8.6°, 15.5±9.0°, and 70.7±9.5°, respectively. No statistically significant correlation was observed between spinopelvic parameters and the mHHs (P>0.05). Conclusion: Radiological parameters of the spinopelvic complex did not show correlation with hip function at the time of diagnosis in patients with symptomatic FAI. Conduct of further studies will be required in the effort to understand the effect of the spinopelvic complex and its compensatory mechanics, primarily between the hip and spine, in patients with FAI before and after hip arthroscopy.

Mobility and Hip Function Among Geriatric Patients With Displaced Neck of Femur Fractures Treated With Arthroplasty.

Background: Neck of femur fractures result in impaired function for older people. Despite surgery, many patients experience a decrease in functional level and poorer health status after the injury. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the short-term mobility and hip function of geriatric patients who underwent hip replacement surgery for a displaced neck of femur fracture in our local population and (2) to identify factors which affect the functional outcome of these patients. Methods: Patients aged 60 years and above, who were admitted for neck of femur fracture from January 2017 to December 2020, and treated surgically with arthroplasty, were included. Information on patient demography, comorbidities, perioperative data, mobility, hip function and complications were retrospectively collected. Outcome measures used were independent ambulation and recovery of pre-fracture mobility at 1 year after surgery while hip function was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total, pain, stiffness, and physical function scores. Factors associated with these outcomes were analyzed. Results: 168 patients with a mean age of 75.2 (SD 8.4) years met the inclusion criteria. 32.1% of patients regained their pre-fracture mobility and 59.6% remained independent 1 year after surgery. Logistic regression analysis identified age, gender, surgical procedure, and time to surgery as significant contributors to recovery of pre-fracture mobility. Older age and increasing requirement for postoperative ambulatory aid resulted in worse WOMAC total and physical function scores. No significant differences were observed in patient-reported hip function between those who had a total hip arthroplasty and those who had a hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: Most geriatric patients with displaced neck of femur fractures did not regain pre-fracture mobility despite surgical treatment with arthroplasty.

When to Reduce and Fix Displaced Lesser Trochanter in Treatment of Trochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the benefits of reducing and fixing displaced lesser trochanter (LT) of trochanteric fractures and when this procedure is worth the effect. Methods: From database establishment through March 2021, four online databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant literature that investigated reduction and fixation for displaced LT of trochanteric fractures. The papers were then screened by two reviewers independently and in duplicate according to prior inclusion and exclusion criteria. Demographic data as well as data on fracture types, surgical protocols, and surgical outcomes were recorded, analyzed, and interpreted. Results: Total 10 clinical studies with 928 patients were included, in which 48 cases had intact LT and 880 cases involved the displaced LT, of which 196 (22.27%) cases underwent reduction and fixation for LT while the rest of 684 (77.73%) cases not. In these studies, complications were evaluated as a more applicable predictive parameter for operation than postoperative hip function. Conclusion: It was beneficial to reduce and fix the displaced LT when one of the conditions below occurred: displacement distance of LT ≥2 cm, quantity of comminuted LT fragments ≥2, and range of LT fragments in medial wall ≥75%; the fracture line of LT fragments reaching or exceeding the midline of the posterior wall.

The influence of anterior and posterior knot placement on hip function after total hip arthroplasty using a modified Dall's approach: a prospective non-randomised comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The direct lateral modified Dall's approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides an excellent vision of the hip joint by osteotomising the greater trochanter (GT). A robust method for the reattachment of osteotomised fragments is essential to prevent complications around the GT. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cables are reported to be useful for reattachment; but the optimal suture method of these cables is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the knot position on hip function after primary THA. METHODS: In a prospective non-randomised study 216 primary THA were included, being scheduled for an operation with a modified Dall's approach. They were divided into 2 groups, anterior (A) and posterior (P) according to the knot position for the GT. Hip function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), satisfaction VAS and Merle d'Aubigne-Postel hip score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. A logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors influenced by the knot position. RESULTS: Patient demographics were comparable between the 2 groups. Differences of the knot position did not affect the radiological failure rate of GT reattachment. Regression analysis showed a significantly positive impact on pain VAS and flexion range at 6 months postoperatively for posterior knot position. CONCLUSIONS: For the reattachment of osteotomised fragments, the posterior knot may be superior to the anterior knot.

Lateral trochanteric bursa repair improves early hip function after posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: The trochanteric bursa (TB) is an anatomic structure, which is dissected during posterior/lateral hip approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Some surgeons prefer to simply resect the bursa as they believe that it may be responsible for postoperative lateral trochanteric pain (LTP). Others advocate that this tissue acts as a buffer minimizing friction between soft tissue and bone, and therefore its repair may prevent LTP after THA. AIM: The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical results of either resecting or repairing the TB during posterior approach THA. METHODS: Forty-two patients with primary hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA via a posterior hip approach were randomly assigned to two groups; Group A, or TB resection group and Group B, or TB repair group. All patients in both groups were evaluated postoperatively in terms of hip function, measured by the Harris Hip Score (HHS), at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, as well as LTP during daily routine activities and lying on the operative side. RESULTS: Forty patients completed the study. Postoperative difference in terms of leg length and femoral offset was similar among the two groups (P = 0.467 and P = 0.39, respectively). At 6 weeks, patients in Group B had higher HHS (P = 0.052) and experienced less LTP when lying on the operative side (P = 0.046) but not during activities (P = 0.759). Thereafter, all functional parameters measured had comparable values in both groups. Subgroup analysis failed to identify any correlation between high offset stems and LTP. CONCLUSION: TB repair in posterior approach THA improves hip functional recovery as well as patients' ability to lie on the operative side during the early postoperative period.