Cognitive symptoms in veterans with migraine or traumatic brain injury: A Million Veteran Program study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the spectrum and severity of cognitive symptoms in veterans with migraine, traumatic brain injury (TBI), or both; and to evaluate the extent to which psychiatric conditions contribute to the relationship of migraine and TBI with cognitive symptoms. BACKGROUND: Migraine contributes significantly to global disability, with veterans facing additional burdens due to high comorbidity of TBI and psychiatric conditions. Understanding the intersection of these conditions is crucial for improving veterans' health-care outcomes. METHODS: This observational study used self-reported data from 338,217 veterans enrolled in the Million Veteran Program (MVP) to assess cognitive symptoms using the Medical Outcomes Study Cognitive Functioning Scale Revised (MOS-Cog-R) and psychiatric conditions in veterans with migraine only, TBI only, both, or neither. RESULTS: Of the participants, 30,080/338,217 (8.9%) veterans reported migraine, 31,906/338,217 (9.4%) reported TBI, and 7828/338,217 (2.3%) reported both migraine and TBI. Veterans with only migraine or only TBI reported similar levels of cognitive symptoms (M = 74.19, standard deviation [SD] = 25.18; M = 73.87, SD = 24.98, respectively), which were substantially higher than veterans without these conditions (M = 62.52, SD = 27.90). Veterans with both conditions reported the most cognitive symptoms (M = 83.01, SD = 22.13) and psychiatric conditions (depression = 5041/7828 [64.4%], anxiety = 3735/7828 [47.7%], post-traumatic stress disorder = 4243/7828 [54.2%]). The association of migraine and TBI with cognitive symptoms persisted beyond the influence of psychiatric conditions (B = -2.20, standard error = -0.36, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Veterans with migraine reported cognitive challenges analogous to veterans with TBI, indicating a need for careful attention to cognitive symptoms in veterans with migraine. Further, the associations of migraine and TBI with cognitive symptoms in veterans were not explained by psychiatric conditions. These findings encourage future research to elucidate the association between self-reported and objective cognitive symptoms and to identify factors, including environmental exposure and genetic influences, contributing to cognitive impairment to optimize the assessment and treatment of veterans with migraine.

Migraine headache in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection: A report of the iSCAD Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic cause of myocardial infarction. Migraine headache has been reported to be common among patients with SCAD, but the degree of migraine-related disability has not been quantified. METHODS: Clinical data and headache variables were obtained from the baseline assessment of the prospective, multicenter iSCAD Registry. Migraine-related disability was quantified using the self-reported Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and medical characteristics from data entry forms were compared between patients with and without migraine. RESULTS: Of the 773 patients with available data, 46% reported previous or current migraines. Those with migraines were more likely to be women (96.9% vs 90.3%, p = 0.0003). The presence of underlying carotid fibromuscular dysplasia was associated with migraine (35% vs 27%, p = 0.0175). There was not a significant association with carotid artery dissection and migraine. Current migraine frequency was less than monthly (58%), monthly (24%), weekly (16%), and daily (3%). Triptan use was reported in 32.5% of patients, and 17.5% used daily migraine prophylactic medications. Using the MIDAS to quantify disability related to migraine, 60.2% reported little or no disability, 14.4% mild, 12.7% moderate, and 12.7% severe. The mean MIDAS score was 9.9 (mild to moderate disability). Patients with SCAD had higher rates of depression and anxiety (28.2% vs 17.7% [p = 0.0004] and 35.3% vs 26.7% [p = 0.0099], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Migraines are common, frequent, and a source of disability in patients with SCAD. The association between female sex, anxiety, and depression may provide some insight for potential treatment modalities.

Sustained response of galcanezumab in migraine prevention: Patient-level data from a post hoc analysis in patients with episodic or chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, at population and individual patient levels, the sustained response of reduction in migraine headache days in patients with migraine treated with galcanezumab. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of double-blind galcanezumab studies in patients with migraine: two 6-month episodic migraine (EM; EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2), one 3-month chronic migraine (CM; REGAIN), and one 3-month treatment-resistant migraine (CONQUER). Patients received monthly subcutaneous galcanezumab 120 mg (after 240 mg initial loading dose), galcanezumab 240 mg, or placebo. In the EM and CM studies, the proportions of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% (EM only) reduction from baseline in average monthly migraine headache days from Months 1 to 3 and Months 4 to 6 were evaluated. A mean monthly response rate was estimated. The sustained effect was defined as maintaining ≥50% response for ≥3 consecutive months in the patient-level data for EM and CM. RESULTS: A total of 3348 patients with EM or CM from the EVOLVE-1/EVOLVE-2 (placebo, n = 894, galcanezumab, n = 879), REGAIN (placebo, n = 558, galcanezumab, n = 555), and CONQUER (EM: placebo, n = 132, galcanezumab, n = 137; CM: placebo, n = 98, galcanezumab, n = 95) studies were included. Patients were predominantly female, White, and had monthly migraine headache day averages ranging from 9.1 to 9.5 days (EM) and 18.1 to 19.6 days (CM). In patients with EM and CM, 19.0% and 22.6% of galcanezumab-treated patients, respectively, had significantly higher maintenance of ≥50% response for all months in the double-blind period compared to 8.0% and 1.5% of placebo-treated patients. The odds ratios (OR) of achieving clinical response for EM and CM were double with galcanezumab (OR = 3.0 [95% CI 1.8, 4.8] and OR = 6.3 [95% CI 1.7, 22.7], respectively). At the individual patient level, of patients who had ≥75% response at Month 3 in the galcanezumab 120 and 240 mg dose groups and placebo group, 39.9% (55/138) and 43.0% (61/142), respectively, of galcanezumab-treated patients maintained ≥75% response during Months 4-6 compared to 32.7% (51/156) with placebo. CONCLUSION: More galcanezumab-treated patients achieved ≥50% response within the first 3 months of treatment compared to placebo; responses were sustained during Months 4-6. The odds of achieving ≥50% response were double with galcanezumab.

Visual temporal discrimination is impaired in patients with migraine without aura.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dysfunctional sensory processing is described in migraine. This study aimed to evaluate visual perception in patients with migraine without aura using the visual temporal discrimination (VTD) test. METHODS: A total of 45 participants were enrolled in this prospective exploratory study. In all, 15 patients had migraine without aura and 15 healthy volunteers were analyzed in the study. The VTD threshold (VTDT) was measured using light-emitting diode lights to perceive two separate visual stimuli as clearly distinct. VTD was tested during the attack and the interictal period. The disease duration, attack side, visual analog scale for pain, accompanying symptoms, and allodynia were recorded during the attack. RESULTS: The VTDT of each visual field in both attack (mean [SD] 102.3 [38.4] ms for the right visual field and 106.3 [52.2] ms for the left) and the interictal periods (mean [SD] 75.2 [27.9] ms for the right and 78.2 [27.9] ms for the left) were significantly higher than in the control group (mean [SD] 45.3 [9.9] ms for the right and 48.2 [11.9] ms for the left) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). The ipsilateral threshold during the attack was significantly prolonged compared to the interictal period (mean [SD] 143.8 [53.8] vs. 78 [19.6] ms, p = 0.025) and the contralateral threshold during the attack (mean [SD] 143.8 [53.8] vs. 71.9 [14.1] ms, p = 0.025). The ipsilateral threshold was significantly correlated with the visual analog score (r = 0.894, p < 0.001) and frequency of the attacks (r = 0.696, p = 0.004), but not correlated with photophobia. CONCLUSION: The VTDTs are prolonged both ictally and interictally in patients with migraine without aura attacks. Ipsilateral threshold prolongation is more pronounced during lateralized migraine attacks. The results suggest dysfunctional visual perception is not limited to the migraine attack period, and a defective sensory processing/modulation in the visual pathways may involve the superior colliculus.

Visual Aura in Non-Migraine Headaches: A Population Study.

BACKGROUND: Visual aura (VA) occurs mostly in migraine with aura (MA), but some case studies have reported aura in non-migraine headaches. Thus, information of VA in non-migraine headaches is scarce. Aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and impact of VA in non-migraine headache and compare it with that of migraine headache. METHODS: This study was a nationwide population-based study. We used an internet-based headache diagnosis questionnaire to diagnose headache, and various modules to evaluate clinical features and comorbidities of participants with headache. We defined migraine headache as migraine and probable migraine (PM), whereas non-migraine headache was defined as a headache but not migraine or PM. VA was defined as a self-reporting VA rating scale score ≥ 3. RESULTS: Of the 3,030 participants, 1,431 (47.2%) and 507 (16.7%) had non-migraine headache and migraine headache, respectively. VA prevalence was much lower in the non-migraine headache group than in the migraine headache group (14.5% [207/1,431] vs. 26.0% [132/507], P < 0.001). In subjects with non-migraine headache, those with VA had a markedly higher number of headache days per 30 days (median [25th-75th percentiles]: 2.0 [1.0-5.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0-3.0], P < 0.001), and headache-related disability (6.0 [3.0-16.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0-7.0], P < 0.001) than those without VA. VA prevalence did not differ significantly according to age and sex. CONCLUSION: Non-migraine headache with VA patients had more severe symptoms than those without VA. These findings may improve the understanding of VA and the management of individuals with non-migraine headache.

[Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. / Konsensusstatement der Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaften (DMKG, ÖKSG & SKG) zur Therapiedauer der medikamentösen Migräneprophylaxe.

Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.

[Consensus statement of the migraine and headache societies (DMKG, ÖKSG, and SKG) on the duration of pharmacological migraine prophylaxis]. / Konsensusstatement der Migräne- und Kopfschmerzgesellschaften (DMKG, ÖKSG & SKG) zur Therapiedauer der medikamentösen Migräneprophylaxe.

Migraine is the most common neurological disorder and can be associated with a high degree of disability. In addition to non-pharmacological approaches to reduce migraine frequency, pharmacological migraine preventatives are available. Evidence-based guidelines from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG), and German Society for Neurology (DGN), Austrian Headache Society (ÖKSG), and Swiss Headache Society (SKG) are available for indication and application. For therapy-relevant questions such as the duration of a pharmacological migraine prevention, no conclusions can be drawn from currently available study data. The aim of this review is to present a therapy consensus statement that integrates the current data situation and, where data are lacking, expert opinions. The resulting current recommendations on the duration of therapy for pharmacological migraine prophylaxis are shown here.

A Fatal Case of a Huge Brain Abscess Misdiagnosed as Migraine Headache in an 18-Year-Old Woman.

BACKGROUND: Mortality associated with delayed diagnosis of brain abscess is high. A high index of suspicion in conjunction with the use of neuroimaging is important for the early diagnosis of brain abscess. Early use of appropriate antimicrobial and neurosurgical care improves outcomes. METHODS: We report a fatal case of an 18 year old female with a huge brain abscess who was misdiagnosed as a case of migraine headache over a 4-month period in a referral hospital. REPORT: An 18-year-old female with a missed history of recent furuncles occurring in the right frontal part of her head and right upper eyelid who presented with a recurrent throbbing headache to a private hospital over 4 months. There was a positive maternal history of episodic headaches, as such, the patient was diagnosed as having a migraine headache disorder at the private hospital. The patient was referred to our facility on account of repeated seizures over 2 days and lapsing into a coma. Clinical examination showed evidence of focal neurologic deficits and a suspicion of brain abscess was confirmed with an urgent cranial MRI. She succumbed to her illness within 3hrs of presentation. CONCLUSION: Detailed history, a high index of suspicion, use of appropriate neuroimaging and early diagnosis is important in reducing the mortality associated with brain abscess.

CONTEXTE: La mortalité associée à un diagnostic tardif d'abcès cérébral est élevée. Un indice de suspicion élevé associé à l'utilisation de la neuro-imagerie est important pour le diagnostic précoce de l'abcès cérébral. L'utilisation précoce d'antimicrobiens et de soins neurochirurgicaux appropriés améliore les résultats. MÉTHODES: Nous rapportons le cas mortel d'une jeune femme de 18 ans atteinte d'un énorme abcès cérébral qui a été diagnostiqué à tort comme un cas de migraine sur une période de 4 mois dans un hôpital de référence. RAPPORTS: Une jeune femme de 18 ans, sans antécédents de furoncles récents survenus dans la partie frontale droite de la tête et sur la paupière supérieure droite, s'est présentée dans un hôpital privé avec des céphalées lancinantes récurrentes sur une période de 4 mois. Les antécédents maternels de maux de tête épisodiques étant positifs, la patiente a été diagnostiquée comme souffrant de migraines à l'hôpital privé. La patiente a été adressée à notre établissement en raison de crises épileptiques répétées pendant deux jours et d'une chute dans le coma. L'examen clinique a révélé des déficits neurologiques focaux et une suspicion d'abcès cérébral a été confirmée par une IRM crânienne urgente. Elle a succombé à sa maladie dans les 3 heures qui ont suivi sa présentation. CONCLUSION: Une anamnèse détaillée, un indice de suspicion élevé, l'utilisation d'une neuro-imagerie appropriée et un diagnostic précoce sont importants pour réduire la mortalité associée aux abcès cérébraux. Mots clés: Abcès cérébral, Céphalée primaire, Céphalée secondaire, Migraine.

Development of Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire Associated with Osmophobia in People with Migraine.

BACKGROUND: It is important to implement disease-specific precautions to develop quality of life in migraine. The effect of osmophobia, which is one of the specific symptoms of migraine that might help to differentiate migraine from other headache disorders, on quality of life is unknown. The aim of the present study was to develop a practicable and reliable scale that assesses the effect of osmophobia on quality of life in migraine. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out with 163 patients with migraine and 110 healthy individuals for control group. The scale items were constructed based on after literature review, expert opinions, and preliminary trial stage. A semi-structured interview was conducted with the patients by the Neurologist to evaluate the presence of osmophobia retrospectively. Migraine osmophobia-related quality of life assessment (MORA) consisted of 6 items including personal care, eating or cooking, house cleaning, close relationship, social life and traveling. RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.86; and the Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.83. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.943 (95%) confidence interval [CI] = 0.902-0.984), a cutoff score of >9.5, a sensitivity of 91.6%, a specificity of 85.7%. Mean scores of the MORA differed between people with migraine (with and without osmophobia) and healthy controls (<0.001). CONCLUSION: MORA is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire that assesses the effect of osmophobia on quality of life in migraine. This questionnaire appears to be a practicable diagnostic instrument in clinical practice and research.

Concussion Characteristics and Early Postinjury Outcomes Between College Students and Intercollegiate Athletes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe concussion characteristics among general college students and compare postinjury outcomes to intercollegiate student athletes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Large university in the Southeast region of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 179 (N=179) college students' (female=120; 67.0%; 23.9±3.9 years) and 49 athletes' (female=28, 57.1%;19.3±1.3 years) medical records were examined. Participants self-reported injury mechanism, health history information, and completed clinical assessments acutely (<7 days postinjury). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics were calculated for each group. Concussion outcomes between students with and without certain health history diagnoses were assessed using separate t tests. We conducted univariate regression analyses to determine if sex, age, and time from concussion to first clinical assessment were significant predictors of clinical outcomes. Statistically significant variables were included as covariates in a series of 1-way analyses of covariance to identify differences in balance, symptom severity, total symptom presence, and neurocognitive domain performance between students and athletes. Fisher exact tests were used to compare health history information between groups (α<0.05). RESULTS: Among students, 24% reported sustaining a concussion while participating in recreational sports, and 27% of impacts occurred to the back of the head. Students had higher proportions of headache, migraine, anxiety, and depression (P<.05). Students reported greater total symptom presence (P=.006) and performed worse on the computerized neurocognitive test domain score for complex attention (P=.015) relative to athletes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for better access to medical care for non- National Collegiate Athletic Association sanctioned athletes because of a large proportion of concussions in the student sample being sustained during sports participation. Identifying common injury mechanisms can provide clinicians with powerful information to improve evaluation and treatment models.

Interictal osmophobia is associated with longer migraine disease duration.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to sensory stimuli is an essential feature of migraine attacks. The relationship between the clinical course of migraine and increased sensitivity to olfactory stimuli has been little studied so far. METHODS: We analyzed the frequency and quality of osmophobia depending on the phase of migraine in patients with episodic and chronic migraine treated in an tertiary headache center with regard to gender, age, medical history and migraine disability assessment score (MIDAS). Standardized diagnostic questions were used for the assessment of osmophobia. RESULTS: In our cross-sectional investigation (n = 113), 38.1% of the patients showed an increased preictal hypersensitivity to odors, whereas 61.9% described ictal and 31.9% interictal hypersensitivity to odors, odor-triggered migraine was described in 30.1%. Median migraine disease duration has been statistically significantly longer in patients who suffered from interictal hypersensitivity to odors (28.5 years vs. 20 years; p = 0.012). There was a significant correlation between interictal hypersensitivity and higher age (54.50 vs. 45; p = 0.015). Patients with higher migraine disability in MIDAS experienced more frequently preictal and interictal olfactory sensitization and odor triggered migraine attacks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with longer migraine disease duration and higher migraine-related impairment, osmophobia was more frequently observed. These results might support the hypothesis of increasing sensitization with increasing burden of migraine.

Migraine review for general practice.

Migraine continues second among the world's causes of disability. Diagnosis is based on the history and clinical examination and imaging is usually not necessary. Migraine can be subdivided depending on whether there is an aura or not and based on the frequency of the headaches. The number of headache days determines whether the patient has episodic migraine or chronic migraine. Treating migraines can be done to treatment the migraine itself and to prevent its appearance. In this review we approach the migraine from a practical point of view with updated information.

Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for neuropathic pain in patients with migraine headache.

INTRODUCTION: There is increasing evidence that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a role in the development of neuropathic pain, a common feature of peripheral neuropathy. Although clinical studies have shown that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are highly efficacious for migraine headache prophylaxis, their effects on nonheadache chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain, in humans are unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for neuropathic pain in patients with coexisting chronic migraine. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 14 patients with chronic migraine and peripheral neuropathy. All patients were treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. We collected data on patient-reported scores on the Neuropathy Pain Scale (NPS) and the frequency of migraine headache days (MHDs) per month. Data were collected 3 and 0 months before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment with anti-CGRP medications. RESULTS: With treatment of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, patients reported a 41.7% decrease in NPS scores from 89.3 at baseline to 52.1 at 12 months posttreatment (P < .05). In addition, there was a 33.3% decrease in MHDs per month from 19.8 at baseline to 13.2 at 12 months posttreatment (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Administration of anti-CGRP medications significantly improved neuropathic pain in patients who also had chronic migraine. To confirm these promising outcomes, it would be worthwhile to conduct a blinded, randomized study with a larger population of patients.

Determinants of migraine headache among regular undergraduate students, of Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia: cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of migraine headaches varied from 2.4 to 48.5% worldwide among university students. As per the knowledge of the investigators, the study of migraine headaches is not done in this study area. Hence, this study aimed to assess determinates of migraine headaches among regular undergraduate students, of Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia, 2020. METHOD: Institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from November 15-30 /2020 by using a self-administered questionnaire among 371 regular undergraduate students at Wollo University. A multistage sampling technique was employed to represent our study population. Identity migraine test, Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire, perceived stress scale, and Oslo social support scale was used. Descriptive statistics, binary and multiple logistic regression were employed. The adjusted odds ratio at a 95% confidence interval and level of significance (p-value < 0.05) was used to interpret the findings. RESULTS: From 371 participants, the prevalence of migraine headache in this study was 34% (95% CI: 29.2, 38.5). Variables statistically associated with migraine headache, were a family history of headache (AOR = 3.83, CI: 2.313, 6.366), suicidal thoughts in the past 3 months (AOR = 10.76, CI: 2.117, 54.74), and had low perceived stress 62.6% (AOR = 0.374, CI: 0.205, 0.683). CONCLUSION: In this study, the prevalence of migraine headaches was very high. Family history of headache, suicidal thoughts, and low perceived stress were determinates for migraine headache. So special emphasis shall be given to those participants who had high perceived stress, a family history of migraine headache, and suicidal thoughts.

Initial experience with novel CGRP-receptor inhibitor therapy in Migraine in the United Arab Emirates: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Erenumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-receptor antibody inhibiting CGRP function. CGRP is prominently involved in the pathophysiology of migraine through nociceptive modulation in the trigeminovascular system. This study aims to explore the treatment effect of erenumab in a real-life setting. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 91 patients with migraine receiving at least three consecutive monthly injections of erenumab and followed up for 3-12 months. The primary objective was to describe the reduction in monthly migraine days throughout the follow-up period. To identify patients who responded to treatment, we analyzed the association between different patient characteristics and their treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (80.2%) responded to erenumab treatment, defined as ≥50% reduction of migraine days per month, across all migraine types. It was noted that ethnicity (p-value = 0.015) and older age (p-value = 0.035) were associated with clinically relevant improvement of symptoms. Middle Eastern ethnicity was related to less improvement of symptoms while Europeans were more likely to benefit from erenumab therapy (odds ratio: 12.788, p = 0.037). Patients aged from 31 to 40 and 41-65 years benefited most from erenumab treatment with a response rate of 77.8 and 89.9%, respectively, also confirmed by logistic regression (p = 0.047). Neither gender nor dose increase of erenumab showed association with the reported clinically relevant improvement of the symptoms. An association between clinically relevant improvement of headaches and the type of migraine was also noted. Around 87.9% of patients with episodic migraine responded to treatment, followed by 84.1% of chronic migraine patients and 50% of medication overuse headache patients. Medication overuse headache showed a lower probability of therapy success with erenumab (odds ratio: 0.126, p = 0.039). An improvement of headaches was eminent in patients who received 140 mg erenumab monthly (2 × 70 mg injections) and patients who had one injection every two weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab is a novel preventive treatment for all migraine types. Clinically relevant improvement of headaches and reduction of monthly migraine days were demonstrated in patients that continued the treatment course. In real-life, a substantial number of patients suspended therapy early, reasons for which need further investigation.

Rimegepant Orally Disintegrating Tablet for Acute Migraine Treatment: A Review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of rimegepant for treatment of migraine. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive PubMed and Cochrane search (1985 to May 2020) was performed utilizing the keywords rimegepant, Nurtec, orally disintegrating tablet, migraine, migraine headache, migraine disorder, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist. Additional data were obtained from the references of identified articles, manufacturer's product labeling and website, ClinicalTrials.gov, and governmental sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language trials evaluating oral rimegepant were included for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) is Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of migraine. According to data from 3 phase 3 randomized controlled trials, rimegepant has been shown to significantly improve freedom from pain at 2 hours after the dose and freedom from the most bothersome symptom 2 hours postdose. Additional outcomes improved include freedom from photophobia and phonophobia at 2 hours postdose and pain relief 2 hours after the dose. Adverse effects of rimegepant include nausea, urinary tract infection, and dizziness. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Orally disintegrating rimegepant provides a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of acute migraine. When patients experience inadequate relief from other therapies, have contraindications to triptans, or are unable to tolerate the adverse effects of triptans, rimegepant is a promising therapeutic option. CONCLUSION: Rimegepant ODT is an efficacious migraine treatment option with a novel mechanism of action, convenient dosage form, and limited adverse effect profile.

Coronavirus disease-19 and headache; impact on pre-existing and characteristics of de novo: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Headache is a common symptom during and after Coronavirus disease-19. We aimed to study headache character in relation to COVID-19. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients who had Coronavirus disease-19, confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction technique and presented to the headache clinic within 3 months after the onset of infections were identified to the study. Study included patients diagnosed as primary headache disorders according to The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Participants were grouped into categories according to having previous or de novo headache. Descriptive data, paired sample t-test and the chi-squared test (X2) were used for statistical analyses of the data. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 35.29 + 9.54 and most of them were females (83.5%). Prior to Coronavirus disease-19 infections, 78 (64.5%) had migraine and 11(9.1%) experienced a tension-type headache while 32 (26.4) reported de novo headache post Coronavirus disease-19. Patient had significant increase in headache days 11.09 ± 8.45 post Coronavirus disease-19 compared with 8.66 ± 7.49 headache days before Coronavirus disease-19 infection (p < 0.006). Post Coronavirus disease-19, the usage of analgesic increased significantly by the patient with migraine (2.31 ± 1.65 vs 3.05 ± 2.09, p = 0.002) while the patient with tension type headache had statistically significant increase in severity (5.556 ± 1.86 vs 7 ± 2.25, p = 0.033) and frequency (7 ± 6.29 vs 12.72 ± 7.96, p = 0.006) of headache attacks. Bi-frontal and temporal headache are the most reported (40.6% each) headache site among de novo headache group. Patients younger than 40 years had longer duration of the headache attack (18.50 ± 16.44 vs 5.5 ± 9.07, p = 0.045) post COVID-19. Male patients compared to females (8.66 ± 1.15 versus 5.93 ± 2.01 p = 0.04) had more severe headache post Coronavirus disease-19. De novo headache resolved within 1 month in most of patients (65.3%). CONCLUSION: Primary headache get worse after Coronavirus disease-19. De novo primary headache is frequent post Coronavirus disease-19 and resolve within 1 month. Headaches related to Coronavirus disease-19 are severe, present as migraine phenotype. Young male patients with Coronavirus disease-19 tend to have worse headache.

Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with migraine and history of failure to 3-4 preventive medication categories: subgroup analysis from CONQUER study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) are associated with substantial headache-related disability, poor quality of life and global societal burden. In this subgroup analysis from the CONQUER study, we report efficacy outcomes from a pre-specified analysis of galcanezumab versus placebo in patients with CM or EM and 3-4 prior preventive medication category failures due to inadequate efficacy (after at least 2 months at maximum tolerated dose), or safety or tolerability reasons. The patient population is of particular interest due to evidence of decreased quality of life and increased economic burden among patients with migraine that is inadequately managed and is of interest to decision-makers globally. METHODS: Key outcomes included overall mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days and proportions of patients achieving ≥30% (CM), ≥50%, and ≥ 75% reduction (response rates) in monthly migraine headache days across Months 1-3. Patient functioning and disability were evaluated at Month 3. RESULTS: Of the 462 randomized patients, 186 (40.3%) had a history of 3-4 preventive category failures. Galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significantly (P ≤ .001) larger overall mean reduction in monthly migraine headache days (total: - 5.49 versus - 1.03; CM: - 6.70 versus - 1.56; EM: - 3.64 versus - 0.65). Similarly, the ≥50% response rate was significantly (P ≤ .001) higher with galcanezumab versus placebo (total: 41.0 versus 12.7; CM: 41.5 versus 8.4; EM: 41.1 versus 16.5). In the CM group, the ≥30% response rate was significantly higher in the galcanezumab group than the placebo group (CM, 57.5 versus 19.8, P ≤ .0001) as was the ≥75% response rate (13.3 versus 2.6, P ≤ .05). Galcanezumab also resulted in significant (P < .0001) improvements in patient functioning and reductions in disability. CONCLUSIONS: Galcanezumab was effective in a difficult-to-treat population of patients with CM or EM who had failed 3-4 prior preventive medication categories. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CONQUER. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03559257 .

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Migraine Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Migraine headaches are chronic neurological diseases that reduce the quality of life by causing severe headaches and autonomic nervous system dysfunction, such as facial flushing, nasal stuffiness, and sweating. Their major treatment methods include medication and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT has been used for pain treatment and various psychogenic neurological diseases by reducing pain, disability, and emotional disorders caused by symptoms of mental illness and improving the understanding of mental health. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CBT in treating migraines. Materials and Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched from the date of inception to December 2020. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) using CBT as an intervention for migraine were included. The primary outcome of this study was to determine the frequency of migraines and the intensity of migraines on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the frequency of drug use, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) index. The two authors independently conducted the data extraction and quality assessment of the included RCTs, and conducted meta-analysis with RevMan V.5.4. Results: Among the 373 studies, 11 RCTs were included in this systematic review. Seven out of the 11 RCTs were conducted in the USA, and four were conducted in the UK, Germany, Iran, and Italy, respectively. Headache frequency and MIDAS scores were statistically significant reduced. In the subgroup analysis, headache strength was significantly reduced. Two of the included studies reported adverse effects, including worsening of migraine intensity and frequency, respiratory symptoms, and vivid memory of a traumatic event. Conclusions: CBT for migraine effectively reduced headache frequency and MIDAS score in meta-analysis and headache intensity subgroup analysis, with few adverse events. Additional RCTs with CBT for migraine headaches are needed for a more accurate analysis.

Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Death in Migraine Patients Treated with Triptans.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to determine the strength of association between treatment with triptans and acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death. BACKGROUND: Case reports in the literature have raised concerns over an association between treatment of migraine headaches with triptans and cardiovascular events. This study aims to systematically evaluate this association in a contemporary population-based cohort. We hypothesized that triptan exposure is not associated with increased cardiovascular events. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted within an integrated healthcare delivery system in Southern California. From January 2009 to December 2018, 189,684 patients age ≥18 years had a diagnosis of migraine. In this group, 130,656 were exposed to triptans. Patients treated with triptans were matched 1:1 to those not exposed to triptans by using a propensity score. The primary outcome was acute myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes were heart failure, all-cause death, and combined acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death. RESULTS: The incidence rate of acute myocardial infarction was 0.67 per 1000 person-year in triptan-exposed vs 1.44 per 1000 person-year in not exposed patients. In propensity-matched analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio for triptan exposure was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.08) for acute myocardial infarction; 1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.08) for all-cause death; 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-1.08) for heart failure; and 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1.06) for a composite of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or death. Sensitivity analyses focusing on stratified subgroups based on age, gender, ethnicity, and several cardiac risk factors also revealed no significant association between triptan exposure and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between exposure to triptans and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. These data provide reassurance regarding the cardiovascular safety of utilizing triptans for the medical management of migraine headaches.