Epigenetic analysis of cell-free DNA by fragmentomic profiling.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation patterns contain important molecular information linked to tissues of origin. We explored the possibility of using fragmentation patterns to predict cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) methylation of cfDNA, obviating the use of bisulfite treatment and associated risks of DNA degradation. This study investigated the cfDNA cleavage profile surrounding a CpG (i.e., within an 11-nucleotide [nt] window) to analyze cfDNA methylation. The cfDNA cleavage proportion across positions within the window appeared nonrandom and exhibited correlation with methylation status. The mean cleavage proportion was ∼twofold higher at the cytosine of methylated CpGs than unmethylated ones in healthy controls. In contrast, the mean cleavage proportion rapidly decreased at the 1-nt position immediately preceding methylated CpGs. Such differential cleavages resulted in a characteristic change in relative presentations of CGN and NCG motifs at 5' ends, where N represented any nucleotide. CGN/NCG motif ratios were correlated with methylation levels at tissue-specific methylated CpGs (e.g., placenta or liver) (Pearson's absolute r > 0.86). cfDNA cleavage profiles were thus informative for cfDNA methylation and tissue-of-origin analyses. Using CG-containing end motifs, we achieved an area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.98 in differentiating patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma and enhanced the positive predictive value of nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening (from 19.6 to 26.8%). Furthermore, we elucidated the feasibility of using cfDNA cleavage patterns to deduce CpG methylation at single CpG resolution using a deep learning algorithm and achieved an AUC of 0.93. FRAGmentomics-based Methylation Analysis (FRAGMA) presents many possibilities for noninvasive prenatal, cancer, and organ transplantation assessment.

Placental, maternal, fetal, and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results.

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing.

Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56,110 pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA analysis is offered to pregnant women worldwide to screen for fetal aneuploidies. In noninvasive prenatal testing, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation is measured as a quality control parameter. Given that fetal cell-free DNA originates from the placenta, the fetal fraction might also reflect placental health and maternal pregnancy adaptation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between the fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies opting for noninvasive prenatal testing between June 2018 and June 2019 within the Dutch nationwide implementation study (Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing [TRIDENT]-2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fetal fraction was assessed as a continuous variable and as <10th percentile, corresponding to a fetal fraction <2.5%. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 56,110 pregnancies. In the analysis of fetal fraction as a continuous variable, a decrease in fetal fraction was associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.89-2.78]), small for gestational age neonates <10th percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 [1.28-1.45]) and <2.3rd percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [1.96-3.57]), and spontaneous preterm birth from 24 to 37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). No association was found for fetal congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.00-1.04]), stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]), or neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96-1.08]). Similar associations were found for adverse pregnancy outcomes when fetal fraction was <10th percentile. CONCLUSION: In early pregnancy, a low fetal fraction is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings can be used to expand the potential of noninvasive prenatal testing in the future, enabling the prediction of pregnancy complications and facilitating tailored pregnancy management through intensified monitoring or preventive measures.

Potential efficacy of digital polymerase chain reaction for non-invasive prenatal screening of autosomal aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening. RESULTS: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523.

Clinical evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies in 9,176 Korean pregnant women: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob's syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob's syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation.

Single-molecule sequencing reveals a large population of long cell-free DNA molecules in maternal plasma.

In the field of circulating cell-free DNA, most of the studies have focused on short DNA molecules (e.g., <500 bp). The existence of long cell-free DNA molecules has been poorly explored. In this study, we demonstrated that single-molecule real-time sequencing allowed us to detect and analyze a substantial proportion of long DNA molecules from both fetal and maternal sources in maternal plasma. Such molecules were beyond the size detection limits of short-read sequencing technologies. The proportions of long cell-free DNA molecules in maternal plasma over 500 bp were 15.5%, 19.8%, and 32.3% for the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. The longest fetal-derived plasma DNA molecule observed was 23,635 bp. Long plasma DNA molecules demonstrated predominance of A or G 5' fragment ends. Pregnancies with preeclampsia demonstrated a reduction in long maternal plasma DNA molecules, reduced frequencies for selected 5' 4-mer end motifs ending with G or A, and increased frequencies for selected motifs ending with T or C. Finally, we have developed an approach that employs the analysis of methylation patterns of the series of CpG sites on a long DNA molecule for determining its tissue origin. This approach achieved an area under the curve of 0.88 in differentiating between fetal and maternal plasma DNA molecules, enabling the determination of maternal inheritance and recombination events in the fetal genome. This work opens up potential clinical utilities of long cell-free DNA analysis in maternal plasma including noninvasive prenatal testing of monogenic diseases and detection/monitoring of pregnancy-associated disorders such as preeclampsia.

Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of clinically relevant (sub)microscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with the nuchal translucency (NT) range from 3.0 to 3.4 mm, which would be potentially missed by cfDNA testing. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of 271 fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and increased first trimester combined test (CT) risk in five cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed. RESULTS: A chromosomal aberration was identified in 18.8% fetuses (1:5; 51/271). In 15% (41/271) of cases, trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were found. In 0.7% (2/271) of cases, sex chromosome aneuploidy was found. In 1.1% (3/271) of cases, CNV >10 Mb was detected, which would potentially also be detected by genome-wide cfDNA testing. The residual risk for missing a submicroscopic chromosome aberration in the presented cohorts is 1.8% (1:54; 5/271). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a significant number of fetuses with increased CT risk and presenting NT of 3.0-3.4 mm carry a clinically relevant chromosomal abnormality other than common trisomy. Invasive testing should be offered, and counseling on NIPT should include the test limitations that may result in NIPT false-negative results in a substantial percentage of fetuses.

Comparison of Single Molecule, Real-Time Sequencing and Nanopore Sequencing for Analysis of the Size, End-Motif, and Tissue-of-Origin of Long Cell-Free DNA in Plasma.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies using single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing revealed a substantial population of analyzable long cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma. Potential clinical utilities of such long cfDNA in pregnancy and cancer have been demonstrated. However, the performance of different long-read sequencing platforms for the analysis of long cfDNA remains unknown. METHODS: Size biases of SMRT sequencing by Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and nanopore sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) were evaluated using artificial mixtures of sonicated human and mouse DNA of different sizes. cfDNA from plasma samples of pregnant women at different trimesters, hepatitis B carriers, and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were sequenced with the 2 platforms. RESULTS: Both platforms showed biases to sequence longer (1500 bp vs 200 bp) DNA fragments, with PacBio showing a stronger bias (5-fold overrepresentation of long fragments vs 2-fold in ONT). Percentages of cfDNA fragments 500 bp were around 6-fold higher in PacBio compared with ONT. End motif profiles of cfDNA from PacBio and ONT were similar, yet exhibited platform-dependent patterns. Tissue-of-origin analysis based on single-molecule methylation patterns showed comparable performance on both platforms. CONCLUSIONS: SMRT sequencing generated data with higher percentages of long cfDNA compared with nanopore sequencing. Yet, a higher number of long cfDNA fragments eligible for the tissue-of-origin analysis could be obtained from nanopore sequencing due to its much higher throughput. When analyzing the size and end motif of cfDNA, one should be aware of the analytical characteristics and possible biases of the sequencing platforms being used.

The value of detailed first-trimester ultrasound in the era of noninvasive prenatal testing.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended noninvasive prenatal testing be offered to all patients. However, current societal guidelines in the United States do not universally recommend a detailed first-trimester ultrasound. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the additional findings identified through first-trimester ultrasound that would have otherwise been missed if noninvasive prenatal testing was used alone as a first-trimester screening method. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 2158 pregnant patients and 2216 fetuses that were seen at a single medical center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. All those included underwent both noninvasive prenatal testing and detailed first-trimester ultrasound between 11.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation. Noninvasive prenatal testing results were categorized as low risk or high risk, and first-trimester ultrasound results were categorized as normal or abnormal. Abnormal first-trimester ultrasounds were further classified as first-trimester screening markers (increased nuchal translucency, absent nasal bone, tricuspid regurgitation, and ductus venosus reverse a-wave) or structural defects (the cranium, neck, heart, thorax, abdominal wall, stomach, kidneys, bladder, spine, and extremities). Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings. RESULTS: Of 2216 fetuses, 65 (3.0%) had a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, whereas 2151 (97.0%) had a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result. Of those with a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result, 2035 (94.6%) had a normal first-trimester ultrasound, whereas 116 (5.4%) had at least 1 abnormal finding on first-trimester ultrasound. The most common screening marker detected within the low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing group was absent nasal bone (52/2151 [2.4%]), followed by reversed a-wave of the ductus venosus (30/2151 [1.4%]). The most common structural defect in this group was cardiac abnormality (15/2151 [0.7%]). Overall, 181 fetuses were identified as having "abnormal screening" through either a high-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result (n=65) or through a low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing result but abnormal first-trimester ultrasound (n=116). In summary, the incorporation of first-trimester ultrasound screening identified 116 additional fetuses (5.4%) that required further follow-up and surveillance than noninvasive prenatal testing alone would have identified. CONCLUSION: Detailed first-trimester ultrasound identified more fetuses with a potential abnormality than noninvasive prenatal testing alone. Therefore, first-trimester ultrasound remains a valuable screening method that should be used in combination with noninvasive prenatal testing.

Cytogenetic outcomes following a failed cell-free DNA screen: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 35,146 singleton pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA screening is routinely offered to pregnant individuals to screen for aneuploidies. Although cell-free DNA screening is consistently more accurate than multiple-marker screening, it sometimes fails to yield a result. These test failures and their clinical implications are poorly described in the literature. Some studies suggest that a failed cell-free DNA screening result is associated with increased likelihood of cytogenetic abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The objectives were to determine: (1) the proportion of test failures on first and subsequent attempts, and (2) whether a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt is associated with increased likelihood of common aneuploidies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies). STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry, Better Outcomes Registry and Network Ontario. The study included all singleton pregnancies in Ontario with an estimated date of delivery from September 1, 2016 to March 31, 2019 that had a cell-free DNA screening record in the registry. Specific outcomes (trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies) of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt were compared with those of pregnancies with low-risk cell-free DNA-screening results using modified Poisson regression adjusted for funding status (publicly funded vs self-paid), gestational age at screening, method of conception, and maternal age for autosomal aneuploidies. RESULTS: Our cohort included 35,146 pregnancies that had cell-free DNA screening during the study period. The overall cell-free DNA screening failure rate was 4.8% on first attempt and 2.2% after multiple attempts. An abnormal cytogenetic result for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, or sex chromosome aneuploidies was identified in 19.4% of pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screening for which cytogenetic testing was performed. Pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen on first attempt had a relative risk of 130.3 (95% confidence interval, 64.7-262.6) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13, and a risk difference of 5.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.3), compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result. The risk of sex chromosome aneuploidies was not significantly greater in pregnancies with a failed result compared with pregnancies with a low-risk result (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-7.9; relative difference, 1.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.9 to 3.2). CONCLUSION: Cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeated testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies.

The predictive value of prenatal cell-free DNA testing for rare autosomal trisomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to determine the predictive value of cell-free DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies that reported on the diagnostic accuracy of cell-free DNA in the detection of rare autosomal trisomies were included. Case series were included if they contained at least 10 cases with diagnostic test results or postnatal genetic testing. METHODS: Study appraisal was completed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects meta-analysis of double-arcsine transformed proportions of confirmed results in the fetus out of the positive tests to obtain a pooled estimate of the positive predictive value. RESULTS: The search identified 7553 studies, of which 1852 were duplicates. After screening 5701 titles and abstracts, 380 studies proceeded to the full-text screen; 206 articles were retrieved for data extraction, of which another 175 articles were excluded. A total of 31 studies, with a total of 1703 women were included for analysis. The pooled positive predictive value of cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of rare autosomal trisomies was 11.46% (95% confidence interval, 7.80-15.65). Statistical heterogeneity was high (I2=82%). Sensitivity analysis restricted to 5 studies at low risk of bias demonstrated a pooled positive predictive value of 9.13% (95% confidence interval, 2.49-18.76). There were insufficient data to provide accurate ascertainment of sensitivity and specificity because most studies only offered confirmatory tests to women with high-risk results. CONCLUSION: The positive predictive value of cell-free DNA in diagnosing rare autosomal trisomies is approximately 11%. Clinicians should provide this information when offering cell-free DNA for screening of conditions outside of common autosomal trisomies.

Cell-free DNA screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy: a large multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of cell-free DNA from maternal blood provides effective screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies. Data on cell-free DNA screening in twin gestations are promising although limited. In previous twin studies, cell-free DNA screening was primarily performed in the second trimester and many studies did not report chorionicity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of cell-free DNA for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in a large, diverse cohort. A secondary aim was to evaluate screening performance for trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies from 17 centers for which cell-free DNA screening was performed from December 2011 to February 2020 by one laboratory using massively parallel sequencing technology. Medical record review was conducted for all newborns and data on the birth outcome, the presence of any congenital abnormalities, phenotypic appearance at birth, and any chromosomal testing that was undertaken in the antenatal or postnatal period were extracted. Cases with a possible fetal chromosomal abnormality with no genetic test results were reviewed by a committee of maternal-fetal medicine geneticists. Cases with a vanishing twin and inadequate follow-up information were excluded. A minimum of 35 confirmed cases of trisomy 21 was required to capture a sensitivity of at least 90% with a prevalence of at least 1.9% with 80% power. Test characteristics were calculated for each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1764 samples were sent for twin cell-free DNA screening. Of those, 78 cases with a vanishing twin and 239 cases with inadequate follow-up were excluded, leaving a total of 1447 cases for inclusion in the analysis. The median maternal age was 35 years and the median gestational age at cell-free DNA testing was 12.3 weeks. In total, 81% of the twins were dichorionic. The median fetal fraction was 12.4%. Trisomy 21 was detected in 41 of 42 pregnancies, yielding a detection rate of 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 83.8-99.7). There was 1 false negative and no false positive cases. Trisomy 21 was detected in 38 out of 39 dichorionic twin pregnancies, yielding a detection rate of 97.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.6-99.7). Trisomy 18 was detected in 10 of the 10 affected pregnancies. There was 1 false positive case. Trisomy 13 was detected in 4 of the 5 cases, yielding a detection rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 11.1-99.2). There was one false negative and no false positive cases. The nonreportable rate was low at 3.9 %. CONCLUSION: Cell-free DNA testing is effective in screening for trisomy 21 in twin gestations from the first trimester of pregnancy. Detection of trisomy 21 was high in dichorionic and monochorionic twins, and the nonreportable result rates were low. This study included high numbers of cases of trisomy 18 and 13 when compared with the current literature. Although screening for these conditions in twins seems to be promising, the numbers were too small to make definitive conclusions regarding the screening efficacy for these conditions. It is possible that cell-free DNA testing performance may differ among laboratories and vary with screening methodologies.

Noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonographic findings and poor prenatal diagnosis rates for twin pregnancies: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly used in the clinical prenatal screening of twin pregnancies, and its screening performance for chromosomal abnormalities requires further evaluation. For twin pregnancies with indications for prenatal diagnosis, there is a lack of clinical data to assess the prenatal diagnosis rate (PDR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of NIPT for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and the PDR in the second and third trimesters. METHODS: Ultrasound scans were carried out for all twin pregnancies between 11 and 13+ 6 gestational weeks. For twin pregnancies with nuchal translucency thickness˂3.0 mm and no foetal structural malformations, NIPT was performed after blood sampling, followed by routine ultrasound monitoring. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent NIPT at the prenatal diagnostic centre of Xiangya Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022 were included in the study. Genetic counselling was offered to each pregnant woman when the NIPT result indicated a high risk of abnormalities or abnormal ultrasonographic (USG) findings were detected. We followed up twin pregnancies for NIPT results, USG findings, prenatal diagnosis results and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: In 1754 twin pregnancies, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of NIPT for trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.9% and 75%, and the corresponding values for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were 100%, 99.9% and 50%, respectively. For the 14 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a high risk of abnormalities, the PDR was 78.6% (11/14). For the 492 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a low risk of abnormalities, the rate of USG findings in the second and third trimesters was 39.4% (194/492); of these pregnancies, prenatal diagnosis was recommended for 16.7% (82/492), but it was actually performed in only 8.3% (41/492), and the PDR was 50% (41/82). There was no significant difference in the PDR between the NIPT high-risk and low-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The screening performance of NIPT for SCA in twin pregnancies needs to be further evaluated. When abnormal NIPT results or USG findings are used as the main prenatal diagnostic indicator in the second and third trimesters, the PDR is poor.

Detecting mitochondrial mutations associated with aminoglycoside ototoxicity by noninvasive prenatal testing.

OBJECTIVES: Numerous diseases and disorders are associated with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations, among which m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T mutations in the 12 S ribosomal RNA gene contribute to aminoglycoside-induced and nonsyndromic hearing loss worldwide. METHODS: A total of 76,842 qualified non-invasive prenatal (NIPT) samples were subjected to mtDNA mutation and haplogroup analysis. RESULTS: We detected 181 m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T mutations, 151 of which were subsequently sequenced for full-length mitochondrial genome verification. The positive predictive values for the m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T mutations were 90.78% and 90.00%, respectively, a performance comparable to that attained with newborn hearing screening. Furthermore, mitochondrial haplogroup analysis revealed that the 12 S rRNA 1555A > G mutation was enriched in sub-haplotype D5[p = 0, OR = 4.6706(2.81-7.78)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal plasma can successfully detect m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T mutations.

High rates of "atypical" single nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal screening results among consanguineous Arab American patients: A single center retrospective study.

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), using placental cell-free DNA from a maternal blood sample, is currently the most sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting common fetal aneuploidies. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of "atypical" single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPS results and subsequent pregnancy outcomes between Arab American and non-Arab American patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant Arab and non-Arab American patients who had SNP-based NIPS performed between September 2018 and January 2021 at an urban health system in Michigan. The rate of "atypical" results and other perinatal outcomes were compared between groups using descriptive statistics. "Atypical" results due to multifetal gestations, either undisclosed or unknown at time of ordering, were excluded. Five thousand eight hundred and seventy-three patients underwent SNP-based NIPS: 771 (13.1%) were identified as Arab American, 5102 (86.9%) were non-Arab American, and 49 (0.8%) patients received "atypical" results. Arab patients represented only 13.1% of patients screened (771/5873) but had a significantly higher rate of "atypical" results than non-Arab American patients (17/771 [2.2%] vs. 32/5102 [0.6%]; p < 0.001). Of the 17 Arab patients with "atypical" results, 9 (52.9%) were in known consanguineous relationships. No major congenital anomalies or chromosomal aberrations were identified for any patients who had "atypical" results, and no significant differences in other perinatal outcomes were observed between Arab and non-Arab American patients. A better understanding of the association between consanguinity and "atypical" SNP-based NIPS results would aid in appropriate test selection and interpretation and may help physicians and genetic counselors provide better perinatal counseling and follow-up care for patients in consanguineous relationships.

Identification and characterization of extrachromosomal circular DNA in maternal plasma.

We explored the presence of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) in the plasma of pregnant women. Through sequencing following either restriction enzyme or Tn5 transposase treatment, we identified eccDNA molecules in the plasma of pregnant women. These eccDNA molecules showed bimodal size distributions peaking at ∼202 and ∼338 bp with distinct 10-bp periodicity observed throughout the size ranges within both peaks, suggestive of their nucleosomal origin. Also, the predominance of the 338-bp peak of eccDNA indicated that eccDNA had a larger size distribution than linear DNA in human plasma. Moreover, eccDNA of fetal origin were shorter than the maternal eccDNA. Genomic annotation of the overall population of eccDNA molecules revealed a preference of these molecules to be generated from 5'-untranslated regions (5'-UTRs), exonic regions, and CpG island regions. Two sets of trinucleotide repeat motifs flanking the junctional sites of eccDNA supported multiple possible models for eccDNA generation. This work highlights the topologic analysis of plasma DNA, which is an emerging direction for circulating nucleic acid research and applications.

Prenatal diagnosis of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities: a 10-year experience from a tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency and profile of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities detected in prenatal diagnosis over the past 10 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed pregnancies diagnosed with non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities between January 2012 and December 2021, using karyotyping and/or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Maternal age, indications for testing, and outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Traditional karyotyping identified 269 (0.90 %) cases of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities among 29,832 fetuses, including 249 cases of numerical abnormalities, 15 unbalanced structural abnormalities, and 5 balanced structural abnormalities. The overall detection rate of common sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) was 0.81 %, with 47,XXY, 47,XXX, 47,XYY, and 45,X accounting for 0.32 , 0.19, 0.17, and 0.13 % respectively. All showed a fluctuating upward trend over the study period, except for 45,X. During the first five years (2012-2016), the major indication for testing was advanced maternal age (AMA), followed by abnormal ultrasound, abnormal noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and abnormal maternal serum screening (MSS). In the second five years (2017-2021), the most frequent indication was abnormal NIPT, followed by AMA, abnormal ultrasound, and abnormal MSS. Among the 7,780 cases that underwent SNP array in parallel, an additional 29 clinically significant aberrations were detected. The most frequent aberration was a microdeletion in the Xp22.31 region, which was associated with X-linked ichthyosis. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal sex chromosome abnormalities are important findings in prenatal diagnosis. The application of NIPT and SNP array technology has greatly improved the detection of SCAs and submicroscopic aberrations associated with sex chromosomes.

Change in client choice under multiple prenatal genetic testing options including noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) after genetic counseling in a Japanese maternity hospital.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined how clients' selection and preference for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy changed with genetic counseling (GC) performed by certified geneticists at a primary hospital specializing in obstetrics, where other multiple prenatal genetic tests options were available. METHODS: A total of 334 couples who underwent GC between 2017 and 2019 were included in the study. The average age of the pregnant women who underwent GC was 35.1 years. RESULTS: Among the 95 couples (28.4%) who wanted NIPT at the start of GC, 10 (10.5%) switched to other tests, and 4 (4.2%) chose not to undergo any test. Among the 106 (31.7%) couples who wanted the combination of ultrasonography and the serum marker test, 12 (11.3%) chose not to undergo the test. Among the 92 (27.5%) couples who were undecided before GC, 21 (22.8%) wanted NIPT, 31 (33.7%) selected combined tests, and 18 (19.6%) did not undergo any test. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the significance of GC before prenatal genetic testing under widespread use of NIPT. Ideally, obstetric facilities should provide GC, or at least, pre-counseling at their own facilities, and offer multiple prenatal genetic testing options or refer to other facilities for the same.

Performance of noninvasive prenatal testing for twin pregnancies in South China.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs) in twin pregnancies. METHOD: A cohort of 2010 women with twin pregnancies was recruited. 1331 patients opted for NIPT, and 679 patients opted for expanded NIPT (NIPT-plus). All high-risk patients were advised to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis. All participants were followed up until 6 months after birth. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were predicted to have a high risk of chromosome abnormalities by NIPT, of which 14 pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis. The 14 cases included 3 cases of trisomy 21, 1 case of trisomy 18, 1 case of trisomy 7, 2 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs), and 7 cases of CNVs, of which the confirmed cases numbered 2, 1, 0, 1, and 0, respectively. Twenty cases were predicted to have a high risk of chromosome abnormalities by NIPT-plus, of which 16 pregnant women underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis. The 16 cases included 1 case of trisomy 21, 1 case of trisomy 7, 7 cases of SCAs, and 7 cases of CNVs, of which were confirmed in 1, 0, 3, and 2, respectively. No false-negative result was reported during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The NIPT/NIPT-plus has excellent performance in the detection of chromosome aneuploidies in twin pregnancies. But for CNVs, the effectiveness of NIPT is poor, and the NIPT-plus have a certain detection efficiency. It is worth noting that pre- and post-genetic counseling is especially important, and the chorionicity, mode of conception, clinical indications, and fetal fraction should be considered as influencing factors.

Combined fetal fraction to analyze the Z-score accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the correlation combined fetal fraction and Z-score for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 of NIPT by the semiconductor sequencing platform and further analyze the differences of different sequencing depths. METHODS: A cohort of 61,581 pregnancies were recruited for NIPT. Invasive prenatal diagnostic confirmation is recommended in all high-risk NIPT cases. Logistic regression and rank correlation analysis were applied to analyze the relationship between different parameters. ROC curve analysis was adopted to analyze the cutoff values of Z-score and fetal fraction. RESULTS: A total of 278 common trisomy pregnancies were verified in 377 NIPT-positive results. The fitted logistic regression models revealed that Z-scores of NIPT-positive results were significantly associated with PPVs (p < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value of Z-scores for T21, T18, and T13 was 7.597, 4.944, and 9.135 for NIPT and 9.489, 8.004, and 12.4 for NIPT-plus. If combing fetal fraction as another evaluation factor, the PPV of trisomy 21 gradually improved. We analyzed the correlation between the fetal fraction and the PPV, which revealed that the fetal fraction was significantly correlated with PPV. By analyzing the PPV of different groups divided by the associated criteria obtained from ROC curve, the PPV of high Z-score and high fetal fraction is higher in groups of Z-score > the optimal cutoff value. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the fetal fraction is significantly correlated with the PPV. Combining fetal fraction with Z-score is significantly better than in groups of Z-score-associated criteria; clinicians can give more accurate and efficient prenatal genetic counseling.