Alcohol-related posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a case report of a patient managed with a benzodiazepine-sparing regimen for alcohol withdrawal.

We report a case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) during treatment for alcohol withdrawal syndrome with gabapentin and clonidine. The patient developed severe hypertension, confusion and tremor, culminating in bilateral vision loss and a seizure. Imaging revealed posterior cerebral edema. Treatment with benzodiazepines, antihypertensives, and anti-seizure medications led to resolution. One year later, imaging showed resolution of the findings. We review the associated literature and propose the recognition of a PRES sub-entity, Alcohol-Related PRES (ARPRES), which can appear in the setting of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, chronic alcohol use, and acute alcohol intoxication, with or without hypertension.

Usefulness of Gabapentin as an Alternative/Adjunct Therapy for Delirium: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are commonly used to treat delirium but can adversely affect the extrapyramidal and cardiac conduction systems. Antipsychotic use has also been reported to be associated with increased mortality in older adults. Therefore, alternative and adjunct medications for delirium are necessary. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP) as an alternative and adjunct medication for delirium. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the records of patients with delirium treated with GBP (71 patients; median age, 81 years; interquartile range, 76-87.5 years; 54.9% males) at a general hospital. We examined duration to delirium improvement, as assessed by the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and DSM-5 criteria, as well as adverse events. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) GBP dose was 200 mg (150-350 mg) /day. A total of 71.8% and 85.9% of the patients failed to meet the diagnostic criteria for delirium at 2 days and 5 days after initial administration, respectively (p<0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with a history of epilepsy or cerebrovascular disease responded better to GBP than did those without such histories, suggesting that patients with abnormal/borderline neuronal activity respond to GBP even though they do not exhibit seizures. GBP did not induce extrapyramidal symptoms, cardiac conduction disturbances, hyperglycemia, or epilepsy but caused sleepiness and myoclonus. CONCLUSIONS: GBP may improve delirium with fewer adverse effects and may be a safe alternative or adjunct treatment for delirium. Dosage adjustment may be necessary to prevent sleepiness.

GABA Analogue HSK16149 in Chinese Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) experience inadequate relief, despite best available medical treatments. There are no approved and effective therapies for patients with DPNP in China. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capsules containing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue HSK16149 in the treatment of Chinese patients with DPNP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2 to 3 adaptive randomized clinical trial was multicenter, double blind, and placebo and pregabalin controlled. The trial started on December 10, 2020, and concluded on July 8, 2022. In stage 1, various doses of HSK16149 were evaluated to determine safety and efficacy for stage 2. The second stage then validated the efficacy and safety of the recommended dose. Intervention: In stage 1, enrolled patients (n = 363) were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1 to 4 HSK16149 doses (40, 80, 120, or 160 mg/d), pregabalin (300 mg/d), or placebo. In stage 2, patients (n = 362) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive HSK16149, 40 or 80 mg/d, or placebo. The final efficacy and safety analysis pooled data from patients receiving the same treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point in stage 1 was the change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 5. The primary efficacy end point in stage 2 was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 13. When the final statistical analysis was performed, the P values calculated from the independent data of each phase were combined using the weighted inverse normal method to make statistical inferences. Results: Of 725 randomized patients in the full-analysis set (393 men [54.2%]; mean [SD] age, 58.80 [9.53] years; 700 [96.6%] of Han Chinese ethnicity), 177 received placebo; 178, HSK16149, 40 mg/d; 179, HSK16149, 80 mg/d; 66, HSK16149, 120 mg/d; 63, HSK16149, 160 mg/d; and 62, pregabalin, 300 mg/d. A total of 644 patients (88.8%) completed the study. The 40- and 80-mg/d doses of HSK16149 were recommended in stage 2. At week 13, the ADPS mean (SD) change from baseline was -2.24 (1.55) for the 40-mg/d and -2.16 (1.79) for 80-mg/d groups and -1.23 (1.68) for the placebo group, showing statistical significance for both HSK16149 doses vs placebo (both P < .001). In a safety set (n = 726), 545 patients (75.1%) had adverse events, which were generally mild to moderate, with dizziness and somnolence being the most common. Conclusions and Relevance: Forty- and eighty-mg/d doses of HSK16149 were recommended for treating patients with DPNP in China. The efficacy of HSK16149 capsules was superior to placebo in all groups for relieving DPNP and appeared well tolerated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04647773.

Orally administered gabapentin and alprazolam induce comparable levels of anxiolysis and sedation in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of anxiolysis achieved by alprazolam and gabapentin in hospitalized cats prior to elective ovariohysterectomy and to evaluate the sedative effects of these agents. ANIMALS: 60 client-owned female cats classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, admitted for elective ovariohysterectomy at a veterinary teaching hospital. METHODS: The cats were prospectively and randomly allocated into 3 groups. Ninety minutes before evaluation, group G received gabapentin (100 mg/cat), group A received alprazolam (0.125 mg/cat), and group P received no medication (placebo). Stress, enclosure activity, and sedation scores were blindly evaluated. RESULTS: Stress scores were similar in cats treated with gabapentin and alprazolam and gabapentin-treated cats had significantly lower stress score than those of the placebo group. Enclosure activity levels did not differ among the groups. Additionally, gabapentin and alprazolam resulted in similar sedation levels 90 minutes after treatment, which differed significantly compared to placebo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that gabapentin provides similar anxiolysis in cats to that of alprazolam when evaluated 90 minutes after administration. Although no difference was noted in sedation levels between gabapentin and alprazolam, both induced deeper sedation than placebo.

Use of kersetin and fisetin flavonoids in combination with pregabalin and gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

We purposed to explore the consequences of the use quercetin and fisetin alone and in combination with pregabalin and gabapentin, which are used in the management of neuropathic pain, and on neuropathic pain in general. The anti-allodynic effect of various doses (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) of quercetin and fisetin, both singly and in combination with pregabalin and gabapentin, was evaluated by developing a neuropathic pain model induced by chronic constrictive nerve damage in rats. The effectiveness of these flavonoids was investigated by combining them with gabapentin (50 mg/kg) and pregabalin (15 mg/kg), choosing the effectual dose of 10 mg/kg and the dose of 5 mg/kg, which did not show significant antiallodynic effects. In groups combined with gabapentin and pregabalin, it was determined that they showed a significant antiallodynic effect compared with 50 mg/kg gabapentin and 15 mg/kg pregabalin. In conclusion, in our combination studies, it was observed that the effectiveness of gabapentin and pregabalin, was increased and the duration of effect was prolonged when used with lower doses of flavonoids. Based on these findings; it is possible to say that quercetin and fisetin are potential agents that can be used alone or in combination with other effective treatments to alleviate neuropathic pain.

Discriminative stimulus properties of two training doses of gabapentin in rats: Substitution by pregabalin, diazepam, and pentobarbital.

Gabapentin is used for the treatment of many conditions, including seizures, pain, and anxiety. Increasing reports of nonprescribed use suggest that gabapentin may elicit positive subjective effects. The present study was conducted to examine the subjective effects of gabapentin using rats trained to discriminate either a 30.0 mg/kg or 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin versus vehicle on a two-choice drug discrimination task. Both doses of gabapentin were established as discriminative stimuli, and the 300.0 mg/kg dose was more readily established compared to the 30.0 mg/kg dose. Full substitution (> 80% gabapentin-lever responding) occurred by the training drug and by the gabapentinoid compound pregabalin. Partial substitution (> 20% gabapentin-lever responding) was shown by the opioid compounds morphine and fentanyl, and dose combinations of the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone with the gabapentin training doses reduced the percentage of gabapentin-lever responding to below 80%. Partial substitution for both training doses of gabapentin occurred with the cannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. The barbiturate compound pentobarbital and the benzodiazepine compound diazepam were only tested for substitution for the 300.0 mg/kg dose of gabapentin and these compounds produced full substitution. These findings demonstrate that gabapentin establishes a robust discriminative cue and exhibits stimulus effects closely similar to pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam. Since pregabalin, pentobarbital, and diazepam carry a risk of problematic use and are classified as controlled substances, further evaluations of gabapentin's risks in this regard are warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Effect of preoperative gabapentin on pain intensity and development of chronic pain after carpal tunnel syndrome surgical treatment in women: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study / Efeito da gabapentina pré-operatória na intensidade da dor e desenvolvimento de dor crônica após o tratamento cirúrgico da síndrome do túnel do carpo em mulheres: estudo randomizado duplo-cego controlado com placebo

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: Effective postoperative analgesia is important for reducing the incidence of chronic pain. This study evaluated the effect of preoperative gabapentin on postoperative analgesia and the incidence of chronic pain among patients undergoing carpal tunnel syndrome surgical treatment. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Randomized, double-blind controlled trial, Federal University of São Paulo Pain Clinic. METHODS: Forty patients aged 18 years or over were randomized into two groups: Gabapentin Group received 600 mg of gabapentin preoperatively, one hour prior to surgery, and Control Group received placebo. All the patients received intravenous regional anesthesia comprising 1% lidocaine. Midazolam was used for sedation if needed. Paracetamol was administered for postoperative analgesia as needed. Codeine was used additionally if the paracetamol was insufficient. The following were evaluated: postoperative pain intensity (over a six-month period), incidence of postoperative neuropathic pain (over a six-month period), need for intraoperative sedation, and use of postoperative paracetamol and codeine. The presence of neuropathic pain was established using the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4) questionnaire. Complex regional pain syndrome was diagnosed using the Budapest questionnaire. RESULTS: No differences in the need for sedation, control over postoperative pain or incidence of chronic pain syndromes (neuropathic or complex regional pain syndrome) were observed. No differences in postoperative paracetamol and codeine consumption were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative gabapentin (600 mg) did not improve postoperative pain control, and did not reduce the incidence of chronic pain among patients undergoing carpal tunnel syndrome surgery.

RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVOS: Analgesia pós-operatória eficaz é importante para reduzir a incidência de dor crônica. Este estudo avaliou o efeito da gabapentina pré-operatória na analgesia pós-operatória e na incidência de dor crônica em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia para tratamento da síndrome do túnel do carpo. DESENHO E LOCAL: Randomizado, duplo cego, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. MÉTODOS: Os 40 pacientes com 18 anos ou mais de idade foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: o Grupo Gabapentina recebeu 600 mg de gabapentina no pré-operatório uma hora antes da cirurgia, e o Grupo Controle recebeu placebo. Todos os pacientes receberam anestesia regional intravenosa com lidocaína a 1%. Midazolam foi utilizado para sedação, se necessário. Paracetamol foi administrado para analgesia pós-operatória, conforme necessário, e codeína, se o paracetamol fosse insuficiente. Foram avaliados: a intensidade da dor pós-operatória (durante seis meses), a incidência de dor neuropática pós-operatória (durante seis meses), a necessidade de sedação intra-operatória e o uso de paracetamol e codeína no pós-operatório. A presença de dor neuropática foi estabelecida utilizando-se o questionário DN4 (dor neuropática 4). Síndrome de dor regional complexa foi diagnosticada através do questionário Budapeste. RESULTADOS: Não foram observadas diferenças na necessidade de sedação, no controle da dor pós-operatória e na incidência de síndromes dolorosas crônicas (neuropáticas ou síndrome de dor regional complexa). Não foram observadas diferenças no consumo de paracetamol e codeína. CONCLUSÕES: Gabapentina pré-operatória (600 mg) não melhorou o controle da dor pós-operatória e não reduziu a incidência de dor crônica em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia para tratamento da síndrome do túnel do carpo.

Efficacy of Combination of Meloxicam and Pregabalin for Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritic pain is largely considered to be inflammatory pain. Sensory nerve fibers innervating the knee have been shown to be significantly damaged in rat models of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in which the subchondral bone junction is destroyed, and this induces neuropathic pain (NP). Pregabalin was developed as a pain killer for NP; however, there are no reports on pregabalin use in OA patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of pregabalin for pain in OA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine knee OA patients were evaluated in this randomized prospective study. Patients were divided into meloxicam, pregabalin, and meloxicam+pregabalin groups. Pain scores were evaluated before and 4 weeks after drug application using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Pain scales among groups were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Before drug application, there was no significant difference in VAS and WOMAC scores among the three groups (p>0.05). Significant pain relief was seen in the meloxicam+pregabalin group in VAS at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and WOMAC score at 4 weeks, compared with the other groups (p0.05). CONCLUSION: Meloxicam+pregabalin was effective for pain in OA patients. This finding suggests that OA pain is a combination of inflammatory and NP.

Protective Effects of Gabapentin on Allodynia and alpha2delta1-Subunit of Voltage-dependent Calcium Channel in Spinal Nerve-Ligated Rats

This study was designed to determine whether early gabapentin treatment has a protective analgesic effect on neuropathic pain and compared its effect to the late treatment in a rat neuropathic model, and as the potential mechanism of protective action, the alpha2delta1-subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channel (alpha2delta1-subunit) was evaluated in both sides of the L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Neuropathic pain was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by a surgical ligation of left L5 nerve. For the early treatment group, rats were injected with gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally 15 min prior to surgery and then every 24 hr during postoperative day (POD) 1-4. For the late treatment group, the same dose of gabapentin was injected every 24 hr during POD 8-12. For the control group, L5 nerve was ligated but no gabapentin was administered. In the early treatment group, the development of allodynia was delayed up to POD 10, whereas allodynia was developed on POD 2 in the control and the late treatment group (p<0.05). The alpha2delta1-subunit was up-regulated in all groups, however, there was no difference in the level of the alpha2delta1-subunit among the three groups. These results suggest that early treatment with gabapentin offers some protection against neuropathic pain but it is unlikely that this action is mediated through modulation of the alpha2delta1-subunit in DRG.

The Interaction of Gabapentin and N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA) on Mechanical Allodynia in Rats with a Spinal Nerve Ligation

We examined the antiallodynic interaction between gabapentin and adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA), in a rat model of nerve ligation injury. Rats were prepared with ligation of left L5-6 spinal nerves and intrathecal catheter implantation for drug administration. Mechanical allodynia was measured by applying von Frey filaments. Gabapentin and R-PIA were administered to obtain the dose-response curve and the 50% effective dose (ED50). Fractions of ED50s were administered concurrently to establish the ED50 of the drug combination. The drug interaction between gabapentin and R-PIA was analyzed using the isobolographic method. Adenosine A1 receptor antagonist was administered intrathecally to examine the reversal of the antiallodynic effect. Locomotor function changes were evaluated by rotarod testing. Intrathecal gabapentin and R-PIA and their combination produced a dose-dependent antagonism against mechanical allodynia without severe side effects. Intrathecal gabapentin synergistically enhanced the antiallodynic effect of R-PIA when coadministered. There were no significant changes in rotarod performance time, except gabapentin 300 microgram. In the combination group, the maximal antiallodynic effect was reversed by A1 adenosine receptor antagonist. These results suggest that activation of adenosine A1 receptors at the spinal level is required for the synergistic interaction on the mechanical allodynia.

The antidotal effects of high-dosage gamma-aminobutyric acid on acute tetramine poisoning as compared with sodium dimercaptopropane sulfonate / 华中科技大学学报（医学）（英德文版）

To investigate the therapeutic effect of high-dosage gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on acute tetramine (TET) poisoning, 50 Kunming mice were divided into 5 groups at random and the antidotal effects of GABA or sodium dimercaptopropane sulfonate (Na-DMPS) on poisoned mice in different groups were observed in order to compare the therapeutic effects of high-dosage GABA with those of Na-DMPS. Slices of brain tissue of the poisoned mice were made to examine pathological changes of cells. The survival analysis was employed. Our results showed that both high-dosage GABA and Na-DMPS could obviously prolong the survival time, delay onset of convulsion and muscular twitch, and ameliorate the symptoms after acute tetramine poisoning in the mice. Better effects could be achieved with earlier use of high dosage GABA or Na-DMPS. There was no significant difference in prolonging the survival time between high-dose GABA and Na-DMPS used immediately after poisioning. It is concluded that high-dosage GABA can effectively antagonize acute toxicity of teramine in mice. And it is suggested that high-dosage GABA may be used as an excellent antidote for acute TET poisoning in clinical practice. The indications and correct dosage for clinical use awaits to be further studied.

La insulinoterapia intensificada más antineuríticos es superior a antineurítico puro en neuropatía diabética dolorosa / Intensified insulin therapy plus antineuritic medication is more effective than antineuritics alone in painful diabetic neuropathy

Background: The basis of the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is the use of drugs that block the transmission of pain (antineuritics) and a good metabolic control of underlying disease. Aim: To describe the outcomes of 17 type-2 diabetics with painful neuropathy, treated between 1988 and 2005 with symptomatic therapy plus intensified insulin. Material and methods: Review of medical records of 17 type-2 diabetic patients, aged 63±11 years and a duration of diabetes of 15±8 years. All patients received intensified insulin therapy with 0.35 units/kg of NPH insulin (2/3 before breakfast and 1/3 evening meal), plus capillary glucose measurements and regular insulin (with sliding-scale centered in ~0.1 units/kg) before the 3 main meals. All patients were also treated with gabapentin, nortriptyline or clomipramine. Pain was assessed using a visual analog score of 10 points. Results: After 1 year, glycosilated hemoglobin decreased from 10.0±1.4 percent to 7.7±1.2 percent (p~=0.003). Pain decreased from 10 to 5.1±3.3 at one month, 2.3±3.2 at six months, and 3.1±3.6 at 1 year (p <0.01). There was a direct statistical correlation between the reduction of HbA1C and pain decline (r =0.736; p =0.037). Pain scores were lower than those reported elsewhere for Pregabalin (n =76; p =0.05), Lamotrigine (n =27; p <0.0005), Topiramate (n =208; p <0.005), and Gabapentin (n =84; p <0.025). The lack of difference to Sodium Valproate (n =21; p =0.07) had borderline significance. Conclusions: The addition of intensified insulin therapy to the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in type-2 diabetics, significantly enhanced the reduction of pain. The lowering of glycosilated hemoglobin was a significant predictor of success in pain reduction.

Antinociceptive Interactions between Intrathecal Gabapentin and MK801 or NBQX in Rat Formalin Test

Antagonists for spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and amino-hydroxy-methtyl-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) receptors are effective in attenuating acute nociception or injury-induced hyperalgesia. The antinociception of spinal gabapentin is developed in injury-induced hyperalgesia without affecting acute nociception. The authors evaluated the effects of intrathecal gabapentin, NMDA antagonist (MK801) and AMPA antagonist (NBQX) in the formalin test which shows injury-induced hyperalgesia as well as acute pain. We further assessed the interactions between gabapentin and either MK801 or NBQX. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with intrathecal catheters. To evoke pain, 50 microliter of 5% formalin solution was injected into the hindpaw. The interaction was investigated by a fixed dose analysis or an isobolographic analysis. MK801 and NBQX suppressed flinching responses during phase 1 of the formalin test, while gabapentin had little effect on phase 1. All three agents decreased the phase 2 flinching response. A fixed dose analysis in phase 1 showed that gabapentin potentiated the antinociceptive effect of MK801 and NBQX. Isobolographic analysis in phase 2 revealed a synergistic interaction after coadministration of gabapentin-MK801 or gabapentin-NBQX. Correspondingly, spinal gabapentin with NMDA or AMPA antagonist may be useful in managing acute pain and injury-induced hyperalgesia.

Interaction between Intrathecal Gabapentin and Adenosine in the Formalin Test of Rats

Spinal gabapentin and adenosine have been known to display an antinociceptive effect. We evaluated the nature of the interaction between gabapentin and adenosine in formalin-induced nociception at the spinal level. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared for intrathecal catheterization. Pain was evoked by injection of formalin solution (5%, 50 microliter) into the hindpaw. After examination of the effects of gabapentin and adenosine, the resulting interaction was investigated with isobolographic and fractional analyses. Neither gabapentin nor adenosine affected motor function. Gabapentin or adenosine decreased the sum of the number of flinches during phase 2, but not during phase 1 in the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis, in phase 2, revealed an additive interaction between gabapentin and adenosine. Taken together, intrathecal gabapentin and adenosine attenuated the facilitated state and interacted additively with each other.

Efectividad y seguridad de gabapentina y pregabalina como monoterapia de primera línea en adultos con dolor neuropático / Effectiveness and safety of gabapentin and pregabalin as first-line monotherapy in adults with neuropathic pain

Antecedentes: Descripción de la condición de salud de interés: La Asociación Internacional del Estudio del Dolor en el año 2011 definió el dolor neuropático como una afección neurológica crónica causado por una lesión o enfermedad del sistema nervioso. Se debe a una lesión o mal funcionamiento del sistema nervioso, a un daño del nervio en sí (u otra parte del sistema sensorial) y no a una activación anormal de las vías nociceptoras. El mecanismo generador del dolor neuropático se halla en cualquier sitio a lo largo del recorrido de las vías nociceptivas (las vías que conducen la información de tipo doloroso), sin estimular inicialmente a los nociceptores (los receptores de dolor), a diferencia de lo que sucede con el dolor nociceptivo o fisiológico. Descripción de las tecnologías: Gabapentina y pregabalina son medicamentos anticonvulsivantes empleados en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático; a ctúan disminuyendo la liberación de neurotransmisores excitadores, lo que reduce la entrada de calcio en las terminaciones nerviosas. Las dos tecnologías tienen registro sanitario INVIMA para la indicación de interés. Evaluación de efectividad y seguridad: Pregunta de evaluación: En adultos con dolor neuropático, ¿cuál es la efectividad y seguridad de gabapentina y pregabalina comparadas con amitriptilina, oxcarbazepina, duloxetina, tramadol (sólo o en combinaciones) o lidocaína en parches, como monoterapia de primera línea para el alivio del dolor? La pregunta de evaluación fue refinada y validada con base en: autorización de mercadeo de \r\nlas tecnologías para la indicación de interés (registro sanitario INVIMA), listado de medicamentos vitales no disponibles, cobertura de las tecnologías en el Plan Obligatorio de Salud (POS) (Acuerdo 029 de 2011), revisión de grupos terapéuticos (clasificación ATC: Anatomical, Therapeutic, Chemical classification system), recomendaciones de guías de práctica clínica actualizadas, disponibilidad de evidencia sobre efectividad y seguridad (reportes de evaluación de tecnologías y revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura), uso de las tecnologías (listas nacionales de recobro, estadísticas de prescripción, etc), \r\nestudios de carga de enfermedad y consulta con un experto temático (especialista clínico). No se dentificaron otros comparadores relevantes para la evaluación. Población: Adultos con dolor neuropático tipo: Neuropatía diabética periférica; Neuralgia posherpética; Dolor neuropático asociado con lesión de la médula espinal. \r\nLa población se refinó después de revisar la evidencia disponible, considerando además, que los efectos de las tecnologías bajo evaluación podrían diferir entre pacientes con distintos tipos de dolor neuropático. Metodología: Búsqueda de literatura, Búsqueda en bases de datos electrónicas. Conclusiones: En pacientes con neuropatía diabética periférica, gabapentina es una opción con ventajas en efectividad, sin ventajas en seguridad y tolerabilidad. En la misma población, pregabalina sin discriminar por dosis no tiene ventajas en efectividad; en dosis ≥ 300 mg es una opción con ventajas en efectividad, no es segura y no presenta ventajas en tolerabilidad; para dosis ≤ 150 mg la evidencia sobre su efectividad no es concluyente, no presenta ventajas en cuanto a seguridad y tolerabilidad. En pacientes con neuralgia posherpética, la evidencia sobre la efectividad de gabapentina no es concluyente, para el mismo tipo de dolor, pregabalina es una opción desfavorable en términos de efectividad y de seguridad a altas dosis. En pacientes con dolor neuropático asociado con lesión de la médula espinal no se identificó evidencia sobre la efectividad de gabapentina o pregabalina. En la misma población, gabapentina no tiene ventajas en tolerabilidad, por su parte, pregabalina no es segura y no presenta ventajas en tolerabilidad. La calidad de la evidencia para las comparaciones de interés y desenlaces descritos es alta.

Pregabalina / No disponible

No disponible

Eficacia y seguridad del vigabatrin en tratamiento adicionado en pacientes con epilepsia parcial refractaria / Safety and efficacy studies of vigabatrin in combined treatment in patients with partial refractory epilepsy

Los estudios epidemiológicos realizados en las últimas décadas han demostrado que alrededor de las tres cuartas partes de los pacientes epilépticos pueden en la actualidad, ser controlados eficazmente con las drogas anticonvulsivantes. Sin embargo alrededor del 20 A 30 por ciento de los mismos, continúan presentando crisis a pesar de la instauración de un tratamiento farmacológico correcto. La reciente introducción de nuevas drogas, una de las cuales es el vigabatrin, podría constituir un paso adelante hacia el control de algunos de estos pacientes. Con el objetivo de determinar la eficacia y la tolerabilidad de esta droga en pacientes que no habían respondido a tratamientos farmacológicos previos, hemos realizado un estudio prospectivo en 20 pacientes con epilepsia parcial, refractaria al tratamiento farmacológico y por otra parte, hemos analizado el impacto de la misma a nivel del estado de la atención tanto en el plano de la conducta como su correlato electrofisiológico. El 65 por ciento de los pacientes presentó una disminución de más del 50 por ciento de las crisis. Se presentaron efectos adversos en el 35 por ciento de los pacientes. Los efectos adversos más importantes observados por nosotros fueron los efectos centrales. En el estudio de cuantificación de la actividad de base del EEG (qEEG) se observó una disminución de la potencia relativa en las bandas de frecuencia lentas y en aquellos pacientes que presentaron una reducción de las crisis superior al 50 por ciento , una mayor organización de la actividad eléctrica y una mejor ejecución de las pruebas de tiempo de reacción simple y atención selectiva (AU)

Eficacia y seguridad del vigabatrin en tratamiento adicionado en pacientes con epilepsia parcial refractaria / Safety and efficacy studies of vigabatrin in combined treatment in patients with partial refractory epilepsy

Los estudios epidemiológicos realizados en las últimas décadas han demostrado que alrededor de las tres cuartas partes de los pacientes epilépticos pueden en la actualidad, ser controlados eficazmente con las drogas anticonvulsivantes. Sin embargo alrededor del 20 A 30 por ciento de los mismos, continúan presentando crisis a pesar de la instauración de un tratamiento farmacológico correcto. La reciente introducción de nuevas drogas, una de las cuales es el vigabatrin, podría constituir un paso adelante hacia el control de algunos de estos pacientes. Con el objetivo de determinar la eficacia y la tolerabilidad de esta droga en pacientes que no habían respondido a tratamientos farmacológicos previos, hemos realizado un estudio prospectivo en 20 pacientes con epilepsia parcial, refractaria al tratamiento farmacológico y por otra parte, hemos analizado el impacto de la misma a nivel del estado de la atención tanto en el plano de la conducta como su correlato electrofisiológico. El 65 por ciento de los pacientes presentó una disminución de más del 50 por ciento de las crisis. Se presentaron efectos adversos en el 35 por ciento de los pacientes. Los efectos adversos más importantes observados por nosotros fueron los efectos centrales. En el estudio de cuantificación de la actividad de base del EEG (qEEG) se observó una disminución de la potencia relativa en las bandas de frecuencia lentas y en aquellos pacientes que presentaron una reducción de las crisis superior al 50 por ciento , una mayor organización de la actividad eléctrica y una mejor ejecución de las pruebas de tiempo de reacción simple y atención selectiva

Gabapentina en la neuralgia postherpética: estudio controlado con placebo, doble ciego y aleatorizado / Gabapentin in postherpetic neuralgia: a ran domised, double blind and placebo controlled study

Se llevó a cabo un estudio multicéntrico controlado con placebo, doble ciego y aleatorizado, de 7 semanas de duración, para evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la gabapentina a dosis de 1.800 ó 2.400 mg.día- 1 en el tratamiento de la neuralgia postherpética. Un total de 334 hombres y muj e res de al menos 18 años (media 73) recibieron gabapentina 1.800 ó 2.400 mg al día o un placebo en tres tomas fraccionadas, con una pauta de ajuste forzado de dosis. La variable de valoración principal fue el cambio en la puntuación diaria media del dolor registrada en un diario (semana basal frente a semana final). Las variables secundarias fueron la puntuación semanal media de interferencia en el sueño; el Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ); la Clinician Global Impression of Change y la P a t i e n t Global Impression of Change (CGIC/PGIC); la S h o r t F o rm-36 Health Survey (SF-36). A partir de la semana 1, las puntuaciones de dolor mostraron una mejoría significativamente mayor con la gabapentina: la diferencia entre el valor final y el basal fue de -34,5 por ciento para la dosis de 1.800 mg, -34,4 por ciento para la dosis de 2.400 mg, en comparación con -15,7 por ciento para el grupo de placebo. La diferencia respecto al placebo fue de un 18,8 por ciento para la dosis de 1.800 (intervalo de confianza del 95 por ciento, 10,9-26,8 por ciento; p < 0,01) y del 18,7 por ciento para la dosis de 2.400 mg (10,7-26,7 por ciento; p < 0,01). Los diarios de interferencia en el sueño mostraron un patrón similar. Hubo diferencias significativas favorables a la gabapentina en cuanto al número de pacientes que notificaron una reducción superior al 50 por ciento en la intensidad del dolor, en la CGIC y en la PGIC, en las puntuaciones sensitiva y total del SF-MPQ (ambas dosis), en la escala análoga visual del dolor del SF-MPQ (solamente para la dosis de 2.400 mg) y en los dominios de vitalidad, dolor corporal y salud mental del SF-36. La gabapentina fue, en general, bien tolerada. Las reacciones adversas más frecuentes fueron el mareo y la somnolencia, en especial durante la fase de ajuste. Así pues, este estudio confirma el papel de la gabapentina como tratamiento eficaz y bien tolerado de la neuralgia postherpética. ©2001 International Association for the Study of Pain. Publicado por Elsevier Science B.V. Reservados todos los derechos. (AU)