Change in Pain Score after Administration of Analgesics for Lower Extremity Fracture Pain during Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Effective acute pain management following injury is critical to improve short-and long-term patient outcomes. Analgesics can effectively reduce pain intensity, yet half of injury patients report moderate to severe pain during hospitalization. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to identify the analgesic, different analgesic combinations, or analgesic and adjuvant analgesic combination that generated the largest percent change from pre- to post-analgesic pain score. DESIGN: This was a descriptive retrospective cohort study of 129 adults admitted with lower extremity fractures to a trauma center. METHODS: Name, dose, and frequency of analgesics and adjuvant analgesics administered from admission to discharge were collected from medical records. Percent change was calculated from pain scores documented on the 0-10 numeric rating scale. RESULTS: The analgesic with largest percent change from pre- to post-administration pain score was hydromorphone 2 mg IV (53%) for the emergency department and morphine 4 mg IV (54%) for the in-patient unit. All analgesics administered in the emergency department and ∼50% administered on the in-patient unit produced a minimal (15%) decrease in pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that few analgesics administered in the emergency department and the in-patient unit to patients with lower extremity fractures provide adequate pain relief. In the emergency department, all analgesics administered resulted in at least minimal improvement of pain. On the in-patient unit 13 analgesic doses resulted at least minimal improvement in pain while nine doses did not even reach 20% change in pain. Findings from this study can be used guide the treatment of fracture pain in the hospital.

Unmet Quality Needs in Oral Drug Delivery: Contrasts of Drug Content and Uniformity on Distinct Approaches for Achieving Individual Dosing.

Individualized dosing is often required in pharmacotherapy, particularly for pediatric and geriatric patients and adjustment of drugs that demand dose adaptation. This study aimed to evaluate critical quality attributes (CQAs) of doses obtained by distinct approaches for achieving individual dosing. Approaches were evaluated as follows: subdivision of tablets by splitter and hand (haloperidol) and delivery by plastic dropper bottle (haloperidol), glass dropper bottle (clonazepam), dosing cup (sodium valproate), and dosing syringe (carbamazepine), including brand name, generic, and similar marketed products. Measuring devices were packaged with their respective product. Drug content uniformity was assessed to each substance according to pharmacopeial methods. Tablets subdivided by splitter had the poorest performance among all approaches, in which doses ranged around 60% of the labeled amount (Acceptance Value = 58.1 and RSD = 23.2%). The greatest performances were observed for the dosing syringe which fulfilled all the requirements for dose precision and for the glass dropper bottle. There were significant differences in dose delivery between manufacturers of the same medicine when measuring the same volume or number of drops. High drug content variability is extremely harmful to pharmacotherapy and may result in therapeutic failure or toxicity. It is crucial that measuring devices and scoring of tablets be checked for functionality and standardized for different manufacturers of the same medicine. Part of the approaches for achieving individual dosing did not meet the quality needs for drug content and uniformity. Yet, our findings show that more accurate and precise dosing can be accessed when using the dosing syringe and glass dropper bottle.

Quality of antiepileptic drugs in sub-Saharan Africa: A study in Gabon, Kenya, and Madagascar.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a major public health issue in low- and middle-income countries, where the availability and accessibility of quality treatment remain important issues, the severity of which may be aggravated by poor quality antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The primary objective of this study was to measure the quality of AEDs in rural and urban areas in 3 African countries. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in Gabon, Kenya, and Madagascar. Both official and unofficial supply chains in urban and rural areas were investigated. Samples of oral AEDs were collected in areas where a patient could buy or obtain them. Pharmacological analytical procedures and Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines were used to assess quality. RESULTS: In total, 102 batches, representing 3782 units of AEDs, were sampled. Overall, 32.3% of the tablets were of poor quality, but no significant difference was observed across sites: 26.5% in Gabon, 37.0% in Kenya, and 34.1% in Madagascar (P = .7). The highest proportions of substandard medications were found in the carbamazepine (38.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8-57.8) and phenytoin (83.3%; 95% CI 35.8-99.5) batches, which were mainly flawed by their failure to dissolve. Sodium valproate was the AED with the poorest quality (32.1%; 95% CI 15.8-42.3). The phenobarbital (94.1%; 95% CI 80.3-99.2) and diazepam (100.0%) batches were of better quality. The prevalence of substandard quality medications increased in samples supplied by public facilities (odds ratio [OR] 9.9; 95% CI 1.2-84.1; P < .04) and manufacturers located in China (OR 119.8; 95% CI 8.7-1651.9; P < .001). The prevalence of AEDs of bad quality increased when they were stored improperly (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.2-24.1; P < .03). SIGNIFICANCE: No counterfeiting was observed. However, inadequate AED storage conditions are likely to lead to ineffective and possibly dangerous AEDs, even when good-quality AEDs are initially imported.

New-onset epilepsy in the elderly.

People who are 60 years old and older have the highest incidence of developing new-onset epilepsy. The increase of the ageing population has resulted in a greater number of patients with new-onset epilepsy or at risk of developing the condition. Previously published review articles regarding epilepsy in older patients have had a broad focus, including people who were diagnosed with epilepsy in their childhood or middle age. The present review focuses on the causes, treatment, prognosis and psychosocial impact of new-onset epilepsy in people aged ≥60 years. Following a search of the medical electronic databases and relevant references, we identified 22 studies overall that met the inclusion criteria. Only four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified that compared different antiepileptic drug treatments in this population, demonstrating that newer-generation antiepileptic drugs (e.g. lamotrigine and levetiracetam) were generally better tolerated. One uncontrolled study provided promising evidence of good outcomes and safety for surgical resection as a treatment for people with uncontrolled seizures. Five studies reported that people ≥60 years with new-onset epilepsy have significant cognitive impairments (e.g. memory loss) and psychological issues including depression, anxiety and fatigue. We found that there is limited evidence to guide treatment in people with Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy. The specific features of new-onset epilepsy in this target population significantly influences the choice of treatment. Cognitive and psychiatric screening before treatment may be useful for management. Two studies with proposed guidelines were identified but no formal clinical practice guidelines exist for this special population to assist with appropriate management. There is a need for more RCTs that investigate effective treatments with limited side effects. More research studies on the psychosocial effects of new-onset epilepsy, and long-term outcomes, for people aged ≥60 years are also required.

[Impact of early benefit assessment on patients with epilepsy in Germany: Current healthcare provision and therapeutic needs]. / Auswirkungen der frühen Nutzenbewertung auf Patienten mit Epilepsie in Deutschland : Aktuelle Versorgungsrealität und therapeutischer Bedarf.

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases and represents a significant burden for patients, their families and society. In more than 75 % of patients anticonvulsant therapy consists of valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. There is a need for polytherapy in drug-refractory patients and they suffer from negative effects on quality of life and employment that is associated with high indirect costs. To allow a comprehensive treatment in this patient group, access to new anticonvulsants with novel modes of action is needed; however, all applications for new antiepileptic drugs failed to prove added benefits during the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG) in Germany. One of the main reasons is the mandatory definition of a standard comparative therapy. It remains unclear whether there will be studies in the future which will fulfill the requirements of the current version of AMNOG. Observational studies after approval and marketing of new antiepileptic drugs could be better alternatives to prove added benefits for individual patients in the current German healthcare system.

Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16-70 years on stable doses of 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2-40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier-predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥ 1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥ 1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier-predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6-35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8-37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy.

Primary care doctors' management behavior with respect to epilepsy in Kerala, southern India.

Although a majority of persons with epilepsy in developing countries are diagnosed, treated, and followed up by primary care doctors, few efforts have been made to examine their understanding with respect to epilepsy management. Through a questionnaire survey, we gathered information about the epilepsy management behavior of 500 primary care doctors distributed across the south Indian state of Kerala. Very few of them ever had diagnosed focal seizures, and the majority of them overutilize EEGs, prescribe continuous antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis for febrile convulsions, use relatively expensive AEDs often in combination and in suboptimal doses, and did not know about alternate management options for AED-resistant epilepsies. A substantial proportion of the current large treatment gap in epilepsy in developing countries could be minimized by educating the primary care physicians about the diagnosis of epileptic seizures, cost-effective AED treatment, and need-based referral for specialized care.

Tensor decomposition of TMS-induced EEG oscillations reveals data-driven profiles of antiepileptic drug effects.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography is a powerful tool to probe human cortical excitability. The EEG response to TMS stimulation is altered by drugs active in the brain, with characteristic "fingerprints" obtained for drugs of known mechanisms of action. However, the extraction of specific features related to drug effects is not always straightforward as the complex TMS-EEG induced response profile is multi-dimensional. Analytical approaches can rely on a-priori assumptions within each dimension or on the implementation of cluster-based permutations which do not require preselection of specific limits but may be problematic when several experimental conditions are tested. We here propose an alternative data-driven approach based on PARAFAC tensor decomposition, which provides a parsimonious description of the main profiles underlying the multidimensional data. We validated reliability of PARAFAC on TMS-induced oscillations before extracting the features of two common anti-epileptic drugs (levetiracetam and lamotrigine) in an integrated manner. PARAFAC revealed an effect of both drugs, significantly suppressing oscillations in the alpha range in the occipital region. Further, this effect was stronger under the intake of levetiracetam. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that PARAFAC can easily disentangle the effects of subject, drug condition, frequency, time and space in TMS-induced oscillations.

Quality of antiepileptic drugs in Vietnam.

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in a central city of South Vietnam. A cross-sectional study was conducted in all the outlets for AEDs. Out of 33 pharmacies 54% had AEDs. Where the drugs were available, 89% of the pharmacies, 10 units were purchased, choosing the cheapest ones. The information on the packaging, the galenic form and the aspect of the drug were studied. Each sample's tablet was weighted and was considered satisfactory if it was within +/-10% of the average. A HPLC method was used for dosing the active ingredient (AI), which was considered satisfactory within +/-10% of the theoretical value. Eight samples were based on carbamazepin and eight on phenytoin. None of the 16 samples collected were past their expiring date. Tablets were homogeneous in shape, dimension and color. The uniformity of weight was satisfactory but the AI results were alarming for Carbamazepin and more often for Phenytoin. Only 35% of the tablets were correctly dosed. Because of differences of sensitivities of AEDs to storage conditions, environmental factors (heat, light and humidity) could be responsible for this result. Best results were achieved in structures where storage seemed to be better. The influence of storage conditions must be further studied to confirm this conclusion.

Comparative in vitro study of six carbamazepine products.

The purpose of present study was to evaluate commercial preparations of carbamazepine tablets with respect to drug release through a defined sequence of experiments using Minitab software. The compliance of products with respect to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) dissolution test and comparison of the products with respect to drug release in different dissolution conditions is reported in the present paper. The different dissolution conditions studied include dissolution medium (1% SLS in purified water, 0.1 N HCl), volume (900 and 1,000 ml), rpm (50 rpm, 75 rpm). Studies indicated that all six products complied with USP dissolution criteria. However, the extent of influence of dissolution conditions on drug release was varied among the products. Distinct dissolution profiles were observed and there was no correlation with disintegration time in certain products. The in vitro dissolution experimentation helped in identifying the discriminatory dissolution conditions and also the formulations that were unaffected with change of dissolution variables. In summary, commercial preparations of carbamazepine vary widely in their dissolution behavior in multi dissolution run experimentation. Identifying this behavior of the products was essential as an in vitro tool for screening a good and a bad formulation.

Availability and costs of antiepileptic drugs and quality of phenobarbital in Vientiane municipality, Lao PDR.

PURPOSE: In developing countries, availability and quality of drugs are critical factors for effective management and control of epilepsy. This study investigated the availability and costs of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and the quality of phenobarbital in Vientiane Municipality, Lao PDR. METHODS: In March 2004, we enrolled all pharmacies (categories I and II) of four central districts of Vientiane eligible to sell AEDs. Two hundred and eight pharmacies of category III (75.1% of all registered pharmacies) were excluded as the sale of AEDs was not authorized. All pharmacists were interviewed with a standard questionnaire. Whenever phenobarbital was available, a sample was purchased and assayed by liquid chromatography. Phenobarbital was defined as being of correct quality if the active substance average content corresponded to +/-15% of the indicated amount. RESULTS: 66 pharmacies were enrolled (13 and 45 of categories I and II, respectively, and 8 hospital pharmacies). Six generics of AEDs were found (phenobarbital, phenytoin, valproic acid, clonazepam, carbamazepine, diazepam) and all pharmacies sold at least 1 AED. The 2 most widely available drugs were diazepam (5 mg) and phenobarbital (100 mg), present in 87.9 and 53.0% of the pharmacies, respectively. All 34 phenobarbital samples examined showed a correct concentration of the active compound. However, the concentration of phenobarbital 100 mg tablets produced in Lao PDR (mean concentration 94.7 mg) was significantly lower (p = 0.005) than the imported equivalent (mean concentration 99.7 mg). The direct drug costs of a yearly treatment with phenobarbital were estimated to be at least 25.2 USD. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of AEDs are present. Their availability, particularly of phenobarbital, is restricted to higher-category pharmacies and within those it is rather limited. To meet the costs of AEDs in this setting is a major challenge for people with epilepsy. However, the quality of the available phenobarbital was rather satisfactory.

Physicochemical stability and compatibility testing of levetiracetam in all-in-one parenteral nutrition admixtures in daily practice.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral antiepileptic drugs are frequently used in critically ill patients for seizure control therapy or prevention. Many of these patients require additional parenteral nutrition (PN). Therefore, a parallel infusion of the frequently used antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) is interesting in terms of the restricted i.v. lines (e.g., neonates). The potential interactions of the complex PN admixture with the drug product and the appropriate admixing of a drug at effective dosages require physicochemical lab assessments to obtain specific and reliable pharmaceutical documentation for the intended admixing. AIM: To assess the of compatibility and stability of LEV, a neutral and hydrophilic drug, in commercial all-in-one (AiO) PN admixtures using simple validated tests to provide necessary data in a timely manner and to allow convenient, documented and safe treatment with PN as the drug vehicle. METHODS: Different concentrations of LEV were injected into two different AiO PN admixtures with no further additives. Stability and compatibility tests for the drug and the PN admixtures were performed over seven days at +4°C, +23±1°C and +37°C without light protection. Stability and sample characteristics were observed by visual inspection and the validated light microscope method. Moreover, the pH level of the admixture was checked, as were the concentrations of LEV over time in the PN admixtures, using an established LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: The stability controls of LEV at different temperatures were within absolute ±20% of the theoretical value in a concentration range of 98.91-117.84% of the initial value. No changes in pH occurred (5.55±0.04) and no microscopic out of specification data or visual changes were observed. The mean value of the largest lipid droplet in each visual field over seven days was 2.4±0.08µm, comparable to that of the drug-free AiO admixture. Samples stored at +37°C showed yellowish discolorations after 96h of storage. CONCLUSION: LEV showed compatibility and stability over seven days in the selected PN admixtures, and the described methods represented a valuable and timely approach to determine the stability and compatibility of the highly hydrophilic, not dissociated LEV in AiO admixtures under conditions of use. Further studies with clinically relevant and representative examples of physicochemically different drug classes are needed.

FDA update.

This report addresses: (1) a general update of FDA activity in areas relevant to AED development; (2) an update on issues relevant to the development of AEDs in the pediatric population; and (3) an update on the Agency's approach to the evaluation of AEDs as monotherapy. FDA ACTIONS: Since January 2002, 47 Approval actions for 10 AEDs were issued, but none for a new chemical entity. Nine of the ten Approvable actions taken were relatively minor changes to existing applications. An Approvable letter was issued for Lyrica (pregabalin) for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy, and partial seizures in adults. The primary issue to be addressed in the face of post-marketing reports of adverse events is one of causality. The FDA has requested that sponsors search their databases for selected problems under review (e.g., suicidality). PEDIATRICS: The Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) and the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) require studies in pediatric patients for those indications granted for adults that are relevant for the pediatric population. Current FDA policy asks sponsors to undertake a development program in pediatric patients essentially analogous to that for adults. MONOTHERAPY TRIALS: Establishing the effectiveness of AEDs as monotherapy continues to be desirable, but problematic. Problems include the difficulty of performing monotherapy trials, ethical issues, designation of patients as "newly diagnosed," and endpoints. Historical controls may be acceptable if: (a) there is a consensus that it is essentially impossible to conduct controlled trials designed to demonstrate a difference between treatments; (b) there is an adequate historical database against which the seizure rate seen with the new drug can reasonably be compared; and (c) there is evidence from adequate and well-controlled trials that the treatment is effective as adjunctive therapy. FDA is Agency is reviewing analyses describing historical controls.

Sensitive inexpensive HPLC determination of four antiepileptic drugs in human plasma: application to PK studies.

AIM: Recently, polytherapy regimen has been introduced for the treatment of epileptic patients for better seizure control with lesser side effects and better control of multiple seizure types. METHODOLOGY: A simple, sensitive and highly specific reversed-phase HPLC method was developed for simultaneous determination of four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine, in real human plasma without interference from endogenous components of plasma. CONCLUSION: The method was proved to be linear in the range of 0.5-50 µg/ml for all drugs. It was successfully applied for clinical PK study of the AEDs in healthy volunteers following single administration. Also, this method was applied for simultaneous determination of the studied drugs in volunteers' plasma receiving synergistic binary combinations from the four AEDs when used as add-on therapy. The good precision and selectivity of the developed method allow it to be used for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of such drugs as a useful tool in epilepsy management.

Guideline conform initial monotherapy increases in patients with focal epilepsy: A population-based study on German health insurance data.

PURPOSE: To examine the implementation of the clinical practice guideline "first epileptic seizure and epilepsy in adulthood" published in 2008 to patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy between 2008 and 2014. METHOD: This retrospective, population-based analysis was performed on patient data of 4.1 million insurants from the German statutory health insurance. Prevalent and incident cases in adults were identified based on ICD-10 codes, using a hierarchical diagnosis selection algorithm. The first anticonvulsive agent in a newly diagnosed epilepsy patient was validated against the clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: We determined an annual crude prevalence rate in adults between 0.946% and 1.090% and incidence rates of at least 156 per 100,000. A significant increase in guideline compliant monotherapy was found in patients with a focal epilepsy syndrome, while, among patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsies, the share of guideline noncompliant monotherapy increased. Both changes are likely due to the overall increase in prescription of levetiracetam from 19.6% in 2008 to 58.9% in 2014 in all newly treated patients. Overall, the proportion of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants fell significantly from 20.7% in 2008 to 4.3% in 2014 (p<0.001). The likelihood to receive non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs was 5.82 (95% CI 4.62-7.33) higher in 2014 than in 2008. CONCLUSION: Initial monotherapy for focal epilepsy is in line with current clinical practice guidelines and mainly implemented by prescription of levetiracetam. Further evaluations should address the question of whether patients treated in line with the guidelines have a favorable outcome, compared to patients not treated in line with current guidelines.

The importance of brand continuity in epilepsy drugs.

Drugs are the mainstay of treatment for epilepsy, and are effective for most patients. However, minute differences between generic and branded drugs, and between different brands of the same drug, can affect epilepsy control. It is vital therefore that patients receive the same brand consistently to avoid loss of control.