Athrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for the relief of neck pain and cervicogenic headache.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthrosis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint (LAAJ) may be a cause of upper neck pain and headache. Intra-articular injection of steroids may provide only short-lasting relief. For intractable pain, arthrodesis of the joint might be considered. OBJECTIVE: To determine the success rates of arthrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for relieving neck pain and disability. DESIGN: Practice audit. SETTING: Private practice of senior author. SUBJECTS: Prospective series of 23 consecutive patients. METHODS: Outcomes were measured using a numerical rating scale for neck pain, and the Neck Disability Index for disability. Success rates were calculated for various degrees of improvement of neck pain at long-term follow-up (8-40 months), and for achieving various combinations of improvement of both neck pain and disability. RESULTS: Complete relief of pain was achieved in 40% of patients, with a further 40% achieving at least 50% relief. At long-term follow-up, 30% of patients had no neck pain and no disability, and a further 25% had only minimal pain, minimal disability, or both. CONCLUSIONS: The present study did not corroborate earlier studies that claimed outstanding outcomes for arthrodesis of the LAAJ, but its outcomes are consonant with more recent studies that provided transparent outcome data. These studies provide Pain Physicians with empirical data on success rates and outcomes, upon which they can base their consideration of referral for arthrodesis.

Posterior intra-articular distraction technique to treat pediatric atlantoaxial instability.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients is challenging. We report our experience with posterior intra-articular distraction technique in treating this disorder. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study which included 15 patients of atlantoaxial instability whose age was less than 16 years at the time of clinical presentation. All patients underwent anterior soft tissue released through a posterior-only approach, followed by intra-facet cage implantation, cantilever correction, and instrumentation. Clinical results were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale and radiographic measurements including the atlantodental interval (ADI), posterior atlantodental interval (pADI), the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain's line, clivuscanal angle (CCA), and triangular area (TA) of craniovertebral junction. RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 72 months, with an average of 41.2 ± 15.2 months. The JOA score increased from 13.6 ± 2.3 to 16.6 ± 0.8. ADI decreased from 4.31 ± 2.37 to 1.85 ± 1.09 mm, and TA decreased from 261.96 ± 107.99 to 197.12 ± 72.37 mm2. pADI increased from 12.89 ± 3.52 to 18.25 ± 3.89 mm, and CCA improved from 132.19 ± 16.34 to 144.35 ± 13.91°. All changes in measurements showed statistically significant. There were no evidence of surgery-related complications or iatrogenic secondary cervical deformity during follow-up. Radiological evaluation showed satisfactory corrections and bony fusions of C1-2 facet joint in all cases. CONCLUSION: Posterior intra-articular distraction followed by cage implantation and cantilever correction can be one of the safe and effective ways to solve atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients.

Atlantoaxial facet fixation using cervical facet cage: technical case report and review of the literature.

In 1994, the use of interfacet spacer placement was for joint distraction, reduction, and fusion to supplement atlantoaxial or occipitocervical fixation. Here, we present a unique case of bilateral atlantoaxial interfacet fixation using cervical facet cages (CFC) in a pediatric patient with basilar invagination. In addition, we review the literature on atlantoaxial facet fixation. We present a 12-year-old boy with Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome who presented with multiple episodes of sudden neck jerking, described as in response to a sensation of being shocked, and guarding against neck motion, found to have basilar invagination with cervicomedullary compression. He underwent an occiput to C3 fusion with C1-C2 CFC fixation. We also conducted a literature review identifying all publications using the following keywords: "C1" AND "C2" OR "atlantoaxial" AND "facet spacer" OR "DTRAX." The patient demonstrated postoperative radiographic reduction of his basilar invagination from 6.4 to 4.1 mm of superior displacement above the McRae line. There was a 4.5 mm decrease in the atlantodental interval secondary to decreased dens retroflexion. His postoperative course was complicated by worsening of his existing dysphagia but was otherwise unremarkable. His neck symptoms completely resolved. We illustrate the safe use of CFC for atlantoaxial facet distraction, reduction, and instrumented fixation in a pediatric patient with basilar invagination. Review of the literature demonstrates that numerous materials can be safely placed as a C1-C2 interfacet spacer including bone grafts, titanium spacers, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion cages. We argue that CFC may be included in this arsenal even in pediatric patients.

"Letter to the editor: traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in adults: a systematic review of published cases".

This critique evaluates a recent study on adult traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF), focusing on its strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for future research. The study provides a comprehensive examination of the anatomical and biomechanical complexities of the C1-C2 articulation, shedding light on the rare nature of adult traumatic AARF and common injury mechanisms. It categorizes AARF based on the atlanto-dental interval (ADI) and dislocation severity, aiding clinicians in assessing injury severity and treatment planning. Furthermore, the study explores conservative and surgical management approaches, offering valuable insights into treatment decision-making and outcomes. However, limitations such as its retrospective nature, reliance on reported cases, lack of standardized protocols, and limited sample size may constrain the generalizability of findings. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with standardized protocols, collaborative efforts among institutions, and innovative techniques to advance our understanding and management of adult traumatic AARF.

Traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in adults: a systematic review of published cases.

Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) in adults is a rare and clinically challenging condition characterized by a spectrum of etiological factors, predominantly attributed to traumatic and inflammatory pathologies within the craniovertebral region. Trauma is the most frequently identified cause within the adult population, with the first case report published in 1907. This study aims to conduct a systematic review that addresses the clinical presentations and management strategies relating to traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory fixation in adults. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was executed, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria encompassed case reports and series documenting AARF cases in individuals aged 18 and above, spanning database inception to July 2022. Studies not published in the English language were excluded. A total of 61 articles reporting cases of AARF in the adult population were included in the study. The mean age of affected individuals was 36.1 years (± 15.6), with a distribution of 46% females and 54% males. Predominant mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle accidents and falls, constituting 38% and 22% of cases, respectively. Among the classification systems employed, Fielding and Hawkins type I accounted for the majority at 63%, followed by type II at 10%, and type III at 4%. Conservative management was used for treatment in 65% of acute (65%) cases and 29% of chronic cases. Traumatic AARF is a rare phenomenon in the adult population, is more common in younger adults, and does not often present with neurologic deficits. Patients diagnosed acutely are more likely to be successfully treated with conservative management, while patients diagnosed chronically are less likely to be reduced with conservatively and often require surgical treatment. Surgery should be considered for patients with irreducible dislocations, ligamentous injuries, unstable associated fractures, and persistent pain resistant to conservative management.

Atlantoaxial intra-articular cage fusion by posterior intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technique note with case series.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of atlantoaxial intra-articular cage (AIC) fusion via intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). METHODS: An analysis was conducted on the data of 10 patients who underwent C1-C2 segmental fixation and AIC fusion for AAD by unilateral intermuscular approach and contralateral open approach. Outcome assessments included Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale Score for Neck Pain (VASSNP). The duration of surgical exposure, screw insertion and cage insertion, and postoperative drainage volume were also compared between two approaches. Bone fusion was evaluated through computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. Postoperative paravertebral tissue edema was evaluated by paravertebral tissue cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity on T2 weighted sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The intermuscular approach exhibited a longer exposure time but lower drainage postoperatively compared to the open approach (P < 0.05). After operation, JOA scores significant improved (P < 0.05), while VASSNP scores significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative CSA between two approaches (P > 0.05). However, compared to the open approach, the intermuscular approach exhibited less CSA (P < 0.05) and lower T2 signal intensity on MRI postoperatively, indicating less invasive to the paravertebral tissues. CONCLUSIONS: AIC fusion by intermuscular approach is an effective and safe technique in the treatment of reducible AAD. Intermuscular approach could reduce the postoperative drainage volume and the extent of paravertebral tissue edema compared to open approach.

Myelopathy resulting from degenerative atlantoaxial subluxation.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical features and treatment strategy of degenerative atlantoaxial subluxation (DAAS). METHODS: Patients with DAAS treated in our institution from 2003 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We utilized the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale to evaluate the neurologic status and distance of Ranawat et al. (DOR) to measure vertical migration. RESULTS: We recruited 40 patients with > 2 years of follow-up and an average age of 62.3 ± 7.7 years. All the patients had myelopathy; only one patient had moderate trauma before exacerbation of symptoms, and the duration of symptoms was 34 ± 36 months. The most frequent radiological features were vertical migration of C1 (100%), sclerosis (100%), and narrowing of the atlantoaxial lateral mass articulations (100%). Two patients underwent transoral release combined with posterior reduction and fusion, and 38 patients underwent posterior reduction and fusion with C1 lateral mass screws-C2 pedicle screws and plate systems only. Forty cases (100%) achieved a solid atlantoaxial fusion, and 38 cases (95%) achieved anatomic atlantoaxial reduction. The JOA score increased from 9.3 ± 2.6 to 14.8 ± 2.1 (P < 0.01). DOR increased from 14.5 ± 2.5 to 17.8 ± 2.2 mm at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). Loosening of the locking caps was detected in one case, bony fusion was achieved, and harvest-site pain was reported in five patients. CONCLUSION: DAAS differs from other types of AAS and presents with anterior subluxation combined with vertical subluxation arising from degenerative changes in the atlantoaxial joints. We recommend anatomic reduction as an optimal strategy for DAAS.

Calvarial bone graft for craniovertebral junction fixation in children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of calvarial graft (CG) in craniovertebral fusion procedures in children at a single single center. METHODS: Paediatric patients in whom CG had been used as the sole construct, or to augment a semi-rigid construct were identified from a prospective operative database. Age, underlying diagnosis and clinical presentation were obtained from review of the electronic patient record. The primary outcome was bony fusion confirmed on CT. Additional outcome measures were donor site morbidity and need for further surgery. RESULTS: From 82 paediatric CVJ procedures, CG was used in 15 patients with a mean age of 4.1 (± 3.52) years. Aetiology comprised skeletal dysplasia (n = 12), congenital anomaly of segmentation (n = 1) and cervical trauma (n = 2). Myelopathy was the most common clinical finding (9/15), followed by cervical pain (3/15). The indications for surgery comprised atlanto-axial subluxation (8/15), basilar invagination with compression (2/15), and cervicomedullary compression without instability but deemed at risk of instability following decompression (4/15). CG was used in three scenarios: (i) CG + wire only (n = 10); (ii) CG + semirigid instrumentation (n = 3); (iii) CG to augment rigid instrumented fixation (n = 2). In 13 patients a Halo-body Jacket was used peri-operatively. At a mean time of 4.4 months following surgery, 80% of cases had radiological evidence of fusion. CONCLUSION: Full thickness calvarial bone graft is readily available, has good structural integrity and is associated with minimal donor site morbidity. CG should be considered for use as a sole construct, or to augment semi-rigid constructs when instrumented fixation is precluded.

The development of posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and its preliminary application in irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and evaluate the preliminary clinical application of this forceps in assisting simple posterior screw-rod system reduction and fixation in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. METHODS: Based on the posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod system, posterior reduction forceps was developed to assist simple posterior screw-rod system for the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. From January 2021 to October 2022, 10 cases with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation were treated with this technique. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was applied before and after surgery to evaluate the neurological status of the patient, and the Atlanto-dental interval (ADI) was measured before and after surgery to evaluate the atlantoaxial reduction. X-ray and CT were performed to evaluate internal fixation, atlantoaxial sequence and bone graft fusion during regular follow-up. MRI was performed to evaluate the status of atlantoaxial reduction and spinal cord compression after surgery. RESULTS: All 10 patients were successfully operated, and there were no complications such as spinal nerve and vascular injury. Postoperative clinical symptoms were significantly relieved in all patients, and postoperative JOA score and ADI were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The developed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation can assist the simple posterior screw-rod system in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation to avoid the release in anterior or posterior approach and reduce the difficulty of surgery. The preliminary results of this technique are satisfactory and it has a good application prospect.

Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Studies have shown biomechanical superiority of cervical pedicle screw placement over other techniques. However, accurate placement is challenging due to the inherent risk of neurovascular complications. Navigation technology based on intraoperative 3D imaging allows highly accurate screw placement, yet studies specifically investigating screw placement in patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial screw placement as treatment of traumatic instabilities using iCT-based navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance with intraoperative 3D control scans. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries treated operatively with dorsal stabilization of C1 and C2. Patients were either assigned to the intraoperative navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance group. Screw accuracy, procedure time, and revisions were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included in this study with 51 patients in the navigation group and 27 patients in the fluoroscopic-guidance group. In total, 312 screws were placed in C1 and C2. Screw accuracy was high in both groups; however, pedicle perforations > 1 mm occurred significantly more often in the fluoroscopic-guidance group (P = 0.02). Procedure time was on average 23 min shorter in the navigation group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the available data showing that navigated atlantoaxial screw placement proves to be feasible as well as highly accurate compared to the fluoroscopic-guidance technique without prolonging the time needed for surgery. When comparing these data with other studies, the application of different classification systems for assessment of screw accuracy should be considered.

The C2 isthmus screw provided sufficient biomechanical stability in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation-a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: The emerging of the C2 isthmus screw fixation technique is gaining popularity in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation or other conditions requiring fixation of C2. However, the biomechanical stability of this fixation is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To compare and elucidate the biomechanical stability of C2 pedicle screw (C2PS), C2 isthmus screw (C2IS) and C2 short isthmus screw (C2SIS) fixation techniques in atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). METHOD: A three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) from occiput to C3 was established and validated from a healthy male volunteer. Three FEMs, C1 pedicle screw (PS)-C2PS, C1PS-C2IS, C1PS-C2SIS were also constructed. The range of motion (ROM) and the maximum von Mises stress under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation loading were analyzed and compared. The pullout strength of the three fixations for C2 was also evaluated. RESULT: C1PS-C2IS model showed the greatest decrease in ROM with flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. C1PS-C2PS model showed the least ROM reduction under all loading conditions than both C2IS and C2SIS. The C1PS-C2PS model had the largest von Mises stress on the screw under all directions followed by C1PS-C2SIS, and lastly the C1PS-C2IS. Under axial rotation and lateral bending loading, the three models showed the maximum and minimum von Mises stress on the screw respectively. The stress of the three models was mainly located in the connection of the screw and rod. Overall, the maximum screw pullout strength for C2PS, C2IS and C2SIS were 729.41N, 816.62N, 640.54N respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with atlantoaxial dislocations, the C2IS fixation provided comparable stability, with no significant stress concentration. Furthermore, the C2IS had sufficient pullout strength when compared with C2PS and C2SIS. C2 isthmus screw fixation may be a biomechanically favourable option in cases with AAD. However, future clinical trials are necessary for the evaluation of the clinical outcomes of this technique.

Sagittal slope angle of lateral atlantoaxial articulation is associated with the severity of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation and predicts reduction degree after surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate (1) lateral atlantoaxial articulation (LAA) morphology in patients with basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and healthy individuals and its relationship with the severity of dislocation and (2) the effect of the LAA morphology on reduction degree (RD) after surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective propensity score matching case-control study, imaging and baseline data of 62 patients with BI and AAD from 2011 to 2022 were collected. Six hundred thirteen  participants without occipitocervical junctional deformity served as controls. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for analysis. RESULTS: The age, BMI and sex did not differ significantly between the two groups after propensity score matching. Sagittal slope angle (SSA) and coronal slope angle (CSA) was lower and greater, respectively, in the patient group than in the control group. A negative SSA value usually indicates anteverted LAA. Regression analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between SSA and severity of dislocation. However, no relationship was found between CSA and the severity of dislocation. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that minimum-SSA emerged as an independent predictor of satisfactory reduction (RD ≥ 90%). The ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.844, with a cut-off value set at -40.2. CONCLUSION: SSA in patients group was significantly smaller and more asymmetric than that in the control group. Dislocation severity was related to SSA but not to CSA. Minimum-SSA can be used as a predictor of horizontal RD after surgery.

Autologous rib grafts for craniocervical junction surgery in children: a clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous iliac bone is commonly used as a bone graft material to achieve solid fusion in craniocervical junction (CVJ) surgery. However, the developing iliac bone of children is less than ideal as a bone graft material. The matured rib bone of children presents a potential substitute material for iliac bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of autologous rib grafts for craniocervical junction surgery in children. METHODS: The outcomes of 10 children with abnormalities of the craniocervical junction who underwent craniocervical junction surgery between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent posterior fusion and internal fixation surgery with autologous rib grafts. Pre- and post-operative images were obtained and clinical follow-ups were conducted to evaluate neurological function, pain level, donor site complications, and bone fusion rates. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful. During the 8- to 24-month follow-up period, all patients achieved satisfactory clinical results. Computed tomography at 3-6 months confirmed successful bone fusion and regeneration of the rib defect in all patients with no neurological or donor site complications. CONCLUSION: Autologous rib bone is a safe and effective material for bone grafting in craniocervical junction fusion surgery for children that can reduce the risks of donor site complications and increase the amount of bone graft, thereby achieving a higher bone fusion rate.

C1-C2 Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation.

Multiple approaches for instrumentation of the upper cervical spine have evolved to treat atlantoaxial instability which, until the 20th century, was largely considered to be inoperable and managed nonsurgically with immobilization. Surgeons set out to provide safe and effective approaches in a clearly dangerous and technically complex anatomic region. It is important to provide a historical analysis of the evolution of techniques that have shaped C1-C2 instrumentation, and how the diligent efforts of surgeons to improve the biomechanical stability and fusion rates of their constructs eventually led to the prevailing Harms technique. This technique is explored by describing its surgical steps, alternative techniques, and associated outcomes. For successful instrumentation of the atlantoaxial joint, a comprehensive understanding of spinal biomechanics, surgical techniques, and anatomic variations is imperative for surgeons to develop a tailored plan for each patient's individual pathology and anatomy.

Craniocervical fusion in the paediatric population - case series of 21 patients.

PURPOSE: Craniocervical junction instability in a paediatric population presents a formidable challenge to the neurosurgeon. With a variety of anatomical variations, diminutive bony and ligamentous structures, possible superimposed syndromic abnormalities, the craniocervical junction is a technically challenging region to operate within. We aimed to review our series of patients to identify the common pathologies necessitating craniocervical fusion along with the use of intraoperative image guidance. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of twenty-one patients, with a mean age of 8.1 years, undergoing craniocervical fixations, involving either occipitocervical fusion or atlantoaxial fixation, from a single institution over a twelve-year period. The presentation, preoperative investigations, indication for surgery, surgical procedure, use of intraoperative navigation and clinical and radiological results were examined. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent primary C1-2 fixation, with the remaining 9 undergoing occipitocervical fusion. Five patients underwent surgery for traumatic instability, seven for os odontoideum, six for congenital anomalies and three for post-infectious instability. Follow up for 20 patients averaged 34 months (range 2-93 months). Five patients had Trisomy 21 and all underwent C1-2 fixation. Frameless stereotactic image guidance was utilised in five patients. No patients suffered immediate complications resulting from craniocervical junction fusion. Patients were observed to either neurologically improve (n = 6), or arrest their neurological deterioration following surgical intervention (n = 14), with concomitant radiological evidence of osseous fusion at follow up in 18 of 20 patients (90%). Two patients (10%) had radiological evidence of screw lucency, but neither required intervention because of being asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Craniocervical fixation in a paediatric population is a viable and safe treatment modality for the management of disorders requiring stabilisation at the craniocervical junction. Our experience of utilising frameless stereotaxy in the setting of grossly distorted anatomical landmarks is also reported.

Retrospective analysis of atlantoaxial rotatory fixation describing age distribution and gender ratio in children and adolescents: A preliminary report.

INTRODUCTION: Atlantoaxial rotatory fixation (AARF) in children presents with an acute onset of neck pain. Almost all cases heal within a few days of onset and are treated conservatively. Because few cases of AARF have been reported, the age distribution or gender ratio of AARF in the child population have not been described enough. In Japan, the social insurance system covers all citizens. Thus, we used insurance claims data to investigate the features of AARF. The aim of this study is to examine the age distribution, compare gender ratio and determine the recurrence proportion of AARF. METHODS: We used the JMDC database to search for claims data submitted between January 2005 and June 2017 for cases of AARF in patients aged <20 years. RESULTS: We identified 1949 patients with AARF, of which 1102 (56.5%) were male. The mean age was 98.3 ± 42.2 months and 91.6 ± 38.4 months in males and females, respectively, and males with AARF were significantly older at onset than females with AARF (p < 0.001). In both sexes, the highest frequency of AARF occurred when the patient was 6 years old. There were 121 (6.2%) cases of recurrent AARF (male: 61, 5.5%; female: 60, 7.1%), but the age differences between the sexes in these cases were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to describe the characteristics of the study population of AARF. Males were more likely to suffer from AARF than females. Furthermore, age (in months) at AARF onset was significantly higher in males than in females. Recurrence rate was not significant in both sexes.

A new etiology of nontraumatic C0-C1-C2-Complex instability - abnormality of musculus rectus capitis posterior minor: a case report.

PURPOSE: This study presents an abnormality of the musculus rectus capitis posterior minor (RCPmi) as a new etiological factor for nontraumatic sagittal plane instability in the C0-C1-C2-complex, with a focus on identifying the absence or atrophy of RCPmi on both sides. METHODS: A 36-year-old male patient presented with recurring neck pain (VAS 8/10) and tingling paresthesia in the entire left hand over a six-month period, without significant neurological deficits. Radiated arm pain was not reported. Imaging examinations revealed sagittal plane instability in the C0-C1-C2-complex, spinal canal stenosis (SCS), and myelopathy at the C1 level. Subsequently, a dorsal C0-1 reposition and fusion with laminectomy were performed. RESULTS: The congenital absence or atrophy of RCPmi, leading to the lack of cephalad-rearward traction on the C1-tuberculum-posterius, induced a developmental failure of the C1 posterior arch. Consequently, the oblate-shaped C1 posterior arch lost support from the underlying C2 posterior arch and the necessary cephalad-rearward traction throughout the patient's 36-year life. This gradual loss of support and traction caused the C1 posterior arch to shift gradually to the anterior side of the C2 posterior arch, resulting in a rotational subluxation centered on the C0/1 joints in the sagittal plane. Ultimately, this led to SCS and myelopathy. Traumatic factors were ruled out from birth to the present, and typical degenerative changes were not found in the upper cervical spine, neck muscles, and ligaments. CONCLUSION: In this case, we not only report the atrophy or absence of RCPmi as a new etiological factor for nontraumatic sagittal plane instability in the C0-C1-C2-complex but also discovered a new function of RCPmi. The cephalad-rearward traction exerted by RCPmi on the C1 posterior arch is essential for the development of a normal C1 anterior-posterior diameter.

Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Case Study of Atlantoaxial Instrumentation in Os Odontoideum.

Despite advancement in surgical innovation, C1-C2 fixation remains challenging due to risks of screw malposition and vertebral artery (VA) injuries. Traditional image-based navigation, while useful, often demands that surgeons frequently shift their attention to external monitors, potentially causing distractions. In this article, we introduce a microscope-based augmented reality (AR) navigation system that projects both anatomical information and real-time navigation images directly onto the surgical field. In the present case report, we discuss a 37-year-old female who suffered from os odontoideum with C1-C2 subluxation. Employing AR-assisted navigation, the patient underwent the successful posterior instrumentation of C1-C2. The integrated AR system offers direct visualization, potentially minimizing surgical distractions. In our opinion, as AR technology advances, its adoption in surgical practices and education is anticipated to expand.

[Expert consensus on posterior facet distraction and fusion technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation(2024)].

Atlantoaxial dislocation is a common bony structural deformity in the craniovertebral junction area. It can cause severe neurological defects, seriously affect the patient's life quality, and even threaten the patient's life. The most effective treatment for patients with apparent clinically symptoms is surgical treatment. In recent years, with the development of surgical techniques, posterior facet distraction and fusion (PFDF) technique has gradually become an important technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. In order to better standardize the diagnosis and treatment of patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and the application of PFDF technique, based on the existing evidence, the Spine and Spinal Cord Group in Neurosurgical Society of Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Craniovertebral Junction Malformation Research Alliance and Craniovertebral Junction Malformation Alliance of National Center for Neurological Disorders organized experts in relevant fields to fully discuss and formulated the "Expert consensus on posterior facet distraction and fusion technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation（2024）". This consensus elaborates and recommends the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and management of complications using PFDF technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. It is intended to provide guidance for surgeons who encounter problems in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation using PFDF technique.

[Advances in the technology of surgical treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation].

The etiology and pathological morphology of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) are complex. Based on the pathological anatomical characteristics of AAD, combined with clinical techniques, it is essential to formulate reasonable classification criteria and develop corresponding treatment strategies for different types of AAD. The satisfactory outcome of surgical treatment for AAD can only be achieved through the comprehensive application of various atlantoaxial reduction techniques, tension band releasing techniques, internal fixation and fusion techniques. This article discusses the latest advancements in surgical treatment techniques for AAD, thoroughly explores treatment strategies based on different types of AAD, and analyzes the practicality and effectiveness of clinical classification and treatment strategies. The posterior atlantoaxial facet releasing and distraction compression reduction technique may pose challenges to traditional treatment strategies in the future. In the development of surgical treatment techniques for AAD, microspinal surgical techniques may play a significant role in improving surgical methods and enhancing treatment outcomes.