RESUMEN
This report aims to shed light on the intricate challenges encountered during the diagnosis and treatment of an uncommon variant of prostate cancer-mixed adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the prostate. Prostate cancers of this nature pose distinctive diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas due to their rarity and complex histological composition. We present a case of a 63-year-old man with metastatic prostate cancer, featuring adenocarcinoma with squamous cell differentiation, who underwent a multimodal treatment approach. The patient responded to first-line carboplatin, docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy, followed by androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) maintenance. However, disease progression led to radiation therapy and a subsequent switch to Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan after chemotherapy challenges. Comprehensive genetic profiling revealed shared mutations in the prostate and liver lesions, emphasizing the role of targeted therapies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted therapy resulted in a notable PSA decline. This case highlights the evolving treatment landscape for rare prostate cancers, integrating genetic insights for tailored interventions. In conclusion, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate is rare, emphasizing the imperative for enhanced comprehension in diagnosis and management. Our case suggests the potential efficacy of ARPI and PSMA-targeted therapies. Our findings advocate for a more nuanced approach to the management of this rare prostate cancer variant, leveraging genomic insights for personalized treatment strategies. This exploration serves as a foundation for further research and clinical considerations in addressing the challenges posed by mixed adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the prostate.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/genética , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patología , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/secundarioRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Radical surgery offers the best chance of cure, it is critical to expand surgery opportunities for patients with early-stage lung cancer to prolong overall survival. However, evidence is still limited regarding the application of neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-tyrosine kinase. PATIENT: The patient reported here was a 53-year-old woman with right lower lung adenosquamous carcinoma. DIAGNOSES: The lung cancer was staged as T3N1M0. Tumor genotype disclosed EGFR Exon19 c.2235-2249de p.E746-A750del. INTERVENTION: After neoadjuvant treatment with icotinib, she underwent thoracotomy and achieved pathological complete response. OUTCOMES: She is currently receiving adjuvant icotinib therapy without recurrence or metastasis during 18-month follow-up. LESSONS: Our case indicated that the feasibility of neoadjuvant icotinib in EGFR-mutant lung adenosquamous carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Éteres Corona , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Quinazolinas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/patología , MutaciónRESUMEN
RESUMO Objetivo: analisar a expressão do Fator de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular (VEGF), seu receptor (VEGFR-2), idade e tipo histológico de carcinomas avançados de colo uterino com relação à resposta clínica à quimioterapia neoadjuvante. Métodos: foram incluídas 40 pacientes com diagnóstico de carcinoma de colo uterino (IB2 e IVA), com biópsias prévias ao tratamento. Todas as pacientes foram submetidas à quimioterapia neoadjuvante e avaliadas quanto à resposta clínica e à expressão do VEGF. Considerou-se boa resposta clínica uma regressão tumoral total ou maior do que 50%. Resultados: em relação à resposta à quimioterapia, 18 pacientes (45%) apresentaram boa resposta e 22 (55%), má resposta. Quanto à expressão do VEGF, em 16 pacientes foi considerada positiva e em 24, negativa. Quando os casos foram analisados separadamente em relação à resposta à quimioterapia, somente a expressão positiva de VEGF foi associada à boa resposta clínica (p=0,0157). Conclusão: a expressão de VEGF mostrou ser isoladamente, um importante marcador de boa resposta ao tratamento quimioterápico neoadjuvante das pacientes com carcinoma avançado de colo uterino.
ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), its receptor (VEGFR-2), age and histological type of advanced cervical carcinomas with respect to the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: we studied 40 patients with cervical carcinoma (IB2 and IVA) diagnosed by biopsies prior to treatment. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluation for clinical response and expression of VEGF. We considered a tumor regression greater than 50% as a good clinical response. Results: eighteen patients (45%) had good response to chemotherapy, and 22 (55%), poor response. VEGF expression was positive in 16 patients and negative in 24. When analyzed separately for response to chemotherapy, only the positive expression of VEGF was associated with good clinical response (p=0.0157). Conclusion: VEGF expression alone was an important marker of good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced carcinoma of the cervix.