Recent developments in the pathology of primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumours.

Primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumours are rare neoplasms that are thought to arise from seromucinous glands that are located in the submucosa of large airways. These neoplasms have clinical and pathologic features that are distinct from other pulmonary neoplasms. The majority of primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumours are malignant, with the most common entities being mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma. Less commonly seen are myoepithelial carcinoma, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, intraductal carcinoma, and polymorphous adenocarcinoma. Benign salivary gland-type tumours of the lung include pleomorphic adenoma and sialadenoma papilliferum. Morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of these neoplasms are largely similar to salivary gland tumours elsewhere, and therefore the exclusion of metastatic disease requires clinical and radiologic correlation. However, the differential diagnostic considerations are different in the lung. The distinction of salivary gland-type tumours from their histologic mimics is important for both prognostication and treatment decisions. Overall, salivary gland type-tumours tend to have a more favourable outcome than other pulmonary carcinomas, although high-grade variants exist for many of these tumour types. Recent advances in our understanding of the spectrum of salivary gland-type tumours reported in the lung and their diversity of molecular and immunohistochemical features have helped to refine the classification of these tumours and have highlighted a few differences between salivary gland-type tumours of the lung and those primary to other sites.

Rare but clinically important salivary gland-type tumor of the lung: A review.

Salivary gland-type tumor (SGT) of the lung, which arises from the bronchial glands of the tracheobronchial tree, was first recognized in the 1950s. SGT represents less than 1% of all lung tumors and is generally reported to have a good prognosis. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) are the two most common subtypes, comprising more than 90% of all SGTs. The reported 5-year survival rate of patients with SGT is 63.4%. Because this type of tumor develops in major bronchi, patients with SGT commonly present with symptoms of bronchial obstruction, including dyspnea, shortness of breath, wheezing, and coughing; thus, the tumor is usually identified at an early stage. Most patients are treated by lobectomy and pneumonectomy, but bronchoplasty or tracheoplasty is often needed to preserve respiratory function. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical resection of SGT is recommended, given that clinical benefit from lymphadenectomy has been reported in patients with MEC. For advanced tumors, appropriate therapy should be considered according to the subtype because of the varying clinicopathologic features. MEC, but not ACC, is less likely to be treated with radiation therapy because of its low response rate. Although previous researchers have learned much from studying SGT over the years, the diagnosis and treatment of SGT remains a complex and challenging problem for thoracic surgeons. In this article, we review the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) of SGT, mainly focusing on MEC and ACC. We also summarize reports of adjuvant and definitive radiation therapy for ACC in the literature.

Current diagnosis and treatment of salivary gland-type tumors of the lung.

Salivary gland-type tumors of the lung are thought to originate from the submucosal exocrine glands of the large airways. Due to their rare occurrence, reports of their study are limited to small-scale or case reports. Therefore, daily clinical practices often require a search for previous reports. In the last 20 years, several genetic rearrangements have been identified, such as MYB::NF1B rearrangements in adenoid cystic carcinoma, CRTC1::MAML2 rearrangements in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, EWSR1::ATF1 rearrangements in hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma and rearrangements of the EWSR1 locus or FUS (TLS) locus in myoepithelioma and myoepithelial carcinoma. These molecular alterations have been useful in diagnosing these tumors, although they have not yet been linked to molecularly targeted therapies. The morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of these tumors are similar to those of their counterparts of extrapulmonary origin, so clinical and radiologic differential diagnosis is required to distinguish between primary and metastatic disease of other primary sites. However, these molecular alterations can be useful in differentiating them from other primary lung cancer histologic types. The management of these tumors requires broad knowledge of the latest diagnostics, surgery, radiotherapy, bronchoscopic interventions, chemotherapy, immunotherapy as well as therapeutic agents in development, including molecularly targeted agents. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary salivary gland tumors, with a focus on adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, which are the two most common subtypes.

Expanding the cytological and architectural spectrum of mucoepidermoid carcinoma: The key to solving diagnostic problems in morphological variants.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Varying sized cysts and sheets composed of three cell types (epidermoid, intermediate, and mucous cells) with varying degrees of atypia form the characteristic histological appearance of MEC. MEC frequently contains a wide variety of modified tumor cells and can be entirely cystic or completely solid. Under these circumstances, MEC requires critical differentiation from many mimickers, ranging from simple cysts and benign tumors to high-grade carcinomas. Tumor-associated lymphoid proliferation and sclerotic changes in the stroma also contribute to diagnostic difficulties. Several well-known diagnostically challenging variants (oncocytic, clear cell, spindle cell, and sclerosing) exist in MEC. With the advent of studies on specific CRTC1/3::MAML2 fusion genes in MEC, newly proposed subtypes have emerged, including Warthin-like and non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like MECs. In addition to the recently defined mucoacinar variant with a serous cell phenotype, MEC devoid of squamous differentiation has also been reported, implying the need to reconsider this basic concept. In this article, we outline the general clinical features and MAML2 status of conventional MEC and review the cytoarchitectural subtypes, with an emphasis on a pitfall in the interpretation of this histologically diverse single entity.

SALTT study: A retrospective analysis of 111 SAlivary gland tumors of Lung and Tracheobronchial Tree.

INTRODUCTION: Primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumours (PPSGT) are rare lung neoplasms arising from submucosal seromucinous glands in the central airway. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of 111 PPSGTs diagnosed at our institute between 2003 and 2021. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.8 years(range 6-78 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. On imaging, 92 % of cases had centrally located tumours and 37.3 % were early stage. The histopathological types included 70 cases (63 %) of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 31 cases (27.7 %) of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ADCC), two cases of myoepithelial carcinoma, one case each of acinic cell carcinoma (ACC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) and 5 others [including adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland origin(n = 3), carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation(n = 1) and poorly differentiated carcinoma of salivary gland type(n = 1)]. The size of the tumours found in the resection specimens ranged from 1 cm to 13 cm, with an average size of 4.9 cm. High-risk attributes such as lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), pleural involvement, positive resection margins, and nodal metastasis were identified in 15.3 %, 15.3 %, 13.6 %,15.2 % and 6.7 % of cases, respectively. These attributes were found to be more frequent in ADCC than in MEC. Surgery was the main treatment modality [68/84 (80 %) cases]. ADCC cases had more recurrence and distant metastasis than MEC cases. The 3- year overall-survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival(RFS) were better in patients with age lesser than 60 years(p-value <0.0001), low pT stage (p-value 0.00038) and lower grade of MEC(p-value-0.0067). CONCLUSION: It is crucial to have an acquaintance with the morphologic spectrum and immunophenotypic characteristics of PPSGT to recognize them in this unusual location. In tandem, it is crucial to differentiate them from conventional primary non-small cell lung carcinoma, as the management protocols and prognostic implications differ significantly.

Parotid Gland Tumors: Molecular Diagnostic Approaches.

Parotid gland pathology represents a web of differential diagnoses. There are many complex cases that require extensive diagnostic tests for a complete and correct final pathology diagnosis. Currently the official classification of parotid gland tumors extends over more than 40 subtypes. We performed a query of the PubMed database regarding the use of molecular biology tests in performing a better characterization of the tumors in specific cases. By using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or next-generation sequencing, the team managing complex cases can offer a personalized therapeutic solution. We review the molecular differential diagnosis according to published articles in the last 5 years for many types of parotid gland tumors ranging from benign to borderline malign tumors to malign aggressive tumors. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a distinct subtype of parotid malignancy that was the subject of a consistent number of articles. However, the molecular biology diagnosis techniques helped more in excluding the diagnosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and probably retrospectively limiting the number of cases with this final diagnosis. In Romania, the molecular biology diagnosis is available only in limited research facilities and should receive more consistent funding that will make it available on a larger scale. The novelty of this scoping review is that we propose an algorithm for molecular differential diagnosis of the tumors that could be encountered in the parotid gland.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma may be devoid of squamoid cells by immunohistochemistry: expanding the histologic and immunohistochemical spectrum of MAML2- rearranged salivary gland tumours.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is historically defined by a mix of squamoid, intermediate, and mucous cells, but we have recently encountered several cases lacking immunoreactivity for squamous markers p40, p63, and CK5/6 despite MAML2 fusions. This study will characterise these unique tumours. Ten MEC were collected arising from the parotid gland (n = 4), submandibular gland (n = 2), nasopharynx (n = 1), base of tongue (n = 1), bronchus (n = 1), and trachea (n = 1). Six tumours were low-grade, two intermediate-grade, one high-grade, and one demonstrated low-grade areas with high-grade transformation. Four cases were oncocytic, four had clear-cell features, two had spindle cell features, and one high-grade MEC had prominent solid, cord-like, and micropapillary features. The tumours were negative for p40 (10/10), p63 (10/10), and CK5/6 (9/9). Targeted RNA sequencing demonstrated CRTC1::MAML2 in five cases, CRTC3::MAML2 in two, and a novel MAML2::CEP126 in the unusual high-grade case. In two cases with insufficient RNA, MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) showed rearrangement. Genetically-confirmed MEC may lack overt squamous differentiation by histology and immunohistochemistry. While most cases harboured canonical fusions and fit within the spectra of MEC variants with oncocytic, clear cell, and/or spindle cell features, one had a novel MAML2::CEP126 fusion and unusual morphology. In MEC without squamoid cells, the use of immunohistochemistry may hinder, rather than aid, the correct diagnosis. In such cases, MAML2 analysis is most useful. The historical definition of MEC as a carcinoma with squamoid, intermediate and mucous cells should be revisited.

Malignant and Benign Tracheobronchial Neoplasms: Comprehensive Review with Radiologic, Bronchoscopic, and Pathologic Correlation.

Tracheobronchial neoplasms are much less common than lung parenchymal neoplasms but can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. They include a broad differential of both malignant and benign entities, extending far beyond more commonly known pathologic conditions such as squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumor. Airway lesions may be incidental findings at imaging or manifest with symptoms related to airway narrowing or mucosal irritation, invasion of adjacent structures, or distant metastatic disease. While there is considerable overlap in clinical manifestation, imaging features, and bronchoscopic appearances, an awareness of potential distinguishing factors may help narrow the differential diagnosis. The authors review the epidemiology, imaging characteristics, typical anatomic distributions, bronchoscopic appearances, and histopathologic findings of a wide range of neoplastic entities involving the tracheobronchial tree. Malignant neoplasms discussed include squamous cell carcinoma, malignant salivary gland tumors (adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma), carcinoid tumor, sarcomas, primary tracheobronchial lymphoma, and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Benign neoplasms discussed include hamartoma, chondroma, lipoma, papilloma, amyloidoma, leiomyoma, neurogenic lesions, and benign salivary gland tumors (pleomorphic adenoma and mucous gland adenoma). Familiarity with the range of potential entities and any distinguishing features should prove valuable to thoracic radiologists, pulmonologists, and cardiothoracic surgeons when encountering the myriad of tracheobronchial neoplasms in clinical practice. Attention is paid to any features that may help render a more specific diagnosis before pathologic confirmation. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Ex Pleomorphic Adenoma of Lacrimal Gland: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (Ca ex PA) is defined as an infiltrative carcinoma arising from a primary or recurrent benign pleomorphic adenoma. Ca ex PA with the histologic subtype mucoepidermoid carcinoma is extremely uncommon. Only 2 previous reports in the lacrimal gland have been documented. We reported a 55-year-old lady with a firm, solid, nontender mass in the supralateral quadrant of the right orbit at the area of the lacrimal gland. After wide excision of mass, pathology revealed high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma Ex pleomorphic adenoma. To reduce tumor recurrence 60 Gray radiation was delivered to the orbital cavity. She is still tumor-free 1 year after completion of treatment.

[Primary salivary gland tumors from a pathology perspective : Morphomolecular peculiarities and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges]. / Primäre Speicheldrüsentumoren aus Sicht der Pathologie : Morphomolekulare Besonderheiten und diagnostisch-therapeutische Herausforderungen.

Similar to tumors of other organs, salivary gland neoplasms were historically viewed as a single neoplastic entity and mostly treated as such. Accordingly, only the clinical tumor stage, and not the histological subtype, was considered to be of significant prognostic impact. However, over the years, several distinct sub-entities have been characterized based on morphological features, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and salivary duct carcinoma. Most importantly, the nosology of salivary gland carcinomas has undergone a dynamic "splitting" on the basis of morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics, so that 21 independent carcinomas are now listed in the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Moreover, it has become evident that splitting of these carcinoma subtypes no longer represents a "pathologist's hobby," but carries significant prognostic and therapeutic relevance for optimized cancer surgery and potentially systemic therapy. The current review summarizes the major features of salivary gland tumors, both benign and malignant, and gives an account of their classification systems and genetic profiles.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the palate mimicking a pyogenic granuloma in a 30-year-old woman.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland adenocarcinoma, more frequently affecting female patients in the fifth decade of life. When MEC arises in the minor salivary glands, the palate is the primary site. This case report describes an MEC on the palate of a 30-year-old woman. The lesion was initially treated as a pyogenic granuloma, but the final diagnosis based on histopathology was low-grade MEC. The patient was referred for cancer treatment, and no recurrence was observed during 3 years of follow-up. Some malignant tumors can mimic nonneoplastic reactive lesions clinically, which highlights the importance of biopsy and proper microscopic analysis of the resulting specimens.

[Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma with eosinophilia of thyroid gland]. / Skleroziruyushchii mukoepidermoidnyi rak shchitovidnoi zhelezy s eozinofiliei stromy.

Sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinoma with stromal eosinophilia of thyroid gland is represented less than 100 cases in the world literature. We present a rare case of sclerosing mucoepidermoid carcinona with stromal eosinophilia in a 69-year-old woman who has been observed for multinodular goiter for more than 3 years. Cytological examination revealed a picture most of all corresponding to a malignant neoplasm (Bethesda V). The patient underwent a thyroidectomy. Pathomorphological examination revealed a neoplasm of mixed structure with foci of cribriform structures and squamous metaplasia with areas of keratinization. According to the IHC study, the expression of TTF-1, p63, cytokeratins 5/6 were positive, while there were no expression of thyroglobulin with its positive reaction in the thyroid tissue. Additional histochemical staining with Alcian blue revealed a positive reaction with a homogeneous acellular substance of the tumor. A comprehensive morphological study with the use of additional stains made it possible to accurately establish the diagnosis, which will determine the further tactics of managing the patient.

Clear Cell Neoplasms of Salivary Glands: A Diagnostic Challenge.

This review focuses on the heterogenous group of clear cell neoplasms of salivary glands and attempts to identify major differential diagnostic features. Within the head and neck region, clear cells are found most commonly in salivary gland tumors, but may also be seen in tumors of squamous or odontogenic epithelial origin, primary or metastatic carcinomas, benign or malignant melanocytic lesions, or benign or malignant mesenchymal tumors. Clear cells occur fairly commonly among a wide variety of salivary gland neoplasms, but mostly they constitute only a minor component of the tumor cell population. Clear cells represent a major diagnostic feature in two salivary gland neoplasms, epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma. In addition, salivary gland neoplasms composed predominantly of clear cells could also include clear cell variants of other salivary neoplasms, such as mucoepidermoid carcinoma and myoepithelial carcinoma, but their tumor type-specific histologic features may only be available in limited nonclear cell areas of the tumor. Diagnosing predominantly clear cell salivary gland tumors is difficult because the immunoprofiles and morphologic features may overlap and the same tumor entity may also have a wide range of other histologic presentations. Many salivary gland tumors are characterized by tumor type-specific genomic alterations, particularly gene fusions of the ETV6 gene in secretory carcinoma, the MYB and MYBL1 genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma, the MAML2 gene in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, the EWSR1 gene in hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma, and others. Thus, along with conventional histopathologic examination and immunoprofiling, molecular and genetic tests may be important in the diagnosis of salivary gland clear cell tumors by demonstrating genetic alterations specific to them.

Non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report.

Non-sebaceous lymphadenoma is a rare benign salivary gland tumor comprised of non-sebaceous epithelial cells and lymphoid tissue. Although its clinicopathological features have been described, its histogenesis and genetic background have not yet been elucidated. MAML2 rearrangement and the resultant CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene are well-known specific genetic changes in mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Here, we present a case of lymphoepithelial tumor characterized by histomorphology of the non-sebaceous lymphadenoma and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion gene. The patient was an 83-year-old woman with an 8-year history of a solid, well-circumscribed tumor in the parotid gland. Histologically, the tumor was surrounded by thin fibrous connective tissue and was composed of tubular-cystic and solid nests of epithelial cells equally distributed in the lymphoid tissue. The histological features were suggestive of non-sebaceous lymphadenoma. Although the histomorphology was not consistent with mucoepidermoid carcinoma, a diagnosis of non-sebaceous lymphadenoma-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma was made based on the presence of the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion gene. The histological features alone could not establish the diagnosis, and ancillary molecular analysis was required.

EWSR1 rearrangement is not specific for hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of salivary glands.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate the molecular rearrangement of EWSR1 in hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC) (with and without eosinophilia) and clear cell variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of salivary glands. METHOD: We performed a molecular detection of HCCC (Group 1) and clear cell variant of MEC (Group 2). Group 1 consisted of 5 cases of typical HCCC and 5 cases of HCCC with eosinophilia. Group 2 encompassed 5 cases of clear-cell MEC. For both groups, we conducted a FISH analysis using EWSR1 dual color break-apart FISH probe (ZytoLight®, 22q12.2) and MAML2 dual color break-apart FISH probe (ZytoLight®, 11q21). RESULTS: All analyzable cases of HCCC with or without eosinophilic components were negative for EWSR1 translocation. All cases of clear-cell MEC were positive for MAML2 translocation. No translocation was observed in HCCC. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that clear cells could cause diagnostic uncertainty and that EWSR1 can be detected in many primary neoplasms of salivary glands and metastatic tumors that were reported in salivary glands. We suggest that recommending EWSR1 as a diagnostic molecular marker for HCCC should be reconsidered.

Diagnostic Value of MAML2 Rearrangements in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is often seen in salivary glands and can harbor MAML2 translocations (MAML2+). The translocation status has diagnostic utility as an objective confirmation of the MEC diagnosis, for example, when distinction from the more aggressive adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is not straightforward. To assess the diagnostic relevance of MAML2, we examined our 5-year experience in prospective testing of 8106 solid tumors using RNA-seq panel testing in combinations with a two-round Delphi-based scenario survey. The prevalence of MAML2+ across all tumors was 0.28% (n = 23/8106) and the majority of MAML2+ cases were found in head and neck tumors (78.3%), where the overall prevalence was 5.9% (n = 18/307). The sensitivity of MAML2 for MEC was 60% and most cases (80%) were submitted for diagnostic confirmation; in 24% of cases, the MAML2 results changed the working diagnosis. An independent survey of 15 experts showed relative importance indexes of 0.8 and 0.65 for "confirmatory MAML2 testing" in suspected MEC and ASC, respectively. Real-world evidence confirmed that the added value of MAML2 is a composite of an imperfect confirmation test for MEC and a highly specific exclusion tool for the diagnosis of ASC. Real-world evidence can help move a rare molecular-genetic biomarker from an emerging tool to the clinic.

[Clinicopathologic analysis of micro and mini parotid gland tumors].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of micro and mini parotid gland tumors and to provide reference for their clinical diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: Patients with parotid gland tumors treated in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from December 2012 to April 2020 were selected. Relevant clinical data of the patients with tumor diameter ≤20 mm detected by preoperative CT were collected to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of micro and mini parotid gland tumors. And the collected data were divided into two groups with diameter 11-20 mm and diameter ≤10 mm according to tumor diameter measured by preoperative CT. The clinicopathological differences between the two groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2 067 patients with primary epithelial parotid gland tumors were collected, and 685 patients with tumor diameter ≤20 mm were examined by CT, accounting for 33.1%. The ratio of male to female patients with micro and mini parotid gland tumors was 1 ∶1.93, the average age was (45.3±13.8) years (12-83 years), and the median course of disease was 12 months (1 week to 30 years). Among them, 635 cases (92.7%) were benign tumors, 50 cases (7.3%) were malignant tumors, and the ratio of benign to malignant was 12.7 ∶1. The most common benign tumor was pleomorphic adenoma, and the most common malignant tumor was mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The micro and mini parotid gland tumors were divided into 11-20 mm group (n=611) and ≤10 mm group (n=74), the clinical characteristics comparison of the two groups of gender ratio, average age, course of di-sease had no statistical difference (P>0.05). In the 11-20 mm diameter group, the percentage of benign and malignant tumor was 92.8% (567/611) and 7.2% (44/611) respectively, and the ratio of benign to malignant tumors was 12.9 ∶1. In the ≤10 mm diameter group, the percentage of benign and malignant tumor was 91.9% (68/74) and 8.1% (6/74) respectively, and the ratio of benign to malignant tumors was 11.3 ∶1. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Fifty patients with malignant tumor were followed up for the median follow-up period of 39.5 months (1-91 months). Local recurrence occurred in 2 patients with one death. The overall 2-year survival rate was 93.7% and the 5-year survival rate was 89.3%. CONCLUSION: The majority of micro and mini parotid gland tumors was benign lesion. There was a good prognosis for micro and mini parotid gland carcinoma. Early surgical treatment was recommended for micro and mini parotid gland tumors.

Why is the histomorphological diagnosis of tumours of minor salivary glands much more difficult?

AIMS: There is a widespread perception among clinicians and pathologists that the histomorphological assessment of minor salivary gland (MinSG) tumours is more difficult and hampered by more misdiagnoses than that of major salivary gland tumours. This is based on a vague, subjective clinical impression, lacking scientific proof. The aim of the present study was to identify and statistically verify potential reasons that could explain this difference. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 14 putative clinical, pathological and combined clinicopathological reasons that, altogether, could explain the phenomenon of the perceived greater diagnostic difficulty associated with MinSG tumours. We performed a comprehensive literature search and a statistical comparison of data from a large personal consultation series (biased for difficult cases) with cumulated data from straightforward, unselected (non-consultation) series from the literature. By performing this comparison, we identified, with statistical significance, a comprehensive series of reasons, as well as of consequences, of the greater difficulty in diagnosing MinSG tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Among the 14 criteria, high frequencies of initial incisional biopsies and of a low-grade category in malignant tumours emerged as the two most important reasons for enhanced diagnostic difficulty. Very rare entities, unusual locations, shortcomings in clinicopathological communication, and pecularities of the special anatomical location of the hard palate, such as tumour necrosis, mucosal ulceration, pseudoinvasion, and the peculiar phenomenon of 'tumoral-mucosal fusion', contribute to further diagnostic difficulties. The awareness of these shortcomings and pitfalls enables us to provide a series of recommendations for clinicians and pathologists that might aid in assessment and reduce the rate of misdiagnosis of MinSG tumours.

Clinical outcomes of bulky parotid gland cancers: need for self-examination and screening program for early diagnosis of parotid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Early detection and diagnosis of parotid gland cancer (PGC) are essential to improve clinical outcomes, because Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage at diagnosis is a very strong indicator of prognosis in PGC. Nevertheless, some patients still present with large parotid mass, maybe due to the unawareness or ignorance of their disease. In this study, we aimed to present the clinical outcomes of bulky PGC (defined by a 4 cm cutoff point for T3-4 versus T1-2 tumors), to emphasize the necessity of a self-examination tool for parotid gland tumor. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 60 consecutive cases with bulky (equal to and greater than 4 cm in the longest diameter, determined radiologically) malignant tumors arising from the parotid gland from 1995 to 2016. The clinical and pathological factors were analyzed to identify risk factors for poor outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, we designed a self-examination tool for parotid gland tumors, similar to breast self-examination for breast cancer detection. RESULTS: Patients with bulky parotid cancer showed 48.9% 5-year and 24.5% 10-year overall survival rates and a 47.9% risk of high-grade malignancy. The common pathological diagnoses were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (18.3%), adenocarcinoma (16.7%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (16.7%), salivary duct carcinoma (16.7%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (11.7%). Survival analyses revealed that tumor size (hazard ratio, HR = 1.262 upon increase of 1 cm, 95% confidence interval, 95%CI 1.059-1.502), lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.999, 95%CI 1.048-8.583), and high tumor grade (HR = 4.148, 95%CI 1.215-14.154) were independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Functional preservation of the facial nerve was possible only in less than half of patients. CONCLUSION: In bulky PGC, lymph node metastasis at diagnosis and high tumor grade indicated poor survival outcomes, and functional outcomes of the facial nerve were suboptimal. Thus, a public effort seems to be necessary to decrease these patients with bulky PGC, and to increase patients' self-awareness of their disease. As a way of early detection, we proposed a parotid self-examination tool to detect parotid gland tumors at an early stage, which is similar to breast self-examination.

Molecular Pathology of Salivary Gland Neoplasms: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Perspective.

Salivary gland neoplasms are an uncommon and widely heterogeneous group of tumors. In recent years, there has been considerable progress in efforts to reveal the molecular landscape of these tumors, although it is still limited and appears to be only the tip of the iceberg. Genomic aberrations, especially specific chromosomal rearrangements including CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, MYB-NFIB and MYBL1-NFIB fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma, PLAG1 and HMGA2 alterations in pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, ETV6-NTRK3 and ETV6-RET in secretory carcinoma, EWSR1-ATF1 and EWSR1-CREM in clear cell carcinoma, provide new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of various salivary gland neoplasms and help to better classify them. These genetic aberrations primarily serve as diagnostic tools in salivary gland tumor diagnosis; however, some also have promise as prognostic or predictive biomarkers. This review summarizes the latest developments in molecular pathology of salivary gland tumors with a focus on distinctive molecular characteristics.