Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(7): 2499-2512, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860998

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To clarify the diagnostic utility and formation of the Mille-feuille sign for ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) on MRI, and to evaluate the other MRI findings and serum markers compared to ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma (OMCRC). METHOD: Three blinded radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR images of 12 patients with OCS, 18 with OMCRC, and 40 with primary ovarian carcinoma (POC) identified by the electronic database of radiology reports. The interobserver agreement was analyzed using Fleiss' kappa test. Their MRI characteristics and tumor markers were compared using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney's U test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine the cutoff points for the ADC value. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement analysis was moderate or higher for all MRI characteristics. The frequency of Mille-feuille sign was comparable for both OCS and OMCRC groups, and predominantly higher than that of the POC group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), respectively. Pathologically, the Mille-feuille sign in OCS reflected alternating layers of tumor cells with stroma and necrosis or intraluminal necrotic debris. Compared to OMCRC, intratumoral hemorrhage (p = 0.02), margin irregularity (p = 0.048), unilateral adnexal mass (p = 0.02), and low ADC values (p < 0.01) were more frequently observed and serum CEA levels was significantly lower (p = 0.007) in the OCS group. Under setting of the cutoff value of ADC at 0.871 × 10-3mm2/s, the discriminative ability for OCS showed 66.7% sensitivity, 94.4% specificity, and 81.0% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Mille-feuille sign was seen in both OCS and OMCRC. MR findings of intratumoral hemorrhage, margin irregularity, unilateral adnexal mass, low ADC values, and low serum CEA levels can be useful in differentiating OCS from OMCRC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinosarcoma , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinosarcoma/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Anciano , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Medios de Contraste
2.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-100614

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) shared the same staging system with endometrial carcinoma in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between UCS and grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (G3EC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 UCS and 115 G3EC patients with initial treatment at the Department of Gynecology in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between February 2006 and August 2013. Chi-square analysis was used to compare differences between variables. Prognostic factors were determined using univariate/multivariate analysis, and the survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to assess the independent prognostic factor. RESULTS: UCS had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared with G3EC. Carcinosarcoma subtype was an independent factor (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 5.8; p=0.039), stratified based on stage. Compared with G3EC, UCS patients had a greater incidence of ascites fluid (55.0% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001) and adnexal involvement (20.0% vs. 8.7%, p=0.048) and larger median tumor volume (4.6 cm vs. 4.0 cm, p=0.046). Subgroup analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that UCS patients exhibited worse OS than G3EC patients in such specific subgroups as patients at younger ages, with postmenopausal status, without ascites fluid, with early stage diseases, without vagina invasion, without lymph node metastases and receiving adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy with chemotherapy was predictive of better survival in UCS patients compared with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone (5-year OS, 71.0% vs. 35.8%, p=0.028). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that tumor mesenchymal component (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 15.8; p=0.014) was an independent prognostic factor for UCS, whereas advanced stages (HR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.0 to 33.9; p=0.046) and ascites fluid (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 22.7; p=0.032) were independently correlated with poor prognosis for G3EC patients. CONCLUSION: The distinctions in both clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between UCS and G3EC suggest that this subtype should be treated separately from high-risk epithelial endometrial carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anexos Uterinos/patología , Factores de Edad , Aorta , Ascitis/etiología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/secundario , Carcinosarcoma/secundario , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Histerectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pelvis , Posmenopausia , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral , Vagina/patología
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 11(10): 677-680, oct. 2009. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-123694

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Uterine tumours with a sarcomatous component are rare neoplasms with a wide pathologic heterogeneity in which the stage is the main prognostic factor. These aspects and their aggressiveness make the analysis of prognostic factors and radiotherapy difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors by stages and to assess the impact of prognostic factors and the effect of radiotherapy on the outcome of the disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-one patients diagnosed and treated for uterine tumours with a sarcomatous component at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona between 1975 and 2003 were retrospectively studied; 76/81 patients underwent surgery (total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and in 13/76 of these patients an additional pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed). All 76 patients were staged after pathological evaluation of the surgical specimen by FIGO classification with 54 patients being stages I-II and 27 patients stages III-IVA. Only 5 patients were clinically staged as III-IVA. Radiotherapy was administered in 21 women with early-stage tumours and in 16 with advanced neoplasms. 5/81 patients received complementary chemotherapy to the surgery and 5 patients received chemotherapy as treatment of local and distant relapse (All the patients were treated with a different chemotherapy schedule). The impact of pathologic prognostic factors and radiotherapy on specific overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analysed by Log Rank test and Cox proportional risk models. The effect of each risk factor was studied by the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: An increased frequency of several adverse prognostic factors was observed in tumours with advanced stages compared to early neoplasms in deep myometrial invasion (83% vs. 27%), VLSI (75% vs. 29%), tumour size >8 cm (50% vs. 30%) and multicentricity (36% vs. 10%), and similar values were found for necrosis (79% vs. 78%) and high mitotic index (78% vs. 80%). For pathological type the frequency by advanced vs. early stages was 54% vs. 52% for carcinosarcomas, 33.5% vs. 17.5% for leiomyosarcoma, and 30.5% and 12.5% for adenosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the stage was the only independent prognostic factor. Stratification by early (I-II) and advanced stages (III, IV) revealed tumour size >8 cm was the only prognostic factor significantly associated with OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS on univariate analysis for early stages (HR: OS 2.52, DFS 3.10, LRFS 3.10 and DMFS 2.63). For advanced stages, radiotherapy was the only prognostic factor associated with OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS on multivariate analysis (HR: OS 4.26, DFS 3.14, LRFS 3.25 and DMFS 3.66). CONCLUSIONS: Uterine tumours with a sarcomatous component have a poor outcome in spite of treatment in comparison to endometrial carcinoma, probably due to the higher frequency of adverse prognostic factors. In early stages tumour size was the most determining factor for OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS. Radiotherapy significantly improved these survivals in advanced cases (AU)


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinosarcoma/radioterapia , Leiomiosarcoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/radioterapia , Carcinosarcoma/secundario , Leiomiosarcoma/secundario , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/tendencias , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA