RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated trends in global surgical site infection rates in colorectal surgery in the past decade. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to describe changes in rates of different surgical site infections from 2013 to 2020, identify risk factors for surgical site infection occurrence, and evaluate the association of minimally invasive surgery and infection rates in colorectal resections. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database 2013-2020 identifying patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal resections by procedure codes was performed. Patient demographic information, comorbidities, procedures, and complications data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. SETTING: This was a retrospective study. PATIENTS: A total of 279,730 patients received colorectal resections from 2013 to 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the rate of surgical site infection, divided into superficial, deep incisional, and organ space infections. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in rates of superficial infections ( p < 0.01) and deep incisional infections ( p < 0.01) from 5.9% in 2013 to 3.3% in 2020 and from 1.4% in 2013 to 0.6% in 2020, respectively, but a rise in organ space infections ( p < 0.01) from 5.2% in 2013 to 7.1% in 2020. Minimally invasive techniques were associated with decreased odds of all surgical site infections compared to open techniques ( p < 0.01) in multivariate analysis, and adoption of minimally invasive techniques increased from 59% in 2013 to 66% in 2020. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its retrospective nature and variables available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial and deep incisional infection rates have significantly decreased, likely secondary to improved adoption of minimally invasive techniques and infection prevention bundles. Organ space infection rates continue to increase. Additional research is warranted to clarify current recommendations for mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotic use as well as to study novel interventions to decrease postoperative infection occurrence. See Video Abstract . TENDENCIAS MODERNAS EN LAS TASAS DE INFECCIN DEL SITIO QUIRRGICO PARA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL UN ESTUDIO DEL PROYECTO NACIONAL DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD QUIRRGICA: ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios que investiguen las tendencias en las tasas globales de infección del sitio quirúrgico en cirugía colorrectal en la última década.OBJETIVO:Este estudio busca describir cambios en las tasas de diferentes infecciones del sitio quirúrgico entre 2013 y 2020, identificar factores de riesgo para la aparición de ISQ y evaluar la asociación de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva y las tasas de infección en resecciones colorrectales.DISEÑO:Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de la base de datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica 2013-2020 que identifica a los pacientes sometidos a resecciones colorrectales abiertas o laparoscópicas mediante códigos de procedimiento. Se obtuvo información demográfica de los pacientes, comorbilidades, procedimientos y datos de complicaciones. Se realizó regresión logística univariable y multivariable.AJUSTE:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo.PACIENTES:Un total de 279,730 pacientes recibieron resección colorrectal entre 2013 y 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La medida de resultado primaria fue la tasa de infección del sitio quirúrgico, dividida en infecciones superficiales, incisionales profundas y del espacio de órganos.RESULTADOS:Hubo una disminución significativa en las tasas de infecciones superficiales (p < 0,01) e infecciones incisionales profundas ( p < 0,01) del 5,9% en 2013 al 3,3% en 2020 y del 1,4% en 2013 al 0,6% en 2020, respectivamente. pero un aumento en las infecciones del espacio de los órganos ( p < 0,01) del 5,2 % en 2013 al 7,1 % en 2020. El uso de técnicas mínimamente invasivas se asoció con una disminución de las probabilidades de todas las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico en comparación con las técnicas abiertas ( p < 0,01) en el análisis multivariado y la adopción de técnicas mínimamente invasivas aumentó del 59% en 2013 al 66% en 2020.LIMITACIONES:El estudio está limitado por la naturaleza retrospectiva y las variables disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES:Las tasas de infección superficial y profunda han disminuido significativamente, probablemente debido a una mejor adopción de técnicas mínimamente invasivas y esquemas de prevención de infecciones. Las tasas de infección del espacio de los órganos continúan aumentando. Se justifica realizar investigaciones adicionales para aclarar las recomendaciones actuales para la preparación intestinal mecánica y el uso de antibióticos orales, así como para estudiar intervenciones novedosas para disminuir la aparición de infecciones posoperatorias. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Cirugía Colorrectal/tendencias , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/tendencias , Colectomía/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal elective colectomy in patients with splenic flexure tumor is debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare splenic flexure colectomy, left hemicolectomy, and subtotal colectomy for perioperative, histological, and survival outcomes in this setting. DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor who underwent elective colectomy were included. PATIENTS: Between 2006 and 2014, 313 consecutive patients were operated on in 15 French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery centers. INTERVENTIONS: Propensity score weighting was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, quality of surgical resection, overall postoperative morbidity, surgical postoperative morbidity, and rate of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The most performed surgery was splenic flexure colectomy (59%), followed by subtotal colectomy (23%) and left hemicolectomy (18%). Subtotal colectomy was more often performed by laparotomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (93% vs 61% vs 56%, p < 0.0001), and was associated with a longer operative time (260 minutes (120-460) vs 180 minutes (68-440) vs 217 minutes (149-480), p < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity was similar between the 3 groups, but the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer after subtotal colectomy (13 days (5-56) vs 10 (4-175) vs 9 (4-55), p = 0.0007). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher after subtotal colectomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (24 (8-90) vs 15 (1-81) vs 16 (3-52), p < 0.0001). The rate of stage III disease and the number of patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy were similar between the 3 groups. There was no difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between the 3 procedures. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: In the elective setting, splenic flexure colectomy is safe and oncologically adequate for patients with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor. However, given the oncological clearance after splenic flexure colectomy, it seems that the debate is not completely closed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703. CUL ES LA COLECTOMA ELECTIVA PTIMA PARA EL CNCER DE NGULO ESPLNICO FIN DEL DEBATE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO DEL GRUPO GRECCAR CON UN ANLISIS DE PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía electiva óptima en pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico continua en debate.OBJETIVO:Comparar la colectomía de ángulo esplénico, hemicolectomía izquierda y colectomía subtotal para los resultados perioperatorios, histológicos y de supervivencia en este escenario.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos que se sometieron a colectomía electiva.PACIENTES:Entre 2006 y 2014, 313 pacientes consecutivos fueron intervenidos en 15 centros GRECCAR.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una ponderación del puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la supervivencia general, la calidad de la resección quirúrgica, la morbilidad posoperatoria general, la morbilidad posoperatoria quirúrgica y la tasa de fuga anastomótica.RESULTADOS:La cirugía más realizada fue la colectomía del ángulo esplénico (59%), seguida de la colectomía subtotal (23%) y la hemicolectomía izquierda (18%). La colectomía subtotal se realizó con mayor frecuencia mediante laparotomía en comparación con la colectomía de ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (93% frente a 61% frente a 56%, p <0.0001), y se asoció con un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado (260 min [120-460] frente a 180 min [68-440] frente a 217 min [149-480], p <0.0001). La morbilidad posoperatoria fue similar entre los tres grupos, pero la duración media de la estancia hospitalaria fue significativamente más prolongada después de la colectomía subtotal (13 días [5-56] frente a 10 [4-175] frente a 9 [4-55], p = 0.0007). La mediana del número de ganglios linfáticos extraídos fue significativamente mayor después de la colectomía subtotal en comparación con la colectomía del ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (24 [8-90] frente a 15 [1-81] frente a 16 [3-52], p <0.0001). La tasa de enfermedad en estadio III y el número de pacientes tratados con quimioterapia adyuvante fueron similares entre los 3 grupos. No hubo diferencias en términos de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia general entre los 3 procedimientos.LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:En un escenario electivo, la colectomía del ángulo esplénico es segura y oncológicamente adecuada para pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos. Sin embargo, dado el aclaramiento oncológico tras la colectomía del ángulo esplénico, parece que el debate no está completamente cerrado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Morbilidad/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Colectomía/tendencias , Colon Transverso/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Periodo Perioperatorio/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for transverse colon cancer involves either extended colectomy or segmental resection, depending on the location of the tumor and surgeon perspective. However, the oncological safety of segmental resection has not yet been established in large cohort studies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare segmental resection versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer in terms of oncological outcomes. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted using a nationwide cohort. PATIENTS: A total of 66,062 patients who underwent colectomy with curative intent for transverse stage I to III adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were divided in 2 groups based on the type of surgery received (extended versus segmental resection). The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate within 30 days of surgical discharge. RESULTS: Extended colectomy was performed in 44,417 (67.2%) patients, whereas 21,645 (32.8%) patients underwent segmental resection. Extended colectomy was associated with lower survival at multivariate analysis (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that extended resection was independently associated with poorer survival in mid transverse colon cancers (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001) and in stage III tumors (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; p < 0.001). The number of at least 12 harvested lymph nodes was an independent predictor of improved survival in both overall and subgroup analyses. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Extended colectomy was not associated with a survival advantage compared with segmental resection. On the contrary, extended colectomy was associated with slightly poorer survival in mid transverse cancers and locally advanced tumors. Segmental resection was found to be safe when appropriate margins and adequate lymph node harvest were achieved. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B454. ABORDAJE QUIRRGICO DEL CNCER DE COLON TRANSVERSO ANLISIS DE LA PRCTICA ACTUAL Y LOS RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS UTILIZANDO LA BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL DE CNCER: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico para el cáncer de colon transverso implica colectomía extendida o resección segmentaria, según la ubicación del tumor y la perspectiva del cirujano. Sin embargo, la seguridad oncológica de la resección segmentaria aún no se ha establecido en estudios de cohortes grandes.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar la resección segmentaria versus la colectomía extendida para el cáncer de colon transverso en términos de resultados oncológicos.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Este estudio se realizó utilizando una cohorte a nivel nacional.PACIENTES:Un total de 66,062 pacientes que se sometieron a colectomía con intención curativa por adenocarcinoma de colon transverso en estadio I-III fueron identificados en la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer (2004-2015).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos según el tipo de cirugía recibida (resección extendida versus resección segmentaria). El resultado primario fue la supervivencia global. Los resultados secundarios fueron la mortalidad a los 30 y 90 días, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y la tasa de reingreso dentro de los 30 días posteriores al alta quirúrgica.RESULTADOS:Se realizó colectomía extendida en 44,417 (67.2%) casos, mientras que 21,645 (32.8%) pacientes fueron sometidos a resección segmentaria. La colectomía extendida se asoció con una menor supervivencia en el análisis multivariado (HR 1.07 IC 95% 1.04-1.10; p <0.001). El análisis de subgrupos mostró que la resección extendida se asoció de forma independiente con una menor supervivencia en los cánceres de colon transverso medio (HR 1.08 IC 95% 1.04-1.12; p <0.001) y en tumores en estadio III (HR 1.11 IC 95% 1.04-1.18; p <0.001). Un número de al menos 12 ganglios linfáticos cosechados fue un predictor independiente de una mejor supervivencia en los análisis general y de subgrupos.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIÓN:La colectomía extendida no se asoció con una ventaja de supervivencia en comparación con la resección segmentaria. Por el contrario, la colectomía extendida se asoció con una supervivencia levemente menor en cánceres de colon transverso medio y tumores localmente avanzados. Se encontró que la resección segmentaria es segura cuando se logran los márgenes apropiados y la cosecha adecuada de ganglios linfáticos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B454.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colectomía/tendencias , Colon Transverso/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infliximab rescue therapy is effective in patients with corticosteroid refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis, but predictors of response remain poorly understood. We aimed to identify predictors of colectomy in this high-risk patient population. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis who received infliximab after failing intravenous corticosteroid therapy between July 2012 and June 2017 were retrospectively identified. Stepwise regression with backward elimination was used to identify predictors of colectomy at 90 days and 1 year. Ninety-day and 1-year colectomy rates were compared between the patients who received 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg IFX rescue dose. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients met the eligibility criteria. Twenty-nine patients received 5 mg/kg, and 34 received 10 mg/kg infliximab dose. Serum albumin on admission (OR 0.10; p = 0.04) and band neutrophil percentage at the time of infliximab administration (OR 1.21; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of 90-day colectomy. A combination of serum albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dl and band neutrophil count ≥ 13% had a 100% positive predictive value for 90-day colectomy. Unadjusted 90-day and 1-year colectomy rates were similar in the 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg infliximab groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, 10 mg/kg infliximab dose was potentially protective for 90-day (OR 0.07; p = 0.06) but not for 1-year colectomy (OR 0.19; p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Bandemia and low serum albumin are independent predictors of failure of infliximab rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis. Serum albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dl and band neutrophil count ≥ 13% had a 100% positive predictive value for 90-day colectomy.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Hipoalbuminemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/diagnóstico , Hipoalbuminemia/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Total abdominal colectomy (TAC) is a treatment modality of last recourse for patients with severe and/or refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). The goal of this study is to evaluate temporal trends and treatment outcomes following TAC among hospitalized UC patients in the biologic era. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify patients older than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) who underwent TAC between 2002 and 2013. We evaluated postoperative morbidity and mortality as outcomes of interest. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality after TAC. RESULTS: A weighted total of 307,799 UC hospitalizations were identified. Of these, 27,853 (9%) resulted in TAC. Between 2002 and 2013, hospitalizations for UC increased by over 70%; however, TAC rates dropped significantly from 111.1 to 77.1 colectomies per 1000 UC admissions. Overall, 2.2% of patients died after TAC. Mortality rates after TAC decreased from 3.5% in 2002 to 1.4% in 2013. Conversely, morbidity rates were stable throughout the study period. UC patients with emergent admissions, higher comorbidity scores and who had TAC in low volume colectomy hospitals had poorer outcomes. Regardless of admission type, outcomes were worse if TAC was performed more than 24 h after admission. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased hospitalizations for UC, rates of TAC have declined during the post-biologic era. For UC patients who undergo TAC, mortality has declined significantly while morbidity remains stable. Older age, race, emergent admissions and delayed surgery are predictive factors of both postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Colectomía/mortalidad , Colectomía/tendencias , Colitis Ulcerosa/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Mortalidad/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Productos Biológicos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To better understand the real-world impact of biologic therapy in persons with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), we evaluated the effect of marketplace introduction of infliximab on the population rates of hospitalisations and surgeries and public payer drug costs. DESIGN: We used health administrative data to study adult persons with CD and UC living in Ontario, Canada between 1995 and 2012. We used an interrupted time series design with segmented regression analysis to evaluate the impact of infliximab introduction on the rates of IBD-related hospitalisations, intestinal resections and public payer drug costs over 10 years among patients with CD and 5 years among patients with UC, allowing for a 1-year transition. RESULTS: Relative to what would have been expected in the absence of infliximab, marketplace introduction of infliximab did not produce significant declines in the rates of CD-related hospitalisations (OR at the last observation quarter 1.06, 95% CI 0.811 to 1.39) or intestinal resections (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.810 to 1.50), or in the rates of UC-related hospitalisations (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.39) or colectomies (OR 0.933, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.61). The findings were similar among infliximab users, except that hospitalisation rates declined substantially among UC patients following marketplace introduction of infliximab (OR 0.515, 95% CI 0.342 to 0.777). There was a threefold rise over expected trends in public payer drug cost among patients with CD following infliximab introduction (OR 2.98,95% CI 2.29 to 3.86), suggesting robust market penetration in this group, but no significant change among patients with UC (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.955 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Marketplace introduction of infliximab has not yielded anticipated reductions in the population rates of IBD-related hospitalisations or intestinal resections, despite robust market penetration among patients with CD. Misguided use of infliximab in CD patients and underuse of infliximab in UC patients may largely explain our study findings.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colectomía/tendencias , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with Crohn's disease has evolved in recent decades, with increasing use of immunomodulatory medication since 1990 and biologicals since 1998. In parallel, there has been increased use of active disease monitoring. To what extent these changes have influenced the incidence of primary and repeat surgical resection remains debated. METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, incident patients of all ages with Crohn's disease, identified in Swedish National Patient Registry between 1990 and 2014, were divided into five calendar periods of diagnosis: 1990-1995 and 1996-2000 with use of inpatient registries, 2001, and 2002-2008 and 2009-2014 with use of inpatient and outpatient registries. The cumulative incidence of first and repeat abdominal surgery (except closure of stomas), by category of surgical procedure, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 21 273 patients with Crohn's disease, the cumulative incidence of first abdominal surgery within 5 years of Crohn's disease diagnosis decreased continuously from 54·8 per cent in 1990-1995 to 40·4 per cent in 1996-2000 (P < 0·001), and again from 19·8 per cent in 2002-2008 to 17·3 per cent in 2009-2014 (P < 0·001). Repeat 5-year surgery rates decreased from 18·9 per cent in 1990-1995 to 16·0 per cent in 1996-2000 (P = 0·009). After 2000, no further significant decreases were observed. CONCLUSION: The 5-year rate of surgical intervention for Crohn's disease has decreased significantly, but the rate of repeat surgery has remained stable despite the introduction of biological therapy.
ANTECEDENTES: El tratamie nto de pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn ha evolucionado en las últimas décadas con un uso cada vez mayor de medicamentos inmunomoduladores desde 1990 y tratamientos biológicos desde 1998. Al mismo tiempo, ha aumentado la utilidad de la vigilancia activa de la enfermedad. Hasta qué punto estos cambios han influido en la incidencia de la resección quirúrgica primaria y repetida sigue siendo objeto de debate. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes a nivel nacional de pacientes incidentes con enfermedad de Crohn de todas las edades identificados en el registro sueco nacional de pacientes entre 1990-2014, que se dividió en cinco períodos de diagnóstico: 1990-1995 y 1996-2000 con el uso de registros de pacientes hospitalizados, 2001, y 2002-2008 y 2009-2014 con uso de registros de pacientes ambulatorios y hospitalizados. Se estimó la incidencia acumulada de la primera cirugía abdominal y de las cirugías abdominales subsiguientes (excepto el cierre de estomas), por categoría de procedimiento quirúrgico, mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Entre 21.273 pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn, la incidencia acumulada de la primera cirugía abdominal durante los 5 años posteriores al diagnóstico de la enfermedad disminuyó continuamente del 54,8% en la cohorte 1990-1995 al 40,4% en la cohorte 1996-2000 (P < 0,001) y nuevamente del 19,8% en cohorte 2002-2008 al 17,3% en la cohorte 2009-2014 (P < 0,001). Las tasas cirugías iterativas a los 5 años disminuyeron de 18,9% en la cohorte 1990-1995 a 16,0% en la cohorte 1996-2000 (P = 0,017). Después del 2000, no se observaron más disminuciones significativas. CONCLUSIÓN: La tasa de intervención quirúrgica a los 5 años para la enfermedad de Crohn ha disminuido significativamente, pero la cirugía iterativa se ha mantenido estable a pesar de la introducción de la terapia biológica.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Colectomía/tendencias , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Proctectomía/tendencias , Reoperación/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Suecia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After traumatic injury, primary anastomosis after colon resection has overtaken ostomy diversion. Improved technology facilitating primary anastomosis speed and integrity may have driven this change. Trends in ostomy versus anastomosis have yet to be quantified, and recent literature comparing outcomes is incomplete. METHODS: The National Trauma Databank (2007-2014) was queried for all blunt colon injuries requiring resection. Patients were dichotomized into study groups based on whether they underwent ostomy creation. Ostomy creation frequency was compared over time. After subgrouping patients by colon injury location, multivariate regression adjusted for baseline characteristics and evaluated the impact of ostomy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 13,949 colon injuries requiring colectomy were identified. Ostomy frequency did not vary by study year (P = 0.536). Univariate analysis showed that patients undergoing ostomy were older (median, 40 versus 32; P < 0.001) and more often had comorbidities (65% versus 56%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that ostomy creation was significantly associated with lower mortality after sigmoid colon injury (odds ratio, 0.512; P = 0.011) and higher rates of unplanned reoperation after transverse colon injury (odds ratio, 3.135; P = 0.048). Across all colon injuries, ostomies were significantly associated with longer hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilator days. CONCLUSIONS: Ostomy creation for colonic injury has reached an equilibrium trough. The impact of ostomy creation varies by not only clinical outcome but also injury location. Further study is needed to define the optimal surgical management for blunt colon injuries requiring resection.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Colon/lesiones , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Colostomía/tendencias , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/tendencias , Colectomía/métodos , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colon/cirugía , Colostomía/métodos , Colostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo colectomy at high-volume centers have better outcomes and fewer complications than those at low-volume centers. We aimed to evaluate the hospital volume of total abdominal colectomy (TAC) for pediatric patients with UC and explore time trends in the proportion of colectomies performed at high-volume centers. We then evaluated the association between hospital colectomy volume and complications. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (age, ≤18 y) hospitalized for UC using the Kids' Inpatient Database, a nationally representative database of pediatric hospitalizations. We identified UC hospitalizations with a procedural code (International Classification of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision) for TAC from 1997 through 2016. We defined complications using diagnosis codes adapted from published algorithms. We defined high-volume as hospitals that performed 10 or more TACs annually. We used multivariate statistics to evaluate the association between hospital volume and in-hospital complications. RESULTS: A total of 1453 hospitalizations of children with UC included a TAC (2306 colectomies nationwide). A total of 766 hospitals performed 1 or more annual colectomies and only 36 (4.7%) were high-volume hospitals, accounting for 21% of colectomies. The proportion of colectomies at high-volume hospitals decreased over time. The absolute risk of complication was 16% at high-volume centers compared with 22% at low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9). The effect of annual TAC volume on complication risk was not statistically significant for nonemergent admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with UC who undergo colectomy at high-volume centers have fewer complications. However, only a small proportion of pediatric colectomies (<5%) are performed at high-volume centers.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Negro o Afroamericano , Niño , Preescolar , Colectomía/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Ileus/epidemiología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Multivariante , Atelectasia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite the availability of endoscopic therapy, many patients in the United States undergo surgical resection for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. We aimed to quantify and examine trends in the use of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps in a nationally representative sample. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample for 2000 through 2014. We included all adult patients who underwent elective colectomy or proctectomy and had a diagnosis of either nonmalignant colorectal polyp or colorectal cancer. We compared trends in surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps with surgery for colorectal cancer and calculated age, sex, race, region, and teaching status/bed-size-specific incidence rates of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. RESULTS: From 2000 through 2014, there were 1,230,458 surgeries for nonmalignant colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer in the United States. Among those surgeries, 25% were performed for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. The incidence of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps has increased significantly, from 5.9 in 2000 to 9.4 in 2014 per 100,000 adults (incidence rate difference, 3.56; 95% confidence interval 3.40-3.72), while the incidence of surgery for colorectal cancer has significantly decreased, from 31.5 to 24.7 surgeries per 100,000 adults (incidence rate difference, -6.80; 95% confidence interval -7.11 to -6.49). The incidence of surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps has been increasing among individuals age 20 to 79, in men and women and including all races and ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of a large, nationally representative sample, we found that surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps is common and has significantly increased over the past 14 years.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Pólipos Intestinales/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Pólipos del Colon/etnología , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Pólipos Intestinales/etnología , Pólipos Intestinales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/etnología , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) for asymptomatic stage IV colon cancer with unresectable metastases remains unclear. Increasingly there has been a trend away from resection. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the treatment of stage IV colon cancers, impact of different treatments on long-term mortality, and factors associated with receipt of postoperative chemotherapy. METHODS: The 2006-2012 National Cancer Data Base was queried for stage IV colon cancer patients. Treatments were grouped into PTR and chemotherapy, PTR only, chemotherapy only, and no treatment. A descriptive analysis was performed examining patient and hospital characteristics associated with different treatments. A Cox regression analysis was used to assess the adjusted effect of different treatments on long-term survival. A multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 31,310 patients, who met inclusion criteria, 22% of the patients underwent PTR and chemotherapy, 37.5% received chemotherapy only, 11.9% underwent PTR, and 28.6% received no treatment. Patients who received no treatment had the highest hazard of death at 1, 3, and 5 y, followed by PTR only, and chemotherapy only compared with PTR combined with chemotherapy. Patients who were older and had more comorbidities were less likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumor resection in conjunction with postoperative chemotherapy among stage IV colon cancer patients with unresectable metastases was associated with a long-term survival benefit compared with other treatment options. Efforts should be made to increase the use of postoperative chemotherapy where feasible.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Colectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/tendencias , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies using the NSQIP database to study hepatectomies lacked hepatic specific variables and outcomes. We used the targeted NSQIP hepatectomy database to examine the nationwide trend and the safety profile of synchronous liver and colorectal resection compared with hepatectomy alone for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: The targeted NSQIP hepatectomy database from 2014 was used to study patients who underwent hepatectomy for diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. RESULTS: Of the 3064 hepatic resections in the database, 1138 cases were performed for colorectal metastasis. Of these, 1040 were liver-alone surgery and 98 were synchronous liver and colorectal resection. Most (58.7%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The rate of neoadjuvant therapy, intraoperative ablation, biliary reconstruction, and the use of minimally invasive technique were similar between the two groups. The overall 30-d mortality in this cohort was low (1.1%). While the mortality rate in the synchronous group was similar to liver-only group (3.1% versus 0.9%, P = 0.077). The rate of liver failure (3.3% versus 4.1%, P = 0.722) and biliary leak (5.3% versus 9.6%, P = 0.084) were similar between the two groups. However, the rate of major complications was higher on multivariable analyses (25.5% versus 12.1%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.1, P < 0.001) for the synchronous group. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis in the modern era has low short-term mortality. While synchronous resection was associated with a higher incidence of major complications, liver-specific complications did not increase with synchronous resection.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hepatectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Colectomía/tendencias , Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Proctectomía/métodos , Proctectomía/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We evaluated the recent incidence of surgery and the changing surgery trends for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan due to the increasing use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was performed to assess the number of surgeries, surgical indications, surgical timing, and immunosuppressive treatments before surgery between 2007 and 2017. RESULTS: A total of 3801 surgical cases were reported over 11 years. The prevalence of UC surgery decreased over the period studied. The rate of prednisolone (PSL) use did not change. The prevalence of both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and anti-TNF agents increased during the period studied (p < 0.01). The prevalence of urgent/emergent surgery did not change. The most distinctive change in surgical indications was the increase in cancer/dysplasia (CAC), the prevalence of which increased from 20.2% in 2007 to 34.8%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of UC surgery seems to be decreasing according to the increasing rate of anti-TNF agent and CNI administration. However, the indication of CAC significantly increased. Further research should evaluate whether or not long-term remission maintained with several agents can lead to increasing CAC.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/administración & dosificación , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colectomía/tendencias , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Inducción de Remisión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The economic and clinical benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery are proven, yet may be underutilized in appropriate cases, especially in the elderly. Since the elderly constitute the greatest colorectal surgical volume, our goal was to identify trends in utilization and impact of laparoscopy in this cohort. METHODS: A national review of elective inpatient colorectal resections from the Premier Inpatient Database between 2010 and 2015 was performed. Patients were included if elderly (≥ 65 years), then grouped into open or laparoscopic procedures. The main outcome measures were trends in utilization by approach and total costs for the episode of care, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and complications by approach in the elderly. Multivariable regression models controlled for differences across platforms, adjusting for patient demographic, comorbidities and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In 70,655 elderly patients evaluated, laparoscopic adoption remained lower than open throughout the study period. Rates increased until 2013, then declined, with increasing rates of open surgery. Laparoscopy was associated with significantly lower mean total costs ($4012 less/case), complications and readmissions (36% and 33% less, respectively), and shorter LOS (2.6 less days) than open cases (all p < 0.0001). When complications occurred, they were less severe and the readmission episodes were less costly with laparoscopy than open colorectal surgery. CONCLUSION: The adoption of laparoscopy in the elderly has lagged behind open surgery and even declined in recent years despite being associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced cost. With this tremendous value proposition to increase use of laparoscopic surgery in the elderly, further work needs to evaluate root causes of the disparity.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Cirugía Colorrectal/tendencias , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/economía , Colectomía/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/economía , Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Summary: Comparisons with other high-income countries suggest that Canada has been slower to adopt laparoscopic colectomy (LC). The Canadian Association of General Surgeons sought to evaluate the barriers to adoption of laparoscopic colon surgery and to propose potential intervention strategies to enhance the use of the procedure. Given the clinical benefits of laparoscopic surgery for patients, the increasing needs for surgical care and the desire of Canadian general surgeons to advance their specialty and enhance the care of their patients, it is an important priority to improve the utilization of LC.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/tendencias , Implementación de Plan de Salud/tendencias , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Canadá , Competencia Clínica , Colectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The value of intravenous acetaminophen in postoperative pain management remains debated. The authors tested the hypothesis that intravenous acetaminophen use, in isolation and in comparison to oral, would be associated with decreased opioid utilization (clinically significant reduction defined as 25%) and opioid-related adverse effects in open colectomy patients. METHODS: Using national claims data from open colectomy patients (Premier Healthcare Database, Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., USA; 2011 to 2016; n = 181,640; 602 hospitals), we separately categorized oral and intravenous acetaminophen use: 1 (1,000 mg) or more than 1 dose on the day of surgery, postoperative day 1, or later. Multilevel models measured associations between intravenous or oral acetaminophen and (1) opioid utilization and (2) opioid-related adverse effects. Percent change and multiplicity-adjusted 99.5% CI are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 25.1% of patients received intravenous acetaminophen, of whom 48.0% (n = 21,878) received 1 dose on the day of surgery. In adjusted analyses, particularly more than 1 dose of intravenous acetaminophen (versus nonuse) on postoperative day 1 was associated with a -12.4% (99.5% CI, -15.2 to -9.4%) change in opioid utilization. In comparison, a stronger reduction was seen in those receiving more than 1 oral acetaminophen dose: -22.6% (99.5% CI, -26.2 to -18.9%). Unadjusted group medians were 550 and 490 oral morphine equivalents, respectively. Intravenous versus oral differences were less pronounced among those receiving more than 1 acetaminophen dose on the day of surgery: -8.0% (99.5% CI, -11.0 to -4.9%) median 499 oral morphine equivalents versus -8.7% (99.5% CI, -14.4 to -2.7%) median 445 oral morphine equivalents, respectively; all statistically significant, but none clinically significant. Comparable outcome patterns existed for opioid-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstrated marginal effects do not support routine use of intravenous acetaminophen given alternative nonopioid analgesic options.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Colectomía/tendencias , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal local anesthetic is an analgesic technique for inclusion in the polypharmacy approach to postoperative pain management in enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Previously, augmentation of epidural analgesia with intraperitoneal local anesthetic was shown to improve functional postoperative recovery following colectomy. OBJECTIVE: This study determines whether intraperitoneal local anesthetic improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing colectomy, in the absence of epidural analgesia, with standardized enhanced recovery after surgery perioperative care. DESIGN: This is a multisite, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02449720). SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 3 hospital sites in South Australia. PATIENTS: Eighty-six adults undergoing colectomy were stratified by approach (35 open; 51 laparoscopic), then randomly assigned to intraperitoneal local anesthetic (n = 44) and control (n = 42) groups. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the intraperitoneal local anesthetic group received an intraoperative intraperitoneal ropivacaine 100-mg bolus both pre- and postdissection and 20 mg/h continuous postoperative infusion for 48 hours. Patients in the control group received a normal saline equivalent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional postoperative recovery was assessed by using the surgical recovery scale for 45 days; postoperative pain was assessed by using a visual analog scale; and opioid consumption, use of rescue ketamine, recovery of bowel function, time to readiness for discharge, and perioperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: The intraperitoneal local anesthetic group reported improved surgical recovery scale scores at day 1 and 7, lower pain scores, required less rescue ketamine, and passed flatus earlier than the control group (p < 0.05). The improvement in surgical recovery scale at day 7 and pain scores remained when laparoscopic colectomy was considered separately. Opioid consumption and time to readiness for discharge were equivalent. LIMITATIONS: This study was powered to detect a difference in surgical recovery scale, but not the other domains of recovery, when the intraperitoneal local anesthetic group was compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that instillation and infusion of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for patients undergoing colectomy, including by the laparoscopic approach, decreases postoperative pain and improves functional postoperative recovery. We recommend routine inclusion of intraperitoneal local anesthetic into the multimodal analgesia component of enhanced recovery after surgery programs for laparoscopic colectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A698.
Asunto(s)
Amidas/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Anciano , Amidas/efectos adversos , Amidas/farmacología , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/tendencias , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Locales/farmacología , Australia/epidemiología , Colectomía/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales/métodos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Recuperación de la Función/fisiología , RopivacaínaRESUMEN
AIM: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has developed from unproven technique to mainstay of treatment. This study examined the application and relative outcomes of laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery over time, as laparoscopic uptake and experience have grown. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery in the English NHS during 2002-2012 were included. Age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index and Index of Multiple Deprivation were compared over time. Post-operative 30-day mortality, length of stay, failure to rescue reoperation and the associated mortality rate were examined. RESULTS: Laparoscopy rates rose from 1.1 to 50.8%. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had lower comorbidity by 0.24 points (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.20-0.27) and lower socioeconomic deprivation by 0.16 deciles (95% CI 0.12-0.20) than those having open procedures. Overall mortality fell by 48.0% from 2002-2003 to 2011-2002 and was 37.8% lower after laparoscopic surgery. Length of stay and mortality after surgical re-intervention also fell. However, re-intervention rates were higher after laparoscopic procedures by 7.8% (95% CI 0.9-15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: There was clear and persistent inequality in the application of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery during this study. Further work must explore and remedy inequalities to maximise patient benefit. Higher re-intervention rates after laparoscopy are unexplained and differ from randomized controlled trials. This may reflect differences in surgeons and practice between research and usual care settings and should be further investigated.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/tendencias , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/tendencias , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Temporal changes for intestinal resections for Crohn's disease (CD) are controversial. We validated administrative database codes for CD diagnosis and surgery in hospitalized patients and then evaluated temporal trends in CD surgical resection rates. METHODS: First, we validated International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10-CM coding for CD diagnosis in hospitalized patients and Canadian Classification of Health Intervention coding for surgical resections. Second, we used these validated codes to conduct population-based surveillance between fiscal years 2002 and 2010 to identify adult CD patients undergoing intestinal resection (n=981). Annual surgical rate was calculated by dividing incident surgeries by estimated CD prevalence. Time trend analysis was performed and annual percent change (APC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in surgical resection rates were calculated using a generalized linear model assuming a Poisson distribution. RESULTS: In the validation cohort, 101/104 (97.1%) patients undergoing surgery and 191/200 (95.5%) patients admitted without surgery were confirmed to have CD on chart review. Among the 116 administrative database codes for surgical resection, 97.4% were confirmed intestinal resections on chart review. From 2002 to 2010, the overall CD surgical resection rate was 3.8 resections per 100 person-years. During the study period, rate of surgery decreased by 3.5% per year (95% CI: -1.1%, -5.8%), driven by decreasing emergent operations (-10.1% per year (95% CI: -13.4%, -6.7%)) whereas elective surgeries increased by 3.7% per year (95% CI: 0.1%, 7.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall surgical resection rates in CD are decreasing, but a paradigm shift has occurred whereby elective operations are now more commonly performed than emergent surgeries.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/tendencias , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Adulto , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/tendencias , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Prevalencia , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
AIM: The standard of care for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis used to be an elective colon resection after the second or third episode. This practice was replaced by a more conservative and individualized approach. This study investigates current surgical practice in the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis in Switzerland. METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all hospital admissions due to uncomplicated diverticulitis in Switzerland using prospectively collected data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office in two periods: 2004/2005 and 2010/2011. Treatment options were compared between the two periods with adjustment for baseline characteristics of patients and treating institutions. RESULTS: A total of 24 497 patients (11 835 in 2004/2005; 12 662 in 2010/2011) were admitted to Swiss hospitals for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Between periods, the incidence increased from 81 to 85 admissions per 105 inhabitants per year. Elective admissions decreased from 46% (n = 5490) to 34% (n = 4294). The unadjusted resection rate decreased from 40% (n = 4730) to 34% (n = 4308). In the adjusted analysis, inpatients were more likely to have a resection in 2010/2011 than in 2004/2005 [odds ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.25-1.54)]. In addition, private insurance, elective mode of admission and younger age increased the odds for resection while there was no evidence of an association between resection and either gender or comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The probability of colon resection for patients hospitalized with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis increased between periods while the overall number of colon resections declined. A change of practice expected given the paradigm shift towards conservative treatment could not be confirmed in this analysis.